Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

PENG vs ATEN vs CSCO vs ANET

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
PENG
Penguin Solutions, Inc.

Hardware, Equipment & Parts

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.48B
5Y Perf.+86.1%
ATEN
A10 Networks, Inc.

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.96B
5Y Perf.+88.8%
CSCO
Cisco Systems, Inc.

Communication Equipment

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$364.95B
5Y Perf.+73.2%
ANET
Arista Networks, Inc.

Computer Hardware

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$178.49B
5Y Perf.+47.7%

PENG vs ATEN vs CSCO vs ANET — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
PENG logoPENG
ATEN logoATEN
CSCO logoCSCO
ANET logoANET
IndustryHardware, Equipment & PartsSoftware - InfrastructureCommunication EquipmentComputer Hardware
Market Cap$2.48B$1.96B$364.95B$178.49B
Revenue (TTM)$1.37B$299M$59.05B$9.71B
Net Income (TTM)$25M$45M$11.08B$3.72B
Gross Margin28.6%79.3%64.4%63.5%
Operating Margin4.7%17.2%23.0%42.8%
Forward P/E17.8x26.4x22.2x40.0x
Total Debt$733M$223M$29.64B$0.00
Cash & Equiv.$454M$71M$9.47B$1.96B

PENG vs ATEN vs CSCO vs ANETLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

PENG
ATEN
CSCO
ANET
StockSep 24May 26Return
Penguin Solutions, … (PENG)100186.1+86.1%
A10 Networks, Inc. (ATEN)100188.8+88.8%
Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO)100173.2+73.2%
Arista Networks, In… (ANET)100147.7+47.7%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: PENG vs ATEN vs CSCO vs ANET

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: ANET leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Penguin Solutions, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and recent price momentum and sentiment. CSCO also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
PENG
Penguin Solutions, Inc.
The Value Play

PENG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and momentum is your priority.

  • Lower P/E (17.8x vs 22.2x)
  • +121.6% vs CSCO's +57.5%
Best for: value and momentum
ATEN
A10 Networks, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

ATEN is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.

  • Beta 0.99, yield 0.9%, current ratio 3.56x
Best for: defensive
CSCO
Cisco Systems, Inc.
The Income Pick

CSCO is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.92, yield 1.7%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.92, Low D/E 63.3%, current ratio 1.00x
  • Beta 0.92 vs PENG's 2.28, lower leverage
  • 1.7% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs PENG's 0.4%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
ANET
Arista Networks, Inc.
The Growth Play

ANET carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 28.6%, EPS growth 23.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 27.1%
  • 33.7% 10Y total return vs ATEN's 366.2%
  • PEG 0.99 vs ATEN's 1.26
  • 28.6% revenue growth vs CSCO's 5.3%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthANET logoANET28.6% revenue growth vs CSCO's 5.3%
ValuePENG logoPENGLower P/E (17.8x vs 22.2x)
Quality / MarginsANET logoANET38.3% margin vs PENG's 1.8%
Stability / SafetyCSCO logoCSCOBeta 0.92 vs PENG's 2.28, lower leverage
DividendsCSCO logoCSCO1.7% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs PENG's 0.4%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)PENG logoPENG+121.6% vs CSCO's +57.5%
Efficiency (ROA)ANET logoANET19.7% ROA vs PENG's 1.6%, ROIC 32.8% vs 6.8%

PENG vs ATEN vs CSCO vs ANET — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

PENGPenguin Solutions, Inc.
FY 2024
Product
79.1%$926M
Service
20.9%$245M
ATENA10 Networks, Inc.
FY 2025
Product
57.5%$167M
Service
42.5%$123M
CSCOCisco Systems, Inc.
FY 2025
Networking
44.5%$28.3B
Service
34.5%$22.0B
Security
12.7%$8.1B
Collaboration
6.5%$4.2B
Observability
1.7%$1.1B
ANETArista Networks, Inc.
FY 2025
Product
84.1%$7.6B
Service
15.9%$1.4B

