Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
PCT vs LOOP vs ECVT vs WM vs RSG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Chemicals - Specialty
Chemicals - Specialty
Waste Management
Waste Management
PCT vs LOOP vs ECVT vs WM vs RSG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls | Chemicals - Specialty | Chemicals - Specialty | Waste Management | Waste Management |
| Market Cap | $1.62B | $68M | $1.53B | $89.32B | $62.29B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $11M | $11M | $819M | $25.41B | $16.70B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-225M | $-3M | $-63M | $2.79B | $2.17B |
| Gross Margin | -10.4% | 96.3% | 22.6% | 32.1% | 22.8% |
| Operating Margin | -11.8% | -3.2% | 15.4% | 18.5% | 20.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 22.9x | 27.1x | 27.8x |
| Total Debt | $776M | $3M | $431M | $22.91B | $596M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $157M | $13M | $197M | $201M | $76M |
PCT vs LOOP vs ECVT vs WM vs RSG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| PureCycle Technolog… (PCT) | 100 | 90.5 | -9.5% |
| Loop Industries, In… (LOOP) | 100 | 13.7 | -86.3% |
| Ecovyst Inc. (ECVT) | 100 | 113.8 | +13.8% |
| Waste Management, I… (WM) | 100 | 202.1 | +102.1% |
| Republic Services, … (RSG) | 100 | 231.1 | +131.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PCT vs LOOP vs ECVT vs WM vs RSG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, PCT doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
LOOP has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 70.2%, EPS growth 28.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.89, current ratio 3.50x
- Beta 0.89, current ratio 3.50x
- 70.2% revenue growth vs ECVT's 2.7%
ECVT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and momentum is your priority.
- Lower P/E (22.9x vs 27.1x)
- +102.7% vs RSG's -19.0%
WM is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 24 yrs, beta -0.17, yield 1.5%
- 1.5% yield, 24-year raise streak, vs PCT's 0.7%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
RSG ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 353.8% 10Y total return vs WM's 301.0%
- PEG 1.56 vs WM's 1.97
- 13.0% margin vs PCT's -20.6%
- 6.4% ROA vs LOOP's -24.0%, ROIC 13.5% vs -8.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 70.2% revenue growth vs ECVT's 2.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (22.9x vs 27.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.0% margin vs PCT's -20.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.89 vs PCT's 2.45, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.5% yield, 24-year raise streak, vs PCT's 0.7%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +102.7% vs RSG's -19.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.4% ROA vs LOOP's -24.0%, ROIC 13.5% vs -8.7% |
PCT vs LOOP vs ECVT vs WM vs RSG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
PCT vs LOOP vs ECVT vs WM vs RSG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
RSG leads in 2 of 6 categories
ECVT leads 1 • WM leads 1 • PCT leads 0 • LOOP leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — ECVT and RSG each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WM is the larger business by revenue, generating $25.4B annually — 2331.0x PCT's $11M. RSG is the more profitable business, keeping 13.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PCT's -20.6%. On growth, PCT holds the edge at +161.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $11M | $11M | $819M | $25.4B | $16.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$105M | $63,000 | $136M | $7.7B | $5.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$225M | -$3M | -$63M | $2.8B | $2.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$176M | -$404,000 | $84M | $3.3B | $2.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -10.4% | +96.3% | +22.6% | +32.1% | +22.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -11.8% | -3.2% | +15.4% | +18.5% | +20.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -20.6% | -24.3% | -7.7% | +11.0% | +13.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -16.1% | -3.6% | +10.2% | +12.9% | +15.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +161.2% | +65.4% | +32.6% | +3.5% | +2.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -5.2% | +76.0% | +2.3% | +13.3% | +7.6% |
Valuation Metrics
ECVT leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 29.4x trailing earnings, RSG trades at a 11% valuation discount to WM's 33.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), RSG offers better value at 1.65x vs WM's 2.41x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.6B | $68M | $1.5B | $89.3B | $62.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.2B | $58M | $1.8B | $112.0B | $62.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -7.39x | -4.46x | -22.90x | 33.05x | 29.43x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 22.87x | 27.06x | 27.85x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 2.41x | 1.65x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 13.28x | 15.00x | 11.96x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 193.38x | 6.26x | 2.11x | 3.54x | 3.75x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 35.16x | 182.83x | 2.68x | 8.96x | 5.25x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 21.87x | 31.72x | 25.86x |
Profitability & Efficiency
RSG leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WM delivers a 28.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $29 in annual profit, vs $-4 for PCT. RSG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PCT's 16.91x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WM scores 7/9 vs LOOP's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -4.1% | -2.1% | -10.2% | +28.9% | +18.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -23.4% | -24.0% | -4.2% | +6.1% | +6.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -20.3% | -8.7% | +4.2% | +10.7% | +13.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -21.6% | -35.0% | +4.6% | +11.7% | +11.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 16.91x | 8.41x | 0.71x | 2.29x | 0.05x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $619M | -$10M | $234M | $22.7B | $520M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $157M | $13M | $197M | $201M | $76M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $776M | $3M | $431M | $22.9B | $596M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -2.18x | -0.69x | 2.08x | 4.89x | 8.69x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RSG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RSG five years ago would be worth $19,137 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,653 for LOOP. Over the past 12 months, ECVT leads with a +102.7% total return vs RSG's -19.