REIT - Specialty
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
PCH vs WELL vs PLD vs VTR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Healthcare Facilities
REIT - Industrial
REIT - Healthcare Facilities
PCH vs WELL vs PLD vs VTR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Specialty | REIT - Healthcare Facilities | REIT - Industrial | REIT - Healthcare Facilities |
| Market Cap | $3.23B | $150.14B | $130.26B | $41.26B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.12B | $11.63B | $8.74B | $6.13B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $64M | $1.43B | $3.21B | $260M |
| Gross Margin | 15.7% | 39.1% | 67.7% | -4.3% |
| Operating Margin | 8.0% | 4.4% | 47.0% | 13.4% |
| Forward P/E | 53.8x | 78.9x | 40.8x | 118.3x |
| Total Debt | $1.03B | $21.38B | $31.49B | $13.22B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $152M | $5.03B | $1.32B | $741M |
PCH vs WELL vs PLD vs VTR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | Feb 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| PotlatchDeltic Corp… (PCH) | 100 | 122.8 | +22.8% |
| Welltower Inc. (WELL) | 100 | 371.7 | +271.7% |
| Prologis, Inc. (PLD) | 100 | 142.7 | +42.7% |
| Ventas, Inc. (VTR) | 100 | 222.2 | +122.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PCH vs WELL vs PLD vs VTR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PCH is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 4.3% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs PLD's 2.7%
WELL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 35.8%, EPS growth -11.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.7%
- 230.2% 10Y total return vs PLD's 263.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.13, Low D/E 49.5%, current ratio 5.34x
- 35.8% FFO/revenue growth vs PLD's 2.2%
PLD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 11 yrs, beta 0.73, yield 2.7%
- Lower P/E (40.8x vs 118.3x)
- 36.7% margin vs VTR's 4.2%
- 3.3% ROA vs VTR's 1.0%, ROIC 3.8% vs 2.5%
VTR is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 0.01, yield 2.1%, current ratio 0.96x
- Beta 0.01 vs PCH's 0.75
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 35.8% FFO/revenue growth vs PLD's 2.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (40.8x vs 118.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 36.7% margin vs VTR's 4.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.01 vs PCH's 0.75 | |
| Dividends | 4.3% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs PLD's 2.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +43.9% vs PCH's +11.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.3% ROA vs VTR's 1.0%, ROIC 3.8% vs 2.5% |
PCH vs WELL vs PLD vs VTR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
PCH vs WELL vs PLD vs VTR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PLD leads in 3 of 6 categories
WELL leads 1 • VTR leads 1 • PCH leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PLD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WELL is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.6B annually — 10.4x PCH's $1.1B. PLD is the more profitable business, keeping 36.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to VTR's 4.2%. On growth, WELL holds the edge at +40.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.1B | $11.6B | $8.7B | $6.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $195M | $2.8B | $6.7B | $2.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $64M | $1.4B | $3.2B | $260M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $131M | $2.5B | $5.2B | $1.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +15.7% | +39.1% | +67.7% | -4.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.0% | +4.4% | +47.0% | +13.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.8% | +12.3% | +36.7% | +4.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.8% | +21.9% | +59.3% | +22.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +23.1% | +40.3% | +8.7% | +22.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.9% | +22.5% | -24.1% | 0.0% |
Valuation Metrics
PLD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 35.0x trailing earnings, PLD trades at a 78% valuation discount to VTR's 160.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PLD's 22.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PCH's 140.5x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.2B | $150.1B | $130.3B | $41.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.1B | $166.5B | $160.4B | $53.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 149.04x | 154.17x | 34.98x | 160.70x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 53.80x | 78.89x | 40.80x | 118.34x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 3.24x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 140.52x | 66.76x | 22.93x | 24.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.04x | 14.08x | 15.88x | 7.07x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.62x | 3.37x | 2.28x | 3.19x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 47.88x | 52.72x | 26.52x | 31.34x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PLD leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PLD delivers a 5.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $2 for VTR. WELL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.49x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to VTR's 1.05x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WELL scores 7/9 vs PLD's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.3% | +3.5% | +5.6% | +2.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.0% | +2.3% | +3.3% | +1.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.8% | +0.5% | +3.8% | +2.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.1% | +0.6% | +4.8% | +3.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.51x | 0.49x | 0.54x | 1.05x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $883M | $16.3B | $30.2B | $12.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $152M | $5.0B | $1.3B | $741M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.0B | $21.4B | $31.5B | $13.