PPC
Pilgrim's Pride Corporation
Packaged Foods
Market Cap$7.23B
5Y Perf.-34.7%
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
PPC vs SFD vs TSN vs HRL vs ADM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
SFD
Smithfield Foods, Inc.
Agricultural Farm Products
Market Cap$10.25B
5Y Perf.+21.3%
TSN
Tyson Foods, Inc.
Agricultural Farm Products
Market Cap$24.18B
5Y Perf.+20.3%
HRL
Hormel Foods Corporation
Packaged Foods
Market Cap$11.41B
5Y Perf.-30.8%
ADM
Archer-Daniels-Midland Company
Agricultural Farm Products
Market Cap$37.36B
5Y Perf.+51.3%
PPC vs SFD vs TSN vs HRL vs ADM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | PPC | SFD | TSN | HRL | ADM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaged Foods | Agricultural Farm Products | Agricultural Farm Products | Packaged Foods | Agricultural Farm Products |
| Market Cap | $7.23B | $10.25B | $24.18B | $11.41B | $37.36B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $18.57B | $15.56B | $55.71B | $12.14B | $80.61B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $888M | $1.01B | $453M | $489M | $1.08B |
| Gross Margin | 11.6% | 13.4% | 6.6% | 15.5% | 5.8% |
| Operating Margin | 7.4% | 8.6% | 2.3% | 6.0% | 1.5% |
| Forward P/E | 8.1x | 9.8x | 17.5x | 14.1x | 18.6x |
| Total Debt | $3.35B | $2.40B | $8.83B | $2.86B | $8.41B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $640M | $1.54B | $1.23B | $671M | $1.01B |
PPC vs SFD vs TSN vs HRL vs ADM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
PPC
SFD
TSN
HRL
ADM
| Stock | Jan 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pilgrim's Pride Cor… (PPC) | 100 | 65.3 | -34.7% |
| Smithfield Foods, I… (SFD) | 100 | 121.3 | +21.3% |
| Tyson Foods, Inc. (TSN) | 100 | 120.3 | +20.3% |
| Hormel Foods Corpor… (HRL) | 100 | 69.2 | -30.8% |
| Archer-Daniels-Midl… (ADM) | 100 | 151.3 | +51.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PPC vs SFD vs TSN vs HRL vs ADM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: PPC leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. Smithfield Foods, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. ADM also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
PPC
Pilgrim's Pride Corporation
The Income Pick
PPC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.02, yield 27.5%
- Rev growth 3.5%, EPS growth -0.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 1.9%
- 52.1% 10Y total return vs ADM's 147.4%
- Beta 0.02, yield 27.5%, current ratio 1.47x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
SFD
Smithfield Foods, Inc.
The Growth Leader
SFD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth and quality is your priority.
- 7.3% revenue growth vs ADM's -6.2%
- 6.5% margin vs TSN's 0.8%
Best for: growth and quality
TSN
Tyson Foods, Inc.
The Income Angle
TSN lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Best for: consumer defensive exposure
HRL
Hormel Foods Corporation
The Income Angle
Among these 5 stocks, HRL doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
Best for: consumer defensive exposure
ADM
Archer-Daniels-Midland Company
The Defensive Pick
ADM ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.12, Low D/E 36.5%, current ratio 11.20x
- +66.2% vs PPC's -30.5%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | SFD | 7.3% revenue growth vs ADM's -6.2% |
| Value | PPC | Lower P/E (8.1x vs 14.1x) |
| Quality / Margins | SFD | 6.5% margin vs TSN's 0.8% |
| Stability / Safety | PPC | Beta 0.02 vs TSN's 0.33 |
| Dividends | PPC | 27.5% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs HRL's 5.5% |
| Momentum (1Y) | ADM | +66.2% vs PPC's -30.5% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | PPC | 8.7% ROA vs TSN's 1.3%, ROIC 20.0% vs 4.1% |
PPC vs SFD vs TSN vs HRL vs ADM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
FY 2025
FY 2025
FY 2025
PPC vs SFD vs TSN vs HRL vs ADM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLPPCLAGGINGADM
Who Leads Where
PPC leads in 1 of 6 categories
SFD leads 0 • TSN leads 0 • HRL leads 0 • ADM leads 0 • 5 tied
Explore the data ↓ADMArcher-Daniels-Midlan…
0leads
HRLHormel Foods Corporat…
0leads
TSNTyson Foods, Inc.