PENG vs ATEN vs CSCO vs ANET — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLANETLAGGINGATEN

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

ANET leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

CSCO is the larger business by revenue, generating $59.1B annually — 197.2x ATEN's $299M. ANET is the more profitable business, keeping 38.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PENG's 1.8%. On growth, ANET holds the edge at +35.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricPENG logoPENGPenguin Solutions…ATEN logoATENA10 Networks, Inc.CSCO logoCSCOCisco Systems, In…ANET logoANETArista Networks, …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$1.4B$299M$59.1B$9.7B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$106M$63M$16.1B$4.2B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$25M$45M$11.1B$3.7B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$122M$51M$12.8B$5.3B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+28.6%+79.3%+64.4%+63.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+4.7%+17.2%+23.0%+42.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+1.8%+14.9%+18.8%+38.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+8.9%+17.2%+21.8%+54.4%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+0.6%+13.4%+9.7%+35.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-58.8%+30.8%+29.5%+25.0%
ANET leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

PENG leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 36.1x trailing earnings, CSCO trades at a 74% valuation discount to PENG's 139.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ANET offers better value at 1.27x vs ATEN's 2.28x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricPENG logoPENGPenguin Solutions…ATEN logoATENA10 Networks, Inc.CSCO logoCSCOCisco Systems, In…ANET logoANETArista Networks, …
Market CapShares × price$2.5B$2.0B$365.0B$178.5B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$2.8B$2.1B$385.1B$176.5B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS139.21x47.82x36.14x51.55x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.17.84x26.40x22.18x40.02x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.28x1.27x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple21.15x33.98x26.34x44.93x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.81x6.73x6.44x19.82x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share3.48x9.48x7.87x14.62x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF24.78x30.19x27.46x41.97x
PENG leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

ANET leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

ANET delivers a 30.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $31 in annual profit, vs $4 for PENG. CSCO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.63x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PENG's 1.21x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CSCO scores 8/9 vs ANET's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricPENG logoPENGPenguin Solutions…ATEN logoATENA10 Networks, Inc.CSCO logoCSCOCisco Systems, In…ANET logoANETArista Networks, …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+4.2%+21.2%+23.2%+30.6%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.6%+7.2%+9.0%+19.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital+6.8%+13.8%+13.0%+32.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+6.5%+11.7%+13.7%+30.4%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–96584
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.21x1.05x0.63x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$279M$151M$20.2B-$2.0B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$454M$71M$9.5B$2.0B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$733M$223M$29.6B$0
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense16.03x55.40x9.64x
ANET leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

ANET leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in ANET five years ago would be worth $69,045 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $18,718 for CSCO. Over the past 12 months, PENG leads with a +121.6% total return vs CSCO's +57.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ANET at 60.1% vs PENG's 26.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricPENG logoPENGPenguin Solutions…ATEN logoATENA10 Networks, Inc.CSCO logoCSCOCisco Systems, In…ANET logoANETArista Networks, …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+92.2%+57.5%+22.3%+6.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+121.6%+62.4%+57.5%+64.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+102.0%+103.5%+109.3%+310.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+102.0%+210.0%+87.2%+590.5%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+102.0%+366.2%+301.7%+3374.3%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+26.4%+26.7%+27.9%+60.1%
ANET leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — PENG and CSCO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

CSCO is the less volatile stock with a 0.92 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PENG's 2.28 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PENG currently trades 98.3% from its 52-week high vs ANET's 78.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricPENG logoPENGPenguin Solutions…ATEN logoATENA10 Networks, Inc.CSCO logoCSCOCisco Systems, In…ANET logoANETArista Networks, …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.28x0.99x0.92x2.15x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$39.66$28.59$94.72$179.80
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$16.04$16.52$59.07$82.80
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+98.3%+95.3%+97.3%+78.8%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10085.157.763.941.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.5M952K18.9M7.3M
Evenly matched — PENG and CSCO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

CSCO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: PENG as "Buy", ATEN as "Buy", CSCO as "Buy", ANET as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 31.4% upside for ANET (target: $186) vs -35.9% for PENG (target: $25). For income investors, CSCO offers the higher dividend yield at 1.75% vs PENG's 0.37%.

MetricPENG logoPENGPenguin Solutions…ATEN logoATENA10 Networks, Inc.CSCO logoCSCOCisco Systems, In…ANET logoANETArista Networks, …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$25.00$20.33$96.50$186.25
# AnalystsCovering analysts8207351
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.4%+0.9%+1.7%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1015
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.14$0.24$1.61
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+2.4%+3.5%+2.0%+0.9%
CSCO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

ANET leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PENG leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallArista Networks, Inc. (ANET)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

PENG vs ATEN vs CSCO vs ANET: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is PENG or ATEN or CSCO or ANET a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Arista Networks, Inc.

(ANET) is the stronger pick with 28. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 3% for Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO). Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) offers the better valuation at 36. 1x trailing P/E (22. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Penguin Solutions, Inc. (PENG) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — PENG or ATEN or CSCO or ANET?

On trailing P/E, Cisco Systems, Inc.

(CSCO) is the cheapest at 36. 1x versus Penguin Solutions, Inc. at 139. 2x. On forward P/E, Penguin Solutions, Inc. is actually cheaper at 17. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Arista Networks, Inc. wins at 0. 99x versus A10 Networks, Inc. 's 1. 26x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — PENG or ATEN or CSCO or ANET?

Over the past 5 years, Arista Networks, Inc.

(ANET) delivered a total return of +590. 5%, compared to +87. 2% for Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ANET returned +33. 7% versus PENG's +102. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — PENG or ATEN or CSCO or ANET?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Cisco Systems, Inc.

(CSCO) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 92β versus Penguin Solutions, Inc. 's 2. 28β — meaning PENG is approximately 148% more volatile than CSCO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 63% versus 121% for Penguin Solutions, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — PENG or ATEN or CSCO or ANET?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Arista Networks, Inc.

(ANET) is pulling ahead at 28. 6% versus 5. 3% for Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Penguin Solutions, Inc. grew EPS 128. 0% year-over-year, compared to -14. 9% for A10 Networks, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ANET leads at 27. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — PENG or ATEN or CSCO or ANET?

Arista Networks, Inc.

(ANET) is the more profitable company, earning 39. 0% net margin versus 1. 6% for Penguin Solutions, Inc. — meaning it keeps 39. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ANET leads at 42. 8% versus 5. 4% for PENG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ATEN leads at 79. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is PENG or ATEN or CSCO or ANET more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 99x versus A10 Networks, Inc. 's 1. 26x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Penguin Solutions, Inc. (PENG) trades at 17. 8x forward P/E versus 40. 0x for Arista Networks, Inc. — 22. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ANET: 31. 4% to $186. 25.

08

Which pays a better dividend — PENG or ATEN or CSCO or ANET?

In this comparison, CSCO (1.

7% yield), ATEN (0. 9% yield), PENG (0. 4% yield) pay a dividend. ANET does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is PENG or ATEN or CSCO or ANET better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Cisco Systems, Inc.

(CSCO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 92), 1. 7% yield, +301. 7% 10Y return). Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET) carries a higher beta of 2. 15 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CSCO: +301. 7%, ANET: +33. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between PENG and ATEN and CSCO and ANET?

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: PENG is a small-cap high-growth stock; ATEN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CSCO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; ANET is a mid-cap high-growth stock. ATEN, CSCO pay a dividend while PENG, ANET do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

PENG

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 17%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ATEN

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
  • Net Margin > 8%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CSCO

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 11%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ANET

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 17%
  • Net Margin > 22%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform PENG and ATEN and CSCO and ANET on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(PENG: 0.6% · ATEN: 13.4%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(PENG: 139.2x · ATEN: 47.8x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.