Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
PKBK vs NBTB vs CZWI vs ICE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges
PKBK vs NBTB vs CZWI vs ICE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges |
| Market Cap | $383M | $2.52B | $207M | $79.60B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $146M | $902M | $90M | $12.64B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $38M | $169M | $14M | $3.30B |
| Gross Margin | 53.3% | 73.6% | 54.7% | 61.9% |
| Operating Margin | 34.2% | 24.3% | 7.0% | 38.7% |
| Forward P/E | 535.7x | 11.5x | 11.8x | 17.3x |
| Total Debt | $143M | $327M | $52M | $20.28B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $157M | $185M | $119M | $837M |
PKBK vs NBTB vs CZWI vs ICE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parke Bancorp, Inc. (PKBK) | 100 | 237.2 | +137.2% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 156.6 | +56.6% |
| Citizens Community … (CZWI) | 100 | 312.8 | +212.8% |
| Intercontinental Ex… (ICE) | 100 | 153.4 | +53.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PKBK vs NBTB vs CZWI vs ICE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PKBK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 12.9%, EPS growth 39.2%
- 286.6% 10Y total return vs CZWI's 149.0%
- NIM 3.4% vs CZWI's 2.9%
- 12.9% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
NBTB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- Dividend streak 13 yrs, beta 0.76, yield 3.0%
- PEG 1.64 vs CZWI's 2.32
- Lower P/E (11.5x vs 17.3x), PEG 1.64 vs 1.95
- 3.0% yield, 13-year raise streak, vs CZWI's 1.7%
CZWI is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.50, Low D/E 27.6%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.50, yield 1.7%, current ratio 3015.31x
ICE is the clearest fit if your priority is stability.
- Beta 0.35 vs NBTB's 0.76
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.9% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.5x vs 17.3x), PEG 1.64 vs 1.95 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs CZWI's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.35 vs NBTB's 0.76 | |
| Dividends | 3.0% yield, 13-year raise streak, vs CZWI's 1.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +67.1% vs ICE's -20.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs CZWI's 0.5% |
PKBK vs NBTB vs CZWI vs ICE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
PKBK vs NBTB vs CZWI vs ICE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ICE leads in 2 of 6 categories
PKBK leads 2 • NBTB leads 1 • CZWI leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ICE leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ICE is the larger business by revenue, generating $12.6B annually — 140.3x CZWI's $90M. ICE is the more profitable business, keeping 26.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CZWI's 16.0%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $146M | $902M | $90M | $12.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $50M | $241M | $9M | $6.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $38M | $169M | $14M | $3.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $39M | $225M | $11M | $4.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +53.3% | +73.6% | +54.7% | +61.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +34.2% | +24.3% | +7.0% | +38.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +25.9% | +18.8% | +16.0% | +26.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +26.7% | +24.9% | +12.4% | +33.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +52.5% | +39.5% | +63.0% | +23.1% |
Valuation Metrics
PKBK leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.2x trailing earnings, PKBK trades at a 58% valuation discount to ICE's 24.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), PKBK offers better value at 1.72x vs CZWI's 2.90x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $383M | $2.5B | $207M | $79.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $370M | $2.7B | $140M | $99.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 10.17x | 14.47x | 14.70x | 24.36x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 535.67x | 11.54x | 11.79x | 17.34x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.72x | 2.06x | 2.90x | 2.74x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.34x | 11.03x | 15.69x | 15.34x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.62x | 2.90x | 2.29x | 6.30x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.18x | 1.29x | 1.11x | 2.77x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.84x | 11.49x | 19.90x | 18.56x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ICE leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PKBK delivers a 12.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $8 for CZWI. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ICE's 0.70x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ICE scores 9/9 vs CZWI's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.0% | +9.5% | +7.8% | +11.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.7% | +1.1% | +0.8% | +2.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.8% | +7.9% | +2.0% | +7.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.6% | +2.4% | +0.6% | +9.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 9 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.44x | 0.17x | 0.28x | 0.70x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$13M | $142M | -$67M | $19.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $157M | $185M | $119M | $837M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $143M | $327M | $52M | $20.