Rental & Leasing Services
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
PONY vs CAT vs DE vs MBLY vs NVDA vs KO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Agricultural - Machinery
Agricultural - Machinery
Auto - Parts
Semiconductors
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
PONY vs CAT vs DE vs MBLY vs NVDA vs KO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Rental & Leasing Services | Agricultural - Machinery | Agricultural - Machinery | Auto - Parts | Semiconductors | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic |
| Market Cap | $2.87B | $423.68B | $155.88B | $7.61B | $4.97T | $355.61B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $90M | $70.75B | $46.86B | $2.01B | $253.49B | $49.28B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-134M | $9.42B | $4.78B | $-4.11B | $159.61B | $13.70B |
| Gross Margin | 15.7% | 32.5% | 35.4% | 48.3% | 74.1% | 61.7% |
| Operating Margin | -289.8% | 16.6% | 18.4% | -209.5% | 64.0% | 29.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | 36.9x | 32.0x | 33.7x | 23.0x | 25.3x |
| Total Debt | $15M | $43.33B | $63.94B | $0.00 | $11.41B | $45.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $295M | $9.98B | $8.28B | $1.84B | $10.61B | $10.27B |
PONY vs CAT vs DE vs MBLY vs NVDA vs KO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 24 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pony AI Inc. Americ… (PONY) | 100 | 62.6 | -37.4% |
| Caterpillar Inc. (CAT) | 100 | 224.2 | +124.2% |
| Deere & Company (DE) | 100 | 123.9 | +23.9% |
| Mobileye Global Inc. (MBLY) | 100 | 51.7 | -48.3% |
| NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) | 100 | 148.4 | +48.4% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 128.9 | +28.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PONY vs CAT vs DE vs MBLY vs NVDA vs KO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 6 stocks, PONY doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
CAT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +153.9% vs MBLY's -41.2%
DE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.60, yield 1.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.60, current ratio 2.31x
- Beta 0.60, yield 1.1%, current ratio 2.31x
- Beta 0.60 vs PONY's 3.32
MBLY doesn't hold a clear category lead here; it's more of a secondary option in this specific comparison.
NVDA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 65.5%, EPS growth 66.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 100.0%
- 174.7% 10Y total return vs CAT's 11.7%
- PEG 0.24 vs KO's 2.26
- 65.5% revenue growth vs DE's -11.6%
KO is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs NVDA's 0.0%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 65.5% revenue growth vs DE's -11.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (23.0x vs 25.3x), PEG 0.24 vs 2.26 | |
| Quality / Margins | 63.0% margin vs MBLY's -204.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.60 vs PONY's 3.32 | |
| Dividends | 2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs NVDA's 0.0%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +153.9% vs MBLY's -41.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 83.1% ROA vs MBLY's -35.5%, ROIC 81.8% vs -3.2% |
PONY vs CAT vs DE vs MBLY vs NVDA vs KO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
PONY vs CAT vs DE vs MBLY vs NVDA vs KO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 6 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NVDA leads in 3 of 6 categories
KO leads 2 • PONY leads 0 • CAT leads 0 • DE leads 0 • MBLY leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NVDA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NVDA is the larger business by revenue, generating $253.5B annually — 2812.6x PONY's $90M. NVDA is the more profitable business, keeping 63.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MBLY's -2.0%. On growth, NVDA holds the edge at +85.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $90M | $70.8B | $46.9B | $2.0B | $253.5B | $49.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$256M | $14.0B | $10.3B | -$3.8B | $165.5B | $15.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$134M | $9.4B | $4.8B | -$4.1B | $159.6B | $13.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$209M | $11.4B | $3.8B | $482M | $119.1B | $12.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +15.7% | +32.5% | +35.4% | +48.3% | +74.1% | +61.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.9% | +16.6% | +18.4% | -2.1% | +64.0% | +29.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -148.5% | +13.3% | +10.2% | -2.0% | +63.0% | +27.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.3% | +16.2% | +8.0% | +23.9% | +47.0% | +25.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +16.3% | +22.2% | +6.7% | +27.4% | +85.2% | +12.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +110.8% | +30.2% | -1.4% | -35.0% | +2.1% | +18.2% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — DE and MBLY and NVDA each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 27.2x trailing earnings, KO trades at a 44% valuation discount to CAT's 48.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NVDA offers better value at 0.44x vs KO's 2.43x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.9B | $423.7B | $155.9B | $7.6B | $4.97T | $355.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.6B | $457.0B | $211.5B | $5.8B | $4.97T | $390.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -23.29x | 48.36x | 31.22x | -19.46x | 41.87x | 27.18x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 36.94x | 31.95x | 33.74x | 22.98x | 25.27x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.72x | 1.91x | — | 0.44x | 2.43x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 33.92x | 19.87x | 74.94x | 37.30x | 26.39x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 31.83x | 6.27x | 3.49x | 4.02x | 23.01x | 7.42x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.81x | 20.03x | 6.03x | 0.64x | 31.97x | 10.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 41.24x | 48.25x | 14.54x | 51.40x | 67.15x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NVDA leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NVDA delivers a 111.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $112 in annual profit, vs $-37 for MBLY. PONY carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DE's 2.46x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs NVDA's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -12.4% | +47.5% | +18.2% | -37.3% | +111.7% | +41.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -11.4% | +10.0% | +4.5% | -35.5% | +83.1% | +13.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -20.9% | +15.9% | +7.8% | -3.2% | +81.8% | +15.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -19.4% | +19.1% | +11.7% | -3.6% | +97.2% | +17.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 2.03x | 2.46x | — | 0.07x | 1.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$280M | $33.4B | $55.7B | -$1.8B | $807M | $35.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $295M | $10.0B | $8.3B | $1.8B | $10.6B | $10.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $15M | $43.3B | $63.9B | $0 | $11.4B | $45.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 9.22x | 3.07x | — | 636.02x | 10.70x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NVDA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NVDA five years ago would be worth $114,051 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,224 for MBLY. Over the past 12 months, CAT leads with a +153.9% total return vs MBLY's -41.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NVDA at 73.3% vs MBLY's -38.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -49.3% | +52.7% | +24.1% | -16.8% | +8.8% | +20.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -35.8% | +153.9% | +13.0% | -41.2% | +41.7% | +17.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -32.1% | +289.8% | +53.9% | -76.6% | +420.5% | +47.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -32.1% | +327.7% | +80.1% | -67.8% | +1040.5% | +65.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -32.1% | +1168.9% | +624.8% | -67.8% | +17472.3% | +121.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -12.1% | +57.4% | +15.4% | -38.4% | +73.3% | +13.7% |
Risk & Volatility
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PONY's 3.32 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 98.3% from its 52-week high vs PONY's 32.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.32x | 1.67x | 0.60x | 2.09x | 1.81x | -0.20x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $24.92 | $946.83 | $674.19 | $20.18 | $236.54 | $84.04 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.95 | $355.70 | $433.00 | $6.47 | $140.85 | $65.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +32.7% | +96.2% | +85.7% | +46.3% | +86.7% | +98.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 38.6 | 52.5 | 50.6 | 49.0 | 44.9 | 60.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.3M | 2.4M | 1.1M | 6.0M | 147.4M | 12.7M |
Analyst Outlook
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PONY as "Buy", CAT as "Buy", DE as "Hold", MBLY as "Buy", NVDA as "Buy", KO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 182.2% upside for PONY (target: $23) vs -3.1% for CAT (target: $882). For income investors, KO offers the higher dividend yield at 2.46% vs PONY's 0.21%.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $23.00 | $882.20 | $690.00 | $13.32 | $309.46 | $86.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 53 | 46 | 26 | 79 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.2% | +0.6% | +1.1% | — | +0.0% | +2.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 32 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 56 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.02 | $5.86 | $6.33 | — | $0.04 | $2.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.2% | +0.7% | +1.3% | +0.8% | +0.2% |
NVDA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). KO leads in 2 (Risk & Volatility, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
PONY vs CAT vs DE vs MBLY vs NVDA vs KO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PONY or CAT or DE or MBLY or NVDA or KO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the stronger pick with 65.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -11. 6% for Deere & Company (DE). The Coca-Cola Company (KO) offers the better valuation at 27. 2x trailing P/E (25. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Pony AI Inc. American Depositary Shares (PONY) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PONY or CAT or DE or MBLY or NVDA or KO?
On trailing P/E, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the cheapest at 27.
2x versus Caterpillar Inc. at 48. 4x. On forward P/E, NVIDIA Corporation is actually cheaper at 23. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: NVIDIA Corporation wins at 0. 24x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PONY or CAT or DE or MBLY or NVDA or KO?
Over the past 5 years, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) delivered a total return of +1041%, compared to -67.
8% for Mobileye Global Inc. (MBLY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NVDA returned +174. 7% versus MBLY's -67. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PONY or CAT or DE or MBLY or NVDA or KO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
20β versus Pony AI Inc. American Depositary Shares's 3. 32β — meaning PONY is approximately -1760% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Pony AI Inc. American Depositary Shares (PONY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 2% for Deere & Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PONY or CAT or DE or MBLY or NVDA or KO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is pulling ahead at 65.
5% versus -11. 6% for Deere & Company (DE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Mobileye Global Inc. grew EPS 87. 4% year-over-year, compared to -27. 8% for Deere & Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, NVDA leads at 100. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PONY or CAT or DE or MBLY or NVDA or KO?
NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the more profitable company, earning 55.
6% net margin versus -148. 9% for Pony AI Inc. American Depositary Shares — meaning it keeps 55. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NVDA leads at 60. 4% versus -289. 8% for PONY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NVDA leads at 71. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PONY or CAT or DE or MBLY or NVDA or KO more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 24x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) trades at 23. 0x forward P/E versus 36. 9x for Caterpillar Inc. — 14. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PONY: 182. 2% to $23. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — PONY or CAT or DE or MBLY or NVDA or KO?
In this comparison, KO (2.
5% yield), DE (1. 1% yield), CAT (0. 6% yield), PONY (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. MBLY, NVDA do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is PONY or CAT or DE or MBLY or NVDA or KO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Mobileye Global Inc. (MBLY) carries a higher beta of 2. 09 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, MBLY: -67. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PONY and CAT and DE and MBLY and NVDA and KO?
These companies operate in different sectors (PONY (Industrials) and CAT (Industrials) and DE (Industrials) and MBLY (Consumer Cyclical) and NVDA (Technology) and KO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: PONY is a small-cap high-growth stock; CAT is a large-cap quality compounder stock; DE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; MBLY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NVDA is a mega-cap high-growth stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. CAT, DE, KO pay a dividend while PONY, MBLY, NVDA do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.