Software - Application
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
PCOR vs ADSK vs TRMB vs ORCL vs SAP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Software - Infrastructure
Software - Application
PCOR vs ADSK vs TRMB vs ORCL vs SAP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Application | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $8.07B | $53.72B | $14.65B | $559.27B | $203.58B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.37B | $6.78B | $3.69B | $64.08B | $36.80B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-77M | $1.12B | $456M | $16.21B | $7.04B |
| Gross Margin | 79.6% | 96.8% | 68.8% | 66.4% | 73.8% |
| Operating Margin | -7.1% | 23.3% | 17.7% | 30.8% | 26.7% |
| Forward P/E | 31.7x | 19.7x | 19.7x | 26.2x | 23.7x |
| Total Debt | $118M | $2.73B | $1.39B | $104.10B | $8.07B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $481M | $2.25B | $253M | $10.79B | $8.22B |
PCOR vs ADSK vs TRMB vs ORCL vs SAP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Procore Technologie… (PCOR) | 100 | 61.7 | -38.3% |
| Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) | 100 | 85.5 | -14.5% |
| Trimble Inc. (TRMB) | 100 | 78.1 | -21.9% |
| Oracle Corporation (ORCL) | 100 | 248.8 | +148.8% |
| SAP SE (SAP) | 100 | 124.1 | +24.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PCOR vs ADSK vs TRMB vs ORCL vs SAP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PCOR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 14.8%, EPS growth 6.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.40, Low D/E 9.4%, current ratio 1.32x
- 14.8% revenue growth vs TRMB's -2.6%
ADSK is the clearest fit if your priority is stability.
- Beta 0.85 vs ORCL's 1.59, lower leverage
Among these 5 stocks, TRMB doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
ORCL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 425.1% 10Y total return vs ADSK's 327.0%
- 25.3% margin vs PCOR's -5.6%
- 0.9% yield, 18-year raise streak, vs SAP's 1.5%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
- +31.6% vs SAP's -39.6%
SAP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 1.5%
- PEG 3.58 vs TRMB's 8.00
- Beta 0.89, yield 1.5%, current ratio 1.17x
- Lower P/E (23.7x vs 26.2x), PEG 3.58 vs 3.69
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 14.8% revenue growth vs TRMB's -2.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (23.7x vs 26.2x), PEG 3.58 vs 3.69 | |
| Quality / Margins | 25.3% margin vs PCOR's -5.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.85 vs ORCL's 1.59, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.9% yield, 18-year raise streak, vs SAP's 1.5%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +31.6% vs SAP's -39.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.7% ROA vs PCOR's -3.7%, ROIC 16.0% vs -9.7% |
PCOR vs ADSK vs TRMB vs ORCL vs SAP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
PCOR vs ADSK vs TRMB vs ORCL vs SAP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ORCL leads in 2 of 6 categories
ADSK leads 1 • PCOR leads 0 • TRMB leads 0 • SAP leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ORCL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ORCL is the larger business by revenue, generating $64.1B annually — 46.7x PCOR's $1.4B. ORCL is the more profitable business, keeping 25.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PCOR's -5.6%. On growth, ORCL holds the edge at +21.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.4B | $6.8B | $3.7B | $64.1B | $36.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $16M | $1.7B | $785M | $26.5B | $11.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$77M | $1.1B | $456M | $16.2B | $7.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $275M | $2.4B | $253M | -$24.7B | $8.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +79.6% | +96.8% | +68.8% | +66.4% | +73.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -7.1% | +23.3% | +17.7% | +30.8% | +26.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -5.6% | +16.6% | +12.4% | +25.3% | +19.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +20.0% | +35.4% | +6.9% | -38.6% | +22.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +15.7% | -6.5% | +11.8% | +21.7% | +3.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +72.7% | +6.0% | +55.6% | +24.5% | +15.4% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — TRMB and SAP each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 24.8x trailing earnings, SAP trades at a 48% valuation discount to ADSK's 48.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SAP offers better value at 3.76x vs TRMB's 14.39x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $8.1B | $53.7B | $14.7B | $559.3B | $203.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7.7B | $54.2B | $15.8B | $652.6B | $203.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -79.88x | 48.00x | 35.34x | 44.82x | 24.82x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 31.68x | 19.69x | 19.67x | 26.18x | 23.68x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 14.39x | 6.31x | 3.76x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 34.35x | 20.05x | 27.36x | 15.54x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.10x | 7.93x | 4.08x | 9.74x | 4.71x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.37x | 17.73x | 2.54x | 26.59x | 3.86x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 37.52x | 22.30x | 110.00x | — | 21.83x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — PCOR and ADSK each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ORCL delivers a 56.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $56 in annual profit, vs $-6 for PCOR. PCOR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ORCL's 4.96x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SAP scores 9/9 vs PCOR's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -6.3% | +36.9% | +8.0% | +56.3% | +15.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.7% | +9.0% | +5.0% | +8.1% | +9.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -9.7% | +33.3% | +6.8% | +12.8% | +16.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -8.6% | +25.6% | +7.8% | +14.4% | +18.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 | 5 | 6 | 9 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.09x | 0.90x | 0.24x | 4.96x | 0.18x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$362M | $485M | $1.1B | $93.3B | -$149M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $481M | $2.2B | $253M | $10.8B | $8.