Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
PNBK vs PBFS vs KO vs DCOM vs NECB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
PNBK vs PBFS vs KO vs DCOM vs NECB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $114M | $423M | $355.61B | $1.77B | $359M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $61M | $129M | $49.28B | $730M | $156M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-12M | $20M | $13.70B | $111M | $44M |
| Gross Margin | 53.5% | 73.0% | 61.7% | 56.1% | 65.9% |
| Operating Margin | -19.1% | 19.2% | 29.3% | 21.5% | 39.8% |
| Forward P/E | 0.7x | 22.2x | 25.3x | 11.9x | 8.3x |
| Total Debt | $16M | $0.00 | $45.49B | $371M | $75M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $186M | $119M | $10.27B | $2.35B | $81M |
PNBK vs PBFS vs KO vs DCOM vs NECB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patriot National Ba… (PNBK) | 100 | 16.4 | -83.6% |
| Pioneer Bancorp, In… (PBFS) | 100 | 184.4 | +84.4% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 184.9 | +84.9% |
| Dime Community Banc… (DCOM) | 100 | 175.5 | +75.5% |
| Northeast Community… (NECB) | 100 | 438.1 | +338.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PNBK vs PBFS vs KO vs DCOM vs NECB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PNBK ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Lower P/E (0.7x vs 11.9x)
PBFS is the clearest fit if your priority is stability.
- Beta 0.48 vs PNBK's 1.46
KO is the clearest fit if your priority is efficiency.
- 13.1% ROA vs PNBK's -1.1%, ROIC 15.8% vs -12.8%
DCOM has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure.
- Rev growth 13.0%, EPS growth 330.9%
- 13.0% NII/revenue growth vs PBFS's -10.7%
- +50.3% vs PNBK's -11.8%
NECB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.71, yield 3.8%
- 5.0% 10Y total return vs KO's 121.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.71, Low D/E 21.4%, current ratio 0.06x
- PEG 0.25 vs KO's 2.26
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.0% NII/revenue growth vs PBFS's -10.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.7x vs 11.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 28.4% margin vs PNBK's -19.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.48 vs PNBK's 1.46 | |
| Dividends | 3.8% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.5%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +50.3% vs PNBK's -11.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs PNBK's -1.1%, ROIC 15.8% vs -12.8% |
PNBK vs PBFS vs KO vs DCOM vs NECB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
PNBK vs PBFS vs KO vs DCOM vs NECB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NECB leads in 1 of 6 categories
PNBK leads 1 • KO leads 1 • DCOM leads 1 • PBFS leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NECB leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO is the larger business by revenue, generating $49.3B annually — 808.5x PNBK's $61M. NECB is the more profitable business, keeping 28.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PNBK's -19.2%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $61M | $129M | $49.3B | $730M | $156M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$11M | $25M | $15.5B | $161M | $63M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$12M | $20M | $13.7B | $111M | $44M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$12M | $21M | $12.6B | $182M | $51M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +53.5% | +73.0% | +61.7% | +56.1% | +65.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -19.1% | +19.2% | +29.3% | +21.5% | +39.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -19.2% | +15.3% | +27.8% | +15.2% | +28.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -19.6% | +16.2% | +25.5% | +25.0% | +32.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | +12.1% | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +66.7% | -4.3% | +18.2% | +2.3% | +6.8% |
Valuation Metrics
PNBK leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.0x trailing earnings, NECB trades at a 71% valuation discount to KO's 27.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NECB offers better value at 0.24x vs DCOM's 2.65x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $114M | $423M | $355.6B | $1.8B | $359M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$56M | $304M | $390.8B | -$218M | $353M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -6.06x | 22.20x | 27.18x | 16.91x | 7.99x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 0.68x | — | 25.27x | 11.89x | 8.30x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.76x | 2.43x | 2.65x | 0.24x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 9.24x | 26.39x | -1.39x | 5.57x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.96x | 4.80x | 7.42x | 2.42x | 2.28x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.80x | 1.35x | 10.40x | 1.17x | 1.01x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 13.14x | 67.15x | 9.68x | 7.07x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-14 for PNBK. PNBK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KO's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DCOM scores 8/9 vs PNBK's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -13.5% | +6.2% | +41.1% | +7.7% | +13.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.1% | +0.9% | +13.1% | +0.8% | +2.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -12.8% | +8.1% | +15.8% | +5.6% | +12.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -15.1% | +9.7% | +17.3% | +6.1% | +16.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.17x | — | 1.33x | 0.25x | 0.21x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$170M | -$119M | $35.2B | -$2.0B | -$6M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $186M | $119M | $10.3B | $2.4B | $81M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $16M | $0 | $45.5B | $371M | $75M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.42x | 0.79x | 10.70x | 0.57x | 1.17x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