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RSG at 12.6% vs LOOP's -23.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -0.1% | +38.9% | +40.9% | +1.8% | -3.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +36.3% | +42.4% | +102.7% | -4.5% | -19.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +20.5% | -55.2% | +32.9% | +36.5% | +42.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -41.1% | -83.5% | +15.4% | +66.8% | +91.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -12.4% | -90.8% | +9.9% | +301.0% | +353.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +6.4% | -23.5% | +9.9% | +10.9% | +12.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ECVT and WM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WM is the less volatile stock with a -0.17 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PCT's 2.45 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ECVT currently trades 93.5% from its 52-week high vs PCT's 51.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.45x | 0.89x | 0.90x | -0.17x | -0.15x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $17.37 | $2.29 | $14.94 | $248.13 | $258.75 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.93 | $0.85 | $6.69 | $194.11 | $198.24 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +51.5% | +61.6% | +93.5% | +89.2% | +77.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.2 | 55.6 | 66.9 | 38.1 | 31.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.8M | 74K | 2.2M | 1.9M | 1.4M |
Analyst Outlook
WM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PCT as "Buy", ECVT as "Buy", WM as "Buy", RSG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 18.9% upside for RSG (target: $240) vs -30.8% for ECVT (target: $10). For income investors, WM offers the higher dividend yield at 1.49% vs PCT's 0.70%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $9.00 | — | $9.67 | $252.86 | $239.78 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | — | 6 | 35 | 35 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.7% | — | — | +1.5% | +1.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | 2 | 24 | 23 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.06 | — | — | $3.30 | $2.37 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | 0.0% | +3.1% | 0.0% | +1.4% |
RSG leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). ECVT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
PCT vs LOOP vs ECVT vs WM vs RSG: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PCT or LOOP or ECVT or WM or RSG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Loop Industries, Inc.
(LOOP) is the stronger pick with 70. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 7% for Ecovyst Inc. (ECVT). Republic Services, Inc. (RSG) offers the better valuation at 29. 4x trailing P/E (27. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate PureCycle Technologies, Inc. (PCT) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PCT or LOOP or ECVT or WM or RSG?
On trailing P/E, Republic Services, Inc.
(RSG) is the cheapest at 29. 4x versus Waste Management, Inc. at 33. 1x. On forward P/E, Ecovyst Inc. is actually cheaper at 22. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Republic Services, Inc. wins at 1. 56x versus Waste Management, Inc. 's 1. 97x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PCT or LOOP or ECVT or WM or RSG?
Over the past 5 years, Republic Services, Inc.
(RSG) delivered a total return of +91. 4%, compared to -83. 5% for Loop Industries, Inc. (LOOP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RSG returned +353. 8% versus LOOP's -90. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PCT or LOOP or ECVT or WM or RSG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Waste Management, Inc.
(WM) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 17β versus PureCycle Technologies, Inc. 's 2. 45β — meaning PCT is approximately -1506% more volatile than WM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Republic Services, Inc. (RSG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 17% for PureCycle Technologies, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PCT or LOOP or ECVT or WM or RSG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Loop Industries, Inc.
(LOOP) is pulling ahead at 70. 2% versus 2. 7% for Ecovyst Inc. (ECVT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: PureCycle Technologies, Inc. grew EPS 31. 3% year-over-year, compared to -916. 7% for Ecovyst Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WM leads at 8. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PCT or LOOP or ECVT or WM or RSG?
Republic Services, Inc.
(RSG) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 9% net margin versus -21. 9% for PureCycle Technologies, Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RSG leads at 20. 0% versus -1991. 2% for PCT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LOOP leads at 95. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PCT or LOOP or ECVT or WM or RSG more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Republic Services, Inc. (RSG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 56x versus Waste Management, Inc. 's 1. 97x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Ecovyst Inc. (ECVT) trades at 22. 9x forward P/E versus 27. 8x for Republic Services, Inc. — 5. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RSG: 18. 9% to $239. 78.
08Which pays a better dividend — PCT or LOOP or ECVT or WM or RSG?
In this comparison, WM (1.
5% yield), RSG (1. 2% yield), PCT (0. 7% yield) pay a dividend. LOOP, ECVT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is PCT or LOOP or ECVT or WM or RSG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Republic Services, Inc.
(RSG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 15), 1. 2% yield, +353. 8% 10Y return). PureCycle Technologies, Inc. (PCT) carries a higher beta of 2. 45 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (RSG: +353. 8%, PCT: -12. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PCT and LOOP and ECVT and WM and RSG?
These companies operate in different sectors (PCT (Industrials) and LOOP (Basic Materials) and ECVT (Basic Materials) and WM (Industrials) and RSG (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: PCT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LOOP is a small-cap high-growth stock; ECVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; WM is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; RSG is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. PCT, WM, RSG pay a dividend while LOOP, ECVT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.