Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

PPTA vs MUX vs CDE vs EXK vs HL

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
PPTA
Perpetua Resources Corp.

Other Precious Metals

Basic MaterialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.07B
5Y Perf.+342.0%
MUX
McEwen Mining Inc.

Other Precious Metals

Basic MaterialsNYSE • CA
Market Cap$1.39B
5Y Perf.+110.5%
CDE
Coeur Mining, Inc.

Gold

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$11.63B
5Y Perf.+101.1%
EXK
Endeavour Silver Corp.

Other Precious Metals

Basic MaterialsNYSE • CA
Market Cap$2.99B
5Y Perf.+72.0%
HL
Hecla Mining Company

Gold

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$12.13B
5Y Perf.+177.0%

PPTA vs MUX vs CDE vs EXK vs HL — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
PPTA logoPPTA
MUX logoMUX
CDE logoCDE
EXK logoEXK
HL logoHL
IndustryOther Precious MetalsOther Precious MetalsGoldOther Precious MetalsGold
Market Cap$3.07B$1.39B$11.63B$2.99B$12.13B
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$162M$2.57B$330M$1.57B
Net Income (TTM)$-44M$74M$799M$-94M$559M
Gross Margin32.9%35.4%9.3%50.9%
Operating Margin22.2%39.4%-1.7%44.1%
Forward P/E129.6x22.2x9.1x14.3x19.1x
Total Debt$28K$926K$365M$120M$299M
Cash & Equiv.$44M$51M$554M$106M$242M

PPTA vs MUX vs CDE vs EXK vs HLLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

PPTA
MUX
CDE
EXK
HL
StockFeb 21May 26Return
Perpetua Resources … (PPTA)100442.0+342.0%
McEwen Mining Inc. (MUX)100210.5+110.5%
Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE)100201.1+101.1%
Endeavour Silver Co… (EXK)100172.0+72.0%
Hecla Mining Company (HL)100277.0+177.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: PPTA vs MUX vs CDE vs EXK vs HL

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: MUX and CDE are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. Coeur Mining, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. HL and PPTA also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
PPTA
Perpetua Resources Corp.
The Defensive Pick

PPTA is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.08, Low D/E 0.0%, current ratio 7.01x
  • Beta 1.08 vs CDE's 1.81, lower leverage
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
MUX
McEwen Mining Inc.
The Income Pick

MUX has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.27, yield 0.2%
  • 45.7% margin vs EXK's -28.4%
  • 0.2% yield, vs HL's 0.1%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Best for: income & stability
CDE
Coeur Mining, Inc.
The Growth Play

CDE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.

  • Rev growth 96.4%, EPS growth 5.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 38.1%
  • 96.4% revenue growth vs PPTA's -260.4%
  • Lower P/E (9.1x vs 19.1x)
Best for: growth exposure
EXK
Endeavour Silver Corp.
The Value Angle

Among these 5 stocks, EXK doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: basic materials exposure
HL
Hecla Mining Company
The Long-Run Compounder

HL ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and defensive.

  • 360.6% 10Y total return vs PPTA's 252.0%
  • Beta 1.26, yield 0.1%, current ratio 2.72x
  • +271.0% vs PPTA's +93.6%
  • 16.3% ROA vs PPTA's -13.7%, ROIC 15.3% vs -58.4%
Best for: long-term compounding and defensive
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCDE logoCDE96.4% revenue growth vs PPTA's -260.4%
ValueCDE logoCDELower P/E (9.1x vs 19.1x)
Quality / MarginsMUX logoMUX45.7% margin vs EXK's -28.4%
Stability / SafetyPPTA logoPPTABeta 1.08 vs CDE's 1.81, lower leverage
DividendsMUX logoMUX0.2% yield, vs HL's 0.1%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)HL logoHL+271.0% vs PPTA's +93.6%
Efficiency (ROA)HL logoHL16.3% ROA vs PPTA's -13.7%, ROIC 15.3% vs -58.4%

PPTA vs MUX vs CDE vs EXK vs HL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

PPTAPerpetua Resources Corp.

Segment breakdown not available.

