Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
PNBK vs CTBI vs NBTB vs HONE vs FIS vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Information Technology Services
Banks - Diversified
PNBK vs CTBI vs NBTB vs HONE vs FIS vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Information Technology Services | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $114M | $1.25B | $2.47B | $522M | $20.42B | $925.11B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $61M | $409M | $902M | $308M | $11.66B | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-12M | $98M | $169M | $26M | $2.67B | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | 53.5% | 66.7% | 73.6% | 51.9% | 37.6% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | -19.1% | 31.0% | 24.3% | 10.6% | 17.9% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | 0.7x | 11.3x | 11.3x | 13.3x | 6.3x | 14.9x |
| Total Debt | $16M | $390M | $327M | $517M | $4.01B | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $186M | $63M | $185M | $231M | $599M | $343.34B |
PNBK vs CTBI vs NBTB vs HONE vs FIS vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patriot National Ba… (PNBK) | 100 | 16.4 | -83.6% |
| Community Trust Ban… (CTBI) | 100 | 210.5 | +110.5% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 154.0 | +54.0% |
| HarborOne Bancorp, … (HONE) | 100 | 141.7 | +41.7% |
| Fidelity National I… (FIS) | 100 | 29.5 | -70.5% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 352.1 | +252.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PNBK vs CTBI vs NBTB vs HONE vs FIS vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PNBK ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Lower P/E (0.7x vs 14.9x)
CTBI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if bank quality is your priority.
- NIM 3.3% vs PNBK's 1.7%
- 24.0% margin vs PNBK's -19.2%
- +41.9% vs FIS's -49.1%
NBTB is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.76, Low D/E 17.3%, current ratio 1.60x
HONE is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 10.7%, EPS growth 78.4%
- 10.7% NII/revenue growth vs PNBK's -4.0%
FIS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.61, yield 4.1%
- PEG 0.26 vs NBTB's 1.61
- Beta 0.61, yield 4.1%, current ratio 0.59x
- Beta 0.61 vs PNBK's 1.46
JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 492.1% 10Y total return vs CTBI's 144.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.7% NII/revenue growth vs PNBK's -4.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.7x vs 14.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 24.0% margin vs PNBK's -19.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.61 vs PNBK's 1.46 | |
| Dividends | 4.1% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs CTBI's 2.9%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +41.9% vs FIS's -49.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.5% ROA vs PNBK's -1.1%, ROIC 6.0% vs -12.8% |
PNBK vs CTBI vs NBTB vs HONE vs FIS vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
PNBK vs CTBI vs NBTB vs HONE vs FIS vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 6 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CTBI leads in 1 of 6 categories
PNBK leads 1 • JPM leads 1 • NBTB leads 0 • HONE leads 0 • FIS leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CTBI leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 4598.9x PNBK's $61M. CTBI is the more profitable business, keeping 24.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PNBK's -19.2%.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $61M | $409M | $902M | $308M | $11.7B | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$11M | $133M | $241M | $37M | $4.1B | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$12M | $98M | $169M | $26M | $2.7B | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$12M | $93M | $225M | $46M | $2.8B | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +53.5% | +66.7% | +73.6% | +51.9% | +37.6% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -19.1% | +31.0% | +24.3% | +10.6% | +17.9% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -19.2% | +24.0% | +18.8% | +8.6% | +22.9% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -19.6% | +22.7% | +24.9% | +14.8% | +23.9% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | +30.1% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +66.7% | +7.3% | +39.5% | +11.1% | +30.6% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
PNBK leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.7x trailing earnings, CTBI trades at a 76% valuation discount to FIS's 52.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.93x vs FIS's 2.16x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $114M | $1.2B | $2.5B | $522M | $20.4B | $925.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$56M | $1.6B | $2.6B | $808M | $23.8B | $1.52T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -6.04x | 12.70x | 14.22x | 18.33x | 52.67x | 16.52x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 0.68x | 11.34x | 11.34x | 13.30x | 6.29x | 14.87x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.25x | 2.02x | 1.23x | 2.16x | 0.93x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 11.97x | 10.85x | 20.84x | 6.54x | 18.72x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.95x | 3.04x | 2.85x | 1.66x | 1.91x | 3.31x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.80x | 1.45x | 1.27x | 0.87x | 1.47x | 2.55x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 12.79x | 11.29x | 200.70x | 7.27x | 9.17x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — CTBI and FIS each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FIS delivers a 18.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $-14 for PNBK. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CTBI scores 7/9 vs PNBK's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -13.5% | +12.0% | +9.5% | +4.6% | +18.4% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.1% | +1.5% | +1.1% | +0.5% | +7.5% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -12.8% | +8.2% | +7.9% | +2.3% | +6.0% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -15.1% | +13.7% | +2.4% | +3.5% | +6.6% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.17x | 0.46x | 0.17x | 0.90x | 0.29x | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$170M | $327M | $142M | $285M | $3.4B | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $186M | $63M | $185M | $231M | $599M | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $16M | $390M | $327M | $517M | $4.0B | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.42x | 1.00x | 1.05x | 0.24x | 21.16x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $22,668 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,137 for PNBK. Over the past 12 months, CTBI leads with a +41.9% total return vs FIS's -49.