Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
PENG vs SMCI vs HPE vs DELL vs NTAP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Computer Hardware
Communication Equipment
Computer Hardware
Computer Hardware
PENG vs SMCI vs HPE vs DELL vs NTAP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Computer Hardware | Communication Equipment | Computer Hardware | Computer Hardware |
| Market Cap | $2.81B | $21.19B | $41.64B | $86.92B | $23.37B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.37B | $33.70B | $35.79B | $113.54B | $6.71B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $25M | $1.78B | $-156M | $5.94B | $1.21B |
| Gross Margin | 28.6% | 8.4% | 30.7% | 20.0% | 70.5% |
| Operating Margin | 4.7% | 4.5% | 5.8% | 7.2% | 22.2% |
| Forward P/E | 20.2x | 13.9x | 13.0x | 26.1x | 14.8x |
| Total Debt | $733M | $4.78B | $22.36B | $31.50B | $3.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $454M | $5.17B | $5.77B | $11.53B | $2.74B |
PENG vs SMCI vs HPE vs DELL vs NTAP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Penguin Solutions, … (PENG) | 100 | 211.1 | +111.1% |
| Super Micro Compute… (SMCI) | 100 | 84.9 | -15.1% |
| Hewlett Packard Ent… (HPE) | 100 | 153.2 | +53.2% |
| Dell Technologies I… (DELL) | 100 | 219.6 | +119.6% |
| NetApp, Inc. (NTAP) | 100 | 95.6 | -4.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PENG vs SMCI vs HPE vs DELL vs NTAP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, PENG doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
SMCI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- Rev growth 46.6%, EPS growth 0.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 61.7%
- PEG 0.23 vs NTAP's 1.48
- 46.6% revenue growth vs NTAP's 4.9%
- Lower P/E (13.9x vs 14.8x), PEG 0.23 vs 1.48
HPE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 1.64, yield 1.9%
- 1.9% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs PENG's 0.3%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
DELL is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 21.2% 10Y total return vs SMCI's 12.1%
- +172.8% vs SMCI's +10.2%
NTAP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.33, current ratio 1.26x
- Beta 1.33, yield 1.7%, current ratio 1.26x
- 18.1% margin vs HPE's -0.4%
- Beta 1.33 vs SMCI's 2.97
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 46.6% revenue growth vs NTAP's 4.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.9x vs 14.8x), PEG 0.23 vs 1.48 | |
| Quality / Margins | 18.1% margin vs HPE's -0.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.33 vs SMCI's 2.97 | |
| Dividends | 1.9% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs PENG's 0.3%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +172.8% vs SMCI's +10.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.2% ROA vs HPE's -0.2%, ROIC 54.4% vs 3.5% |
PENG vs SMCI vs HPE vs DELL vs NTAP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
PENG vs SMCI vs HPE vs DELL vs NTAP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NTAP leads in 2 of 6 categories
HPE leads 2 • DELL leads 1 • PENG leads 0 • SMCI leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NTAP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DELL is the larger business by revenue, generating $113.5B annually — 82.8x PENG's $1.4B. NTAP is the more profitable business, keeping 18.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HPE's -0.4%. On growth, SMCI holds the edge at +122.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.4B | $33.7B | $35.8B | $113.5B | $6.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $106M | $1.5B | $4.5B | $8.3B | $1.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $25M | $1.8B | -$156M | $5.9B | $1.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $122M | -$6.8B | $4.4B | $4.6B | $1.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +28.6% | +8.4% | +30.7% | +20.0% | +70.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.7% | +4.5% | +5.8% | +7.2% | +22.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.8% | +5.3% | -0.4% | +5.2% | +18.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +8.9% | -20.3% | +12.2% | +4.1% | +19.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +0.6% | +122.7% | +19.1% | +40.2% | +4.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -58.8% | +3.3% | -26.2% | -100.0% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
HPE leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 20.8x trailing earnings, NTAP trades at a 87% valuation discount to PENG's 158.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SMCI offers better value at 0.35x vs NTAP's 2.08x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.8B | $21.2B | $41.6B | $86.9B | $23.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.1B | $20.8B | $58.2B | $106.9B | $24.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 157.96x | 21.05x | -702.58x | — | 20.81x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 20.24x | 13.89x | 13.01x | 26.11x | 14.79x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.35x | — | — | 2.08x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 23.71x | 15.86x | 13.29x | 13.12x | 15.26x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.06x | 0.96x | 1.21x | 0.77x | 3.56x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.95x | 3.53x | 1.68x | — | 23.72x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 28.11x | 13.83x | 66.41x | — | 17.46x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NTAP leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NTAP delivers a 104.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $105 in annual profit, vs $-1 for HPE. SMCI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.76x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NTAP's 3.36x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PENG scores 6/9 vs DELL's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.2% | +26.0% | -0.6% | — | +104.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.6% | +8.9% | -0.2% | +5.9% | +12.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.8% | +15.9% | +3.5% | +33.0% | +54.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.5% | +13.1% | +3.4% | +22.9% | +22.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.21x | 0.76x | 0.90x | — | 3.36x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $279M | -$391M | $16.6B | $20.0B | $749M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $454M | $5.2B | $5.8B | $11.5B | $2.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $733M | $4.8B | $22.4B | $31.5B | $3.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 16.03x | 10.86x | -11.81x | 6.01x | 14.83x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
