Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

PRCT vs NTRA vs ISRG vs EXAS

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
PRCT
PROCEPT BioRobotics Corporation

Medical - Devices

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.45B
5Y Perf.-33.3%
NTRA
Natera, Inc.

Medical - Diagnostics & Research

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$31.16B
5Y Perf.+97.3%
ISRG
Intuitive Surgical, Inc.

Medical - Instruments & Supplies

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$161.07B
5Y Perf.+36.8%
EXAS
Exact Sciences Corporation

Medical - Diagnostics & Research

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$20.02B
5Y Perf.+8.3%

PRCT vs NTRA vs ISRG vs EXAS — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
PRCT logoPRCT
NTRA logoNTRA
ISRG logoISRG
EXAS logoEXAS
IndustryMedical - DevicesMedical - Diagnostics & ResearchMedical - Instruments & SuppliesMedical - Diagnostics & Research
Market Cap$1.45B$31.16B$161.07B$20.02B
Revenue (TTM)$322M$2.31B$10.58B$3.25B
Net Income (TTM)$-102M$-208M$2.98B$-208M
Gross Margin63.0%64.8%66.3%69.7%
Operating Margin-33.9%-13.4%30.5%-6.4%
Forward P/E43.8x582.8x
Total Debt$52M$214M$303M$2.52B
Cash & Equiv.$287M$1.08B$3.37B$956M

PRCT vs NTRA vs ISRG vs EXASLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

PRCT
NTRA
ISRG
EXAS
StockSep 21May 26Return
PROCEPT BioRobotics… (PRCT)10066.7-33.3%
Natera, Inc. (NTRA)100197.3+97.3%
Intuitive Surgical,… (ISRG)100136.8+36.8%
Exact Sciences Corp… (EXAS)100108.3+8.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: PRCT vs NTRA vs ISRG vs EXAS

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: ISRG leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Exact Sciences Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and recent price momentum and sentiment. PRCT also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
PRCT
PROCEPT BioRobotics Corporation
The Growth Play

PRCT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 37.2%, EPS growth 1.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 60.1%
  • 37.2% revenue growth vs EXAS's 17.7%
Best for: growth exposure
NTRA
Natera, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

NTRA is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 20.9% 10Y total return vs EXAS's 16.7%
Best for: long-term compounding
ISRG
Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

ISRG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.02, Low D/E 1.7%, current ratio 4.87x
  • Beta 1.02, current ratio 4.87x
  • Better valuation composite
  • 28.2% margin vs PRCT's -31.8%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
EXAS
Exact Sciences Corporation
The Income Pick

EXAS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.

  • beta 0.12
  • Beta 0.12 vs NTRA's 1.26
  • +96.9% vs PRCT's -52.1%
Best for: income & stability
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthPRCT logoPRCT37.2% revenue growth vs EXAS's 17.7%
ValueISRG logoISRGBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsISRG logoISRG28.2% margin vs PRCT's -31.8%
Stability / SafetyEXAS logoEXASBeta 0.12 vs NTRA's 1.26
DividendsTieNone of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)EXAS logoEXAS+96.9% vs PRCT's -52.1%
Efficiency (ROA)ISRG logoISRG14.8% ROA vs PRCT's -20.3%, ROIC 15.0% vs -55.7%

PRCT vs NTRA vs ISRG vs EXAS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

PRCTPROCEPT BioRobotics Corporation

Segment breakdown not available.

NTRANatera, Inc.
FY 2025
Product
99.6%$2.3B
Licensing and other
0.4%$10M
ISRGIntuitive Surgical, Inc.
FY 2025
Instruments and Accessories
59.8%$6.0B
Systems
24.6%$2.5B
Services
15.6%$1.6B
EXASExact Sciences Corporation
FY 2025
Screening
77.9%$2.5B
Precision Oncology
22.1%$717M

PRCT vs NTRA vs ISRG vs EXAS — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLISRGLAGGINGEXAS

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

ISRG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

ISRG is the larger business by revenue, generating $10.6B annually — 32.9x PRCT's $322M. ISRG is the more profitable business, keeping 28.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PRCT's -31.8%. On growth, NTRA holds the edge at +39.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricPRCT logoPRCTPROCEPT BioRoboti…NTRA logoNTRANatera, Inc.ISRG logoISRGIntuitive Surgica…EXAS logoEXASExact Sciences Co…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$322M$2.3B$10.6B$3.2B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$102M-$310M$3.8B-$41M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$102M-$208M$3.0B-$208M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$81M$97M$2.8B$357M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+63.0%+64.8%+66.3%+69.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-33.9%-13.4%+30.5%-6.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-31.8%-9.0%+28.2%-6.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-25.0%+4.2%+26.8%+11.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+20.2%+39.8%+23.0%+23.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-24.4%+185.4%+18.8%+90.4%
ISRG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

PRCT leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
MetricPRCT logoPRCTPROCEPT BioRoboti…NTRA logoNTRANatera, Inc.ISRG logoISRGIntuitive Surgica…EXAS logoEXASExact Sciences Co…
Market CapShares × price$1.4B$31.2B$161.1B$20.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1.2B$30.3B$158.0B$21.6B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-14.79x-144.62x57.62x-95.37x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.43.84x582.83x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.65x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple43.62x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue4.70x13.51x16.00x6.16x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share3.86x17.55x9.17x8.24x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF285.53x64.67x56.10x
PRCT leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

