Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

PMAX vs BTBT vs MARA vs CANG

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
PMAX
Powell Max Limited Class A Ordinary Shares

Specialty Business Services

IndustrialsNASDAQ • VG
Market Cap$666K
5Y Perf.-98.7%
BTBT
Bit Digital, Inc.

Financial - Capital Markets

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$589M
5Y Perf.-47.9%
MARA
Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.

Financial - Capital Markets

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.83B
5Y Perf.-21.7%
CANG
Cango Inc.

Auto - Dealerships

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • CN
Market Cap$250M
5Y Perf.-39.7%

PMAX vs BTBT vs MARA vs CANG — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
PMAX logoPMAX
BTBT logoBTBT
MARA logoMARA
CANG logoCANG
IndustrySpecialty Business ServicesFinancial - Capital MarketsFinancial - Capital MarketsAuto - Dealerships
Market Cap$666K$589M$4.83B$250M
Revenue (TTM)$84M$164M$907M$3.46B
Net Income (TTM)$-35M$137M$-1.31B$-178M
Gross Margin34.7%61.9%-47.7%13.6%
Operating Margin-43.3%16.8%-90.6%7.3%
Forward P/E9.2x5.7x
Total Debt$20M$14M$3.65B$170M
Cash & Equiv.$42M$95M$547M$1.29B

PMAX vs BTBT vs MARA vs CANGLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

PMAX
BTBT
MARA
CANG
StockSep 24May 26Return
Powell Max Limited … (PMAX)1001.3-98.7%
Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT)10052.1-47.9%
Marathon Digital Ho… (MARA)10078.3-21.7%
Cango Inc. (CANG)10060.3-39.7%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: PMAX vs BTBT vs MARA vs CANG

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: BTBT leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Powell Max Limited Class A Ordinary Shares is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility. MARA and CANG also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
PMAX
Powell Max Limited Class A Ordinary Shares
The Defensive Pick

PMAX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.72, Low D/E 94.5%, current ratio 1.45x
  • Beta 1.72, current ratio 1.45x
  • Beta 1.72 vs BTBT's 3.37
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
BTBT
Bit Digital, Inc.
The Banking Pick

BTBT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and bank quality.

  • Rev growth 264.6%, EPS growth 225.0%
  • NIM 0.1% vs MARA's 0.1%
  • 264.6% NII/revenue growth vs CANG's -52.7%
  • 17.3% margin vs MARA's -144.6%
Best for: growth exposure and bank quality
MARA
Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.
The Banking Pick

MARA is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • -4.7% vs PMAX's -85.9%
Best for: momentum
CANG
Cango Inc.
The Income Pick

CANG is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 2.25
  • -44.9% 10Y total return vs MARA's -51.6%
  • Better valuation composite
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthBTBT logoBTBT264.6% NII/revenue growth vs CANG's -52.7%
ValueCANG logoCANGBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsBTBT logoBTBT17.3% margin vs MARA's -144.6%
Stability / SafetyPMAX logoPMAXBeta 1.72 vs BTBT's 3.37
DividendsBTBT logoBTBT0.3% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)MARA logoMARA-4.7% vs PMAX's -85.9%
Efficiency (ROA)BTBT logoBTBT19.0% ROA vs PMAX's -80.7%

PMAX vs BTBT vs MARA vs CANG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

PMAXPowell Max Limited Class A Ordinary Shares

Segment breakdown not available.

BTBTBit Digital, Inc.
FY 2024
Other Member
100.0%$550,260
MARAMarathon Digital Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Hosting Services
100.0%$5M
CANGCango Inc.
FY 2024
After-market Service Facilitation Service Income
62.9%$41M
Loan Facilitation Income And Other Related Income
24.1%$16M
Automobile trading income
9.6%$6M
Service, Other
3.4%$2M

PMAX vs BTBT vs MARA vs CANG — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLBTBTLAGGINGCANG

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

BTBT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

CANG is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.5B annually — 41.0x PMAX's $84M. BTBT is the more profitable business, keeping 17.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MARA's -144.6%. On growth, CANG holds the edge at +58.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricPMAX logoPMAXPowell Max Limite…BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.MARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …CANG logoCANGCango Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$84M$164M$907M$3.5B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$28M$166M$627M$333M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$35M$137M-$1.3B-$178M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$4M-$448M-$312M$0
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+34.7%+61.9%-47.7%+13.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-43.3%+16.8%-90.6%+7.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-41.6%+17.3%-144.6%-5.2%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-4.8%-65.3%-34.4%-154.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+6.2%+58.3%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-21.0%+2.8%-4.8%+3.6%
BTBT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

PMAX leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

At 5.7x trailing earnings, CANG trades at a 38% valuation discount to BTBT's 9.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CANG's 3.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BTBT's 8.5x.

