Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
PMVP vs AGEN vs KYMR vs RCUS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
PMVP vs AGEN vs KYMR vs RCUS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $75M | $135M | $7.03B | $2.55B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $114M | $51M | $236M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-78M | $115K | $-315M | $-369M |
| Gross Margin | — | 35.7% | 33.2% | 90.7% |
| Operating Margin | — | -17.7% | -7.0% | -168.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 2.9x | — | — |
| Total Debt | $838K | $10M | $82M | $99M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $38M | $3M | $357M | $222M |
PMVP vs AGEN vs KYMR vs RCUS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| PMV Pharmaceuticals… (PMVP) | 100 | 4.0 | -96.0% |
| Agenus Inc. (AGEN) | 100 | 4.8 | -95.2% |
| Kymera Therapeutics… (KYMR) | 100 | 266.4 | +166.4% |
| Arcus Biosciences, … (RCUS) | 100 | 148.0 | +48.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PMVP vs AGEN vs KYMR vs RCUS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PMVP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 0.72
- Lower volatility, beta 0.72, Low D/E 0.8%, current ratio 10.09x
- Beta 0.72, current ratio 10.09x
- 5.4% margin vs KYMR's -6.1%
AGEN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 10.4%, EPS growth 100.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.2%
- 10.4% revenue growth vs PMVP's -34.8%
- 0.1% ROA vs PMVP's -54.2%
KYMR is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 158.8% 10Y total return vs RCUS's 49.2%
RCUS is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +197.3% vs AGEN's +25.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.4% revenue growth vs PMVP's -34.8% | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.4% margin vs KYMR's -6.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.72 vs AGEN's 2.58 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +197.3% vs AGEN's +25.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 0.1% ROA vs PMVP's -54.2% |
PMVP vs AGEN vs KYMR vs RCUS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
PMVP vs AGEN vs KYMR vs RCUS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AGEN leads in 2 of 6 categories
KYMR leads 2 • PMVP leads 0 • RCUS leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AGEN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RCUS and PMVP operate at a comparable scale, with $236M and $0 in trailing revenue. AGEN is the more profitable business, keeping 0.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KYMR's -6.1%. On growth, KYMR holds the edge at +55.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $114M | $51M | $236M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$86M | -$10M | -$352M | -$391M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$78M | $115,000 | -$315M | -$369M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$74M | -$159M | -$244M | -$489M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +35.7% | +33.2% | +90.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -17.7% | -7.0% | -168.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +0.1% | -6.1% | -156.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -139.1% | -4.7% | -2.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +27.5% | +55.5% | -39.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -191.9% | +85.3% | +13.4% | +10.5% |
Valuation Metrics
AGEN leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $75M | $135M | $7.0B | $2.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $38M | $142M | $6.8B | $2.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.95x | -1123.53x | -23.33x | -7.71x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 2.94x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 1.18x | 179.28x | 10.34x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.71x | — | 4.60x | 4.32x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
KYMR leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KYMR delivers a -25.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-25 in annual profit, vs $-69 for RCUS. PMVP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RCUS's 0.16x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AGEN scores 6/9 vs RCUS's 0/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -59.1% | — | -25.0% | -69.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -54.2% | +0.1% | -22.3% | -35.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -63.4% | — | -24.9% | -64.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -61.1% | — | -27.2% | -42.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 6 | 4 | 0 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | — | 0.05x | 0.16x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$37M | $7M | -$275M | -$123M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $38M | $3M | $357M | $222M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $838,000 | $10M | $82M | $99M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 1.11x | -2119.53x | -13.38x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KYMR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KYMR five years ago would be worth $19,577 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $405 for PMVP. Over the past 12 months, RCUS leads with a +197.3% total return vs AGEN's +25.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KYMR at 45.9% vs AGEN's -50.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +14.6% | +18.3% | +18.3% | +8.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +59.5% | +25.7% | +179.8% | +197.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -71.7% | -88.0% | +210.3% | +27.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.0% | -93.7% | +95.8% | -12.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.2% | -94.2% | +158.8% | +49.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -34.4% | -50.7% | +45.9% | +8.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PMVP and RCUS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PMVP is the less volatile stock with a 0.72 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AGEN's 2.58 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RCUS currently trades 88.3% from its 52-week high vs AGEN's 52.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.72x | 2.58x | 1.03x | 1.84x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.88 | $7.34 | $103.00 | $28.72 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.81 | $2.71 | $28.06 | $7.72 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +75.0% | +52.0% | +83.6% | +88.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.4 | 46.1 | 50.5 | 52.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 666K | 822K | 583K | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AGEN as "Buy", KYMR as "Buy", RCUS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 91.9% upside for AGEN (target: $7) vs 18.3% for RCUS (target: $30).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $7.33 | $118.06 | $30.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 11 | 26 | 18 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
AGEN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). KYMR leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
PMVP vs AGEN vs KYMR vs RCUS: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PMVP or AGEN or KYMR or RCUS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Agenus Inc.
(AGEN) is the stronger pick with 10. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -16. 7% for Kymera Therapeutics, Inc. (KYMR). Analysts rate Agenus Inc. (AGEN) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — PMVP or AGEN or KYMR or RCUS?
Over the past 5 years, Kymera Therapeutics, Inc.
(KYMR) delivered a total return of +95. 8%, compared to -96. 0% for PMV Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (PMVP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KYMR returned +158. 8% versus PMVP's -96. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — PMVP or AGEN or KYMR or RCUS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), PMV Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(PMVP) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 72β versus Agenus Inc. 's 2. 58β — meaning AGEN is approximately 256% more volatile than PMVP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, PMV Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (PMVP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 16% for Arcus Biosciences, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — PMVP or AGEN or KYMR or RCUS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Agenus Inc.
(AGEN) is pulling ahead at 10. 4% versus -16. 7% for Kymera Therapeutics, Inc. (KYMR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Agenus Inc. grew EPS 100. 0% year-over-year, compared to -30. 0% for PMV Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RCUS leads at 30. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — PMVP or AGEN or KYMR or RCUS?
Agenus Inc.
(AGEN) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 1% net margin versus -794. 4% for Kymera Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PMVP leads at 0. 0% versus -891. 3% for KYMR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KYMR leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is PMVP or AGEN or KYMR or RCUS more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AGEN: 91.
9% to $7. 33.
07Which pays a better dividend — PMVP or AGEN or KYMR or RCUS?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is PMVP or AGEN or KYMR or RCUS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, PMV Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(PMVP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 72)). Agenus Inc. (AGEN) carries a higher beta of 2. 58 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PMVP: -96. 2%, AGEN: -94. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between PMVP and AGEN and KYMR and RCUS?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.