PINS vs NFLX

For growth investors, Netflix, Inc.

(NFLX) is the stronger pick with 15. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 15. 8% for Pinterest, Inc. (PINS). Pinterest, Inc. (PINS) offers the better valuation at 34. 7x trailing P/E (11. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Pinterest, Inc. (PINS) a "Buy" — based on 47 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Pinterest, Inc.

(PINS) is the cheapest at 34. 7x versus Netflix, Inc. at 34. 9x. On forward P/E, Pinterest, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 6x.

Over the past 5 years, Netflix, Inc.

(NFLX) delivered a total return of +76. 7%, compared to -64. 3% for Pinterest, Inc. (PINS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NFLX returned +872. 1% versus PINS's -13. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Netflix, Inc.

(NFLX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 39β versus Pinterest, Inc. 's 1. 27β — meaning PINS is approximately 225% more volatile than NFLX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Pinterest, Inc. (PINS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 54% for Netflix, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Netflix, Inc.

(NFLX) is pulling ahead at 15. 9% versus 15. 8% for Pinterest, Inc. (PINS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Netflix, Inc. grew EPS 27. 6% year-over-year, compared to -77. 2% for Pinterest, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PINS leads at 14. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Netflix, Inc.

(NFLX) is the more profitable company, earning 24. 3% net margin versus 9. 9% for Pinterest, Inc. — meaning it keeps 24. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NFLX leads at 29. 5% versus 7. 6% for PINS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PINS leads at 80. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Pinterest, Inc.

(PINS) trades at 11. 6x forward P/E versus 24. 8x for Netflix, Inc. — 13. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NFLX: 31. 7% to $116. 29.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Netflix, Inc.

(NFLX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 39), +872. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NFLX: +872. 1%, PINS: -13. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.