REIT - Retail
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
PINE vs FCPT vs NNN vs ADC vs O
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Retail
REIT - Retail
REIT - Retail
REIT - Retail
PINE vs FCPT vs NNN vs ADC vs O — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Retail | REIT - Retail | REIT - Retail | REIT - Retail | REIT - Retail |
| Market Cap | $277M | $2.76B | $8.44B | $9.15B | $57.74B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $65M | $301M | $936M | $750M | $5.92B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-415K | $117M | $387M | $220M | $1.12B |
| Gross Margin | -4.1% | 98.0% | 81.4% | 87.6% | 68.6% |
| Operating Margin | 28.0% | 56.0% | 63.3% | 48.0% | 29.3% |
| Forward P/E | 58.5x | 21.6x | 21.7x | 38.9x | 37.6x |
| Total Debt | $394M | $1.21B | $4.82B | $3.35B | $32.85B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5M | $12M | $5M | $16M | $435M |
PINE vs FCPT vs NNN vs ADC vs O — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alpine Income Prope… (PINE) | 100 | 156.5 | +56.5% |
| Four Corners Proper… (FCPT) | 100 | 116.4 | +16.4% |
| NNN REIT, Inc. (NNN) | 100 | 141.3 | +41.3% |
| Agree Realty Corpor… (ADC) | 100 | 121.4 | +21.4% |
| Realty Income Corpo… (O) | 100 | 115.6 | +15.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PINE vs FCPT vs NNN vs ADC vs O
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PINE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +36.4% vs FCPT's -3.5%
FCPT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for dividends.
- 5.6% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs O's 5.2%
NNN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.
- Lower P/E (21.7x vs 37.6x), PEG 1.94 vs 72.19
- 41.4% margin vs PINE's -0.6%
- 4.1% ROA vs PINE's -0.1%, ROIC 4.8% vs 2.2%
ADC is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 16.4%, EPS growth -0.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 18.7%
- 135.3% 10Y total return vs O's 45.3%
- 16.4% FFO/revenue growth vs NNN's 6.6%
O is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 14 yrs, beta 0.11, yield 5.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.11, Low D/E 81.9%, current ratio 0.51x
- Beta 0.11, yield 5.2%, current ratio 0.51x
- Beta 0.11 vs PINE's 0.31, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 16.4% FFO/revenue growth vs NNN's 6.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (21.7x vs 37.6x), PEG 1.94 vs 72.19 | |
| Quality / Margins | 41.4% margin vs PINE's -0.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.11 vs PINE's 0.31, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 5.6% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs O's 5.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +36.4% vs FCPT's -3.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.1% ROA vs PINE's -0.1%, ROIC 4.8% vs 2.2% |
PINE vs FCPT vs NNN vs ADC vs O — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
PINE vs FCPT vs NNN vs ADC vs O — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PINE leads in 2 of 6 categories
NNN leads 1 • FCPT leads 0 • ADC leads 0 • O leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — PINE and NNN each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
O is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.9B annually — 91.4x PINE's $65M. NNN is the more profitable business, keeping 41.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PINE's -0.6%. On growth, PINE holds the edge at +29.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $65M | $301M | $936M | $750M | $5.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $45M | $231M | $867M | $638M | $4.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$415,000 | $117M | $387M | $220M | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$46M | $188M | $464M | $110M | $4.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -4.1% | +98.0% | +81.4% | +87.6% | +68.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +28.0% | +56.0% | +63.3% | +48.0% | +29.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -0.6% | +38.7% | +41.4% | +29.3% | +18.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -71.7% | +62.5% | +49.6% | +14.7% | +68.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +29.6% | +9.4% | +4.1% | +18.7% | +12.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +185.7% | +7.7% | -2.0% | +19.0% | +17.9% |
Valuation Metrics
PINE leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 21.4x trailing earnings, NNN trades at a 60% valuation discount to O's 52.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NNN offers better value at 1.92x vs FCPT's 116.82x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $277M | $2.8B | $8.4B | $9.2B | $57.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $667M | $4.0B | $13.3B | $12.5B | $90.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -88.00x | 23.09x | 21.43x | 43.06x | 52.92x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 58.47x | 21.55x | 21.68x | 38.89x | 37.60x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 116.82x | 1.92x | 113.54x | 72.19x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.54x | 17.66x | 15.81x | 20.28x | 21.99x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.58x | 9.39x | 9.11x | 12.74x | 10.04x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.00x | 1.59x | 1.89x | 1.35x | 1.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 14.37x | 12.65x | 18.16x | 14.45x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NNN leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NNN delivers a 8.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $-0 for PINE. ADC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.53x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PINE's 1.31x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FCPT scores 7/9 vs PINE's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -0.1% | +7.4% | +8.8% | +3.7% | +2.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.1% | +4.1% | +4.1% | +2.3% | +1.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.2% | +4.5% | +4.8% | +2.8% | +1.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.8% | +6.0% | +6.4% | +3.8% | +2.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 7 | 4 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.31x | 0.74x | 1.09x | 0.53x | 0.82x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $390M | $1.2B | $4.8B | $3.3B | $32.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5M | $12M | $5M | $16M | $435M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $394M | $1.2B | $4.8B | $3.4B | $32.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.82x | 3.17x | 2.93x | 2.54x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PINE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PINE five years ago would be worth $13,812 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,621 for FCPT. Over the past 12 months, PINE leads with a +36.4% total return vs FCPT's -3.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PINE at 13.1% vs FCPT's 4.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +17.1% | +9.9% | +15.3% | +7.1% | +9.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +36.4% | -3.5% | +12.8% | +5.8% | +15.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +44.8% | +12.8% | +14.8% | +26.0% | +13.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +38.1% | +16.2% | +17.8% | +29.2% | +18.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +36.8% | +97.5% | +37.5% | +135.3% | +45.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +13.1% | +4.1% | +4.7% | +8.0% | +4.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NNN and ADC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ADC is the less volatile stock with a -0.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PINE's 0.31 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NNN currently trades 96.4% from its 52-week high vs FCPT's 89.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.31x | 0.15x | 0.16x | -0.12x | 0.11x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $20.80 | $28.11 | $46.03 | $82.08 | $67.94 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $13.10 | $22.78 | $38.90 | $69.56 | $54.38 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.1% | +89.5% | +96.4% | +92.9% | +91.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.1 | 56.6 | 55.9 | 45.9 | 40.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 175K | 653K | 1.5M | 1.1M | 5.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FCPT and O each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PINE as "Buy", FCPT as "Hold", NNN as "Hold", ADC as "Buy", O as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 9.6% upside for ADC (target: $84) vs 3.8% for NNN (target: $46). For income investors, FCPT offers the higher dividend yield at 5.56% vs PINE's 0.18%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $20.75 | $27.00 | $46.06 | $83.50 | $66.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 15 | 29 | 32 | 34 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.2% | +5.6% | +5.3% | +4.0% | +5.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 8 | 9 | 3 | 14 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.04 | $1.40 | $2.36 | $3.06 | $3.23 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.0% | 0.0% |
PINE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). NNN leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
PINE vs FCPT vs NNN vs ADC vs O: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PINE or FCPT or NNN or ADC or O a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Agree Realty Corporation (ADC) is the stronger pick with 16.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 6% for NNN REIT, Inc. (NNN). NNN REIT, Inc. (NNN) offers the better valuation at 21. 4x trailing P/E (21. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. (PINE) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PINE or FCPT or NNN or ADC or O?
On trailing P/E, NNN REIT, Inc.
(NNN) is the cheapest at 21. 4x versus Realty Income Corporation at 52. 9x. On forward P/E, Four Corners Property Trust, Inc. is actually cheaper at 21. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: NNN REIT, Inc. wins at 1. 94x versus Four Corners Property Trust, Inc. 's 116. 82x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PINE or FCPT or NNN or ADC or O?
Over the past 5 years, Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc.
(PINE) delivered a total return of +38. 1%, compared to +16. 2% for Four Corners Property Trust, Inc. (FCPT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ADC returned +135. 3% versus PINE's +36. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PINE or FCPT or NNN or ADC or O?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Agree Realty Corporation (ADC) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
12β versus Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. 's 0. 31β — meaning PINE is approximately -367% more volatile than ADC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Agree Realty Corporation (ADC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 53% versus 131% for Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PINE or FCPT or NNN or ADC or O?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Agree Realty Corporation (ADC) is pulling ahead at 16.
4% versus 6. 6% for NNN REIT, Inc. (NNN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Realty Income Corporation grew EPS 19. 4% year-over-year, compared to -257. 1% for Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, O leads at 19. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PINE or FCPT or NNN or ADC or O?
NNN REIT, Inc.
(NNN) is the more profitable company, earning 42. 1% net margin versus -4. 4% for Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. — meaning it keeps 42. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NNN leads at 61. 5% versus 28. 3% for O. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FCPT leads at 95. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PINE or FCPT or NNN or ADC or O more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, NNN REIT, Inc. (NNN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 94x versus Four Corners Property Trust, Inc. 's 116. 82x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Four Corners Property Trust, Inc. (FCPT) trades at 21. 6x forward P/E versus 58. 5x for Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. — 36. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ADC: 9. 6% to $83. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — PINE or FCPT or NNN or ADC or O?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Four Corners Property Trust, Inc. (FCPT) offers the highest yield at 5. 6%, versus 0. 2% for Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. (PINE).
09Is PINE or FCPT or NNN or ADC or O better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Agree Realty Corporation (ADC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
12), 4. 0% yield, +135. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ADC: +135. 3%, PINE: +36. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PINE and FCPT and NNN and ADC and O?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PINE is a small-cap high-growth stock; FCPT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; NNN is a small-cap income-oriented stock; ADC is a small-cap high-growth stock; O is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. FCPT, NNN, ADC, O pay a dividend while PINE does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.