Integrated Freight & Logistics
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
PBI vs QUAD vs ENSG vs UPS vs FDX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Business Services
Medical - Care Facilities
Integrated Freight & Logistics
Integrated Freight & Logistics
PBI vs QUAD vs ENSG vs UPS vs FDX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Integrated Freight & Logistics | Specialty Business Services | Medical - Care Facilities | Integrated Freight & Logistics | Integrated Freight & Logistics |
| Market Cap | $2.33B | $400M | $10.18B | $85.05B | $88.39B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.88B | $2.37B | $5.27B | $88.33B | $91.93B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $167M | $27M | $363M | $5.25B | $4.48B |
| Gross Margin | 54.7% | 18.5% | 15.2% | 18.1% | 24.4% |
| Operating Margin | 19.7% | 5.0% | 8.5% | 8.6% | 6.5% |
| Forward P/E | 10.2x | 6.3x | 23.2x | 14.1x | 19.0x |
| Total Debt | $2.22B | $444M | $4.15B | $32.29B | $37.42B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $285M | $63M | $504M | $5.89B | $5.50B |
PBI vs QUAD vs ENSG vs UPS vs FDX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pitney Bowes Inc. (PBI) | 100 | 657.2 | +557.2% |
| Quad/Graphics, Inc. (QUAD) | 100 | 268.8 | +168.8% |
| The Ensign Group, I… (ENSG) | 100 | 398.7 | +298.7% |
| United Parcel Servi… (UPS) | 100 | 100.4 | +0.4% |
| FedEx Corporation (FDX) | 100 | 287.9 | +187.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PBI vs QUAD vs ENSG vs UPS vs FDX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PBI has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in quality and momentum.
- 8.9% margin vs QUAD's 1.2%
- +77.7% vs UPS's +13.5%
QUAD is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (6.3x vs 19.0x)
ENSG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 18.7%, EPS growth 14.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 18.7%
- 7.5% 10Y total return vs FDX's 153.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.42, current ratio 1.42x
- 18.7% revenue growth vs QUAD's -9.4%
UPS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 16 yrs, beta 0.90, yield 6.3%
- PEG 0.42 vs ENSG's 1.68
- Beta 0.90, yield 6.3%, current ratio 1.22x
- 6.3% yield, 16-year raise streak, vs FDX's 1.5%
Among these 5 stocks, FDX doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.7% revenue growth vs QUAD's -9.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.3x vs 19.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 8.9% margin vs QUAD's 1.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.42 vs PBI's 1.07 | |
| Dividends | 6.3% yield, 16-year raise streak, vs FDX's 1.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +77.7% vs UPS's +13.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.3% ROA vs QUAD's 2.2%, ROIC 16.1% vs 17.9% |
PBI vs QUAD vs ENSG vs UPS vs FDX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
PBI vs QUAD vs ENSG vs UPS vs FDX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PBI leads in 2 of 6 categories
QUAD leads 1 • UPS leads 1 • ENSG leads 0 • FDX leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PBI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FDX is the larger business by revenue, generating $91.9B annually — 49.0x PBI's $1.9B. PBI is the more profitable business, keeping 8.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to QUAD's 1.2%. On growth, ENSG holds the edge at +18.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.9B | $2.4B | $5.3B | $88.3B | $91.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $452M | $196M | $558M | $10.5B | $10.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $167M | $27M | $363M | $5.2B | $4.5B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $391M | $44M | $406M | $4.5B | $4.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +54.7% | +18.5% | +15.2% | +18.1% | +24.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +19.7% | +5.0% | +8.5% | +8.6% | +6.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +8.9% | +1.2% | +6.9% | +5.9% | +4.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +20.8% | +1.9% | +7.7% | +5.1% | +4.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.2% | -7.7% | +18.4% | -1.6% | +8.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +94.7% | +18.2% | +21.9% | -27.1% | +15.7% |
Valuation Metrics
QUAD leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.2x trailing earnings, QUAD trades at a 52% valuation discount to ENSG's 29.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), UPS offers better value at 0.45x vs ENSG's 2.16x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.3B | $400M | $10.2B | $85.1B | $88.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.3B | $781M | $13.8B | $111.5B | $120.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 18.54x | 14.19x | 29.85x | 15.26x | 22.36x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.22x | 6.30x | 23.19x | 14.13x | 19.01x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 2.16x | 0.45x | 0.80x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.55x | 3.96x | 25.71x | 9.12x | 11.63x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.23x | 0.17x | 2.01x | 0.96x | 1.01x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 2.97x | 4.59x | 5.23x | 3.25x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 7.77x | 7.90x | 27.46x | 17.85x | 29.65x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — PBI and QUAD each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
UPS delivers a 33.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $33 in annual profit, vs $16 for FDX. FDX carries lower financial leverage with a 1.33x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to QUAD's 3.45x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PBI scores 7/9 vs FDX's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +25.0% | +16.6% | +33.0% | +15.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.2% | +2.2% | +6.8% | +7.3% | +5.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +27.2% | +17.9% | +7.0% | +16.1% | +7.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +23.1% | +19.3% | +10.2% | +15.3% | +8.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 3.45x | 1.86x | 1.99x | 1.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.9B | $381M | $3.7B | $26.4B | $31.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $285M | $63M | $504M | $5.9B | $5.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.2B | $444M | $4.2B | $32.3B | $37.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.16x | 2.11x | 88.33x | 7.37x | 16.50x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PBI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in QUAD five years ago would be worth $25,813 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,997 for UPS. Over the past 12 months, PBI leads with a +77.7% total return vs UPS's +13.