Software - Application
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
PHUN vs XTIA vs JOBY vs APPS vs ACHR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Aerospace & Defense
Airlines, Airports & Air Services
Software - Application
Aerospace & Defense
PHUN vs XTIA vs JOBY vs APPS vs ACHR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Aerospace & Defense | Airlines, Airports & Air Services | Software - Application | Aerospace & Defense |
| Market Cap | $41M | $411K | $9.83B | $477M | $4.67B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2M | $5M | $78M | $532M | $300K |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-12M | $-61M | $-957M | $-42M | $-618M |
| Gross Margin | 41.3% | 53.5% | 11.2% | 60.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | -7.4% | -9.5% | -10.2% | 0.1% | -2431.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | 10.2x | — |
| Total Debt | $932K | $3M | $61M | $418M | $42M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $113M | $4M | $241M | $40M | $1.02B |
PHUN vs XTIA vs JOBY vs APPS vs ACHR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Phunware, Inc. (PHUN) | 100 | 3.2 | -96.8% |
| XTI Aerospace, Inc. (XTIA) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| Joby Aviation, Inc. (JOBY) | 100 | 94.0 | -6.0% |
| Digital Turbine, In… (APPS) | 100 | 7.1 | -92.9% |
| Archer Aviation Inc. (ACHR) | 100 | 64.4 | -35.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PHUN vs XTIA vs JOBY vs APPS vs ACHR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PHUN is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 2.37, Low D/E 0.9%, current ratio 17.63x
XTIA ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.07
- Beta 1.07 vs ACHR's 2.96
JOBY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and defensive.
- -4.8% 10Y total return vs APPS's 353.4%
- Beta 2.70, current ratio 24.09x
- 391.8% revenue growth vs PHUN's -34.0%
- +55.7% vs PHUN's -29.4%
APPS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth -9.9%, EPS growth 78.6%, 3Y rev CAGR -13.1%
- -7.9% margin vs ACHR's -2.1K%
- -4.9% ROA vs XTIA's -127.3%, ROIC -7.4% vs -177.5%
Among these 5 stocks, ACHR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 391.8% revenue growth vs PHUN's -34.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | -7.9% margin vs ACHR's -2.1K% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.07 vs ACHR's 2.96 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +55.7% vs PHUN's -29.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -4.9% ROA vs XTIA's -127.3%, ROIC -7.4% vs -177.5% |
PHUN vs XTIA vs JOBY vs APPS vs ACHR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
PHUN vs XTIA vs JOBY vs APPS vs ACHR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
APPS leads in 2 of 6 categories
XTIA leads 1 • PHUN leads 0 • JOBY leads 0 • ACHR leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
APPS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
APPS is the larger business by revenue, generating $532M annually — 1774.7x ACHR's $300,000. APPS is the more profitable business, keeping -7.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ACHR's -2060.7%. On growth, XTIA holds the edge at +170.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2M | $5M | $78M | $532M | $300,000 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$17M | -$43M | -$759M | $70M | -$709M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$12M | -$61M | -$957M | -$42M | -$618M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$12M | -$39M | -$661M | $19M | -$512M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +41.3% | +53.5% | +11.2% | +60.1% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -7.4% | -9.5% | -10.2% | +0.1% | -2431.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -5.1% | -13.3% | -12.3% | -7.9% | -2060.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -5.1% | -8.4% | -8.5% | +3.5% | -1705.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.5% | +170.6% | — | +12.4% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +52.0% | +98.2% | -9.1% | +113.6% | +43.5% |
Valuation Metrics
XTIA leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $41M | $411,219 | $9.8B | $477M | $4.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$71M | -$621,781 | $9.6B | $855M | $3.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.15x | -0.01x | -8.85x | -4.48x | -6.34x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 10.23x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 29.66x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 12.79x | 0.13x | 183.94x | 0.97x | 9999.00x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.21x | 0.06x | 5.86x | 2.69x | 1.78x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
APPS leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PHUN delivers a -11.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-12 in annual profit, vs $-5 for XTIA. PHUN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to APPS's 2.72x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ACHR scores 5/9 vs JOBY's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -11.6% | -5.0% | -74.2% | -21.5% | -37.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -10.8% | -127.3% | -52.1% | -4.9% | -32.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -177.5% | -54.7% | -7.4% | -89.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -28.2% | -5.4% | -49.8% | -8.9% | -44.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.47x | 0.04x | 2.72x | 0.02x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$112M | -$1M | -$180M | $378M | -$979M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $113M | $4M | $241M | $40M | $1.