Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
PGEN vs SNDX vs FATE vs IMVT vs KYMR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
PGEN vs SNDX vs FATE vs IMVT vs KYMR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $1.22B | $1.81B | $280M | $5.53B | $6.91B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6M | $217M | $7M | $0.00 | $51M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-247M | $-243M | $-136M | $-464M | $-315M |
| Gross Margin | 23.0% | 98.0% | — | — | 33.2% |
| Operating Margin | -18.6% | -102.9% | -22.2% | — | -7.0% |
| Total Debt | $6M | $346M | $78M | $98K | $82M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $30M | $135M | $47M | $714M | $357M |
PGEN vs SNDX vs FATE vs IMVT vs KYMR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Precigen, Inc. (PGEN) | 100 | 68.6 | -31.4% |
| Syndax Pharmaceutic… (SNDX) | 100 | 125.9 | +25.9% |
| Fate Therapeutics, … (FATE) | 100 | 6.7 | -93.3% |
| Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) | 100 | 80.2 | -19.8% |
| Kymera Therapeutics… (KYMR) | 100 | 265.3 | +165.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PGEN vs SNDX vs FATE vs IMVT vs KYMR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PGEN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +207.4% vs IMVT's +96.1%
SNDX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.81
- Rev growth 6.3%, EPS growth 11.8%
- 6.3% revenue growth vs FATE's -51.2%
- Beta 0.81 vs FATE's 2.17
Among these 5 stocks, FATE doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
IMVT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 173.6% 10Y total return vs KYMR's 154.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.37, Low D/E 0.0%, current ratio 11.16x
- 3.2% margin vs PGEN's -39.1%
KYMR is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 1.15, current ratio 10.47x
- -22.3% ROA vs PGEN's -144.1%, ROIC -24.9% vs -152.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.3% revenue growth vs FATE's -51.2% | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.2% margin vs PGEN's -39.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.81 vs FATE's 2.17 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +207.4% vs IMVT's +96.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -22.3% ROA vs PGEN's -144.1%, ROIC -24.9% vs -152.8% |
PGEN vs SNDX vs FATE vs IMVT vs KYMR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
PGEN vs SNDX vs FATE vs IMVT vs KYMR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SNDX leads in 1 of 6 categories
KYMR leads 1 • PGEN leads 1 • FATE leads 0 • IMVT leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SNDX leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SNDX and IMVT operate at a comparable scale, with $217M and $0 in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -112.0% (SNDX) to -39.1% (PGEN). On growth, SNDX holds the edge at +2.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6M | $217M | $7M | $0 | $51M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$115M | -$218M | -$148M | -$487M | -$352M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$247M | -$243M | -$136M | -$464M | -$315M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$76M | -$278M | -$88M | -$423M | -$244M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +23.0% | +98.0% | — | — | +33.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -18.6% | -102.9% | -22.2% | — | -7.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -39.1% | -112.0% | -20.5% | — | -6.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -12.0% | -128.2% | -13.2% | — | -4.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.1% | +2.2% | -26.4% | — | +55.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -11.7% | +100.0% | +38.6% | +19.7% | +13.4% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — SNDX and FATE and KYMR each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.2B | $1.8B | $280M | $5.5B | $6.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.2B | $2.0B | $312M | $4.8B | $6.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -8.83x | -6.24x | -2.11x | -9.97x | -22.93x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 309.66x | 10.51x | 42.18x | — | 176.26x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 28.85x | 27.53x | 1.39x | 5.83x | 4.52x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
KYMR leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KYMR delivers a -25.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-25 in annual profit, vs $-6 for PGEN. IMVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SNDX's 5.36x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KYMR scores 4/9 vs IMVT's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -5.9% | -2.6% | -65.8% | -47.1% | -25.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -144.1% | -45.2% | -42.7% | -44.1% | -22.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -152.8% | -54.2% | -36.5% | — | -24.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -107.2% | -53.0% | -43.1% | -66.1% | -27.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.14x | 5.36x | 0.38x | 0.00x | 0.05x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$24M | $212M | $31M | -$714M | -$275M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $30M | $135M | $47M | $714M | $357M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6M | $346M | $78M | $98,000 | $82M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -273.83x | -2.31x | — | — | -2119.53x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PGEN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KYMR five years ago would be worth $19,212 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $318 for FATE. Over the past 12 months, PGEN leads with a +207.4% total return vs IMVT's +96.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PGEN at 49.2% vs FATE's -23.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -3.0% | -3.6% | +145.5% | +5.1% | +16.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +207.4% | +105.6% | +143.0% | +96.1% | +190.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +232.0% | +1.2% | -55.4% | +40.9% | +205.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -36.5% | +28.1% | -96.8% | +62.4% | +92.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -84.6% | +43.4% | +40.5% | +173.6% | +154.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +49.2% | +0.4% | -23.6% | +12.1% | +45.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SNDX and FATE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SNDX is the less volatile stock with a 0.81 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FATE's 2.17 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FATE currently trades 98.6% from its 52-week high vs PGEN's 79.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.44x | 0.81x | 2.17x | 1.37x | 1.15x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.23 | $25.58 | $2.46 | $30.09 | $103.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.23 | $8.58 | $0.91 | $13.36 | $28.06 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +79.3% | +80.3% | +98.6% | +90.5% | +82.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.7 | 41.3 | 81.0 | 60.2 | 54.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.3M | 1.5M | 1.9M | 1.4M | 602K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PGEN as "Buy", SNDX as "Buy", FATE as "Buy", IMVT as "Buy", KYMR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 1525.5% upside for FATE (target: $40) vs 38.3% for KYMR (target: $117).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $6.00 | $40.00 | $39.50 | $45.50 | $117.06 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 16 | 22 | 31 | 23 | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
SNDX leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). KYMR leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
PGEN vs SNDX vs FATE vs IMVT vs KYMR: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PGEN or SNDX or FATE or IMVT or KYMR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Syndax Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(SNDX) is the stronger pick with 627. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -51. 2% for Fate Therapeutics, Inc. (FATE). Analysts rate Precigen, Inc. (PGEN) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — PGEN or SNDX or FATE or IMVT or KYMR?
Over the past 5 years, Kymera Therapeutics, Inc.
(KYMR) delivered a total return of +92. 1%, compared to -96. 8% for Fate Therapeutics, Inc. (FATE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IMVT returned +173. 6% versus PGEN's -84. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — PGEN or SNDX or FATE or IMVT or KYMR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Syndax Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(SNDX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 81β versus Fate Therapeutics, Inc. 's 2. 17β — meaning FATE is approximately 169% more volatile than SNDX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 5% for Syndax Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — PGEN or SNDX or FATE or IMVT or KYMR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Syndax Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(SNDX) is pulling ahead at 627. 8% versus -51. 2% for Fate Therapeutics, Inc. (FATE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Fate Therapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 29. 9% year-over-year, compared to -45. 2% for Immunovant, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, KYMR leads at -5. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — PGEN or SNDX or FATE or IMVT or KYMR?
Immunovant, Inc.
(IMVT) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -32. 2% for Precigen, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IMVT leads at 0. 0% versus -34. 4% for PGEN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KYMR leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — PGEN or SNDX or FATE or IMVT or KYMR?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is PGEN or SNDX or FATE or IMVT or KYMR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Syndax Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(SNDX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 81)). Fate Therapeutics, Inc. (FATE) carries a higher beta of 2. 17 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SNDX: +43. 4%, FATE: +40. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between PGEN and SNDX and FATE and IMVT and KYMR?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PGEN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SNDX is a small-cap high-growth stock; FATE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IMVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KYMR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.