Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
PGC logo
PGC
NBTB logo
NBTB
CNOB logo
CNOB
FULT logo
FULT
FIS logo
FIS
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

PGC vs NBTB vs CNOB vs FULT vs FIS

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
PGC
Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$819M
5Y Perf.+146.9%
NBTB
NBT Bancorp Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.52B
5Y Perf.+56.6%
CNOB
ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.65B
5Y Perf.+103.3%
FULT
Fulton Financial Corporation

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.50B
5Y Perf.+121.8%
FIS
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$20.26B
5Y Perf.-70.8%

PGC vs NBTB vs CNOB vs FULT vs FIS — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
PGC logoPGC
NBTB logoNBTB
CNOB logoCNOB
FULT logoFULT
FIS logoFIS
IndustryBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalInformation Technology Services
Market Cap$819M$2.52B$1.65B$4.50B$20.26B
Revenue (TTM)$441M$902M$676M$1.89B$11.66B
Net Income (TTM)$37M$169M$80M$392M$2.67B
Gross Margin58.1%73.6%49.9%67.4%37.6%
Operating Margin11.9%24.3%16.7%25.7%17.9%
Forward P/E12.5x11.5x10.0x11.5x6.2x
Total Debt$260M$327M$1.17B$1.30B$4.01B
Cash & Equiv.$9M$185M$92M$271M$599M

PGC vs NBTB vs CNOB vs FULT vs FISLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

PGC
NBTB
CNOB
FULT
FIS
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Peapack-Gladstone F… (PGC)100246.9+146.9%
NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB)100156.6+56.6%
ConnectOne Bancorp,… (CNOB)100203.3+103.3%
Fulton Financial Co… (FULT)100221.8+121.8%
Fidelity National I… (FIS)10029.2-70.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: PGC vs NBTB vs CNOB vs FULT vs FIS

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: FIS leads in 5 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment. CNOB also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇FIS emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
PGC
Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation
The Banking Pick

PGC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.

  • 155.7% 10Y total return vs FULT's 114.2%
  • +64.7% vs FIS's -49.4%
Best for: long-term compounding
NBTB
NBT Bancorp Inc.
The Banking Pick

NBTB is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.76, Low D/E 17.3%, current ratio 1.60x
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
CNOB
ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc.
The Banking Pick

CNOB ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 13.4%, EPS growth -15.9%
  • 13.4% NII/revenue growth vs FULT's 5.0%
Best for: growth exposure
FULT
Fulton Financial Corporation
The Banking Pick

FULT is the clearest fit if your priority is bank quality.

  • NIM 3.2% vs CNOB's 2.5%
Best for: bank quality
FIS
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
The Income Pick

FIS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and valuation efficiency.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.61, yield 4.2%
  • PEG 0.26 vs NBTB's 1.64
  • Beta 0.61, yield 4.2%, current ratio 0.59x
  • Lower P/E (6.2x vs 11.5x), PEG 0.26 vs 0.82
Best for: income & stability and valuation efficiency
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCNOB logoCNOB13.4% NII/revenue growth vs FULT's 5.0%
ValueFIS logoFISLower P/E (6.2x vs 11.5x), PEG 0.26 vs 0.82
Quality / MarginsFIS logoFIS22.9% margin vs PGC's 8.5%
Stability / SafetyFIS logoFISBeta 0.61 vs CNOB's 1.02, lower leverage
DividendsFIS logoFIS4.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs NBTB's 3.0%
Momentum (1Y)PGC logoPGC+64.7% vs FIS's -49.4%
Efficiency (ROA)FIS logoFIS7.5% ROA vs PGC's 0.5%, ROIC 6.0% vs 4.6%

PGC vs NBTB vs CNOB vs FULT vs FIS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the Fintech Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the Fintech Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
PGCPeapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation
FY 2025
Banking Segment
76.6%$217M
Wealth Management Division
23.4%$66M
NBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.
FY 2025
Insurance Revenue
100.0%$18M
CNOBConnectOne Bancorp, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

