Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
PBHC vs BWFG vs NBTB vs CZWI vs TRST
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
PBHC vs BWFG vs NBTB vs CZWI vs TRST — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $85M | $415M | $2.35B | $203M | $858M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $79M | $208M | $867M | $90M | $278M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-3M | $35M | $169M | $14M | $61M |
| Gross Margin | 38.5% | 51.6% | 72.1% | 54.7% | 67.1% |
| Operating Margin | -5.2% | 23.3% | 25.3% | 7.0% | 29.2% |
| Forward P/E | — | 9.6x | 10.8x | 11.8x | 16.9x |
| Total Debt | $107M | $180M | $327M | $52M | $193M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $12M | $225M | $185M | $119M | $51M |
PBHC vs BWFG vs NBTB vs CZWI vs TRST — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pathfinder Bancorp,… (PBHC) | 100 | 133.2 | +33.2% |
| Bankwell Financial … (BWFG) | 100 | 355.9 | +255.9% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 143.9 | +43.9% |
| Citizens Community … (CZWI) | 100 | 286.8 | +186.8% |
| TrustCo Bank Corp NY (TRST) | 100 | 153.7 | +53.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PBHC vs BWFG vs NBTB vs CZWI vs TRST
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PBHC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for defensive.
- Beta 0.20, yield 2.8%, current ratio 26.41x
- Beta 0.20 vs NBTB's 0.89
BWFG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 6.1%, EPS growth 261.8%
- 175.8% 10Y total return vs CZWI's 157.0%
- PEG 0.22 vs TRST's 4.66
- Lower P/E (9.6x vs 16.9x), PEG 0.22 vs 4.66
NBTB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and bank quality is your priority.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 3.2%
- NIM 3.1% vs TRST's 2.6%
- 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
- 3.2% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs CZWI's 1.8%
CZWI is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.46, Low D/E 27.6%, current ratio 3015.31x
TRST is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +60.3% vs PBHC's -3.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.6x vs 16.9x), PEG 0.22 vs 4.66 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs CZWI's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.20 vs NBTB's 0.89 | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs CZWI's 1.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +60.3% vs PBHC's -3.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs CZWI's 0.5% |
PBHC vs BWFG vs NBTB vs CZWI vs TRST — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
PBHC vs BWFG vs NBTB vs CZWI vs TRST — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NBTB leads in 2 of 6 categories
PBHC leads 1 • CZWI leads 1 • BWFG leads 0 • TRST leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — NBTB and TRST each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NBTB is the larger business by revenue, generating $867M annually — 11.0x PBHC's $79M. TRST is the more profitable business, keeping 22.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PBHC's -4.3%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $79M | $208M | $867M | $90M | $278M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$2M | $53M | $241M | $9M | $90M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$3M | $35M | $169M | $14M | $61M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $10M | -$5M | $225M | $11M | $46M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +38.5% | +51.6% | +72.1% | +54.7% | +67.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -5.2% | +23.3% | +25.3% | +7.0% | +29.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.3% | +16.9% | +19.5% | +16.0% | +22.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +13.2% | +12.6% | +25.2% | +11.5% | +16.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.6% | +2.1% | +39.5% | +63.0% | +44.1% |
Valuation Metrics
PBHC leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.7x trailing earnings, BWFG trades at a 21% valuation discount to TRST's 14.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BWFG offers better value at 0.27x vs TRST's 4.11x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $85M | $415M | $2.4B | $203M | $858M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $181M | $370M | $2.5B | $136M | $1000M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -25.70x | 11.71x | 13.53x | 14.44x | 14.90x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 9.62x | 10.80x | 11.78x | 16.87x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.27x | 1.92x | 2.85x | 4.11x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 7.04x | 10.35x | 15.28x | 11.14x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.08x | 2.00x | 2.71x | 2.25x | 3.08x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.73x | 1.35x | 1.21x | 1.09x | 1.29x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.20x | 15.90x | 10.75x | 19.55x | 18.75x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NBTB leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BWFG delivers a 12.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-3 for PBHC. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PBHC's 0.89x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NBTB scores 7/9 vs PBHC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.8% | +12.2% | +9.5% | +7.8% | +8.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.2% | +1.1% | +1.1% | +0.8% | +1.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -1.3% | +8.0% | +7.9% | +2.0% | +7.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.5% | +4.4% | +2.4% | +0.6% | +2.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.89x | 0.60x | 0.17x | 0.28x | 0.28x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $96M | -$45M | $142M | -$67M | $142M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $12M | $225M | $185M | $119M | $51M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $107M | $180M | $327M | $52M | $193M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.13x | 0.49x | 1.05x | 0.16x | 0.90x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CZWI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BWFG five years ago would be worth $19,208 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,963 for PBHC. Over the past 12 months, TRST leads with a +60.3% total return vs PBHC's -3.