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.28x | 0.26x | 5.27x | 1.40x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WELL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WELL five years ago would be worth $31,264 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,179 for PCH. Over the past 12 months, WELL leads with a +43.9% total return vs PCH's +11.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WELL at 41.3% vs PCH's 0.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +5.1% | +15.0% | +9.5% | +12.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +11.5% | +43.9% | +37.1% | +33.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +2.2% | +182.2% | +19.3% | +93.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -8.2% | +212.6% | +39.6% | +80.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +93.8% | +230.2% | +263.8% | +67.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +0.7% | +41.3% | +6.1% | +24.5% |
Risk & Volatility
VTR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VTR is the less volatile stock with a 0.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PCH's 0.75 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. VTR currently trades 98.1% from its 52-week high vs PCH's 91.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.75x | 0.13x | 0.73x | 0.01x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $45.61 | $219.59 | $145.44 | $88.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $37.05 | $142.65 | $103.02 | $61.76 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.5% | +97.6% | +96.4% | +98.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.0 | 62.6 | 49.7 | 62.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 0 | 2.6M | 3.1M | 3.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — PCH and PLD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PCH as "Hold", WELL as "Buy", PLD as "Buy", VTR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 22.2% upside for PCH (target: $51) vs 3.0% for PLD (target: $144). For income investors, PCH offers the higher dividend yield at 4.30% vs WELL's 1.29%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $51.00 | $226.50 | $144.43 | $90.80 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 34 | 42 | 32 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.3% | +1.3% | +2.7% | +2.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 2 | 11 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.79 | $2.76 | $3.74 | $1.86 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.1% | 0.0% | +0.0% | 0.0% |
PLD leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). WELL leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
PCH vs WELL vs PLD vs VTR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PCH or WELL or PLD or VTR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Welltower Inc.
(WELL) is the stronger pick with 35. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 2% for Prologis, Inc. (PLD). Prologis, Inc. (PLD) offers the better valuation at 35. 0x trailing P/E (40. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Welltower Inc. (WELL) a "Buy" — based on 34 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PCH or WELL or PLD or VTR?
On trailing P/E, Prologis, Inc.
(PLD) is the cheapest at 35. 0x versus Ventas, Inc. at 160. 7x. On forward P/E, Prologis, Inc. is actually cheaper at 40. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PCH or WELL or PLD or VTR?
Over the past 5 years, Welltower Inc.
(WELL) delivered a total return of +212. 6%, compared to -8. 2% for PotlatchDeltic Corporation (PCH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PLD returned +263. 8% versus VTR's +67. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PCH or WELL or PLD or VTR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ventas, Inc.
(VTR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 01β versus PotlatchDeltic Corporation's 0. 75β — meaning PCH is approximately 7797% more volatile than VTR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Welltower Inc. (WELL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 49% versus 105% for Ventas, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PCH or WELL or PLD or VTR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Welltower Inc.
(WELL) is pulling ahead at 35. 8% versus 2. 2% for Prologis, Inc. (PLD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Ventas, Inc. grew EPS 184. 2% year-over-year, compared to -63. 6% for PotlatchDeltic Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, WELL leads at 22. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PCH or WELL or PLD or VTR?
Prologis, Inc.
(PLD) is the more profitable company, earning 45. 5% net margin versus 2. 1% for PotlatchDeltic Corporation — meaning it keeps 45. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PLD leads at 53. 8% versus 3. 1% for PCH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PLD leads at 74. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PCH or WELL or PLD or VTR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Prologis, Inc.
(PLD) trades at 40. 8x forward P/E versus 118. 3x for Ventas, Inc. — 77. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PCH: 22. 2% to $51. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — PCH or WELL or PLD or VTR?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
PotlatchDeltic Corporation (PCH) offers the highest yield at 4. 3%, versus 1. 3% for Welltower Inc. (WELL).
09Is PCH or WELL or PLD or VTR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Ventas, Inc.
(VTR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 01), 2. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (VTR: +67. 4%, PCH: +93. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PCH and WELL and PLD and VTR?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PCH is a small-cap income-oriented stock; WELL is a mid-cap high-growth stock; PLD is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; VTR is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.