Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
PNFP vs HOMB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
PNFP vs HOMB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $7.58B | $5.29B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.85B | $1.45B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $624M | $458M |
| Gross Margin | 49.1% | 65.6% |
| Operating Margin | 20.4% | 36.0% |
| Forward P/E | 9.6x | 10.8x |
| Total Debt | $2.53B | $1.20B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3.34B | $910M |
PNFP vs HOMB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pinnacle Financial … (PNFP) | 100 | 247.6 | +147.6% |
| Home Bancshares, In… (HOMB) | 100 | 185.6 | +85.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PNFP vs HOMB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PNFP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 15.3%, EPS growth -16.5%
- 125.4% 10Y total return vs HOMB's 58.2%
- 15.3% NII/revenue growth vs HOMB's 9.5%
HOMB is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 21 yrs, beta 0.82, yield 2.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.82, Low D/E 30.4%, current ratio 0.16x
- PEG 3.55 vs PNFP's 3.59
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.3% NII/revenue growth vs HOMB's 9.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.6x vs 10.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs HOMB's 0.3% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.82 vs PNFP's 1.11, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.8% yield, 21-year raise streak, vs PNFP's 0.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -1.9% vs PNFP's -4.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs HOMB's 0.3% |
PNFP vs HOMB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
PNFP vs HOMB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HOMB leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PNFP is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.9B annually — 2.0x HOMB's $1.5B. HOMB is the more profitable business, keeping 27.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PNFP's 16.6%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.9B | $1.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $841M | $601M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $624M | $458M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.1B | $354M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +49.1% | +65.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +20.4% | +36.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +16.6% | +27.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +28.3% | +29.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +17.7% | +26.0% |
Valuation Metrics
PNFP leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.4x trailing earnings, HOMB trades at a 19% valuation discount to PNFP's 16.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), HOMB offers better value at 4.39x vs PNFP's 6.16x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7.6B | $5.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.8B | $5.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 16.55x | 13.36x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.65x | 10.82x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 6.16x | 4.39x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.96x | 10.12x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.66x | 3.64x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.18x | 1.36x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.39x | 12.53x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HOMB leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HOMB delivers a 10.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $9 for PNFP. HOMB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.30x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PNFP's 0.39x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HOMB scores 7/9 vs PNFP's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.4% | +10.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.1% | +2.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.9% | +7.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.2% | +9.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.39x | 0.30x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$812M | $292M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3.3B | $910M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.5B | $1.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.60x | 1.44x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PNFP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PNFP five years ago would be worth $11,634 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,664 for HOMB. Over the past 12 months, HOMB leads with a -1.9% total return vs PNFP's -4.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PNFP at 28.5% vs HOMB's 12.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +4.8% | -3.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -4.3% | -1.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +112.0% | +42.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +16.3% | +6.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +125.4% | +58.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +28.5% | +12.4% |
Risk & Volatility
HOMB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HOMB is the less volatile stock with a 0.82 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PNFP's 1.11 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HOMB currently trades 87.1% from its 52-week high vs PNFP's 81.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.11x | 0.82x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $120.46 | $30.83 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $81.07 | $25.68 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +81.9% | +87.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.0 | 50.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.4M | 1.4M |
Analyst Outlook
HOMB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates PNFP as "Buy" and HOMB as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 19.2% upside for PNFP (target: $118) vs 19.1% for HOMB (target: $32). For income investors, HOMB offers the higher dividend yield at 2.79% vs PNFP's 0.91%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $117.63 | $32.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 21 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.9% | +2.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 21 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.89 | $0.75 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | +1.6% |
HOMB leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PNFP leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns).
PNFP vs HOMB: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PNFP or HOMB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc.
(PNFP) is the stronger pick with 15. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 9. 5% for Home Bancshares, Inc. (HOMB). Home Bancshares, Inc. (HOMB) offers the better valuation at 13. 4x trailing P/E (10. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc. (PNFP) a "Buy" — based on 21 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PNFP or HOMB?
On trailing P/E, Home Bancshares, Inc.
(HOMB) is the cheapest at 13. 4x versus Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc. at 16. 6x. On forward P/E, Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Home Bancshares, Inc. wins at 3. 55x versus Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc. 's 3. 59x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PNFP or HOMB?
Over the past 5 years, Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc.
(PNFP) delivered a total return of +16. 3%, compared to +6. 6% for Home Bancshares, Inc. (HOMB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PNFP returned +125. 4% versus HOMB's +58. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PNFP or HOMB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Home Bancshares, Inc.
(HOMB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 82β versus Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc. 's 1. 11β — meaning PNFP is approximately 36% more volatile than HOMB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Home Bancshares, Inc. (HOMB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 30% versus 39% for Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PNFP or HOMB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc.
(PNFP) is pulling ahead at 15. 3% versus 9. 5% for Home Bancshares, Inc. (HOMB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Home Bancshares, Inc. grew EPS 3. 6% year-over-year, compared to -16. 5% for Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PNFP or HOMB?
Home Bancshares, Inc.
(HOMB) is the more profitable company, earning 27. 7% net margin versus 16. 6% for Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HOMB leads at 36. 0% versus 20. 4% for PNFP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HOMB leads at 65. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PNFP or HOMB more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Home Bancshares, Inc. (HOMB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 3. 55x versus Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc. 's 3. 59x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc. (PNFP) trades at 9. 6x forward P/E versus 10. 8x for Home Bancshares, Inc. — 1. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PNFP: 19. 2% to $117. 63.
08Which pays a better dividend — PNFP or HOMB?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Home Bancshares, Inc. (HOMB) offers the highest yield at 2. 8%, versus 0. 9% for Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc. (PNFP).
09Is PNFP or HOMB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Home Bancshares, Inc.
(HOMB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 82), 2. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HOMB: +58. 2%, PNFP: +125. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PNFP and HOMB?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PNFP is a small-cap high-growth stock; HOMB is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.