Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
PENG vs ATEN vs CSCO vs ANET
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Infrastructure
Communication Equipment
Computer Hardware
PENG vs ATEN vs CSCO vs ANET — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Software - Infrastructure | Communication Equipment | Computer Hardware |
| Market Cap | $2.48B | $1.96B | $364.95B | $178.49B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.37B | $299M | $59.05B | $9.71B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $25M | $45M | $11.08B | $3.72B |
| Gross Margin | 28.6% | 79.3% | 64.4% | 63.5% |
| Operating Margin | 4.7% | 17.2% | 23.0% | 42.8% |
| Forward P/E | 17.8x | 26.4x | 22.2x | 40.0x |
| Total Debt | $733M | $223M | $29.64B | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $454M | $71M | $9.47B | $1.96B |
PENG vs ATEN vs CSCO vs ANET — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Penguin Solutions, … (PENG) | 100 | 186.1 | +86.1% |
| A10 Networks, Inc. (ATEN) | 100 | 188.8 | +88.8% |
| Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) | 100 | 173.2 | +73.2% |
| Arista Networks, In… (ANET) | 100 | 147.7 | +47.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PENG vs ATEN vs CSCO vs ANET
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PENG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and momentum is your priority.
- Lower P/E (17.8x vs 22.2x)
- +121.6% vs CSCO's +57.5%
ATEN is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 0.99, yield 0.9%, current ratio 3.56x
CSCO is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.92, yield 1.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.92, Low D/E 63.3%, current ratio 1.00x
- Beta 0.92 vs PENG's 2.28, lower leverage
- 1.7% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs PENG's 0.4%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
ANET carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 28.6%, EPS growth 23.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 27.1%
- 33.7% 10Y total return vs ATEN's 366.2%
- PEG 0.99 vs ATEN's 1.26
- 28.6% revenue growth vs CSCO's 5.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 28.6% revenue growth vs CSCO's 5.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (17.8x vs 22.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 38.3% margin vs PENG's 1.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.92 vs PENG's 2.28, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.7% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs PENG's 0.4%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +121.6% vs CSCO's +57.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.7% ROA vs PENG's 1.6%, ROIC 32.8% vs 6.8% |
PENG vs ATEN vs CSCO vs ANET — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
PENG vs ATEN vs CSCO vs ANET — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ANET leads in 3 of 6 categories
PENG leads 1 • CSCO leads 1 • ATEN leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ANET leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CSCO is the larger business by revenue, generating $59.1B annually — 197.2x ATEN's $299M. ANET is the more profitable business, keeping 38.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PENG's 1.8%. On growth, ANET holds the edge at +35.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.4B | $299M | $59.1B | $9.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $106M | $63M | $16.1B | $4.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $25M | $45M | $11.1B | $3.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $122M | $51M | $12.8B | $5.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +28.6% | +79.3% | +64.4% | +63.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.7% | +17.2% | +23.0% | +42.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.8% | +14.9% | +18.8% | +38.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +8.9% | +17.2% | +21.8% | +54.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +0.6% | +13.4% | +9.7% | +35.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -58.8% | +30.8% | +29.5% | +25.0% |
Valuation Metrics
PENG leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 36.1x trailing earnings, CSCO trades at a 74% valuation discount to PENG's 139.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ANET offers better value at 1.27x vs ATEN's 2.28x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.5B | $2.0B | $365.0B | $178.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.8B | $2.1B | $385.1B | $176.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 139.21x | 47.82x | 36.14x | 51.55x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 17.84x | 26.40x | 22.18x | 40.02x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.28x | — | 1.27x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 21.15x | 33.98x | 26.34x | 44.93x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.81x | 6.73x | 6.44x | 19.82x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.48x | 9.48x | 7.87x | 14.62x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 24.78x | 30.19x | 27.46x | 41.97x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ANET leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ANET delivers a 30.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $31 in annual profit, vs $4 for PENG. CSCO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.63x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PENG's 1.21x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CSCO scores 8/9 vs ANET's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.2% | +21.2% | +23.2% | +30.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.6% | +7.2% | +9.0% | +19.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.8% | +13.8% | +13.0% | +32.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.5% | +11.7% | +13.7% | +30.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.21x | 1.05x | 0.63x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $279M | $151M | $20.2B | -$2.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $454M | $71M | $9.5B | $2.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $733M | $223M | $29.6B | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 16.03x | 55.40x | 9.64x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ANET leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ANET five years ago would be worth $69,045 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $18,718 for CSCO. Over the past 12 months, PENG leads with a +121.6% total return vs CSCO's +57.