FULTFulton Financial Corporation
FY 2024
Financial Service, Other
32.8%$85M
Fiduciary and Trust
32.7%$85M
Deposit Account
21.4%$56M
Service, Other
7.7%$20M
Mortgage Banking
5.4%$14M
FISFidelity National Information Services, Inc.
FY 2025
Banking Solutions
69.5%$7.3B
Capital Market Solutions
30.5%$3.2B

PGC vs NBTB vs CNOB vs FULT vs FIS — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLPGCLAGGINGFULT

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — NBTB and FIS each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

FIS is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.7B annually — 26.4x PGC's $441M. FIS is the more profitable business, keeping 22.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PGC's 8.5%.

MetricPGC logoPGCPeapack-Gladstone…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.CNOB logoCNOBConnectOne Bancor…FULT logoFULTFulton Financial …FIS logoFISFidelity National…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$441M$902M$676M$1.9B$11.7B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$63M$241M$122M$529M$4.1B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$37M$169M$80M$392M$2.7B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$15M$225M$102M$267M$2.8B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+58.1%+73.6%+49.9%+67.4%+37.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+11.9%+24.3%+16.7%+25.7%+17.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+8.5%+18.8%+11.9%+20.7%+22.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+3.3%+24.9%+15.1%+14.1%+23.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+30.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+32.7%+39.5%+53.1%+47.2%+30.6%
Evenly matched — NBTB and FIS each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

FIS leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 11.2x trailing earnings, FULT trades at a 79% valuation discount to FIS's 52.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FULT offers better value at 0.80x vs PGC's 2.43x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricPGC logoPGCPeapack-Gladstone…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.CNOB logoCNOBConnectOne Bancor…FULT logoFULTFulton Financial …FIS logoFISFidelity National…
Market CapShares × price$819M$2.5B$1.6B$4.5B$20.3B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1.1B$2.7B$2.7B$5.5B$23.7B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS21.92x14.47x22.14x11.23x52.27x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.12.49x11.54x10.04x11.49x6.24x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.43x2.06x0.80x2.14x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple16.92x11.03x24.17x10.43x6.50x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.86x2.90x2.72x2.38x1.90x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.24x1.29x1.05x1.23x1.46x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF28.66x11.49x16.31x15.81x7.21x
FIS leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — NBTB and FIS each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

FIS delivers a 18.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $5 for CNOB. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CNOB's 0.74x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PGC scores 8/9 vs CNOB's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricPGC logoPGCPeapack-Gladstone…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.CNOB logoCNOBConnectOne Bancor…FULT logoFULTFulton Financial …FIS logoFISFidelity National…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+5.8%+9.5%+5.5%+11.6%+18.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+0.5%+1.1%+0.6%+1.2%+7.5%
ROICReturn on invested capital+4.6%+7.9%+3.5%+7.5%+6.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+4.8%+2.4%+1.5%+9.5%+6.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–987466
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.40x0.17x0.74x0.37x0.29x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$251M$142M$1.1B$1.0B$3.4B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$9M$185M$92M$271M$599M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$260M$327M$1.2B$1.3B$4.0B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.32x1.05x0.39x0.84x21.16x
Evenly matched — NBTB and FIS each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

PGC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in FULT five years ago would be worth $16,107 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,267 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, PGC leads with a +64.7% total return vs FIS's -49.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CNOB at 29.0% vs FIS's -6.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricPGC logoPGCPeapack-Gladstone…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.CNOB logoCNOBConnectOne Bancor…FULT logoFULTFulton Financial …FIS logoFISFidelity National…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+66.8%+17.6%+26.9%+21.0%-38.9%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+64.7%+18.3%+45.1%+37.8%-49.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+61.5%+48.5%+114.8%+96.0%-18.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+46.6%+44.4%+32.8%+61.1%-67.3%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+155.7%+108.5%+139.7%+114.2%-25.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+17.3%+14.1%+29.0%+25.1%-6.8%
PGC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — NBTB and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