DELL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SMCI five years ago would be worth $100,483 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $16,254 for NTAP. Over the past 12 months, DELL leads with a +172.8% total return vs SMCI's +10.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DELL at 79.4% vs NTAP's 24.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +118.1% | +14.2% | +30.2% | +104.6% | +11.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +147.8% | +10.2% | +89.0% | +172.8% | +27.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +129.2% | +158.9% | +131.9% | +477.9% | +94.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +129.2% | +904.8% | +106.3% | +429.9% | +62.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +129.2% | +1214.9% | +286.8% | +2117.2% | +487.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +31.8% | +37.3% | +32.4% | +79.4% | +24.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HPE and NTAP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NTAP is the less volatile stock with a 1.33 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SMCI's 2.97 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HPE currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs SMCI's 56.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.42x | 2.97x | 1.64x | 1.75x | 1.33x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $44.45 | $62.36 | $31.34 | $263.99 | $126.66 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $16.04 | $19.49 | $16.69 | $95.64 | $92.91 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.5% | +56.7% | +100.0% | +98.6% | +93.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 85.0 | 66.1 | 68.1 | 69.4 | 63.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.5M | 38.5M | 14.9M | 7.8M | 2.1M |
Analyst Outlook
HPE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PENG as "Buy", SMCI as "Hold", HPE as "Hold", DELL as "Buy", NTAP as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 2.1% upside for NTAP (target: $121) vs -43.5% for PENG (target: $25). For income investors, HPE offers the higher dividend yield at 1.92% vs PENG's 0.33%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $25.00 | $35.80 | $28.71 | $182.67 | $120.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 22 | 37 | 43 | 70 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.3% | — | +1.9% | — | +1.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | 3 | 2 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.14 | — | $0.60 | — | $2.03 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.1% | +0.9% | +0.5% | +6.9% | +4.9% |
NTAP leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). HPE leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
PENG vs SMCI vs HPE vs DELL vs NTAP: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PENG or SMCI or HPE or DELL or NTAP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Super Micro Computer, Inc.
(SMCI) is the stronger pick with 46. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 9% for NetApp, Inc. (NTAP). NetApp, Inc. (NTAP) offers the better valuation at 20. 8x trailing P/E (14. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Penguin Solutions, Inc. (PENG) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PENG or SMCI or HPE or DELL or NTAP?
On trailing P/E, NetApp, Inc.
(NTAP) is the cheapest at 20. 8x versus Penguin Solutions, Inc. at 158. 0x. On forward P/E, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company is actually cheaper at 13. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Super Micro Computer, Inc. wins at 0. 23x versus NetApp, Inc. 's 1. 48x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PENG or SMCI or HPE or DELL or NTAP?
Over the past 5 years, Super Micro Computer, Inc.
(SMCI) delivered a total return of +904. 8%, compared to +62. 5% for NetApp, Inc. (NTAP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DELL returned +21. 2% versus PENG's +129. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PENG or SMCI or HPE or DELL or NTAP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NetApp, Inc.
(NTAP) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 33β versus Super Micro Computer, Inc. 's 2. 97β — meaning SMCI is approximately 123% more volatile than NTAP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Super Micro Computer, Inc. (SMCI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 76% versus 3% for NetApp, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PENG or SMCI or HPE or DELL or NTAP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Super Micro Computer, Inc.
(SMCI) is pulling ahead at 46. 6% versus 4. 9% for NetApp, Inc. (NTAP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Penguin Solutions, Inc. grew EPS 128. 0% year-over-year, compared to -102. 3% for Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, SMCI leads at 61. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PENG or SMCI or HPE or DELL or NTAP?
NetApp, Inc.
(NTAP) is the more profitable company, earning 18. 0% net margin versus 0. 2% for Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company — meaning it keeps 18. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NTAP leads at 20. 3% versus 4. 8% for HPE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NTAP leads at 70. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PENG or SMCI or HPE or DELL or NTAP more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Super Micro Computer, Inc. (SMCI) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 23x versus NetApp, Inc. 's 1. 48x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company (HPE) trades at 13. 0x forward P/E versus 26. 1x for Dell Technologies Inc. — 13. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NTAP: 2. 1% to $120. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — PENG or SMCI or HPE or DELL or NTAP?
In this comparison, HPE (1.
9% yield), NTAP (1. 7% yield), PENG (0. 3% yield) pay a dividend. SMCI, DELL do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is PENG or SMCI or HPE or DELL or NTAP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, NetApp, Inc.
(NTAP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1. 7% yield, +487. 5% 10Y return). Penguin Solutions, Inc. (PENG) carries a higher beta of 2. 42 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NTAP: +487. 5%, PENG: +129. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PENG and SMCI and HPE and DELL and NTAP?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PENG is a small-cap high-growth stock; SMCI is a mid-cap high-growth stock; HPE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; DELL is a mid-cap high-growth stock; NTAP is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. HPE, NTAP pay a dividend while PENG, SMCI, DELL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.