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $118M | $2.7B | $1.4B | $104.1B | $8.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -43.00x | 289.00x | 12.26x | 5.44x | 8.49x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ORCL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ORCL five years ago would be worth $25,183 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,082 for PCOR. Over the past 12 months, ORCL leads with a +31.6% total return vs SAP's -39.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ORCL at 27.3% vs PCOR's -1.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -23.6% | -12.4% | -21.0% | -0.1% | -25.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -17.0% | -11.4% | -6.7% | +31.6% | -39.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -3.3% | +30.8% | +30.1% | +106.5% | +35.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -39.2% | -12.1% | -22.0% | +151.8% | +33.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -39.2% | +327.0% | +166.8% | +425.1% | +151.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -1.1% | +9.4% | +9.2% | +27.3% | +10.7% |
Risk & Volatility
ADSK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ADSK is the less volatile stock with a 0.85 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ORCL's 1.59 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ADSK currently trades 76.3% from its 52-week high vs SAP's 55.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.27x | 0.78x | 1.35x | 1.58x | 0.85x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $82.32 | $329.09 | $87.50 | $345.72 | $313.28 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $46.08 | $214.10 | $61.63 | $134.57 | $160.68 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +65.0% | +76.3% | +70.7% | +56.3% | +55.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.5 | 52.4 | 36.8 | 68.5 | 48.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.1M | 1.9M | 1.7M | 26.3M | 3.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — ORCL and SAP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PCOR as "Buy", ADSK as "Buy", TRMB as "Buy", ORCL as "Buy", SAP as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 124.2% upside for SAP (target: $392) vs 25.9% for PCOR (target: $67). For income investors, SAP offers the higher dividend yield at 1.51% vs ORCL's 0.85%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $67.40 | $338.00 | $93.50 | $257.09 | $391.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 24 | 51 | 28 | 86 | 43 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +0.9% | +1.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | — | 18 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $1.65 | $2.24 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.6% | +2.6% | +5.9% | +0.3% | +1.1% |
ORCL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). ADSK leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 3 tied.
PCOR vs ADSK vs TRMB vs ORCL vs SAP: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PCOR or ADSK or TRMB or ORCL or SAP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Procore Technologies, Inc.
(PCOR) is the stronger pick with 14. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 6% for Trimble Inc. (TRMB). SAP SE (SAP) offers the better valuation at 24. 8x trailing P/E (23. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Procore Technologies, Inc. (PCOR) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PCOR or ADSK or TRMB or ORCL or SAP?
On trailing P/E, SAP SE (SAP) is the cheapest at 24.
8x versus Autodesk, Inc. at 48. 0x. On forward P/E, Trimble Inc. is actually cheaper at 19. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: SAP SE wins at 3. 58x versus Trimble Inc. 's 8. 00x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PCOR or ADSK or TRMB or ORCL or SAP?
Over the past 5 years, Oracle Corporation (ORCL) delivered a total return of +151.
8%, compared to -39. 2% for Procore Technologies, Inc. (PCOR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ORCL returned +428. 7% versus PCOR's -39. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PCOR or ADSK or TRMB or ORCL or SAP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Autodesk, Inc.
(ADSK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 78β versus Oracle Corporation's 1. 58β — meaning ORCL is approximately 104% more volatile than ADSK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Procore Technologies, Inc. (PCOR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 5% for Oracle Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PCOR or ADSK or TRMB or ORCL or SAP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Procore Technologies, Inc.
(PCOR) is pulling ahead at 14. 8% versus -2. 6% for Trimble Inc. (TRMB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SAP SE grew EPS 126. 0% year-over-year, compared to -71. 3% for Trimble Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PCOR leads at 22. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PCOR or ADSK or TRMB or ORCL or SAP?
Oracle Corporation (ORCL) is the more profitable company, earning 21.
7% net margin versus -7. 6% for Procore Technologies, Inc. — meaning it keeps 21. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ORCL leads at 30. 8% versus -8. 9% for PCOR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ADSK leads at 96. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PCOR or ADSK or TRMB or ORCL or SAP more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, SAP SE (SAP) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 3. 58x versus Trimble Inc. 's 8. 00x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Trimble Inc. (TRMB) trades at 19. 7x forward P/E versus 31. 7x for Procore Technologies, Inc. — 12. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SAP: 124. 2% to $391. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — PCOR or ADSK or TRMB or ORCL or SAP?
In this comparison, SAP (1.
5% yield), ORCL (0. 9% yield) pay a dividend. PCOR, ADSK, TRMB do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is PCOR or ADSK or TRMB or ORCL or SAP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, SAP SE (SAP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
85), 1. 5% yield, +151. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SAP: +151. 5%, PCOR: -39. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PCOR and ADSK and TRMB and ORCL and SAP?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
ORCL, SAP pay a dividend while PCOR, ADSK, TRMB do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.