Software - Application
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
PCOR vs ADSK vs TRMB vs HCKT vs CSGP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Information Technology Services
Real Estate - Services
PCOR vs ADSK vs TRMB vs HCKT vs CSGP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Application | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Information Technology Services | Real Estate - Services |
| Market Cap | $8.07B | $53.72B | $14.65B | $288M | $14.83B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.37B | $6.78B | $3.69B | $297M | $3.41B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-77M | $1.12B | $456M | $14M | $25M |
| Gross Margin | 79.6% | 96.8% | 68.8% | 30.1% | 77.4% |
| Operating Margin | -7.1% | 23.3% | 17.7% | 10.5% | -0.8% |
| Forward P/E | 29.6x | 20.2x | 20.0x | 6.9x | 25.8x |
| Total Debt | $118M | $2.73B | $1.39B | $80M | $1.14B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $481M | $2.25B | $253M | $18M | $1.73B |
PCOR vs ADSK vs TRMB vs HCKT vs CSGP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Procore Technologie… (PCOR) | 100 | 61.9 | -38.1% |
| Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) | 100 | 87.8 | -12.2% |
| Trimble Inc. (TRMB) | 100 | 79.5 | -20.5% |
| The Hackett Group, … (HCKT) | 100 | 64.1 | -35.9% |
| CoStar Group, Inc. (CSGP) | 100 | 41.0 | -59.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PCOR vs ADSK vs TRMB vs HCKT vs CSGP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PCOR is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 14.8%, EPS growth 6.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.5%
ADSK has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in long-term compounding.
- 327.0% 10Y total return vs TRMB's 166.8%
- 16.6% margin vs PCOR's -5.6%
- 9.0% ROA vs PCOR's -3.7%, ROIC 33.3% vs -9.7%
TRMB is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- -6.7% vs CSGP's -53.6%
HCKT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.10, yield 4.1%
- PEG 0.31 vs TRMB's 8.15
- Lower P/E (6.9x vs 25.8x)
- 4.1% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
CSGP ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.80, Low D/E 13.7%, current ratio 2.84x
- Beta 0.80, current ratio 2.84x
- 18.7% FFO/revenue growth vs HCKT's -2.6%
- Beta 0.80 vs TRMB's 1.46, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.7% FFO/revenue growth vs HCKT's -2.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.9x vs 25.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 16.6% margin vs PCOR's -5.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.80 vs TRMB's 1.46, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.1% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -6.7% vs CSGP's -53.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.0% ROA vs PCOR's -3.7%, ROIC 33.3% vs -9.7% |
PCOR vs ADSK vs TRMB vs HCKT vs CSGP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
PCOR vs ADSK vs TRMB vs HCKT vs CSGP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ADSK leads in 3 of 6 categories
HCKT leads 2 • PCOR leads 0 • TRMB leads 0 • CSGP leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ADSK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ADSK is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.8B annually — 22.8x HCKT's $297M. ADSK is the more profitable business, keeping 16.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PCOR's -5.6%. On growth, CSGP holds the edge at +22.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.4B | $6.8B | $3.7B | $297M | $3.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $16M | $1.7B | $785M | $35M | $278M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$77M | $1.1B | $456M | $14M | $25M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $275M | $2.4B | $253M | $25M | $241M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +79.6% | +96.8% | +68.8% | +30.1% | +77.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -7.1% | +23.3% | +17.7% | +10.5% | -0.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -5.6% | +16.6% | +12.4% | +4.7% | +0.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +20.0% | +35.4% | +6.9% | +8.3% | +7.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +15.7% | -6.5% | +11.8% | -11.6% | +22.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +72.7% | +6.0% | +55.6% | +54.5% | +127.7% |
Valuation Metrics
HCKT leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 24.3x trailing earnings, HCKT trades at a 99% valuation discount to CSGP's 2107.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), HCKT offers better value at 1.08x vs TRMB's 14.39x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $8.1B | $53.7B | $14.7B | $288M | $14.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7.7B | $54.2B | $15.8B | $349M | $14.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -79.88x | 48.00x | 35.34x | 24.28x | 2107.23x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 29.64x | 20.22x | 20.01x | 6.90x | 25.84x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 14.39x | 1.08x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 34.35x | 20.05x | 10.97x | 83.74x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.10x | 7.93x | 4.08x | 0.94x | 4.57x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.37x | 17.73x | 2.54x | 4.57x | 1.77x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 37.52x | 22.30x | 110.00x | 8.87x | 361.59x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ADSK leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ADSK delivers a 36.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $37 in annual profit, vs $-6 for PCOR. PCOR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HCKT's 1.17x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ADSK scores 7/9 vs PCOR's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -6.3% | +36.9% | +8.0% | +15.8% | +0.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.7% | +9.0% | +5.0% | +7.0% | +0.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -9.7% | +33.3% | +6.8% | +16.4% | -0.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -8.6% | +25.6% | +7.8% | +18.1% | -0.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.09x | 0.90x | 0.24x | 1.17x | 0.14x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$362M | $485M | $1.1B | $61M | -$589M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $481M | $2.2B | $253M | $18M | $1.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $118M | $2.7B | $1.4B | $80M | $1.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -43.00x | 289.00x | 12.26x | 37.81x | 1.58x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ADSK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ADSK five years ago would be worth $8,785 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,112 for CSGP. Over the past 12 months, TRMB leads with a -6.7% total return vs CSGP's -53.