Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
PENG vs SMCI vs ATEN vs ITRN vs MTSI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Computer Hardware
Software - Infrastructure
Communication Equipment
Semiconductors
PENG vs SMCI vs ATEN vs ITRN vs MTSI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Computer Hardware | Software - Infrastructure | Communication Equipment | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $2.48B | $20.14B | $1.96B | $1.38B | $25.84B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.37B | $33.70B | $299M | $359M | $1.07B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $25M | $1.78B | $45M | $58M | $177M |
| Gross Margin | 28.6% | 8.4% | 79.3% | 49.7% | 55.3% |
| Operating Margin | 4.7% | 4.5% | 17.2% | 21.4% | 16.0% |
| Forward P/E | 17.8x | 15.1x | 26.4x | 17.8x | 76.9x |
| Total Debt | $733M | $4.78B | $223M | $5M | $538M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $454M | $5.17B | $71M | $108M | $112M |
PENG vs SMCI vs ATEN vs ITRN vs MTSI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Penguin Solutions, … (PENG) | 100 | 186.1 | +86.1% |
| Super Micro Compute… (SMCI) | 100 | 80.7 | -19.3% |
| A10 Networks, Inc. (ATEN) | 100 | 188.8 | +88.8% |
| Ituran Location and… (ITRN) | 100 | 222.1 | +122.1% |
| MACOM Technology So… (MTSI) | 100 | 309.6 | +209.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PENG vs SMCI vs ATEN vs ITRN vs MTSI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, PENG doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
SMCI has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 46.6%, EPS growth 0.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 61.7%
- 11.5% 10Y total return vs MTSI's 8.0%
- PEG 0.25 vs ATEN's 1.26
- 46.6% revenue growth vs ITRN's 6.8%
ATEN is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.99, current ratio 3.56x
- Beta 0.99, yield 0.9%, current ratio 3.56x
- Beta 0.99 vs SMCI's 2.76
ITRN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 1.18, yield 3.2%
- 3.2% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs PENG's 0.4%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
- 15.8% ROA vs PENG's 1.6%, ROIC 47.2% vs 6.8%
MTSI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for quality and momentum.
- 16.5% margin vs PENG's 1.8%
- +203.8% vs SMCI's +3.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 46.6% revenue growth vs ITRN's 6.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.1x vs 76.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 16.5% margin vs PENG's 1.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.99 vs SMCI's 2.76 | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs PENG's 0.4%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +203.8% vs SMCI's +3.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.8% ROA vs PENG's 1.6%, ROIC 47.2% vs 6.8% |
PENG vs SMCI vs ATEN vs ITRN vs MTSI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
PENG vs SMCI vs ATEN vs ITRN vs MTSI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ITRN leads in 2 of 6 categories
SMCI leads 1 • MTSI leads 1 • PENG leads 0 • ATEN leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — SMCI and ITRN each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SMCI is the larger business by revenue, generating $33.7B annually — 112.6x ATEN's $299M. MTSI is the more profitable business, keeping 16.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PENG's 1.8%. On growth, SMCI holds the edge at +122.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.4B | $33.7B | $299M | $359M | $1.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $106M | $1.5B | $63M | $96M | $210M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $25M | $1.8B | $45M | $58M | $177M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $122M | -$6.8B | $51M | $71M | $168M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +28.6% | +8.4% | +79.3% | +49.7% | +55.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.7% | +4.5% | +17.2% | +21.4% | +16.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.8% | +5.3% | +14.9% | +16.1% | +16.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +8.9% | -20.3% | +17.2% | +19.7% | +15.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +0.6% | +122.7% | +13.4% | +12.8% | +22.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -58.8% | +3.3% | +30.8% | +10.0% | +42.9% |
Valuation Metrics
SMCI leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 20.0x trailing earnings, SMCI trades at a 86% valuation discount to PENG's 139.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SMCI offers better value at 0.33x vs ATEN's 2.28x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.5B | $20.1B | $2.0B | $1.4B | $25.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.8B | $19.7B | $2.1B | $1.3B | $26.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 139.21x | 20.01x | 47.82x | 20.19x | -471.88x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 17.84x | 15.14x | 26.40x | 17.84x | 76.91x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.33x | 2.28x | 0.66x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 21.15x | 15.06x | 33.98x | 13.33x | 136.13x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.81x | 0.92x | 6.73x | 3.85x | 26.71x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.48x | 3.35x | 9.48x | 5.22x | 19.20x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 24.78x | 13.14x | 30.19x | 20.72x | 134.01x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ITRN leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ITRN delivers a 27.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $4 for PENG. ITRN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PENG's 1.21x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ITRN scores 7/9 vs MTSI's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.2% | +26.0% | +21.2% | +27.3% | +13.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.6% | +8.9% | +7.2% | +15.8% | +8.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.8% | +15.9% | +13.8% | +47.2% | +6.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.5% | +13.1% | +11.7% | +29.5% | +7.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.21x | 0.76x | 1.05x | 0.02x | 0.41x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $279M | -$391M | $151M | -$103M | $426M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $454M | $5.2B | $71M | $108M | $112M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $733M | $4.8B | $223M | $5M | $538M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 16.03x | 10.86x | 55.40x | 32.28x | 391.47x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MTSI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SMCI five years ago would be worth $92,363 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $20,197 for PENG. Over the past 12 months, MTSI leads with a +203.8% total return vs SMCI's +3.