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.75x | 1.05x | 0.16x | 6.53x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PKBK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PKBK five years ago would be worth $17,514 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,085 for ICE. Over the past 12 months, PKBK leads with a +67.1% total return vs ICE's -20.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CZWI at 36.4% vs ICE's 10.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +34.0% | +17.6% | +24.3% | -11.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +67.1% | +18.3% | +52.1% | -20.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +104.0% | +48.5% | +153.7% | +34.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +75.1% | +44.4% | +69.0% | +30.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +286.6% | +108.5% | +149.0% | +195.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +26.8% | +14.1% | +36.4% | +10.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NBTB and ICE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ICE is the less volatile stock with a 0.35 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NBTB's 0.76 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NBTB currently trades 99.8% from its 52-week high vs ICE's 74.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.63x | 0.76x | 0.50x | 0.35x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $32.24 | $48.27 | $22.62 | $189.35 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $18.78 | $39.20 | $12.83 | $136.67 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.7% | +99.8% | +94.9% | +74.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 65.0 | 63.1 | 51.2 | 31.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 90K | 266K | 41K | 3.2M |
Analyst Outlook
NBTB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NBTB as "Hold", CZWI as "Buy", ICE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 38.0% upside for ICE (target: $194) vs -4.5% for NBTB (target: $46). For income investors, NBTB offers the higher dividend yield at 2.96% vs ICE's 1.38%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $46.00 | — | $194.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 10 | 2 | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.2% | +3.0% | +1.7% | +1.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 13 | 6 | 13 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.71 | $1.43 | $0.37 | $1.93 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.7% | +0.4% | +3.0% | +1.7% |
ICE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PKBK leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.
PKBK vs NBTB vs CZWI vs ICE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PKBK or NBTB or CZWI or ICE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Parke Bancorp, Inc.
(PKBK) is the stronger pick with 12. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). Parke Bancorp, Inc. (PKBK) offers the better valuation at 10. 2x trailing P/E (535. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PKBK or NBTB or CZWI or ICE?
On trailing P/E, Parke Bancorp, Inc.
(PKBK) is the cheapest at 10. 2x versus Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. at 24. 4x. On forward P/E, NBT Bancorp Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: NBT Bancorp Inc. wins at 1. 64x versus Parke Bancorp, Inc. 's 90. 45x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PKBK or NBTB or CZWI or ICE?
Over the past 5 years, Parke Bancorp, Inc.
(PKBK) delivered a total return of +75. 1%, compared to +30. 9% for Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PKBK returned +286. 6% versus NBTB's +108. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PKBK or NBTB or CZWI or ICE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
(ICE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 35β versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 0. 76β — meaning NBTB is approximately 116% more volatile than ICE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 70% for Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PKBK or NBTB or CZWI or ICE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Parke Bancorp, Inc.
(PKBK) is pulling ahead at 12. 9% versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Parke Bancorp, Inc. grew EPS 39. 2% year-over-year, compared to 9. 0% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PKBK or NBTB or CZWI or ICE?
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
(ICE) is the more profitable company, earning 26. 1% net margin versus 16. 0% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. — meaning it keeps 26. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ICE leads at 38. 7% versus 7. 0% for CZWI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PKBK or NBTB or CZWI or ICE more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 64x versus Parke Bancorp, Inc. 's 90. 45x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) trades at 11. 5x forward P/E versus 535. 7x for Parke Bancorp, Inc. — 524. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ICE: 38. 0% to $194. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — PKBK or NBTB or CZWI or ICE?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) offers the highest yield at 3. 0%, versus 1. 4% for Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE).
09Is PKBK or NBTB or CZWI or ICE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
(ICE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 35), 1. 4% yield, +195. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ICE: +195. 3%, NBTB: +108. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PKBK and NBTB and CZWI and ICE?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PKBK is a small-cap deep-value stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock; ICE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.