0leads
SFDSmithfield Foods, Inc.
0leads
PPCPilgrim's Pride Corpo…
1leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs SFDvs TSNMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
Tied
—
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
PPC4/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
Tied
—
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
Tied
—
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — SFD and TSN each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ADM is the larger business by revenue, generating $80.6B annually — 6.6x HRL's $12.1B. SFD is the more profitable business, keeping 6.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TSN's 0.8%. On growth, TSN holds the edge at +4.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | PPCPilgrim's Pride C… | SFDSmithfield Foods,… | TSNTyson Foods, Inc. | HRLHormel Foods Corp… | ADMArcher-Daniels-Mi… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $18.6B | $15.6B | $55.7B | $12.1B | $80.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.8B | $1.6B | $2.7B | $932M | $3.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $888M | $1.0B | $453M | $489M | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $773M | $813M | $1.2B | $578M | $4.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +11.6% | +13.4% | +6.6% | +15.5% | +5.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.4% | +8.6% | +2.3% | +6.0% | +1.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.8% | +6.5% | +0.8% | +4.0% | +1.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.2% | +5.2% | +2.2% | +4.8% | +6.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.6% | +0.8% | +4.4% | +1.3% | +1.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -65.3% | +6.9% | +36.1% | +6.5% | +1.6% |
Evenly matched — SFD and TSN each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
PPC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 6.7x trailing earnings, PPC trades at a 87% valuation discount to TSN's 49.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PPC's 4.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ADM's 17.2x.
| Metric | PPCPilgrim's Pride C… | SFDSmithfield Foods,… | TSNTyson Foods, Inc. | HRLHormel Foods Corp… | ADMArcher-Daniels-Mi… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7.2B | $10.3B | $24.2B | $11.4B | $37.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $9.9B | $11.1B | $31.8B | $13.6B | $44.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 6.70x | 10.39x | 49.95x | 23.84x | 34.77x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.05x | 9.80x | 17.46x | 14.13x | 18.63x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.11x | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 4.81x | 6.84x | 11.34x | 13.84x | 17.18x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.39x | 0.66x | 0.44x | 0.94x | 0.47x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.96x | 1.45x | 1.30x | 1.44x | 1.63x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.95x | 14.28x | 20.55x | 21.36x | 8.89x |
PPC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — PPC and SFD each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PPC delivers a 24.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $2 for TSN. SFD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.34x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PPC's 0.91x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TSN scores 6/9 vs HRL's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | PPCPilgrim's Pride C… | SFDSmithfield Foods,… | TSNTyson Foods, Inc. | HRLHormel Foods Corp… | ADMArcher-Daniels-Mi… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +24.1% | +14.7% | +2.5% | +4.3% | +4.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.7% | +8.6% | +1.3% | +3.7% | +2.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +20.0% | +12.2% | +4.1% | +5.3% | +3.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +20.8% | +12.4% | +4.6% | +6.0% | +4.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.91x | 0.34x | 0.48x | 0.36x | 0.37x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.7B | $857M | $7.6B | $2.2B | $7.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $640M | $1.5B | $1.2B | $671M | $1.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.4B | $2.4B | $8.8B | $2.9B | $8.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 8.87x | 34.71x | 2.73x | 6.44x | 3.03x |
Evenly matched — PPC and SFD each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — PPC and ADM each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PPC five years ago would be worth $16,053 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,569 for HRL. Over the past 12 months, ADM leads with a +66.2% total return vs PPC's -30.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PPC at 19.6% vs HRL's -15.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | PPCPilgrim's Pride C… | SFDSmithfield Foods,… | TSNTyson Foods, Inc. | HRLHormel Foods Corp… | ADMArcher-Daniels-Mi… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -23.8% | +19.2% | +17.9% | -8.8% | +32.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -30.5% | +20.7% | +26.8% | -24.7% | +66.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +71.1% | +33.7% | +45.6% | -40.5% | +10.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +60.5% | +33.7% | -1.6% | -44.3% | +29.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +52.1% | +33.7% | +23.1% | -23.9% | +147.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +19.6% | +10.2% | +13.3% | -15.9% | +3.4% |
Evenly matched — PPC and ADM each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PPC and TSN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PPC is the less volatile stock with a 0.02 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TSN's 0.33 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TSN currently trades 97.8% from its 52-week high vs PPC's 59.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | PPCPilgrim's Pride C… | SFDSmithfield Foods,… | TSNTyson Foods, Inc. | HRLHormel Foods Corp… | ADMArcher-Daniels-Mi… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.02x | 0.30x | 0.33x | 0.15x | 0.12x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $51.45 | $29.80 | $69.48 | $31.86 | $81.75 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $30.22 | $21.08 | $50.56 | $20.32 | $46.81 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +59.1% | +87.5% | +97.8% | +65.1% | +94.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 35.9 | 40.0 | 64.5 | 39.5 | 68.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 1.5M | 2.7M | 4.2M | 3.8M |
Evenly matched — PPC and TSN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — PPC and HRL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PPC as "Hold", SFD as "Buy", TSN as "Buy", HRL as "Hold", ADM as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 51.3% upside for PPC (target: $46) vs -22.6% for ADM (target: $60). For income investors, PPC offers the higher dividend yield at 27.51% vs ADM's 2.63%.