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MTSI at 84.4% vs PENG's 26.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +92.2% | +8.6% | +57.5% | +42.2% | +96.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +121.6% | +3.5% | +62.4% | +76.7% | +203.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +102.0% | +146.1% | +103.5% | +206.4% | +526.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +102.0% | +823.6% | +210.0% | +180.2% | +513.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +102.0% | +1149.8% | +366.2% | +233.6% | +795.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +26.4% | +35.0% | +26.7% | +45.2% | +84.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ATEN and ITRN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ATEN is the less volatile stock with a 0.99 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SMCI's 2.76 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ITRN currently trades 98.5% from its 52-week high vs SMCI's 53.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.28x | 2.76x | 0.99x | 1.18x | 1.75x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $39.66 | $62.36 | $28.59 | $59.84 | $355.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $16.04 | $19.49 | $16.52 | $32.71 | $110.09 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.3% | +53.9% | +95.3% | +98.5% | +97.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 85.1 | 69.9 | 57.7 | 68.3 | 71.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.5M | 38.1M | 952K | 118K | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
ITRN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PENG as "Buy", SMCI as "Hold", ATEN as "Buy", ITRN as "Hold", MTSI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 37.7% upside for SMCI (target: $46) vs -35.9% for PENG (target: $25). For income investors, ITRN offers the higher dividend yield at 3.21% vs PENG's 0.37%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $25.00 | $46.29 | $20.33 | $56.00 | $254.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 22 | 20 | 5 | 23 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.4% | — | +0.9% | +3.2% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | 0 | 3 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.14 | — | $0.24 | $1.89 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.4% | +1.0% | +3.5% | +0.2% | +0.2% |
ITRN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). SMCI leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
PENG vs SMCI vs ATEN vs ITRN vs MTSI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PENG or SMCI or ATEN or ITRN or MTSI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Super Micro Computer, Inc.
(SMCI) is the stronger pick with 46. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 8% for Ituran Location and Control Ltd. (ITRN). Super Micro Computer, Inc. (SMCI) offers the better valuation at 20. 0x trailing P/E (15. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Penguin Solutions, Inc. (PENG) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PENG or SMCI or ATEN or ITRN or MTSI?
On trailing P/E, Super Micro Computer, Inc.
(SMCI) is the cheapest at 20. 0x versus Penguin Solutions, Inc. at 139. 2x. On forward P/E, Super Micro Computer, Inc. is actually cheaper at 15. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Super Micro Computer, Inc. wins at 0. 25x versus A10 Networks, Inc. 's 1. 26x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PENG or SMCI or ATEN or ITRN or MTSI?
Over the past 5 years, Super Micro Computer, Inc.
(SMCI) delivered a total return of +823. 6%, compared to +102. 0% for Penguin Solutions, Inc. (PENG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SMCI returned +1150% versus PENG's +102. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PENG or SMCI or ATEN or ITRN or MTSI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), A10 Networks, Inc.
(ATEN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 99β versus Super Micro Computer, Inc. 's 2. 76β — meaning SMCI is approximately 179% more volatile than ATEN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ituran Location and Control Ltd. (ITRN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 121% for Penguin Solutions, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PENG or SMCI or ATEN or ITRN or MTSI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Super Micro Computer, Inc.
(SMCI) is pulling ahead at 46. 6% versus 6. 8% for Ituran Location and Control Ltd. (ITRN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Penguin Solutions, Inc. grew EPS 128. 0% year-over-year, compared to -170. 2% for MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SMCI leads at 61. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PENG or SMCI or ATEN or ITRN or MTSI?
Ituran Location and Control Ltd.
(ITRN) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 1% net margin versus -5. 6% for MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 16. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ITRN leads at 21. 4% versus 5. 4% for PENG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ATEN leads at 79. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PENG or SMCI or ATEN or ITRN or MTSI more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Super Micro Computer, Inc. (SMCI) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 25x versus A10 Networks, Inc. 's 1. 26x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Super Micro Computer, Inc. (SMCI) trades at 15. 1x forward P/E versus 76. 9x for MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. — 61. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SMCI: 37. 7% to $46. 29.
08Which pays a better dividend — PENG or SMCI or ATEN or ITRN or MTSI?
In this comparison, ITRN (3.
2% yield), ATEN (0. 9% yield), PENG (0. 4% yield) pay a dividend. SMCI, MTSI do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is PENG or SMCI or ATEN or ITRN or MTSI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, A10 Networks, Inc.
(ATEN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 99), 0. 9% yield, +366. 2% 10Y return). Penguin Solutions, Inc. (PENG) carries a higher beta of 2. 28 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ATEN: +366. 2%, PENG: +102. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PENG and SMCI and ATEN and ITRN and MTSI?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PENG is a small-cap high-growth stock; SMCI is a mid-cap high-growth stock; ATEN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ITRN is a small-cap income-oriented stock; MTSI is a mid-cap high-growth stock. ATEN, ITRN pay a dividend while PENG, SMCI, MTSI do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.