Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
PENG vs SMCI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Computer Hardware
PENG vs SMCI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Computer Hardware |
| Market Cap | $2.81B | $21.19B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.37B | $33.70B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $25M | $1.78B |
| Gross Margin | 28.6% | 8.4% |
| Operating Margin | 4.7% | 4.5% |
| Forward P/E | 20.2x | 13.9x |
| Total Debt | $733M | $4.78B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $454M | $5.17B |
PENG vs SMCI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Penguin Solutions, … (PENG) | 100 | 211.1 | +111.1% |
| Super Micro Compute… (SMCI) | 100 | 84.9 | -15.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PENG vs SMCI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PENG is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 2.42, yield 0.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.42, current ratio 2.25x
- Beta 2.42, yield 0.3%, current ratio 2.25x
SMCI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 46.6%, EPS growth 0.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 61.7%
- 12.1% 10Y total return vs PENG's 129.2%
- 46.6% revenue growth vs PENG's 16.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 46.6% revenue growth vs PENG's 16.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.9x vs 20.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.3% margin vs PENG's 1.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 2.42 vs SMCI's 2.97 | |
| Dividends | 0.3% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +147.8% vs SMCI's +10.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.9% ROA vs PENG's 1.6%, ROIC 15.9% vs 6.8% |
PENG vs SMCI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
PENG vs SMCI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — PENG and SMCI each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SMCI is the larger business by revenue, generating $33.7B annually — 24.6x PENG's $1.4B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 5.3% (SMCI) to 1.8% (PENG). On growth, SMCI holds the edge at +122.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.4B | $33.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $106M | $1.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $25M | $1.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $122M | -$6.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +28.6% | +8.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.7% | +4.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.8% | +5.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +8.9% | -20.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +0.6% | +122.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -58.8% | +3.3% |
Valuation Metrics
SMCI leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 21.1x trailing earnings, SMCI trades at a 87% valuation discount to PENG's 158.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SMCI's 15.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PENG's 23.7x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.8B | $21.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.1B | $20.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 157.96x | 21.05x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 20.24x | 13.89x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.35x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 23.71x | 15.86x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.06x | 0.96x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.95x | 3.53x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 28.11x | 13.83x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SMCI leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SMCI delivers a 26.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $26 in annual profit, vs $4 for PENG. SMCI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.76x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PENG's 1.21x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.2% | +26.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.6% | +8.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.8% | +15.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.5% | +13.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.21x | 0.76x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $279M | -$391M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $454M | $5.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $733M | $4.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 16.03x | 10.86x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SMCI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SMCI five years ago would be worth $100,483 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $22,917 for PENG. Over the past 12 months, PENG leads with a +147.8% total return vs SMCI's +10.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SMCI at 37.3% vs PENG's 31.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +118.1% | +14.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +147.8% | +10.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +129.2% | +158.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +129.2% | +904.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +129.2% | +1214.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +31.8% | +37.3% |
Risk & Volatility
PENG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PENG is the less volatile stock with a 2.42 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SMCI's 2.97 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PENG currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs SMCI's 56.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.42x | 2.97x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $44.45 | $62.36 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $16.04 | $19.49 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.5% | +56.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 85.0 | 66.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.5M | 38.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates PENG as "Buy" and SMCI as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 1.2% upside for SMCI (target: $36) vs -43.5% for PENG (target: $25). PENG is the only dividend payer here at 0.33% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $25.00 | $35.80 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.3% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.14 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.1% | +0.9% |
SMCI leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). PENG leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
PENG vs SMCI: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PENG or SMCI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Super Micro Computer, Inc.
(SMCI) is the stronger pick with 46. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 16. 9% for Penguin Solutions, Inc. (PENG). Super Micro Computer, Inc. (SMCI) offers the better valuation at 21. 1x trailing P/E (13. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Penguin Solutions, Inc. (PENG) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PENG or SMCI?
On trailing P/E, Super Micro Computer, Inc.
(SMCI) is the cheapest at 21. 1x versus Penguin Solutions, Inc. at 158. 0x. On forward P/E, Super Micro Computer, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PENG or SMCI?
Over the past 5 years, Super Micro Computer, Inc.
(SMCI) delivered a total return of +904. 8%, compared to +129. 2% for Penguin Solutions, Inc. (PENG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SMCI returned +1215% versus PENG's +129. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PENG or SMCI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Penguin Solutions, Inc.
(PENG) is the lower-risk stock at 2. 42β versus Super Micro Computer, Inc. 's 2. 97β — meaning SMCI is approximately 23% more volatile than PENG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Super Micro Computer, Inc. (SMCI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 76% versus 121% for Penguin Solutions, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PENG or SMCI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Super Micro Computer, Inc.
(SMCI) is pulling ahead at 46. 6% versus 16. 9% for Penguin Solutions, Inc. (PENG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Penguin Solutions, Inc. grew EPS 128. 0% year-over-year, compared to 0. 0% for Super Micro Computer, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SMCI leads at 61. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PENG or SMCI?
Super Micro Computer, Inc.
(SMCI) is the more profitable company, earning 4. 8% net margin versus 1. 6% for Penguin Solutions, Inc. — meaning it keeps 4. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SMCI leads at 5. 7% versus 5. 4% for PENG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PENG leads at 28. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PENG or SMCI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Super Micro Computer, Inc.
(SMCI) trades at 13. 9x forward P/E versus 20. 2x for Penguin Solutions, Inc. — 6. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SMCI: 1. 2% to $35. 80.
08Which pays a better dividend — PENG or SMCI?
In this comparison, PENG (0.
3% yield) pays a dividend. SMCI does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is PENG or SMCI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Super Micro Computer, Inc.
(SMCI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1215% 10Y return). Penguin Solutions, Inc. (PENG) carries a higher beta of 2. 42 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SMCI: +1215%, PENG: +129. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PENG and SMCI?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.