Drug Manufacturers - General
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
PFE vs BMY vs JNJ vs MRK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Drug Manufacturers - General
Drug Manufacturers - General
Drug Manufacturers - General
PFE vs BMY vs JNJ vs MRK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Drug Manufacturers - General | Drug Manufacturers - General | Drug Manufacturers - General | Drug Manufacturers - General |
| Market Cap | $150.63B | $114.85B | $536.23B | $277.34B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $63.31B | $48.48B | $92.15B | $64.93B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $7.49B | $7.28B | $25.12B | $18.25B |
| Gross Margin | 69.3% | 68.7% | 68.1% | 74.2% |
| Operating Margin | 23.4% | 25.7% | 26.1% | 41.1% |
| Forward P/E | 8.9x | 8.9x | 19.2x | 21.9x |
| Total Debt | $67.42B | $47.14B | $36.63B | $50.53B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.14B | $10.21B | $24.11B | $14.56B |
PFE vs BMY vs JNJ vs MRK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pfizer Inc. (PFE) | 100 | 73.1 | -26.9% |
| Bristol-Myers Squib… (BMY) | 100 | 94.2 | -5.8% |
| Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) | 100 | 149.6 | +49.6% |
| Merck & Co., Inc. (MRK) | 100 | 145.9 | +45.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PFE vs BMY vs JNJ vs MRK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PFE is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.54, yield 6.5%
- 6.5% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs JNJ's 2.2%
BMY is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (8.9x vs 19.2x)
JNJ is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Rev growth 4.3%, EPS growth -57.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.06, Low D/E 51.2%, current ratio 1.11x
- 4.3% revenue growth vs PFE's -1.6%
- Beta 0.06 vs PFE's 0.54, lower leverage
MRK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 166.5% 10Y total return vs JNJ's 132.3%
- PEG 1.03 vs JNJ's 34.17
- Beta 0.48, yield 2.9%, current ratio 1.54x
- 28.1% margin vs PFE's 11.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.3% revenue growth vs PFE's -1.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.9x vs 19.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 28.1% margin vs PFE's 11.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.06 vs PFE's 0.54, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 6.5% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs JNJ's 2.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +46.1% vs BMY's +23.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 14.6% ROA vs PFE's 3.6%, ROIC 22.0% vs 7.5% |
PFE vs BMY vs JNJ vs MRK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
PFE vs BMY vs JNJ vs MRK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MRK leads in 1 of 6 categories
BMY leads 1 • JNJ leads 1 • PFE leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MRK leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JNJ is the larger business by revenue, generating $92.1B annually — 1.9x BMY's $48.5B. MRK is the more profitable business, keeping 28.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PFE's 11.8%. On growth, JNJ holds the edge at +6.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $63.3B | $48.5B | $92.1B | $64.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $21.0B | $15.7B | $31.4B | $32.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $7.5B | $7.3B | $25.1B | $18.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $9.5B | $11.9B | $19.1B | $12.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +69.3% | +68.7% | +68.1% | +74.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +23.4% | +25.7% | +26.1% | +41.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.8% | +15.0% | +27.3% | +28.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +15.0% | +24.6% | +20.7% | +19.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.4% | +2.6% | +6.8% | +4.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -9.5% | +9.2% | +91.0% | -19.6% |
Valuation Metrics
BMY leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.4x trailing earnings, MRK trades at a 60% valuation discount to JNJ's 38.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), MRK offers better value at 0.73x vs JNJ's 34.17x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $150.6B | $114.8B | $536.2B | $277.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $216.9B | $151.8B | $548.8B | $313.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 19.47x | 16.30x | 38.43x | 15.42x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.94x | 8.93x | 19.20x | 21.93x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 34.17x | 0.73x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.66x | 9.17x | 18.61x | 10.68x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.41x | 2.38x | 6.04x | 4.27x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.74x | 6.20x | 7.56x | 5.35x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 16.60x | 8.94x | 27.02x | 22.44x |
Profitability & Efficiency
JNJ leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BMY delivers a 39.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $39 in annual profit, vs $8 for PFE. JNJ carries lower financial leverage with a 0.51x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BMY's 2.55x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BMY scores 8/9 vs MRK's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.3% | +39.0% | +31.7% | +36.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.6% | +7.9% | +13.0% | +14.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.5% | +16.9% | +20.7% | +22.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.0% | +18.7% | +17.6% | +23.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 8 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.78x | 2.55x | 0.51x | 0.96x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $66.3B | $36.9B | $12.5B | $36.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.1B | $10.2B | $24.1B | $14.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $67.4B | $47.1B | $36.6B | $50.