Electrical Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
PLUG vs AMZN vs WMT vs MSFT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
Specialty Retail
Software - Infrastructure
PLUG vs AMZN vs WMT vs MSFT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Specialty Retail | Specialty Retail | Software - Infrastructure |
| Market Cap | $4.61B | $2.96T | $1.04T | $3.07T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $710M | $742.78B | $703.06B | $318.27B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-1.63B | $90.80B | $22.91B | $125.22B |
| Gross Margin | 99.8% | 50.6% | 24.9% | 68.3% |
| Operating Margin | 38.1% | 11.5% | 4.1% | 46.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | 35.3x | 44.7x | 24.9x |
| Total Debt | $997M | $152.99B | $67.09B | $112.18B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1M | $86.81B | $10.73B | $30.24B |
PLUG vs AMZN vs WMT vs MSFT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Plug Power Inc. (PLUG) | 100 | 78.6 | -21.4% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) | 100 | 225.1 | +125.1% |
| Walmart Inc. (WMT) | 100 | 314.6 | +214.6% |
| Microsoft Corporati… (MSFT) | 100 | 225.8 | +125.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PLUG vs AMZN vs WMT vs MSFT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PLUG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +320.2% vs MSFT's -3.7%
AMZN is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 1.26 vs WMT's 4.06
- Better valuation composite
WMT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 37 yrs, beta 0.12, yield 0.7%
- Beta 0.12 vs PLUG's 2.57, lower leverage
MSFT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 14.9%, EPS growth 15.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.4%
- 7.7% 10Y total return vs WMT's 5.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.89, Low D/E 32.7%, current ratio 1.35x
- Beta 0.89, yield 0.8%, current ratio 1.35x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 14.9% revenue growth vs WMT's 4.7% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 39.3% margin vs PLUG's -229.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.12 vs PLUG's 2.57, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.8% yield, 19-year raise streak, vs WMT's 0.7%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +320.2% vs MSFT's -3.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.2% ROA vs PLUG's -64.3%, ROIC 24.9% vs 10.9% |
PLUG vs AMZN vs WMT vs MSFT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
PLUG vs AMZN vs WMT vs MSFT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MSFT leads in 3 of 6 categories
WMT leads 1 • PLUG leads 0 • AMZN leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MSFT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN is the larger business by revenue, generating $742.8B annually — 1046.3x PLUG's $710M. MSFT is the more profitable business, keeping 39.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PLUG's -2.3%. On growth, MSFT holds the edge at +18.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $710M | $742.8B | $703.1B | $318.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$1.5B | $155.9B | $42.8B | $192.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$1.6B | $90.8B | $22.9B | $125.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$2M | -$2.5B | $15.3B | $72.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +99.8% | +50.6% | +24.9% | +68.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +38.1% | +11.5% | +4.1% | +46.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.3% | +12.2% | +3.3% | +39.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.3% | -0.3% | +2.2% | +22.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +17.6% | +16.6% | +5.8% | +18.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +95.9% | +74.8% | +35.1% | +23.4% |
Valuation Metrics
MSFT leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 30.3x trailing earnings, MSFT trades at a 36% valuation discount to WMT's 47.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), AMZN offers better value at 1.37x vs WMT's 4.33x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.6B | $2.96T | $1.04T | $3.07T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.6B | $3.02T | $1.09T | $3.16T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | — | 38.35x | 47.65x | 30.34x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 35.26x | 44.67x | 24.91x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.37x | 4.33x | 1.61x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 20.74x | 24.83x | 19.40x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.49x | 4.12x | 1.45x | 10.91x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 7.24x | 10.44x | 8.99x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 384.26x | 24.94x | 42.93x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MSFT leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MSFT delivers a 33.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $33 in annual profit, vs $-124 for PLUG. MSFT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.33x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PLUG's 19.75x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMZN scores 6/9 vs PLUG's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -124.4% | +23.3% | +22.3% | +33.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -64.3% | +11.5% | +7.9% | +19.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.9% | +14.7% | +14.7% | +24.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +18.6% | +15.3% | +17.5% | +29.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 19.75x | 0.37x | 0.67x | 0.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $996M | $66.2B | $56.4B | $81.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1M | $86.8B | $10.7B | $30.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $997M | $153.0B | $67.1B | $112.