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ADSK at 9.4% vs CSGP's -22.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -23.6% | -12.4% | -21.0% | -41.0% | -46.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -17.0% | -11.4% | -6.7% | -50.3% | -53.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -3.3% | +30.8% | +30.1% | -31.0% | -52.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -39.2% | -12.1% | -22.0% | -18.8% | -58.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -39.2% | +327.0% | +166.8% | +0.9% | +77.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -1.1% | +9.4% | +9.2% | -11.6% | -22.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ADSK and CSGP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CSGP is the less volatile stock with a 0.80 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TRMB's 1.46 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ADSK currently trades 76.3% from its 52-week high vs CSGP's 35.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.40x | 0.85x | 1.46x | 1.10x | 0.80x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $82.32 | $329.09 | $87.50 | $26.29 | $97.43 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $46.08 | $214.10 | $61.63 | $9.48 | $33.31 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +65.0% | +76.3% | +70.7% | +43.4% | +35.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.5 | 52.4 | 36.8 | 28.9 | 30.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.1M | 1.9M | 1.7M | 299K | 5.9M |
Analyst Outlook
HCKT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PCOR as "Buy", ADSK as "Buy", TRMB as "Buy", HCKT as "Buy", CSGP as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 79.7% upside for HCKT (target: $21) vs 26.4% for PCOR (target: $68). HCKT is the only dividend payer here at 4.14% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $67.67 | $338.00 | $95.00 | $20.50 | $61.91 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 24 | 51 | 28 | 5 | 25 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +4.1% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | — | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $0.47 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.6% | +2.6% | +5.9% | +24.0% | +3.9% |
ADSK leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). HCKT leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
PCOR vs ADSK vs TRMB vs HCKT vs CSGP: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PCOR or ADSK or TRMB or HCKT or CSGP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, CoStar Group, Inc.
(CSGP) is the stronger pick with 18. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 6% for The Hackett Group, Inc. (HCKT). The Hackett Group, Inc. (HCKT) offers the better valuation at 24. 3x trailing P/E (6. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Procore Technologies, Inc. (PCOR) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PCOR or ADSK or TRMB or HCKT or CSGP?
On trailing P/E, The Hackett Group, Inc.
(HCKT) is the cheapest at 24. 3x versus CoStar Group, Inc. at 2107. 2x. On forward P/E, The Hackett Group, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: The Hackett Group, Inc. wins at 0. 31x versus Trimble Inc. 's 8. 15x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PCOR or ADSK or TRMB or HCKT or CSGP?
Over the past 5 years, Autodesk, Inc.
(ADSK) delivered a total return of -12. 1%, compared to -58. 9% for CoStar Group, Inc. (CSGP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ADSK returned +327. 0% versus PCOR's -39. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PCOR or ADSK or TRMB or HCKT or CSGP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CoStar Group, Inc.
(CSGP) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 80β versus Trimble Inc. 's 1. 46β — meaning TRMB is approximately 84% more volatile than CSGP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Procore Technologies, Inc. (PCOR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 117% for The Hackett Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PCOR or ADSK or TRMB or HCKT or CSGP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), CoStar Group, Inc.
(CSGP) is pulling ahead at 18. 7% versus -2. 6% for The Hackett Group, Inc. (HCKT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Procore Technologies, Inc. grew EPS 6. 9% year-over-year, compared to -95. 1% for CoStar Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PCOR leads at 22. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PCOR or ADSK or TRMB or HCKT or CSGP?
Autodesk, Inc.
(ADSK) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 6% net margin versus -7. 6% for Procore Technologies, Inc. — meaning it keeps 16. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ADSK leads at 23. 3% versus -8. 9% for PCOR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ADSK leads at 96. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PCOR or ADSK or TRMB or HCKT or CSGP more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, The Hackett Group, Inc. (HCKT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 31x versus Trimble Inc. 's 8. 15x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, The Hackett Group, Inc. (HCKT) trades at 6. 9x forward P/E versus 29. 6x for Procore Technologies, Inc. — 22. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HCKT: 79. 7% to $20. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — PCOR or ADSK or TRMB or HCKT or CSGP?
In this comparison, HCKT (4.
1% yield) pays a dividend. PCOR, ADSK, TRMB, CSGP do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is PCOR or ADSK or TRMB or HCKT or CSGP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Hackett Group, Inc.
(HCKT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 10), 4. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HCKT: +0. 9%, PCOR: -39. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PCOR and ADSK and TRMB and HCKT and CSGP?
These companies operate in different sectors (PCOR (Technology) and ADSK (Technology) and TRMB (Technology) and HCKT (Technology) and CSGP (Real Estate)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: PCOR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ADSK is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; TRMB is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; HCKT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; CSGP is a mid-cap high-growth stock. HCKT pays a dividend while PCOR, ADSK, TRMB, CSGP do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.