ISRG leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

ISRG delivers a 16.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $-28 for PRCT. ISRG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to EXAS's 1.05x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EXAS scores 7/9 vs NTRA's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricPRCT logoPRCTPROCEPT BioRoboti…NTRA logoNTRANatera, Inc.ISRG logoISRGIntuitive Surgica…EXAS logoEXASExact Sciences Co…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-27.7%-15.3%+16.9%-8.7%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-20.3%-10.6%+14.8%-3.5%
ROICReturn on invested capital-55.7%-36.1%+15.0%-3.6%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-22.5%-18.3%+16.5%-4.0%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–95567
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.14x0.13x0.02x1.05x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$235M-$862M-$3.1B$1.6B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$287M$1.1B$3.4B$956M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$52M$214M$303M$2.5B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-30.92x-25.21x-5.47x
ISRG leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

NTRA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in NTRA five years ago would be worth $21,587 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,066 for PRCT. Over the past 12 months, EXAS leads with a +96.9% total return vs PRCT's -52.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NTRA at 60.6% vs PRCT's -2.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricPRCT logoPRCTPROCEPT BioRoboti…NTRA logoNTRANatera, Inc.ISRG logoISRGIntuitive Surgica…EXAS logoEXASExact Sciences Co…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-17.3%-3.9%-19.3%+3.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-52.1%+37.3%-15.4%+96.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-7.8%+314.0%+49.6%+53.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-39.3%+115.9%+58.7%+0.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-39.3%+2089.4%+554.2%+1669.1%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-2.7%+60.6%+14.4%+15.2%
NTRA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

EXAS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

EXAS is the less volatile stock with a 0.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NTRA's 1.26 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EXAS currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs PRCT's 38.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricPRCT logoPRCTPROCEPT BioRoboti…NTRA logoNTRANatera, Inc.ISRG logoISRGIntuitive Surgica…EXAS logoEXASExact Sciences Co…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.23x1.26x1.02x0.12x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$66.85$256.36$603.88$104.98
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$19.35$131.81$427.84$38.81
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+38.1%+85.7%+75.1%+99.9%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10050.957.142.476.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.7M1.3M1.8M4.2M
EXAS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: PRCT as "Buy", NTRA as "Buy", ISRG as "Buy", EXAS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 74.9% upside for PRCT (target: $45) vs -1.6% for EXAS (target: $103).

MetricPRCT logoPRCTPROCEPT BioRoboti…NTRA logoNTRANatera, Inc.ISRG logoISRGIntuitive Surgica…EXAS logoEXASExact Sciences Co…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$44.50$262.50$622.60$103.18
# AnalystsCovering analysts15275541
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+1.4%+0.1%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

ISRG leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PRCT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).

Best OverallIntuitive Surgical, Inc. (ISRG)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

PRCT vs NTRA vs ISRG vs EXAS: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is PRCT or NTRA or ISRG or EXAS a better buy right now?

For growth investors, PROCEPT BioRobotics Corporation (PRCT) is the stronger pick with 37.

2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 17. 7% for Exact Sciences Corporation (EXAS). Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (ISRG) offers the better valuation at 57. 6x trailing P/E (43. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate PROCEPT BioRobotics Corporation (PRCT) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — PRCT or NTRA or ISRG or EXAS?

On forward P/E, Intuitive Surgical, Inc.

is actually cheaper at 43. 8x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — PRCT or NTRA or ISRG or EXAS?

Over the past 5 years, Natera, Inc.

(NTRA) delivered a total return of +115. 9%, compared to -39. 3% for PROCEPT BioRobotics Corporation (PRCT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NTRA returned +20. 9% versus PRCT's -39. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — PRCT or NTRA or ISRG or EXAS?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Exact Sciences Corporation (EXAS) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

12β versus Natera, Inc. 's 1. 26β — meaning NTRA is approximately 943% more volatile than EXAS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (ISRG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 105% for Exact Sciences Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — PRCT or NTRA or ISRG or EXAS?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), PROCEPT BioRobotics Corporation (PRCT) is pulling ahead at 37.

2% versus 17. 7% for Exact Sciences Corporation (EXAS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Exact Sciences Corporation grew EPS 80. 3% year-over-year, compared to 0. 7% for Natera, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PRCT leads at 60. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — PRCT or NTRA or ISRG or EXAS?

Intuitive Surgical, Inc.

(ISRG) is the more profitable company, earning 28. 4% net margin versus -31. 0% for PROCEPT BioRobotics Corporation — meaning it keeps 28. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ISRG leads at 29. 3% versus -33. 7% for PRCT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EXAS leads at 69. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is PRCT or NTRA or ISRG or EXAS more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Intuitive Surgical, Inc.

(ISRG) trades at 43. 8x forward P/E versus 582. 8x for Exact Sciences Corporation — 539. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PRCT: 74. 9% to $44. 50.

08

Which pays a better dividend — PRCT or NTRA or ISRG or EXAS?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is PRCT or NTRA or ISRG or EXAS better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Exact Sciences Corporation (EXAS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

12), +1669% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (EXAS: +1669%, PRCT: -39. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between PRCT and NTRA and ISRG and EXAS?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

PRCT

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 10%
  • Gross Margin > 37%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NTRA

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 19%
  • