Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
PCSA vs CRVS vs TPVG vs AGEN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Asset Management
Biotechnology
PCSA vs CRVS vs TPVG vs AGEN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Asset Management | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $7M | $1.31B | $234M | $135M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $0.00 | $97M | $114M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-14M | $-44M | $-12M | $115K |
| Gross Margin | — | — | 83.5% | 35.7% |
| Operating Margin | — | — | 77.9% | -17.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 6.2x | 2.9x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $937K | $469M | $10M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6M | $5M | $20M | $3M |
PCSA vs CRVS vs TPVG vs AGEN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processa Pharmaceut… (PCSA) | 100 | 1.7 | -98.3% |
| Corvus Pharmaceutic… (CRVS) | 100 | 450.7 | +350.7% |
| TriplePoint Venture… (TPVG) | 100 | 57.6 | -42.4% |
| Agenus Inc. (AGEN) | 100 | 5.1 | -94.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PCSA vs CRVS vs TPVG vs AGEN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PCSA is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +9.0% vs TPVG's +7.4%
CRVS is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.57, Low D/E 1.5%, current ratio 6.21x
- Beta 1.57, current ratio 6.21x
TPVG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.77, yield 17.8%
- Rev growth 36.6%, EPS growth 48.8%
- 91.2% 10Y total return vs CRVS's 24.8%
- 36.6% NII/revenue growth vs PCSA's -14.5%
AGEN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and efficiency is your priority.
- Lower P/E (2.9x vs 6.2x)
- 0.1% ROA vs PCSA's -191.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 36.6% NII/revenue growth vs PCSA's -14.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (2.9x vs 6.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 50.6% margin vs AGEN's 0.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.77 vs AGEN's 2.58 | |
| Dividends | 17.8% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +9.0% vs TPVG's +7.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 0.1% ROA vs PCSA's -191.1% |
PCSA vs CRVS vs TPVG vs AGEN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
PCSA vs CRVS vs TPVG vs AGEN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TPVG leads in 2 of 6 categories
AGEN leads 2 • CRVS leads 1 • PCSA leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TPVG leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AGEN and CRVS operate at a comparable scale, with $114M and $0 in trailing revenue. TPVG is the more profitable business, keeping 50.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AGEN's 0.1%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $0 | $97M | $114M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$14M | -$48M | -$22M | -$10M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$14M | -$44M | -$12M | $115,000 |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$14M | -$35M | -$59M | -$159M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | — | +83.5% | +35.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | — | +77.9% | -17.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | — | +50.6% | +0.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | — | -58.7% | -139.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | +27.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +93.3% | -15.4% | -2.3% | +85.3% |
Valuation Metrics
AGEN leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7M | $1.3B | $234M | $135M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1M | $1.3B | $683M | $142M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.26x | -29.34x | 4.73x | -1123.53x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 6.23x | 2.94x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 4.67x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 9.02x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | — | 2.41x | 1.18x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.64x | 20.26x | 0.66x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — TPVG and AGEN each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TPVG delivers a -3.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-3 in annual profit, vs $-3 for PCSA. CRVS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TPVG's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AGEN scores 6/9 vs CRVS's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.6% | -38.9% | -3.4% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -191.1% | -35.7% | -1.5% | +0.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -33.9% | -78.1% | +7.2% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -3.8% | -90.2% | +9.4% | — |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.02x | 1.33x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$6M | -$4M | $449M | $7M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6M | $5M | $20M | $3M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $937,000 | $469M | $10M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -18.29x | -1.02x | 1.11x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CRVS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CRVS five years ago would be worth $60,742 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $199 for PCSA. Over the past 12 months, PCSA leads with a +896.4% total return vs TPVG's +7.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CRVS at 128.7% vs AGEN's -50.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -6.8% | +112.4% | -9.6% | +18.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +896.4% | +364.2% | +7.4% | +25.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -80.5% | +1096.2% | -5.6% | -88.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.0% | +507.4% | -15.2% | -93.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.1% | +24.8% | +91.2% | -94.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -42.0% | +128.7% | -1.9% | -50.7% |
Risk & Volatility
TPVG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TPVG is the less volatile stock with a 0.77 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AGEN's 2.58 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TPVG currently trades 76.6% from its 52-week high vs PCSA's 30.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.81x | 1.57x | 0.77x | 2.58x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $8.88 | $26.95 | $7.53 | $7.34 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.11 | $3.17 | $4.48 | $2.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +30.7% | +57.7% | +76.6% | +52.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.7 | 44.2 | 67.6 | 46.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 52K | 1.2M | 501K | 822K |
Analyst Outlook
AGEN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PCSA as "Buy", CRVS as "Buy", TPVG as "Hold", AGEN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 229.7% upside for PCSA (target: $9) vs 55.1% for TPVG (target: $9). TPVG is the only dividend payer here at 17.76% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $9.00 | $33.17 | $8.95 | $7.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 13 | 12 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +17.8% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $1.02 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.1% |
TPVG leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). AGEN leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
PCSA vs CRVS vs TPVG vs AGEN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PCSA or CRVS or TPVG or AGEN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the stronger pick with 36. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 10. 4% for Agenus Inc. (AGEN). TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG) offers the better valuation at 4. 7x trailing P/E (6. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Processa Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (PCSA) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PCSA or CRVS or TPVG or AGEN?
On forward P/E, Agenus Inc.
is actually cheaper at 2. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PCSA or CRVS or TPVG or AGEN?
Over the past 5 years, Corvus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(CRVS) delivered a total return of +507. 4%, compared to -98. 0% for Processa Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (PCSA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TPVG returned +91. 2% versus AGEN's -94. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PCSA or CRVS or TPVG or AGEN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 77β versus Agenus Inc. 's 2. 58β — meaning AGEN is approximately 236% more volatile than TPVG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Corvus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (CRVS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 133% for TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PCSA or CRVS or TPVG or AGEN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is pulling ahead at 36. 6% versus 10. 4% for Agenus Inc. (AGEN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Agenus Inc. grew EPS 100. 0% year-over-year, compared to 48. 0% for Corvus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PCSA or CRVS or TPVG or AGEN?
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the more profitable company, earning 50. 6% net margin versus 0. 0% for Corvus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — meaning it keeps 50. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TPVG leads at 77. 9% versus -18. 0% for AGEN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AGEN leads at 90. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PCSA or CRVS or TPVG or AGEN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Agenus Inc.
(AGEN) trades at 2. 9x forward P/E versus 6. 2x for TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. — 3. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PCSA: 229. 7% to $9. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — PCSA or CRVS or TPVG or AGEN?
In this comparison, TPVG (17.
8% yield) pays a dividend. PCSA, CRVS, AGEN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is PCSA or CRVS or TPVG or AGEN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 77), 17. 8% yield). Agenus Inc. (AGEN) carries a higher beta of 2. 58 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TPVG: +91. 2%, AGEN: -94. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PCSA and CRVS and TPVG and AGEN?
These companies operate in different sectors (PCSA (Healthcare) and CRVS (Healthcare) and TPVG (Financial Services) and AGEN (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: PCSA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CRVS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TPVG is a small-cap high-growth stock; AGEN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. TPVG pays a dividend while PCSA, CRVS, AGEN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.