Aerospace & Defense
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
PEW vs RGR vs SWBI vs OLN vs AOUT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Aerospace & Defense
Aerospace & Defense
Chemicals - Specialty
Leisure
PEW vs RGR vs SWBI vs OLN vs AOUT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Aerospace & Defense | Aerospace & Defense | Chemicals - Specialty | Leisure |
| Market Cap | $89M | $623M | $655M | $3.05B | $146M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $52M | $552M | $486M | $6.72B | $205M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-3M | $-12M | $12M | $-127M | $-10M |
| Gross Margin | 13.7% | 14.4% | 26.4% | 5.3% | 43.1% |
| Operating Margin | -9.0% | -4.1% | 4.6% | -1.6% | -4.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | 20.6x | 53.6x | — | 66.2x |
| Total Debt | $7M | $2M | $115M | $3.39B | $33M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $110M | $18M | $25M | $168M | $23M |
PEW vs RGR vs SWBI vs OLN vs AOUT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| GrabAGun Digital Ho… (PEW) | 100 | 29.3 | -70.7% |
| Sturm, Ruger & Comp… (RGR) | 100 | 89.4 | -10.6% |
| Smith & Wesson Bran… (SWBI) | 100 | 112.8 | +12.8% |
| Olin Corporation (OLN) | 100 | 51.4 | -48.6% |
| American Outdoor Br… (AOUT) | 100 | 112.2 | +12.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PEW vs RGR vs SWBI vs OLN vs AOUT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PEW is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.82, Low D/E 6.4%, current ratio 7.19x
RGR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value is your priority.
- Lower P/E (20.6x vs 66.2x)
SWBI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.74, yield 3.5%
- -3.7% 10Y total return vs OLN's 61.0%
- Beta 0.74, yield 3.5%, current ratio 4.16x
- 2.5% margin vs PEW's -4.8%
Among these 5 stocks, OLN doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
AOUT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 10.6%, EPS growth 99.4%, 3Y rev CAGR -3.5%
- 10.6% revenue growth vs SWBI's -11.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.6% revenue growth vs SWBI's -11.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (20.6x vs 66.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 2.5% margin vs PEW's -4.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.74 vs AOUT's 1.51 | |
| Dividends | 3.5% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs RGR's 1.6%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +65.8% vs PEW's -76.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.2% ROA vs RGR's -4.7%, ROIC 4.1% vs -3.0% |
PEW vs RGR vs SWBI vs OLN vs AOUT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
PEW vs RGR vs SWBI vs OLN vs AOUT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SWBI leads in 5 of 6 categories
OLN leads 1 • PEW leads 0 • RGR leads 0 • AOUT leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SWBI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OLN is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.7B annually — 129.5x PEW's $52M. SWBI is the more profitable business, keeping 2.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PEW's -4.8%. On growth, SWBI holds the edge at +17.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $52M | $552M | $486M | $6.7B | $205M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$4M | -$5M | $30M | $284M | $344,000 |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$3M | -$12M | $12M | -$127M | -$10M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$9M | $42M | $73M | $352M | $4M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +13.7% | +14.4% | +26.4% | +5.3% | +43.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -9.0% | -4.1% | +4.6% | -1.6% | -4.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.8% | -2.2% | +2.5% | -1.9% | -4.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -17.1% | +7.7% | +15.0% | +5.2% | +1.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +4.1% | +17.1% | -3.7% | -3.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -97.8% | +122.4% | -61.8% | -25.8% |
Valuation Metrics
OLN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, OLN's 9.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than RGR's 53.8x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $89M | $623M | $655M | $3.0B | $146M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$14M | $606M | $745M | $6.3B | $156M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -22.88x | -144.63x | 49.10x | -72.32x | -1600.83x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 20.61x | 53.56x | — | 66.24x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 53.83x | 13.37x | 9.88x | 11.90x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.92x | 1.14x | 1.38x | 0.45x | 0.66x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.54x | 2.23x | 1.76x | 1.59x | 0.69x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 16.19x | — | 12.29x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
SWBI leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SWBI delivers a 3.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $3 in annual profit, vs $-7 for OLN. RGR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to OLN's 1.76x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AOUT scores 7/9 vs SWBI's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -4.7% | -4.2% | +3.3% | -6.6% | -5.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -4.0% | -4.7% | +2.2% | -1.7% | -4.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -158.4% | -3.0% | +4.1% | +1.7% | -0.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -3.6% | -3.8% | +4.9% | +1.9% | -0.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.06x | 0.01x | 0.31x | 1.76x | 0.19x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$103M | -$17M | $90M | $3.2B | $10M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $110M | $18M | $25M | $168M | $23M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $7M | $2M | $115M | $3.4B | $33M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -353.50x | 5.17x | 0.66x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SWBI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SWBI five years ago would be worth $8,610 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,951 for PEW. Over the past 12 months, SWBI leads with a +65.8% total return vs PEW's -76.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SWBI at 10.9% vs PEW's -33.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -2.1% | +16.9% | +48.9% | +25.1% | +21.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -76.4% | +19.8% | +65.8% | +35.2% | -16.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -70.5% | -23.0% | +36.4% | -46.8% | +17.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -70.5% | -26.4% | -13.9% | -33.9% | -65.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -70.5% | -4.9% | -3.7% | +61.0% | -38.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -33.4% | -8.4% | +10.9% | -19.0% | +5.6% |