| Metric | PPCPilgrim's Pride C… | SFDSmithfield Foods,… | TSNTyson Foods, Inc. | HRLHormel Foods Corp… | ADMArcher-Daniels-Mi… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $46.00 | $32.00 | $70.25 | $27.25 | $60.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 21 | 4 | 30 | 29 | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +27.5% | +3.9% | +2.9% | +5.5% | +2.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 | 13 | 34 | 31 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $8.36 | $1.01 | $2.00 | $1.15 | $2.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.8% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Evenly matched — PPC and HRL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
PPC leads in 1 of 6 categories — strongest in Valuation Metrics. 5 categories are tied.
Best OverallPilgrim's Pride Corporation (PPC)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
PPC vs SFD vs TSN vs HRL vs ADM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PPC or SFD or TSN or HRL or ADM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Pilgrim's Pride Corporation (PPC) is the stronger pick with 3.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 2% for Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM). Pilgrim's Pride Corporation (PPC) offers the better valuation at 6. 7x trailing P/E (8. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Smithfield Foods, Inc. (SFD) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PPC or SFD or TSN or HRL or ADM?
On trailing P/E, Pilgrim's Pride Corporation (PPC) is the cheapest at 6.
7x versus Tyson Foods, Inc. at 49. 9x. On forward P/E, Pilgrim's Pride Corporation is actually cheaper at 8. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PPC or SFD or TSN or HRL or ADM?
Over the past 5 years, Pilgrim's Pride Corporation (PPC) delivered a total return of +60.
5%, compared to -44. 3% for Hormel Foods Corporation (HRL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ADM returned +147. 4% versus HRL's -23. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PPC or SFD or TSN or HRL or ADM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Pilgrim's Pride Corporation (PPC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
02β versus Tyson Foods, Inc. 's 0. 33β — meaning TSN is approximately 1261% more volatile than PPC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Smithfield Foods, Inc. (SFD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 34% versus 91% for Pilgrim's Pride Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PPC or SFD or TSN or HRL or ADM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Pilgrim's Pride Corporation (PPC) is pulling ahead at 3.
5% versus -6. 2% for Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Pilgrim's Pride Corporation grew EPS -0. 7% year-over-year, compared to -40. 8% for Hormel Foods Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, PPC leads at 1. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PPC or SFD or TSN or HRL or ADM?
Smithfield Foods, Inc.
(SFD) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 4% net margin versus 0. 9% for Tyson Foods, Inc. — meaning it keeps 6. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PPC leads at 8. 7% versus 1. 8% for ADM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HRL leads at 15. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PPC or SFD or TSN or HRL or ADM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Pilgrim's Pride Corporation (PPC) trades at 8.
1x forward P/E versus 18. 6x for Archer-Daniels-Midland Company — 10. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PPC: 51. 3% to $46. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — PPC or SFD or TSN or HRL or ADM?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Pilgrim's Pride Corporation (PPC) offers the highest yield at 27. 5%, versus 2. 6% for Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM).
09Is PPC or SFD or TSN or HRL or ADM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Pilgrim's Pride Corporation (PPC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
02), 27. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PPC: +52. 1%, TSN: +23. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PPC and SFD and TSN and HRL and ADM?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PPC is a small-cap deep-value stock; SFD is a mid-cap deep-value stock; TSN is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; HRL is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; ADM is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
Revenue Growth>
%
(PPC: 1.6% · SFD: 0.8%)Net Margin>
%
(PPC: 4.8% · SFD: 6.5%)P/E Ratio<
x
(PPC: 6.7x · SFD: 10.4x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.