Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
PNBK vs PBFS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
PNBK vs PBFS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $114M | $423M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $61M | $129M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-12M | $20M |
| Gross Margin | 53.5% | 73.0% |
| Operating Margin | -19.1% | 19.2% |
| Forward P/E | 0.7x | 22.2x |
| Total Debt | $16M | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $186M | $119M |
PNBK vs PBFS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patriot National Ba… (PNBK) | 100 | 16.4 | -83.6% |
| Pioneer Bancorp, In… (PBFS) | 100 | 184.4 | +84.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PNBK vs PBFS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PNBK is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth -4.0%, EPS growth 98.4%
- -4.0% NII/revenue growth vs PBFS's -10.7%
- Lower P/E (0.7x vs 22.2x)
PBFS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 0.48
- 14.4% 10Y total return vs PNBK's -92.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.48, current ratio 0.24x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -4.0% NII/revenue growth vs PBFS's -10.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.7x vs 22.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.6% vs PNBK's 0.7% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.48 vs PNBK's 1.46 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +47.2% vs PNBK's -11.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.6% vs PNBK's 0.7% |
PNBK vs PBFS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
PNBK vs PBFS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PBFS leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PBFS is the larger business by revenue, generating $129M annually — 2.1x PNBK's $61M. PBFS is the more profitable business, keeping 15.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PNBK's -19.2%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $61M | $129M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$11M | $25M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$12M | $20M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$12M | $21M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +53.5% | +73.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -19.1% | +19.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -19.2% | +15.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -19.6% | +16.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +66.7% | -4.3% |
Valuation Metrics
PNBK leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $114M | $423M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$56M | $304M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -6.06x | 22.20x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 0.68x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.76x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 9.24x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.96x | 4.80x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.80x | 1.35x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 13.14x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PBFS leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PBFS delivers a 6.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-14 for PNBK. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PBFS scores 6/9 vs PNBK's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -13.5% | +6.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.1% | +0.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -12.8% | +8.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -15.1% | +9.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.17x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$170M | -$119M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $186M | $119M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $16M | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.42x | 0.79x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PBFS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PBFS five years ago would be worth $14,000 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,162 for PNBK. Over the past 12 months, PBFS leads with a +47.2% total return vs PNBK's -11.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PBFS at 23.9% vs PNBK's -49.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -41.9% | +26.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -11.8% | +47.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -86.8% | +90.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -88.4% | +40.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -92.1% | +14.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -49.0% | +23.9% |
Risk & Volatility
PBFS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PBFS is the less volatile stock with a 0.48 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PNBK's 1.46 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PBFS currently trades 99.0% from its 52-week high vs PNBK's 48.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.46x | 0.48x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.00 | $17.04 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.86 | $11.40 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +48.5% | +99.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 31.9 | 70.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 276K | 16K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.5% |
PBFS leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PNBK leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
PNBK vs PBFS: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PNBK or PBFS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Patriot National Bancorp, Inc.
(PNBK) is the stronger pick with -4. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -10. 7% for Pioneer Bancorp, Inc. (PBFS). Pioneer Bancorp, Inc. (PBFS) offers the better valuation at 22. 2x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — PNBK or PBFS?
Over the past 5 years, Pioneer Bancorp, Inc.
(PBFS) delivered a total return of +40. 0%, compared to -88. 4% for Patriot National Bancorp, Inc. (PNBK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PBFS returned +14. 4% versus PNBK's -92. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — PNBK or PBFS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Pioneer Bancorp, Inc.
(PBFS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 48β versus Patriot National Bancorp, Inc. 's 1. 46β — meaning PNBK is approximately 208% more volatile than PBFS relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — PNBK or PBFS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Patriot National Bancorp, Inc.
(PNBK) is pulling ahead at -4. 0% versus -10. 7% for Pioneer Bancorp, Inc. (PBFS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Patriot National Bancorp, Inc. grew EPS 98. 4% year-over-year, compared to 24. 6% for Pioneer Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — PNBK or PBFS?
Pioneer Bancorp, Inc.
(PBFS) is the more profitable company, earning 21. 8% net margin versus -21. 9% for Patriot National Bancorp, Inc. — meaning it keeps 21. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PBFS leads at 37. 3% versus -21. 8% for PNBK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PBFS leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — PNBK or PBFS?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is PNBK or PBFS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Pioneer Bancorp, Inc.
(PBFS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 48)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PBFS: +14. 4%, PNBK: -92. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between PNBK and PBFS?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.