Risk & Volatility
SWBI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SWBI is the less volatile stock with a 0.74 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AOUT's 1.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SWBI currently trades 93.3% from its 52-week high vs PEW's 13.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.82x | 1.00x | 0.74x | 1.47x | 1.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $21.40 | $48.21 | $15.79 | $30.46 | $13.46 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.55 | $28.33 | $7.73 | $18.08 | $6.26 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +13.9% | +81.0% | +93.3% | +87.8% | +71.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.5 | 42.6 | 51.7 | 58.6 | 54.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 345K | 163K | 596K | 2.7M | 38K |
Analyst Outlook
SWBI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: RGR as "Buy", SWBI as "Buy", OLN as "Hold", AOUT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 30.1% upside for AOUT (target: $13) vs -9.1% for OLN (target: $24). For income investors, SWBI offers the higher dividend yield at 3.53% vs RGR's 1.60%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $15.25 | $24.33 | $12.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 12 | 4 | 35 | 5 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.6% | +3.5% | +3.0% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 5 | 3 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.62 | $0.52 | $0.80 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +4.2% | +3.9% | +1.7% | +2.6% |
SWBI leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). OLN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
PEW vs RGR vs SWBI vs OLN vs AOUT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PEW or RGR or SWBI or OLN or AOUT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, American Outdoor Brands, Inc.
(AOUT) is the stronger pick with 10. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -11. 4% for Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. (SWBI). Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. (SWBI) offers the better valuation at 49. 1x trailing P/E (53. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc. (RGR) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PEW or RGR or SWBI or OLN or AOUT?
On forward P/E, Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 20. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PEW or RGR or SWBI or OLN or AOUT?
Over the past 5 years, Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc.
(SWBI) delivered a total return of -13. 9%, compared to -70. 5% for GrabAGun Digital Holdings Inc. (PEW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: OLN returned +61. 0% versus PEW's -70. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PEW or RGR or SWBI or OLN or AOUT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc.
(SWBI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 74β versus American Outdoor Brands, Inc. 's 1. 51β — meaning AOUT is approximately 105% more volatile than SWBI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc. (RGR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 176% for Olin Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PEW or RGR or SWBI or OLN or AOUT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), American Outdoor Brands, Inc.
(AOUT) is pulling ahead at 10. 6% versus -11. 4% for Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. (SWBI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: American Outdoor Brands, Inc. grew EPS 99. 4% year-over-year, compared to -148. 1% for GrabAGun Digital Holdings Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RGR leads at -2. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PEW or RGR or SWBI or OLN or AOUT?
Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc.
(SWBI) is the more profitable company, earning 2. 8% net margin versus -2. 6% for GrabAGun Digital Holdings Inc. — meaning it keeps 2. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SWBI leads at 5. 0% versus -4. 5% for PEW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AOUT leads at 44. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PEW or RGR or SWBI or OLN or AOUT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc.
(RGR) trades at 20. 6x forward P/E versus 66. 2x for American Outdoor Brands, Inc. — 45. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AOUT: 30. 1% to $12. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — PEW or RGR or SWBI or OLN or AOUT?
In this comparison, SWBI (3.
5% yield), OLN (3. 0% yield), RGR (1. 6% yield) pay a dividend. PEW, AOUT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is PEW or RGR or SWBI or OLN or AOUT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc.
(SWBI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 74), 3. 5% yield). American Outdoor Brands, Inc. (AOUT) carries a higher beta of 1. 51 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SWBI: -3. 7%, AOUT: -38. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PEW and RGR and SWBI and OLN and AOUT?
These companies operate in different sectors (PEW (Industrials) and RGR (Industrials) and SWBI (Industrials) and OLN (Basic Materials) and AOUT (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: PEW is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RGR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SWBI is a small-cap income-oriented stock; OLN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AOUT is a small-cap quality compounder stock. RGR, SWBI, OLN pay a dividend while PEW, AOUT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.