FIS is the less volatile stock with a 0.61 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CNOB's 1.02 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NBTB currently trades 99.8% from its 52-week high vs FIS's 47.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricPGC logoPGCPeapack-Gladstone…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.CNOB logoCNOBConnectOne Bancor…FULT logoFULTFulton Financial …FIS logoFISFidelity National…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.89x0.76x1.02x0.99x0.61x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$46.57$48.27$32.87$23.48$82.74
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$24.42$39.20$21.79$16.60$37.91
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+99.3%+99.8%+99.7%+99.5%+47.4%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10070.263.169.968.130.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded116K266K328K1.7M5.6M
Evenly matched — NBTB and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — NBTB and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: PGC as "Buy", NBTB as "Hold", CNOB as "Buy", FULT as "Hold", FIS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 60.4% upside for FIS (target: $63) vs -4.5% for NBTB (target: $46). For income investors, FIS offers the higher dividend yield at 4.16% vs PGC's 0.43%.

MetricPGC logoPGCPeapack-Gladstone…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.CNOB logoCNOBConnectOne Bancor…FULT logoFULTFulton Financial …FIS logoFISFidelity National…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldBuyHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$49.00$46.00$34.00$23.50$62.88
# AnalystsCovering analysts710112037
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.4%+3.0%+1.9%+3.3%+4.2%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises013751
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.20$1.43$0.63$0.77$1.63
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.7%+0.4%+0.1%+1.5%+7.0%
Evenly matched — NBTB and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

FIS leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). PGC leads in 1 (Total Returns). 4 tied.

Best OverallPeapack-Gladstone Financial… (PGC)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

PGC vs NBTB vs CNOB vs FULT vs FIS: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is PGC or NBTB or CNOB or FULT or FIS a better buy right now?

For growth investors, ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc.

(CNOB) is the stronger pick with 13. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 0% for Fulton Financial Corporation (FULT). Fulton Financial Corporation (FULT) offers the better valuation at 11. 2x trailing P/E (11. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation (PGC) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — PGC or NBTB or CNOB or FULT or FIS?

On trailing P/E, Fulton Financial Corporation (FULT) is the cheapest at 11.

2x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 52. 3x. On forward P/E, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. wins at 0. 26x versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 1. 64x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — PGC or NBTB or CNOB or FULT or FIS?

Over the past 5 years, Fulton Financial Corporation (FULT) delivered a total return of +61.

1%, compared to -67. 3% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PGC returned +155. 7% versus FIS's -25. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — PGC or NBTB or CNOB or FULT or FIS?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.

(FIS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 61β versus ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc. 's 1. 02β — meaning CNOB is approximately 68% more volatile than FIS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 74% for ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — PGC or NBTB or CNOB or FULT or FIS?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc.

(CNOB) is pulling ahead at 13. 4% versus 5. 0% for Fulton Financial Corporation (FULT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Fulton Financial Corporation grew EPS 32. 5% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — PGC or NBTB or CNOB or FULT or FIS?

Fulton Financial Corporation (FULT) is the more profitable company, earning 20.

7% net margin versus 3. 6% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FULT leads at 25. 7% versus 11. 9% for PGC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is PGC or NBTB or CNOB or FULT or FIS more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 26x versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 1. 64x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) trades at 6. 2x forward P/E versus 12. 5x for Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation — 6. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 60. 4% to $62. 88.

08

Which pays a better dividend — PGC or NBTB or CNOB or FULT or FIS?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) offers the highest yield at 4. 2%, versus 0. 4% for Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation (PGC).

09

Is PGC or NBTB or CNOB or FULT or FIS better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.

(FIS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 61), 4. 2% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FIS: -25. 6%, PGC: +155. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between PGC and NBTB and CNOB and FULT and FIS?

These companies operate in different sectors (PGC (Financial Services) and NBTB (Financial Services) and CNOB (Financial Services) and FULT (Financial Services) and FIS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: PGC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; CNOB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FULT is a small-cap deep-value stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. NBTB, CNOB, FULT, FIS pay a dividend while PGC does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.