Industrial - Machinery
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
PKOH vs ESAB vs NNBR vs AIXI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication
Conglomerates
Software - Application
PKOH vs ESAB vs NNBR vs AIXI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Machinery | Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication | Conglomerates | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $444M | $6.24B | $139M | $8M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.61B | $2.91B | $435M | $115M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $24M | $207M | $-35M | $-53M |
| Gross Margin | 12.6% | 35.4% | 2.3% | 64.3% |
| Operating Margin | 5.0% | 16.2% | -3.3% | -44.2% |
| Forward P/E | 10.0x | 17.7x | 43.6x | — |
| Total Debt | $670M | $1.43B | $211M | $46M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $45M | $186M | $11M | $847K |
PKOH vs ESAB vs NNBR vs AIXI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Park-Ohio Holdings … (PKOH) | 100 | 255.3 | +155.3% |
| ESAB Corporation (ESAB) | 100 | 173.4 | +73.4% |
| NN, Inc. (NNBR) | 100 | 257.9 | +157.9% |
| Xiao-I Corporation (AIXI) | 100 | 1.2 | -98.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PKOH vs ESAB vs NNBR vs AIXI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PKOH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.38, yield 1.8%
- Beta 1.38, yield 1.8%, current ratio 2.33x
- Better valuation composite
- 1.8% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs ESAB's 0.4%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
ESAB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- 107.2% 10Y total return vs PKOH's 45.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.24, Low D/E 64.8%, current ratio 1.90x
- 7.1% margin vs AIXI's -45.9%
- 4.2% ROA vs AIXI's -65.3%, ROIC 11.9% vs -34.4%
NNBR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
AIXI is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 18.8%, EPS growth 52.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 29.3%
- 18.8% revenue growth vs NNBR's -9.1%
- Beta 0.94 vs NNBR's 2.04
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.8% revenue growth vs NNBR's -9.1% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 7.1% margin vs AIXI's -45.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.94 vs NNBR's 2.04 | |
| Dividends | 1.8% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs ESAB's 0.4%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +60.8% vs AIXI's -79.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.2% ROA vs AIXI's -65.3%, ROIC 11.9% vs -34.4% |
PKOH vs ESAB vs NNBR vs AIXI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
PKOH vs ESAB vs NNBR vs AIXI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ESAB leads in 2 of 6 categories
NNBR leads 2 • PKOH leads 0 • AIXI leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ESAB leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ESAB is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.9B annually — 25.4x AIXI's $115M. ESAB is the more profitable business, keeping 7.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AIXI's -45.9%. On growth, NNBR holds the edge at +12.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.6B | $2.9B | $435M | $115M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $105M | $539M | $22M | -$49M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $24M | $207M | -$35M | -$53M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1M | $218M | -$1M | -$2M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +12.6% | +35.4% | +2.3% | +64.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.0% | +16.2% | -3.3% | -44.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.5% | +7.1% | -8.0% | -45.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.1% | +7.5% | -0.3% | -2.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.8% | +9.9% | +12.1% | -64.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.3% | -29.1% | -8.7% | -29.9% |
Valuation Metrics
NNBR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 18.1x trailing earnings, PKOH trades at a 34% valuation discount to ESAB's 27.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PKOH's 9.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NNBR's 19.0x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $444M | $6.2B | $139M | $8M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.1B | $7.5B | $338M | $53M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 18.14x | 27.53x | -2.58x | -0.45x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.96x | 17.74x | 43.60x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 3.79x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.33x | 13.00x | 19.03x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.28x | 2.19x | 0.33x | 0.11x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.12x | 2.82x | 0.93x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 222.03x | 29.24x | 19.16x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ESAB leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ESAB delivers a 9.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $-28 for NNBR. ESAB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.65x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PKOH's 1.74x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PKOH scores 5/9 vs NNBR's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.2% | +9.5% | -28.4% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.7% | +4.2% | -7.7% | -65.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.2% | +11.9% | -4.5% | -34.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.9% | +13.1% | -5.0% | -3.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.74x | 0.65x | 1.44x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $626M | $1.2B | $200M | $45M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $45M | $186M | $11M | $846,593 |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $670M | $1.4B | $211M | $46M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.44x | 3.40x | -0.74x | -14.13x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NNBR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ESAB five years ago would be worth $20,716 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $138 for AIXI. Over the past 12 months, PKOH leads with a +60.8% total return vs AIXI's -79.