Auto - Recreational Vehicles
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
PII vs GM vs F vs HMC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Auto - Manufacturers
Auto - Manufacturers
Auto - Manufacturers
PII vs GM vs F vs HMC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Recreational Vehicles | Auto - Manufacturers | Auto - Manufacturers | Auto - Manufacturers |
| Market Cap | $3.80B | $70.70B | $47.73B | $31.22B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $7.27B | $184.62B | $189.86B | $21.34T |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-446M | $2.54B | $-6.11B | $496.01B |
| Gross Margin | 19.6% | 6.1% | 9.2% | 20.6% |
| Operating Margin | -0.5% | 1.3% | 1.8% | 3.1% |
| Forward P/E | 37.3x | 6.2x | 7.7x | 7.0x |
| Total Debt | $1.54B | $130.28B | $167.57B | $4.42T |
| Cash & Equiv. | $138M | $20.95B | $23.36B | $4.53T |
PII vs GM vs F vs HMC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Polaris Inc. (PII) | 100 | 76.8 | -23.2% |
| General Motors Comp… (GM) | 100 | 303.0 | +203.0% |
| Ford Motor Company (F) | 100 | 213.3 | +113.3% |
| Honda Motor Co., Lt… (HMC) | 100 | 92.4 | -7.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PII vs GM vs F vs HMC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PII is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +107.0% vs HMC's -16.5%
GM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 180.2% 10Y total return vs F's 36.2%
- Lower P/E (6.2x vs 7.0x)
F is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 6.2% yield, vs PII's 3.9%
HMC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.96, yield 5.9%
- Rev growth 6.2%, EPS growth -20.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 14.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.96, Low D/E 35.0%, current ratio 1.36x
- Beta 0.96, yield 5.9%, current ratio 1.36x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.2% revenue growth vs GM's -1.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.2x vs 7.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 2.3% margin vs PII's -6.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.96 vs PII's 1.56, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 6.2% yield, vs PII's 3.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +107.0% vs HMC's -16.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.5% ROA vs PII's -8.6%, ROIC 5.9% vs -0.8% |
PII vs GM vs F vs HMC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
PII vs GM vs F vs HMC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HMC leads in 3 of 6 categories
GM leads 1 • PII leads 0 • F leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HMC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HMC is the larger business by revenue, generating $21.34T annually — 2932.8x PII's $7.3B. HMC is the more profitable business, keeping 2.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PII's -6.1%. On growth, PII holds the edge at +8.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $7.3B | $184.6B | $189.9B | $21.34T |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $178M | $15.5B | $10.0B | $1.52T |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$446M | $2.5B | -$6.1B | $496.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $161M | $12.5B | $11.9B | $11.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +19.6% | +6.1% | +9.2% | +20.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -0.5% | +1.3% | +1.8% | +3.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -6.1% | +1.4% | -3.2% | +2.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.2% | +6.8% | +6.3% | +0.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.0% | -0.9% | +6.4% | -3.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +29.1% | -15.2% | +4.3% | -40.0% |
Valuation Metrics
HMC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.0x trailing earnings, HMC trades at a 71% valuation discount to GM's 24.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, HMC's 2.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than F's 22.5x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.8B | $70.7B | $47.7B | $31.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.2B | $180.0B | $191.9B | $30.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -8.20x | 23.98x | -5.91x | 7.01x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 37.25x | 6.22x | 7.72x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.45x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 20.20x | 10.29x | 22.51x | 2.44x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.53x | 0.38x | 0.25x | 0.23x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.54x | 1.21x | 1.35x | 0.46x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 6.81x | 6.38x | 3.83x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
HMC leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HMC delivers a 3.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $4 in annual profit, vs $-45 for PII. HMC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.35x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to F's 4.66x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GM scores 6/9 vs F's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -45.2% | +3.8% | -14.7% | +3.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -8.6% | +0.9% | -2.1% | +1.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.8% | +1.3% | +1.0% | +5.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -1.0% | +1.6% | +1.4% | +5.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 3 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.83x | 2.06x | 4.66x | 0.35x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.4B | $109.3B | $144.2B | -$106.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $138M | $20.9B | $23.4B | $4.53T |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.5B | $130.3B | $167.6B | $4.42T |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -3.26x | 2.60x | 0.93x | 13.59x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GM five years ago would be worth $13,592 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,543 for PII. Over the past 12 months, PII leads with a +107.0% total return vs HMC's -16.