MUXMcEwen Mining Inc.
FY 2025
United States Reportable Segment
59.1%$117M
Canada Reportable Segment
38.5%$76M
Mexico Reportable Segment
2.4%$5M
CDECoeur Mining, Inc.
FY 2025
Gold
64.9%$1.3B
Product, Silver
35.1%$726M
EXKEndeavour Silver Corp.
FY 2024
Concentrate Sales
101.1%$71M
Provisional Pricing Adjustments
-1.1%$-776,000
HLHecla Mining Company
FY 2024
Silver Contracts
43.5%$414M
Gold
33.5%$318M
Zinc
13.8%$131M
Lead
9.2%$87M
Copper
0.0%$416,000

PPTA vs MUX vs CDE vs EXK vs HL — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLCDELAGGINGHL

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — CDE and HL each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

CDE and PPTA operate at a comparable scale, with $2.6B and $0 in trailing revenue. MUX is the more profitable business, keeping 45.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to EXK's -28.4%. On growth, EXK holds the edge at +154.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricPPTA logoPPTAPerpetua Resource…MUX logoMUXMcEwen Mining Inc.CDE logoCDECoeur Mining, Inc.EXK logoEXKEndeavour Silver …HL logoHLHecla Mining Comp…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$162M$2.6B$330M$1.6B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$75M$61M$1.2B$49M$853M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$44M$74M$799M-$94M$559M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$61M-$24M$915M-$129M$472M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+32.9%+35.4%+9.3%+50.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+22.2%+39.4%-1.7%+44.1%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+45.7%+31.1%-28.4%+35.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-14.7%+35.6%-39.1%+30.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-100.0%+137.8%+154.0%+57.4%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-5.4%+4.9%+4.9%-97.5%-160.0%
Evenly matched — CDE and HL each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

CDE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 20.1x trailing earnings, CDE trades at a 84% valuation discount to PPTA's 129.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CDE's 11.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than EXK's 76.0x.

MetricPPTA logoPPTAPerpetua Resource…MUX logoMUXMcEwen Mining Inc.CDE logoCDECoeur Mining, Inc.EXK logoEXKEndeavour Silver …HL logoHLHecla Mining Comp…
Market CapShares × price$3.1B$1.4B$11.6B$3.0B$12.1B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$3.0B$1.3B$11.4B$3.0B$12.2B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS129.59x39.61x20.13x-78.08x36.92x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.22.21x9.10x14.34x19.07x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.39x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple74.65x11.19x76.02x17.25x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue7.03x5.62x13.72x8.53x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share17.19x2.31x3.56x5.07x4.58x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF17.48x39.11x
CDE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

CDE leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

HL delivers a 22.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $-18 for EXK. PPTA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to EXK's 0.25x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HL scores 8/9 vs EXK's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricPPTA logoPPTAPerpetua Resource…MUX logoMUXMcEwen Mining Inc.CDE logoCDECoeur Mining, Inc.EXK logoEXKEndeavour Silver …HL logoHLHecla Mining Comp…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-14.1%+13.6%+15.2%-18.4%+22.5%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-13.7%+9.0%+11.2%-9.2%+16.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital-58.4%-1.9%+23.5%+1.5%+15.3%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-56.0%-1.9%+23.9%+1.6%+16.8%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–945648
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.00x0.00x0.11x0.25x0.12x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$44M-$50M-$188M$14M$57M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$44M$51M$554M$106M$242M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$28,288$926,000$365M$120M$299M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-1.52x47.33x-39.17x19.04x
CDE leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

PPTA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in PPTA five years ago would be worth $32,583 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $16,111 for EXK. Over the past 12 months, HL leads with a +271.0% total return vs PPTA's +93.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PPTA at 75.1% vs EXK's 34.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricPPTA logoPPTAPerpetua Resource…MUX logoMUXMcEwen Mining Inc.CDE logoCDECoeur Mining, Inc.EXK logoEXKEndeavour Silver …HL logoHLHecla Mining Comp…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+16.2%+25.1%+3.2%+12.5%-4.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+93.6%+198.5%+216.1%+193.4%+271.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+436.9%+163.5%+414.6%+144.0%+194.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+225.8%+79.8%+96.0%+61.1%+150.3%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+252.0%-0.1%+149.9%+182.7%+360.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+75.1%+38.1%+72.6%+34.6%+43.4%
PPTA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — PPTA and MUX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