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $932,000 | $3M | $61M | $418M | $42M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -196.80x | -74.17x | — | -1.83x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — JOBY and ACHR each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JOBY five years ago would be worth $10,096 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for XTIA. Over the past 12 months, JOBY leads with a +55.7% total return vs PHUN's -29.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ACHR at 43.2% vs XTIA's -93.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +9.2% | +26.6% | -30.4% | -16.5% | -22.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -29.4% | +40.3% | +55.7% | +10.5% | -26.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.4% | -100.0% | +128.7% | -66.5% | +193.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.0% | -100.0% | +1.0% | -93.9% | -36.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.6% | -100.0% | -4.8% | +353.4% | -37.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -59.5% | -93.8% | +31.8% | -30.6% | +43.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PHUN and XTIA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
XTIA is the less volatile stock with a 1.07 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ACHR's 2.96 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PHUN currently trades 52.1% from its 52-week high vs XTIA's 24.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.28x | 1.03x | 2.84x | 1.61x | 2.95x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.88 | $7.43 | $20.95 | $8.28 | $14.62 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.56 | $1.22 | $6.32 | $2.74 | $4.80 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +52.1% | +24.4% | +47.7% | +48.2% | +43.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.6 | 40.9 | 65.5 | 62.9 | 61.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 140K | 2.1M | 24.7M | 2.1M | 27.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: JOBY as "Hold", APPS as "Hold", ACHR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 714.5% upside for APPS (target: $33) vs 59.1% for JOBY (target: $16).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $15.90 | $32.50 | $12.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 8 | 11 | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
APPS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). XTIA leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
PHUN vs XTIA vs JOBY vs APPS vs ACHR: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PHUN or XTIA or JOBY or APPS or ACHR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Joby Aviation, Inc.
(JOBY) is the stronger pick with 391. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -34. 0% for Phunware, Inc. (PHUN). Analysts rate Archer Aviation Inc. (ACHR) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — PHUN or XTIA or JOBY or APPS or ACHR?
Over the past 5 years, Joby Aviation, Inc.
(JOBY) delivered a total return of +1. 0%, compared to -100. 0% for XTI Aerospace, Inc. (XTIA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: APPS returned +359. 1% versus XTIA's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — PHUN or XTIA or JOBY or APPS or ACHR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), XTI Aerospace, Inc.
(XTIA) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 03β versus Archer Aviation Inc. 's 2. 95β — meaning ACHR is approximately 186% more volatile than XTIA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Phunware, Inc. (PHUN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 3% for Digital Turbine, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — PHUN or XTIA or JOBY or APPS or ACHR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Joby Aviation, Inc.
(JOBY) is pulling ahead at 391. 8% versus -34. 0% for Phunware, Inc. (PHUN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Phunware, Inc. grew EPS 95. 8% year-over-year, compared to -29. 9% for Joby Aviation, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, APPS leads at -13. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — PHUN or XTIA or JOBY or APPS or ACHR?
Digital Turbine, Inc.
(APPS) is the more profitable company, earning -18. 8% net margin versus -2060. 7% for Archer Aviation Inc. — meaning it keeps -18. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: APPS leads at -11. 0% versus -2431. 0% for ACHR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — XTIA leads at 59. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is PHUN or XTIA or JOBY or APPS or ACHR more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for APPS: 714.
5% to $32. 50.
07Which pays a better dividend — PHUN or XTIA or JOBY or APPS or ACHR?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is PHUN or XTIA or JOBY or APPS or ACHR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, XTI Aerospace, Inc.
(XTIA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 03)). Phunware, Inc. (PHUN) carries a higher beta of 2. 28 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (XTIA: -100. 0%, PHUN: -99. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between PHUN and XTIA and JOBY and APPS and ACHR?
These companies operate in different sectors (PHUN (Technology) and XTIA (Industrials) and JOBY (Industrials) and APPS (Technology) and ACHR (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: PHUN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; XTIA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JOBY is a small-cap high-growth stock; APPS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ACHR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.