DCOM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NECB five years ago would be worth $24,194 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,162 for PNBK. Over the past 12 months, DCOM leads with a +50.3% total return vs PNBK's -11.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DCOM at 32.6% vs PNBK's -49.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -41.9% | +26.7% | +20.3% | +35.9% | +15.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -11.8% | +47.2% | +17.2% | +50.3% | +17.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -86.8% | +90.4% | +47.0% | +133.2% | +98.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -88.4% | +40.0% | +65.6% | +31.8% | +141.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -92.1% | +14.4% | +121.1% | +77.9% | +500.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -49.0% | +23.9% | +13.7% | +32.6% | +25.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — KO and NECB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PNBK's 1.46 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NECB currently trades 99.8% from its 52-week high vs PNBK's 48.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.46x | 0.48x | -0.20x | 0.95x | 0.71x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.00 | $17.04 | $84.04 | $40.53 | $26.02 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.86 | $11.40 | $65.35 | $25.63 | $19.27 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +48.5% | +99.0% | +98.3% | +98.9% | +99.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 31.9 | 70.2 | 60.6 | 69.9 | 67.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 276K | 16K | 12.7M | 272K | 33K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — KO and NECB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: KO as "Buy", DCOM as "Hold", NECB as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 4.2% upside for KO (target: $86) vs -1.4% for DCOM (target: $40). For income investors, NECB offers the higher dividend yield at 3.75% vs KO's 2.46%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $86.13 | $39.50 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 48 | 10 | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +2.5% | +2.5% | +3.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | 56 | 0 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $2.04 | $1.00 | $0.98 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.5% | +0.2% | 0.0% | +0.4% |
NECB leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). PNBK leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
PNBK vs PBFS vs KO vs DCOM vs NECB: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PNBK or PBFS or KO or DCOM or NECB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Dime Community Bancshares, Inc.
(DCOM) is the stronger pick with 13. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -10. 7% for Pioneer Bancorp, Inc. (PBFS). Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc. (NECB) offers the better valuation at 8. 0x trailing P/E (8. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Coca-Cola Company (KO) a "Buy" — based on 48 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PNBK or PBFS or KO or DCOM or NECB?
On trailing P/E, Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc.
(NECB) is the cheapest at 8. 0x versus The Coca-Cola Company at 27. 2x. On forward P/E, Patriot National Bancorp, Inc. is actually cheaper at 0. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc. wins at 0. 25x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PNBK or PBFS or KO or DCOM or NECB?
Over the past 5 years, Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc.
(NECB) delivered a total return of +141. 9%, compared to -88. 4% for Patriot National Bancorp, Inc. (PNBK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NECB returned +500. 4% versus PNBK's -92. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PNBK or PBFS or KO or DCOM or NECB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
20β versus Patriot National Bancorp, Inc. 's 1. 46β — meaning PNBK is approximately -832% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Patriot National Bancorp, Inc. (PNBK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 133% for The Coca-Cola Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PNBK or PBFS or KO or DCOM or NECB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Dime Community Bancshares, Inc.
(DCOM) is pulling ahead at 13. 0% versus -10. 7% for Pioneer Bancorp, Inc. (PBFS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. grew EPS 330. 9% year-over-year, compared to -7. 7% for Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PNBK or PBFS or KO or DCOM or NECB?
Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc.
(NECB) is the more profitable company, earning 28. 2% net margin versus -21. 9% for Patriot National Bancorp, Inc. — meaning it keeps 28. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NECB leads at 39. 6% versus -21. 8% for PNBK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PBFS leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PNBK or PBFS or KO or DCOM or NECB more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc. (NECB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 25x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Patriot National Bancorp, Inc. (PNBK) trades at 0. 7x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 24. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KO: 4. 2% to $86. 13.
08Which pays a better dividend — PNBK or PBFS or KO or DCOM or NECB?
In this comparison, NECB (3.
8% yield), DCOM (2. 5% yield), KO (2. 5% yield) pay a dividend. PNBK, PBFS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is PNBK or PBFS or KO or DCOM or NECB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, PNBK: -92. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PNBK and PBFS and KO and DCOM and NECB?
These companies operate in different sectors (PNBK (Financial Services) and PBFS (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and DCOM (Financial Services) and NECB (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: PNBK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PBFS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; DCOM is a small-cap deep-value stock; NECB is a small-cap deep-value stock. KO, DCOM, NECB pay a dividend while PNBK, PBFS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.