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ANET at 60.1% vs PENG's 26.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +92.2% | +57.5% | +22.3% | +6.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +121.6% | +62.4% | +57.5% | +64.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +102.0% | +103.5% | +109.3% | +310.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +102.0% | +210.0% | +87.2% | +590.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +102.0% | +366.2% | +301.7% | +3374.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +26.4% | +26.7% | +27.9% | +60.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PENG and CSCO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CSCO is the less volatile stock with a 0.92 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PENG's 2.28 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PENG currently trades 98.3% from its 52-week high vs ANET's 78.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.28x | 0.99x | 0.92x | 2.15x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $39.66 | $28.59 | $94.72 | $179.80 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $16.04 | $16.52 | $59.07 | $82.80 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.3% | +95.3% | +97.3% | +78.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 85.1 | 57.7 | 63.9 | 41.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.5M | 952K | 18.9M | 7.3M |
Analyst Outlook
CSCO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PENG as "Buy", ATEN as "Buy", CSCO as "Buy", ANET as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 31.4% upside for ANET (target: $186) vs -35.9% for PENG (target: $25). For income investors, CSCO offers the higher dividend yield at 1.75% vs PENG's 0.37%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $25.00 | $20.33 | $96.50 | $186.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 20 | 73 | 51 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.4% | +0.9% | +1.7% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 | 15 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.14 | $0.24 | $1.61 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.4% | +3.5% | +2.0% | +0.9% |
ANET leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PENG leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
PENG vs ATEN vs CSCO vs ANET: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PENG or ATEN or CSCO or ANET a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Arista Networks, Inc.
(ANET) is the stronger pick with 28. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 3% for Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO). Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) offers the better valuation at 36. 1x trailing P/E (22. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Penguin Solutions, Inc. (PENG) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PENG or ATEN or CSCO or ANET?
On trailing P/E, Cisco Systems, Inc.
(CSCO) is the cheapest at 36. 1x versus Penguin Solutions, Inc. at 139. 2x. On forward P/E, Penguin Solutions, Inc. is actually cheaper at 17. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Arista Networks, Inc. wins at 0. 99x versus A10 Networks, Inc. 's 1. 26x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PENG or ATEN or CSCO or ANET?
Over the past 5 years, Arista Networks, Inc.
(ANET) delivered a total return of +590. 5%, compared to +87. 2% for Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ANET returned +33. 7% versus PENG's +102. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PENG or ATEN or CSCO or ANET?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Cisco Systems, Inc.
(CSCO) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 92β versus Penguin Solutions, Inc. 's 2. 28β — meaning PENG is approximately 148% more volatile than CSCO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 63% versus 121% for Penguin Solutions, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PENG or ATEN or CSCO or ANET?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Arista Networks, Inc.
(ANET) is pulling ahead at 28. 6% versus 5. 3% for Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Penguin Solutions, Inc. grew EPS 128. 0% year-over-year, compared to -14. 9% for A10 Networks, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ANET leads at 27. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PENG or ATEN or CSCO or ANET?
Arista Networks, Inc.
(ANET) is the more profitable company, earning 39. 0% net margin versus 1. 6% for Penguin Solutions, Inc. — meaning it keeps 39. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ANET leads at 42. 8% versus 5. 4% for PENG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ATEN leads at 79. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PENG or ATEN or CSCO or ANET more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 99x versus A10 Networks, Inc. 's 1. 26x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Penguin Solutions, Inc. (PENG) trades at 17. 8x forward P/E versus 40. 0x for Arista Networks, Inc. — 22. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ANET: 31. 4% to $186. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — PENG or ATEN or CSCO or ANET?
In this comparison, CSCO (1.
7% yield), ATEN (0. 9% yield), PENG (0. 4% yield) pay a dividend. ANET does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is PENG or ATEN or CSCO or ANET better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Cisco Systems, Inc.
(CSCO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 92), 1. 7% yield, +301. 7% 10Y return). Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET) carries a higher beta of 2. 15 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CSCO: +301. 7%, ANET: +33. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PENG and ATEN and CSCO and ANET?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PENG is a small-cap high-growth stock; ATEN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CSCO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; ANET is a mid-cap high-growth stock. ATEN, CSCO pay a dividend while PENG, ANET do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.