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NNBR at 40.7% vs AIXI's -75.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +49.5% | -8.9% | +106.0% | +68.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +60.8% | -15.8% | +50.8% | -79.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +107.6% | +75.8% | +178.4% | -98.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -12.1% | +107.2% | -63.4% | -98.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +45.4% | +107.2% | -75.7% | -98.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +27.6% | +20.7% | +40.7% | -75.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PKOH and AIXI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AIXI is the less volatile stock with a 0.94 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NNBR's 2.04 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PKOH currently trades 97.4% from its 52-week high vs AIXI's 18.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.38x | 1.24x | 2.04x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $31.68 | $137.42 | $2.99 | $4.02 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $15.52 | $89.41 | $1.10 | $0.08 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.4% | +74.5% | +92.3% | +18.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 66.0 | 50.7 | 65.6 | 49.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 44K | 612K | 936K | 60.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — PKOH and ESAB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PKOH as "Buy", ESAB as "Buy", NNBR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 43.2% upside for ESAB (target: $147) vs 20.0% for PKOH (target: $37). For income investors, PKOH offers the higher dividend yield at 1.81% vs ESAB's 0.35%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $37.00 | $146.67 | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 10 | 9 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.8% | +0.4% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 4 | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.56 | $0.36 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
ESAB leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NNBR leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 2 tied.
PKOH vs ESAB vs NNBR vs AIXI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PKOH or ESAB or NNBR or AIXI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Xiao-I Corporation (AIXI) is the stronger pick with 18.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 1% for NN, Inc. (NNBR). Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. (PKOH) offers the better valuation at 18. 1x trailing P/E (10. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. (PKOH) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PKOH or ESAB or NNBR or AIXI?
On trailing P/E, Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.
(PKOH) is the cheapest at 18. 1x versus ESAB Corporation at 27. 5x. On forward P/E, Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. is actually cheaper at 10. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PKOH or ESAB or NNBR or AIXI?
Over the past 5 years, ESAB Corporation (ESAB) delivered a total return of +107.
2%, compared to -98. 6% for Xiao-I Corporation (AIXI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ESAB returned +107. 2% versus AIXI's -98. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PKOH or ESAB or NNBR or AIXI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Xiao-I Corporation (AIXI) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
94β versus NN, Inc. 's 2. 04β — meaning NNBR is approximately 116% more volatile than AIXI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ESAB Corporation (ESAB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 65% versus 174% for Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PKOH or ESAB or NNBR or AIXI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Xiao-I Corporation (AIXI) is pulling ahead at 18.
8% versus -9. 1% for NN, Inc. (NNBR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Xiao-I Corporation grew EPS 52. 7% year-over-year, compared to -46. 7% for Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AIXI leads at 29. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PKOH or ESAB or NNBR or AIXI?
ESAB Corporation (ESAB) is the more profitable company, earning 8.
0% net margin versus -20. 6% for Xiao-I Corporation — meaning it keeps 8. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ESAB leads at 17. 3% versus -18. 3% for AIXI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AIXI leads at 68. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PKOH or ESAB or NNBR or AIXI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.
(PKOH) trades at 10. 0x forward P/E versus 43. 6x for NN, Inc. — 33. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ESAB: 43. 2% to $146. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — PKOH or ESAB or NNBR or AIXI?
In this comparison, PKOH (1.
8% yield), ESAB (0. 4% yield) pay a dividend. NNBR, AIXI do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is PKOH or ESAB or NNBR or AIXI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.
(PKOH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1. 8% yield). NN, Inc. (NNBR) carries a higher beta of 2. 04 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PKOH: +45. 4%, NNBR: -75. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PKOH and ESAB and NNBR and AIXI?
These companies operate in different sectors (PKOH (Industrials) and ESAB (Industrials) and NNBR (Industrials) and AIXI (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: PKOH is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ESAB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NNBR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AIXI is a small-cap high-growth stock. PKOH pays a dividend while ESAB, NNBR, AIXI do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.