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CZWI at 37.5% vs PBHC's 4.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -0.3% | +16.1% | +9.3% | +21.5% | +18.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -3.1% | +55.7% | +9.0% | +45.6% | +60.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +12.9% | +144.3% | +54.1% | +160.0% | +88.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +9.6% | +92.1% | +29.9% | +71.2% | +46.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +46.9% | +175.8% | +102.2% | +157.0% | +97.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +4.1% | +34.7% | +15.5% | +37.5% | +23.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PBHC and TRST each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PBHC is the less volatile stock with a 0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NBTB's 0.89 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TRST currently trades 98.6% from its 52-week high vs PBHC's 84.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.20x | 0.84x | 0.89x | 0.46x | 0.75x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $16.50 | $53.86 | $46.92 | $22.62 | $49.11 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $12.06 | $33.26 | $39.20 | $12.83 | $30.17 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +84.1% | +96.8% | +96.1% | +93.2% | +98.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.3 | 55.8 | 57.3 | 63.7 | 64.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3K | 40K | 236K | 40K | 112K |
Analyst Outlook
NBTB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BWFG as "Buy", NBTB as "Hold", CZWI as "Buy", TRST as "Hold". For income investors, NBTB offers the higher dividend yield at 3.17% vs BWFG's 1.54%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $46.00 | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 3 | 10 | 2 | 3 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.8% | +1.5% | +3.2% | +1.8% | +3.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 12 | 7 | 8 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.39 | $0.80 | $1.43 | $0.37 | $1.51 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.3% | +0.4% | +3.1% | +4.4% |
NBTB leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). PBHC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
PBHC vs BWFG vs NBTB vs CZWI vs TRST: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PBHC or BWFG or NBTB or CZWI or TRST a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the stronger pick with 10. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. (BWFG) offers the better valuation at 11. 7x trailing P/E (9. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. (BWFG) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PBHC or BWFG or NBTB or CZWI or TRST?
On trailing P/E, Bankwell Financial Group, Inc.
(BWFG) is the cheapest at 11. 7x versus TrustCo Bank Corp NY at 14. 9x. On forward P/E, Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. wins at 0. 22x versus TrustCo Bank Corp NY's 4. 66x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PBHC or BWFG or NBTB or CZWI or TRST?
Over the past 5 years, Bankwell Financial Group, Inc.
(BWFG) delivered a total return of +92. 1%, compared to +9. 6% for Pathfinder Bancorp, Inc. (PBHC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BWFG returned +175. 8% versus PBHC's +46. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PBHC or BWFG or NBTB or CZWI or TRST?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Pathfinder Bancorp, Inc.
(PBHC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 20β versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 0. 89β — meaning NBTB is approximately 348% more volatile than PBHC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 89% for Pathfinder Bancorp, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PBHC or BWFG or NBTB or CZWI or TRST?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is pulling ahead at 10. 4% versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. grew EPS 261. 8% year-over-year, compared to -228. 6% for Pathfinder Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PBHC or BWFG or NBTB or CZWI or TRST?
TrustCo Bank Corp NY (TRST) is the more profitable company, earning 22.
0% net margin versus -4. 3% for Pathfinder Bancorp, Inc. — meaning it keeps 22. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TRST leads at 29. 2% versus -5. 2% for PBHC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PBHC or BWFG or NBTB or CZWI or TRST more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. (BWFG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 22x versus TrustCo Bank Corp NY's 4. 66x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. (BWFG) trades at 9. 6x forward P/E versus 16. 9x for TrustCo Bank Corp NY — 7. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — PBHC or BWFG or NBTB or CZWI or TRST?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) offers the highest yield at 3. 2%, versus 1. 5% for Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. (BWFG).
09Is PBHC or BWFG or NBTB or CZWI or TRST better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Pathfinder Bancorp, Inc.
(PBHC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 20), 2. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PBHC: +46. 9%, NBTB: +102. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PBHC and BWFG and NBTB and CZWI and TRST?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PBHC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BWFG is a small-cap deep-value stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock; TRST is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.