MetricPMAX logoPMAXPowell Max Limite…BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.MARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …CANG logoCANGCango Inc.
Market CapShares × price$666,120$589M$4.8B$250M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash-$2M$508M$7.9B$85M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.27x9.15x-3.44x5.66x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple8.49x3.13x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.14x3.60x5.32x2.12x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.23x0.56x1.30x0.42x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF
PMAX leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

BTBT leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

BTBT delivers a 21.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $-5 for PMAX. BTBT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MARA's 1.05x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BTBT scores 6/9 vs MARA's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricPMAX logoPMAXPowell Max Limite…BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.MARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …CANG logoCANGCango Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-4.9%+21.4%-30.5%-4.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-80.7%+19.0%-17.1%-2.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital+6.5%-9.0%+4.6%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-4.3%+8.5%-12.1%+4.5%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–93634
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.94x0.03x1.05x0.04x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$22M-$81M$3.1B-$1.1B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$42M$95M$547M$1.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$20M$14M$3.6B$170M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-90.56x4.73x-1.87x
BTBT leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

MARA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CANG five years ago would be worth $8,579 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $131 for PMAX. Over the past 12 months, MARA leads with a -4.7% total return vs PMAX's -85.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MARA at 10.8% vs PMAX's -76.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricPMAX logoPMAXPowell Max Limite…BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.MARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …CANG logoCANGCango Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-78.9%-10.3%+28.2%-62.0%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-85.9%-9.0%-4.7%-73.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-98.7%-19.7%+36.1%+1.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-98.7%-84.6%-59.5%-14.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-98.7%-60.4%-51.6%-44.9%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-76.4%-7.1%+10.8%+0.4%
MARA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — PMAX and MARA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

PMAX is the less volatile stock with a 1.72 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BTBT's 3.37 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MARA currently trades 54.2% from its 52-week high vs PMAX's 4.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricPMAX logoPMAXPowell Max Limite…BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.MARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …CANG logoCANGCango Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.72x3.37x3.11x2.25x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$89.60$4.55$23.45$2.88
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.90$1.25$6.66$0.33
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+4.7%+40.2%+54.2%+18.6%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10054.569.169.658.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.6M18.5M47.6M1.3M
Evenly matched — PMAX and MARA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

CANG leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: BTBT as "Buy", MARA as "Buy", CANG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 459.2% upside for CANG (target: $3) vs 27.0% for MARA (target: $16). BTBT is the only dividend payer here at 0.31% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricPMAX logoPMAXPowell Max Limite…BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.MARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …CANG logoCANGCango Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$5.00$16.13$3.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts2192
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.3%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises05
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.01
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+1.0%+5.3%
CANG leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

BTBT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PMAX leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallBit Digital, Inc. (BTBT)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

PMAX vs BTBT vs MARA vs CANG: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is PMAX or BTBT or MARA or CANG a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Bit Digital, Inc.

(BTBT) is the stronger pick with 264. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -52. 7% for Cango Inc. (CANG). Cango Inc. (CANG) offers the better valuation at 5. 7x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — PMAX or BTBT or MARA or CANG?

On trailing P/E, Cango Inc.

(CANG) is the cheapest at 5. 7x versus Bit Digital, Inc. at 9. 2x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — PMAX or BTBT or MARA or CANG?

Over the past 5 years, Cango Inc.

(CANG) delivered a total return of -14. 2%, compared to -98. 7% for Powell Max Limited Class A Ordinary Shares (PMAX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CANG returned -44. 9% versus PMAX's -98. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — PMAX or BTBT or MARA or CANG?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Powell Max Limited Class A Ordinary Shares (PMAX) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

72β versus Bit Digital, Inc. 's 3. 37β — meaning BTBT is approximately 96% more volatile than PMAX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 105% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — PMAX or BTBT or MARA or CANG?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Bit Digital, Inc.

(BTBT) is pulling ahead at 264. 6% versus -52. 7% for Cango Inc. (CANG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cango Inc. grew EPS 960. 0% year-over-year, compared to -350. 8% for Powell Max Limited Class A Ordinary Shares. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — PMAX or BTBT or MARA or CANG?

Cango Inc.

(CANG) is the more profitable company, earning 37. 3% net margin versus -144. 6% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 37. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CANG leads at 22. 2% versus -90. 6% for MARA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BTBT leads at 61. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Which pays a better dividend — PMAX or BTBT or MARA or CANG?

In this comparison, BTBT (0.

3% yield) pays a dividend. PMAX, MARA, CANG do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

08

Is PMAX or BTBT or MARA or CANG better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Powell Max Limited Class A Ordinary Shares (PMAX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding.

Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) carries a higher beta of 3. 37 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PMAX: -98. 7%, BTBT: -60. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between PMAX and BTBT and MARA and CANG?

These companies operate in different sectors (PMAX (Industrials) and BTBT (Financial Services) and MARA (Financial Services) and CANG (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: PMAX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BTBT is a small-cap high-growth stock; MARA is a small-cap high-growth stock; CANG is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

PMAX

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 20%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BTBT

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 132%
  • Net Margin > 10%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MARA

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 19%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CANG

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 2916%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform PMAX and BTBT and MARA and CANG on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(PMAX: 6.2% · BTBT: 264.6%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.