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PBI at 75.9% vs UPS's -11.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +51.6% | +33.6% | +0.3% | +0.7% | +28.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +77.7% | +44.4% | +27.5% | +13.5% | +77.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +443.8% | +197.1% | +88.9% | -31.4% | +70.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +117.6% | +158.1% | +103.2% | -40.0% | +27.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +5.5% | -23.3% | +752.0% | +44.7% | +153.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +75.9% | +43.8% | +23.6% | -11.8% | +19.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PBI and ENSG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ENSG is the less volatile stock with a 0.42 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PBI's 1.07 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PBI currently trades 97.6% from its 52-week high vs ENSG's 80.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.07x | 1.03x | 0.42x | 0.90x | 1.03x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $15.95 | $8.64 | $218.00 | $122.41 | $404.03 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.81 | $5.01 | $133.81 | $82.00 | $213.56 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.6% | +88.7% | +80.0% | +81.8% | +93.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 68.4 | 50.6 | 23.3 | 44.0 | 50.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.2M | 231K | 358K | 5.8M | 1.8M |
Analyst Outlook
UPS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PBI as "Hold", QUAD as "Buy", ENSG as "Buy", UPS as "Hold", FDX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 27.6% upside for ENSG (target: $222) vs -19.3% for PBI (target: $13). For income investors, UPS offers the higher dividend yield at 6.34% vs ENSG's 0.14%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $12.57 | $8.00 | $222.33 | $115.23 | $364.19 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 7 | 13 | 45 | 49 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.9% | +3.8% | +0.1% | +6.3% | +1.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 2 | 12 | 16 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.30 | $0.29 | $0.24 | $6.35 | $5.51 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +16.2% | +2.0% | +0.2% | +1.2% | +3.4% |
PBI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). QUAD leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
PBI vs QUAD vs ENSG vs UPS vs FDX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PBI or QUAD or ENSG or UPS or FDX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, The Ensign Group, Inc.
(ENSG) is the stronger pick with 18. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Quad/Graphics, Inc. (QUAD). Quad/Graphics, Inc. (QUAD) offers the better valuation at 14. 2x trailing P/E (6. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Quad/Graphics, Inc. (QUAD) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PBI or QUAD or ENSG or UPS or FDX?
On trailing P/E, Quad/Graphics, Inc.
(QUAD) is the cheapest at 14. 2x versus The Ensign Group, Inc. at 29. 8x. On forward P/E, Quad/Graphics, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 3x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: United Parcel Service, Inc. wins at 0. 42x versus The Ensign Group, Inc. 's 1. 68x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PBI or QUAD or ENSG or UPS or FDX?
Over the past 5 years, Quad/Graphics, Inc.
(QUAD) delivered a total return of +158. 1%, compared to -40. 0% for United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ENSG returned +752. 0% versus QUAD's -23. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PBI or QUAD or ENSG or UPS or FDX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Ensign Group, Inc.
(ENSG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 42β versus Pitney Bowes Inc. 's 1. 07β — meaning PBI is approximately 154% more volatile than ENSG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, FedEx Corporation (FDX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 133% versus 3% for Quad/Graphics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PBI or QUAD or ENSG or UPS or FDX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Ensign Group, Inc.
(ENSG) is pulling ahead at 18. 7% versus -9. 4% for Quad/Graphics, Inc. (QUAD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Pitney Bowes Inc. grew EPS 174. 3% year-over-year, compared to -3. 0% for United Parcel Service, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ENSG leads at 18. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PBI or QUAD or ENSG or UPS or FDX?
Pitney Bowes Inc.
(PBI) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 6% net margin versus 1. 1% for Quad/Graphics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 7. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PBI leads at 20. 4% versus 4. 9% for QUAD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PBI leads at 54. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PBI or QUAD or ENSG or UPS or FDX more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 42x versus The Ensign Group, Inc. 's 1. 68x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Quad/Graphics, Inc. (QUAD) trades at 6. 3x forward P/E versus 23. 2x for The Ensign Group, Inc. — 16. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ENSG: 27. 6% to $222. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — PBI or QUAD or ENSG or UPS or FDX?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS) offers the highest yield at 6. 3%, versus 0. 1% for The Ensign Group, Inc. (ENSG).
09Is PBI or QUAD or ENSG or UPS or FDX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Ensign Group, Inc.
(ENSG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 42), +752. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ENSG: +752. 0%, PBI: +5. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PBI and QUAD and ENSG and UPS and FDX?
These companies operate in different sectors (PBI (Industrials) and QUAD (Industrials) and ENSG (Healthcare) and UPS (Industrials) and FDX (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: PBI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; QUAD is a small-cap deep-value stock; ENSG is a mid-cap high-growth stock; UPS is a mid-cap deep-value stock; FDX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. PBI, QUAD, UPS, FDX pay a dividend while ENSG does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.