PPTA is the less volatile stock with a 1.08 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CDE's 1.81 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MUX currently trades 78.7% from its 52-week high vs HL's 52.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricPPTA logoPPTAPerpetua Resource…MUX logoMUXMcEwen Mining Inc.CDE logoCDECoeur Mining, Inc.EXK logoEXKEndeavour Silver …HL logoHLHecla Mining Comp…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.08x1.27x1.81x1.71x1.26x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$37.37$29.70$27.77$15.15$34.17
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$11.22$6.88$5.55$3.14$4.68
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+76.3%+78.7%+65.2%+67.0%+52.9%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10053.251.049.347.646.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.4M992K22.2M9.4M15.4M
Evenly matched — PPTA and MUX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

MUX leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: PPTA as "Buy", MUX as "Buy", CDE as "Buy", EXK as "Buy", HL as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 60.1% upside for CDE (target: $29) vs 25.6% for EXK (target: $13). MUX is the only dividend payer here at 0.18% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricPPTA logoPPTAPerpetua Resource…MUX logoMUXMcEwen Mining Inc.CDE logoCDECoeur Mining, Inc.EXK logoEXKEndeavour Silver …HL logoHLHecla Mining Comp…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$41.00$30.00$29.00$12.75$23.83
# AnalystsCovering analysts37211426
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.2%+0.1%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0000
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.04$0.01
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+0.1%0.0%+0.0%
MUX leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

CDE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). PPTA leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.

Best OverallCoeur Mining, Inc. (CDE)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

PPTA vs MUX vs CDE vs EXK vs HL: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is PPTA or MUX or CDE or EXK or HL a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Coeur Mining, Inc.

(CDE) is the stronger pick with 96. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 9% for Endeavour Silver Corp. (EXK). Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE) offers the better valuation at 20. 1x trailing P/E (9. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Perpetua Resources Corp. (PPTA) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — PPTA or MUX or CDE or EXK or HL?

On trailing P/E, Coeur Mining, Inc.

(CDE) is the cheapest at 20. 1x versus Perpetua Resources Corp. at 129. 6x. On forward P/E, Coeur Mining, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 1x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — PPTA or MUX or CDE or EXK or HL?

Over the past 5 years, Perpetua Resources Corp.

(PPTA) delivered a total return of +225. 8%, compared to +61. 1% for Endeavour Silver Corp. (EXK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HL returned +360. 6% versus MUX's -0. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — PPTA or MUX or CDE or EXK or HL?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Perpetua Resources Corp.

(PPTA) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 08β versus Coeur Mining, Inc. 's 1. 81β — meaning CDE is approximately 67% more volatile than PPTA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Perpetua Resources Corp. (PPTA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 25% for Endeavour Silver Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — PPTA or MUX or CDE or EXK or HL?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Coeur Mining, Inc.

(CDE) is pulling ahead at 96. 4% versus 5. 9% for Endeavour Silver Corp. (EXK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hecla Mining Company grew EPS 765. 7% year-over-year, compared to -519. 4% for Endeavour Silver Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CDE leads at 38. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — PPTA or MUX or CDE or EXK or HL?

Coeur Mining, Inc.

(CDE) is the more profitable company, earning 28. 3% net margin versus -14. 5% for Endeavour Silver Corp. — meaning it keeps 28. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HL leads at 37. 5% versus -6. 5% for MUX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HL leads at 41. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is PPTA or MUX or CDE or EXK or HL more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Coeur Mining, Inc.

(CDE) trades at 9. 1x forward P/E versus 22. 2x for McEwen Mining Inc. — 13. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CDE: 60. 1% to $29. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — PPTA or MUX or CDE or EXK or HL?

In this comparison, MUX (0.

2% yield) pays a dividend. PPTA, CDE, EXK, HL do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is PPTA or MUX or CDE or EXK or HL better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Perpetua Resources Corp.

(PPTA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 08), +252. 0% 10Y return). Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE) carries a higher beta of 1. 81 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PPTA: +252. 0%, CDE: +149. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between PPTA and MUX and CDE and EXK and HL?

Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: PPTA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MUX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CDE is a mid-cap high-growth stock; EXK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HL is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

PPTA

Quality Business

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MUX

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 27%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CDE

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 68%
  • Net Margin > 18%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

EXK

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 77%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

HL

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 28%
  • Net Margin > 21%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform PPTA and MUX and CDE and EXK and HL on the metrics below

P/E Ratio<
x
(PPTA: 129.6x · MUX: 39.6x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.