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GM at 33.4% vs PII's -10.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.9% | -3.0% | -7.6% | -17.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +107.0% | +73.8% | +24.3% | -16.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -29.0% | +137.4% | +17.8% | +4.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -44.6% | +35.9% | +32.9% | -3.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +4.3% | +180.2% | +36.2% | +25.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -10.8% | +33.4% | +5.6% | +1.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GM and HMC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HMC is the less volatile stock with a 0.96 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PII's 1.56 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GM currently trades 89.5% from its 52-week high vs HMC's 69.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.56x | 1.07x | 0.97x | 0.96x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $75.25 | $87.62 | $14.80 | $34.89 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $33.23 | $44.97 | $9.88 | $23.25 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +89.1% | +89.5% | +82.3% | +69.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.2 | 55.4 | 49.3 | 50.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.3M | 6.7M | 42.5M | 1.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — PII and F each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PII as "Hold", GM as "Buy", F as "Hold", HMC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 31.0% upside for HMC (target: $32) vs 2.5% for PII (target: $69). For income investors, F offers the higher dividend yield at 6.17% vs GM's 0.86%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $68.75 | $91.75 | $13.96 | $31.51 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 27 | 51 | 46 | 18 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.9% | +0.9% | +6.2% | +5.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 29 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.64 | $0.68 | $0.75 | $223.36 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +8.5% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
HMC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). GM leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
PII vs GM vs F vs HMC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PII or GM or F or HMC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Honda Motor Co.
, Ltd. (HMC) is the stronger pick with 6. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 3% for General Motors Company (GM). Honda Motor Co. , Ltd. (HMC) offers the better valuation at 7. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate General Motors Company (GM) a "Buy" — based on 51 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PII or GM or F or HMC?
On trailing P/E, Honda Motor Co.
, Ltd. (HMC) is the cheapest at 7. 0x versus General Motors Company at 24. 0x. On forward P/E, General Motors Company is actually cheaper at 6. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PII or GM or F or HMC?
Over the past 5 years, General Motors Company (GM) delivered a total return of +35.
9%, compared to -44. 6% for Polaris Inc. (PII). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GM returned +180. 2% versus PII's +4. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PII or GM or F or HMC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Honda Motor Co.
, Ltd. (HMC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 96β versus Polaris Inc. 's 1. 56β — meaning PII is approximately 62% more volatile than HMC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Honda Motor Co. , Ltd. (HMC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 35% versus 5% for Ford Motor Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PII or GM or F or HMC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Honda Motor Co.
, Ltd. (HMC) is pulling ahead at 6. 2% versus -1. 3% for General Motors Company (GM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Honda Motor Co. , Ltd. grew EPS -20. 8% year-over-year, compared to -519. 5% for Polaris Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HMC leads at 14. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PII or GM or F or HMC?
Honda Motor Co.
, Ltd. (HMC) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 9% net margin versus -6. 5% for Polaris Inc. — meaning it keeps 3. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HMC leads at 5. 6% versus -0. 4% for PII. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HMC leads at 21. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PII or GM or F or HMC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, General Motors Company (GM) trades at 6.
2x forward P/E versus 37. 3x for Polaris Inc. — 31. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HMC: 31. 0% to $31. 51.
08Which pays a better dividend — PII or GM or F or HMC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Ford Motor Company (F) offers the highest yield at 6. 2%, versus 0. 9% for General Motors Company (GM).
09Is PII or GM or F or HMC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, General Motors Company (GM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
07), 0. 9% yield, +180. 2% 10Y return). Polaris Inc. (PII) carries a higher beta of 1. 56 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GM: +180. 2%, PII: +4. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PII and GM and F and HMC?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PII is a small-cap income-oriented stock; GM is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; F is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; HMC is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.