PLG
Platinum Group Metals Ltd.
Other Precious Metals
Market Cap$215M
5Y Perf.+16.0%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
PLG vs SBSW
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
SBSW
Sibanye Stillwater Limited
Gold
Market Cap$9.33B
5Y Perf.+79.7%
PLG vs SBSW — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | PLG | SBSW |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Other Precious Metals | Gold |
| Market Cap | $215M | $9.33B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $238.26B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-5M | $-12.39B |
| Gross Margin | — | 21.2% |
| Operating Margin | — | 18.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 0.2x |
| Total Debt | $258K | $44.34B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $417K | $17.16B |
PLG vs SBSW — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
PLG
SBSW
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Platinum Group Meta… (PLG) | 100 | 116.0 | +16.0% |
| Sibanye Stillwater … (SBSW) | 100 | 179.7 | +79.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PLG vs SBSW
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: SBSW leads in 4 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. Platinum Group Metals Ltd. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
PLG
Platinum Group Metals Ltd.
The Defensive Pick
PLG is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 2.20, Low D/E 0.4%, current ratio 15.38x
- 0.4% margin vs SBSW's -5.2%
- -6.4% ROA vs SBSW's -8.3%, ROIC -7.0% vs 22.9%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
SBSW
Sibanye Stillwater Limited
The Income Pick
SBSW carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.27, yield 0.2%
- Rev growth 7.1%, EPS growth 34.1%, 3Y rev CAGR -4.6%
- 30.7% 10Y total return vs PLG's -93.8%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | SBSW | 7.1% revenue growth vs PLG's 6.1% |
| Quality / Margins | PLG | 0.4% margin vs SBSW's -5.2% |
| Stability / Safety | SBSW | Beta 1.27 vs PLG's 2.20 |
| Dividends | SBSW | 0.2% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | SBSW | +167.2% vs PLG's +41.5% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | PLG | -6.4% ROA vs SBSW's -8.3%, ROIC -7.0% vs 22.9% |
PLG vs SBSW — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2024
PLG vs SBSW — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLPLGLAGGINGSBSW
SBSWSibanye Stillwater Li…
2leads
PLGPlatinum Group Metals…
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs SBSWMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
PLG1/1
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
PLG2/2
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
PLG5/8
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
SBSW6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
SBSW2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PLG leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SBSW and PLG operate at a comparable scale, with $238.3B and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | PLGPlatinum Group Me… | SBSWSibanye Stillwate… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $238.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$5M | $63.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$5M | -$12.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$6M | -$9.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +21.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +18.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -5.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -4.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +25.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.2% | -10.0% |
PLG leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
PLG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | PLGPlatinum Group Me… | SBSWSibanye Stillwate… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $215M | $9.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $215M | $11.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -40.47x | -31.78x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 0.25x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 5.67x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 1.27x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.09x | 3.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 90.73x |
PLG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PLG leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PLG delivers a -6.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-7 in annual profit, vs $-28 for SBSW. PLG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SBSW's 1.00x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SBSW scores 6/9 vs PLG's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | PLGPlatinum Group Me… | SBSWSibanye Stillwate… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -6.7% | -28.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -6.4% | -8.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -7.0% | +22.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -8.8% | +19.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 1.00x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$159,000 | $27.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $417,000 | $17.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $258,000 | $44.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 1.31x |
PLG leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SBSW leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SBSW five years ago would be worth $8,014 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,432 for PLG. Over the past 12 months, SBSW leads with a +167.2% total return vs PLG's +41.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SBSW at 12.1% vs PLG's 0.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | PLGPlatinum Group Me… | SBSWSibanye Stillwate… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -25.3% | -6.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +41.5% | +167.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1.2% | +40.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -65.7% | -19.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.8% | +30.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +0.4% | +12.1% |
SBSW leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SBSW leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SBSW is the less volatile stock with a 1.27 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PLG's 2.20 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SBSW currently trades 62.0% from its 52-week high vs PLG's 43.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | PLGPlatinum Group Me… | SBSWSibanye Stillwate… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.20x | 1.27x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.04 | $21.29 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.08 | $4.52 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +43.1% | +62.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.8 | 57.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.7M | 5.7M |
SBSW leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
SBSW is the only dividend payer here at 0.18% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | PLGPlatinum Group Me… | SBSWSibanye Stillwate… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $18.27 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.40 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
PLG leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). SBSW leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility).
Best OverallPlatinum Group Metals Ltd. (PLG)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
PLG vs SBSW: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PLG or SBSW a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Sibanye Stillwater Limited (SBSW) a "Hold" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison.
The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — PLG or SBSW?
Over the past 5 years, Sibanye Stillwater Limited (SBSW) delivered a total return of -19.
9%, compared to -65. 7% for Platinum Group Metals Ltd. (PLG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SBSW returned +30. 7% versus PLG's -93. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — PLG or SBSW?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sibanye Stillwater Limited (SBSW) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
27β versus Platinum Group Metals Ltd. 's 2. 20β — meaning PLG is approximately 73% more volatile than SBSW relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Platinum Group Metals Ltd. (PLG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 100% for Sibanye Stillwater Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — PLG or SBSW?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sibanye Stillwater Limited grew EPS 34.
1% year-over-year, compared to 5. 1% for Platinum Group Metals Ltd.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — PLG or SBSW?
Platinum Group Metals Ltd.
(PLG) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -4. 0% for Sibanye Stillwater Limited — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SBSW leads at 18. 5% versus 0. 0% for PLG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SBSW leads at 23. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — PLG or SBSW?
In this comparison, SBSW (0.
2% yield) pays a dividend. PLG does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is PLG or SBSW better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Sibanye Stillwater Limited (SBSW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
27)). Platinum Group Metals Ltd. (PLG) carries a higher beta of 2. 20 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SBSW: +30. 7%, PLG: -93. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between PLG and SBSW?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.