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -36.18x | 39.96x | 11.85x | 55.65x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WMT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WMT five years ago would be worth $28,531 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,467 for PLUG. Over the past 12 months, PLUG leads with a +320.2% total return vs MSFT's -3.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WMT at 37.5% vs PLUG's -29.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +48.4% | +21.4% | +15.6% | -12.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +320.2% | +48.6% | +33.0% | -3.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -64.4% | +159.8% | +160.2% | +37.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -85.3% | +66.3% | +185.3% | +71.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +72.4% | +715.9% | +505.0% | +768.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -29.1% | +37.5% | +37.5% | +11.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AMZN and WMT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WMT is the less volatile stock with a 0.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PLUG's 2.57 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMZN currently trades 98.7% from its 52-week high vs PLUG's 72.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.57x | 1.51x | 0.12x | 0.89x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.58 | $278.56 | $134.69 | $555.45 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.69 | $183.85 | $91.89 | $356.28 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +72.3% | +98.7% | +96.6% | +74.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.5 | 80.5 | 58.1 | 52.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 76.7M | 45.6M | 17.2M | 32.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — WMT and MSFT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PLUG as "Buy", AMZN as "Buy", WMT as "Buy", MSFT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 33.3% upside for MSFT (target: $552) vs 5.4% for WMT (target: $137). For income investors, MSFT offers the higher dividend yield at 0.78% vs WMT's 0.72%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $3.91 | $306.77 | $137.04 | $551.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 38 | 94 | 64 | 81 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.7% | +0.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 37 | 19 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.94 | $3.23 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.8% | +0.6% |
MSFT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). WMT leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
PLUG vs AMZN vs WMT vs MSFT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PLUG or AMZN or WMT or MSFT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the stronger pick with 14.
9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 7% for Walmart Inc. (WMT). Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) offers the better valuation at 30. 3x trailing P/E (24. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Plug Power Inc. (PLUG) a "Buy" — based on 38 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PLUG or AMZN or WMT or MSFT?
On trailing P/E, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the cheapest at 30.
3x versus Walmart Inc. at 47. 6x. On forward P/E, Microsoft Corporation is actually cheaper at 24. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Amazon. com, Inc. wins at 1. 26x versus Walmart Inc. 's 4. 06x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PLUG or AMZN or WMT or MSFT?
Over the past 5 years, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) delivered a total return of +185. 3%, compared to -85. 3% for Plug Power Inc. (PLUG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MSFT returned +768. 1% versus PLUG's +72. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PLUG or AMZN or WMT or MSFT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 12β versus Plug Power Inc. 's 2. 57β — meaning PLUG is approximately 2098% more volatile than WMT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 33% versus 20% for Plug Power Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PLUG or AMZN or WMT or MSFT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is pulling ahead at 14.
9% versus 4. 7% for Walmart Inc. (WMT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Plug Power Inc. grew EPS 100. 0% year-over-year, compared to 13. 3% for Walmart Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MSFT leads at 12. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PLUG or AMZN or WMT or MSFT?
Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the more profitable company, earning 36.
1% net margin versus -229. 8% for Plug Power Inc. — meaning it keeps 36. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MSFT leads at 45. 6% versus 4. 2% for WMT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PLUG leads at 99. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PLUG or AMZN or WMT or MSFT more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 26x versus Walmart Inc. 's 4. 06x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) trades at 24. 9x forward P/E versus 44. 7x for Walmart Inc. — 19. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MSFT: 33. 3% to $551. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — PLUG or AMZN or WMT or MSFT?
In this comparison, MSFT (0.
8% yield), WMT (0. 7% yield) pay a dividend. PLUG, AMZN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is PLUG or AMZN or WMT or MSFT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 12), 0. 7% yield, +505. 0% 10Y return). Plug Power Inc. (PLUG) carries a higher beta of 2. 57 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (WMT: +505. 0%, PLUG: +72. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PLUG and AMZN and WMT and MSFT?
These companies operate in different sectors (PLUG (Industrials) and AMZN (Consumer Cyclical) and WMT (Consumer Defensive) and MSFT (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
WMT, MSFT pay a dividend while PLUG, AMZN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.