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.02x | 10.33x | 48.23x | 19.68x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — JNJ and MRK each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MRK five years ago would be worth $17,024 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,674 for PFE. Over the past 12 months, MRK leads with a +46.1% total return vs BMY's +23.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JNJ at 13.5% vs PFE's -6.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +6.9% | +7.6% | +7.9% | +6.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +23.7% | +23.4% | +44.8% | +46.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -18.4% | -7.1% | +46.3% | +2.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -13.3% | +5.2% | +46.1% | +70.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +29.6% | +6.7% | +132.3% | +166.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -6.6% | -2.4% | +13.5% | +0.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PFE and JNJ each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
JNJ is the less volatile stock with a 0.06 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PFE's 0.54 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PFE currently trades 92.1% from its 52-week high vs JNJ's 88.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.54x | 0.50x | 0.06x | 0.48x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $28.75 | $62.89 | $251.71 | $125.14 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $21.97 | $42.52 | $146.12 | $73.31 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.1% | +89.4% | +88.4% | +89.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.2 | 41.4 | 37.1 | 46.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 33.3M | 10.3M | 7.0M | 7.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — PFE and JNJ each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PFE as "Hold", BMY as "Hold", JNJ as "Buy", MRK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 15.2% upside for MRK (target: $129) vs 3.0% for PFE (target: $27). For income investors, PFE offers the higher dividend yield at 6.49% vs JNJ's 2.19%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $27.27 | $62.00 | $249.27 | $129.31 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 39 | 41 | 40 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +6.5% | +4.4% | +2.2% | +2.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 15 | 6 | 36 | 14 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.72 | $2.47 | $4.87 | $3.26 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.5% | +1.8% |
MRK leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). BMY leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
PFE vs BMY vs JNJ vs MRK: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PFE or BMY or JNJ or MRK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) is the stronger pick with 4.
3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 6% for Pfizer Inc. (PFE). Merck & Co. , Inc. (MRK) offers the better valuation at 15. 4x trailing P/E (21. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) a "Buy" — based on 40 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PFE or BMY or JNJ or MRK?
On trailing P/E, Merck & Co.
, Inc. (MRK) is the cheapest at 15. 4x versus Johnson & Johnson at 38. 4x. On forward P/E, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company is actually cheaper at 8. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Merck & Co. , Inc. wins at 1. 03x versus Johnson & Johnson's 34. 17x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PFE or BMY or JNJ or MRK?
Over the past 5 years, Merck & Co.
, Inc. (MRK) delivered a total return of +70. 2%, compared to -13. 3% for Pfizer Inc. (PFE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MRK returned +166. 5% versus BMY's +6. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PFE or BMY or JNJ or MRK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
06β versus Pfizer Inc. 's 0. 54β — meaning PFE is approximately 854% more volatile than JNJ relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 51% versus 3% for Bristol-Myers Squibb Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PFE or BMY or JNJ or MRK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) is pulling ahead at 4.
3% versus -1. 6% for Pfizer Inc. (PFE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company grew EPS 178. 2% year-over-year, compared to -57. 8% for Johnson & Johnson. Over a 3-year CAGR, JNJ leads at 4. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PFE or BMY or JNJ or MRK?
Merck & Co.
, Inc. (MRK) is the more profitable company, earning 28. 1% net margin versus 12. 4% for Pfizer Inc. — meaning it keeps 28. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MRK leads at 36. 2% versus 24. 7% for PFE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MRK leads at 72. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PFE or BMY or JNJ or MRK more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Merck & Co. , Inc. (MRK) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 03x versus Johnson & Johnson's 34. 17x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY) trades at 8. 9x forward P/E versus 21. 9x for Merck & Co. , Inc. — 13. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MRK: 15. 2% to $129. 31.
08Which pays a better dividend — PFE or BMY or JNJ or MRK?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Pfizer Inc. (PFE) offers the highest yield at 6. 5%, versus 2. 2% for Johnson & Johnson (JNJ).
09Is PFE or BMY or JNJ or MRK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
06), 2. 2% yield, +132. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (JNJ: +132. 3%, PFE: +29. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PFE and BMY and JNJ and MRK?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PFE is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; BMY is a mid-cap deep-value stock; JNJ is a large-cap quality compounder stock; MRK is a large-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.