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 34.2% vs PNBK's -52.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -42.1% | +24.1% | +15.7% | — | -38.5% | +2.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -2.9% | +41.9% | +21.0% | +9.6% | -49.1% | +24.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.1% | +97.6% | +51.3% | +39.3% | -18.8% | +141.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -88.6% | +82.6% | +37.8% | -11.7% | -66.7% | +126.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -92.0% | +144.3% | +107.7% | +88.3% | -25.8% | +492.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -52.3% | +25.5% | +14.8% | +11.7% | -6.7% | +34.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FIS and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FIS is the less volatile stock with a 0.61 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PNBK's 1.46 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JPM currently trades 98.2% from its 52-week high vs FIS's 47.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.46x | 0.71x | 0.76x | 1.08x | 0.61x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.00 | $71.31 | $48.81 | $14.29 | $82.74 | $337.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.86 | $49.61 | $39.20 | $10.57 | $37.91 | $266.85 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +48.3% | +96.7% | +97.0% | +84.7% | +47.7% | +98.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.0 | 56.5 | 59.1 | 32.5 | 35.2 | 63.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 285K | 87K | 267K | 0 | 5.7M | 7.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CTBI and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CTBI as "Hold", NBTB as "Hold", HONE as "Hold", FIS as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 59.2% upside for FIS (target: $63) vs -2.9% for NBTB (target: $46). For income investors, FIS offers the higher dividend yield at 4.13% vs JPM's 1.80%.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $76.00 | $46.00 | $14.00 | $62.88 | $339.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 6 | 10 | 6 | 37 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.9% | +3.0% | +2.6% | +4.1% | +1.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 31 | 13 | 6 | 1 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.99 | $1.43 | $0.32 | $1.63 | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.4% | +4.1% | +7.0% | +3.7% |
CTBI leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). PNBK leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
PNBK vs CTBI vs NBTB vs HONE vs FIS vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PNBK or CTBI or NBTB or HONE or FIS or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, HarborOne Bancorp, Inc.
(HONE) is the stronger pick with 10. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 0% for Patriot National Bancorp, Inc. (PNBK). Community Trust Bancorp, Inc. (CTBI) offers the better valuation at 12. 7x trailing P/E (11. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) a "Buy" — based on 37 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PNBK or CTBI or NBTB or HONE or FIS or JPM?
On trailing P/E, Community Trust Bancorp, Inc.
(CTBI) is the cheapest at 12. 7x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 52. 7x. On forward P/E, Patriot National Bancorp, Inc. is actually cheaper at 0. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. wins at 0. 26x versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 1. 61x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PNBK or CTBI or NBTB or HONE or FIS or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +126. 7%, compared to -88. 6% for Patriot National Bancorp, Inc. (PNBK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +492. 1% versus PNBK's -92. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PNBK or CTBI or NBTB or HONE or FIS or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
(FIS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 61β versus Patriot National Bancorp, Inc. 's 1. 46β — meaning PNBK is approximately 141% more volatile than FIS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PNBK or CTBI or NBTB or HONE or FIS or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), HarborOne Bancorp, Inc.
(HONE) is pulling ahead at 10. 7% versus -4. 0% for Patriot National Bancorp, Inc. (PNBK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Patriot National Bancorp, Inc. grew EPS 98. 4% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PNBK or CTBI or NBTB or HONE or FIS or JPM?
Community Trust Bancorp, Inc.
(CTBI) is the more profitable company, earning 24. 0% net margin versus -21. 9% for Patriot National Bancorp, Inc. — meaning it keeps 24. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CTBI leads at 31. 0% versus -21. 8% for PNBK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PNBK or CTBI or NBTB or HONE or FIS or JPM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 26x versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 1. 61x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Patriot National Bancorp, Inc. (PNBK) trades at 0. 7x forward P/E versus 14. 9x for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — 14. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 59. 2% to $62. 88.
08Which pays a better dividend — PNBK or CTBI or NBTB or HONE or FIS or JPM?
In this comparison, FIS (4.
1% yield), NBTB (3. 0% yield), CTBI (2. 9% yield), HONE (2. 6% yield), JPM (1. 8% yield) pay a dividend. PNBK does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is PNBK or CTBI or NBTB or HONE or FIS or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 94), 1. 8% yield, +492. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (JPM: +492. 1%, PNBK: -92. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PNBK and CTBI and NBTB and HONE and FIS and JPM?
These companies operate in different sectors (PNBK (Financial Services) and CTBI (Financial Services) and NBTB (Financial Services) and HONE (Financial Services) and FIS (Technology) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: PNBK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CTBI is a small-cap deep-value stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; HONE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. CTBI, NBTB, HONE, FIS, JPM pay a dividend while PNBK does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.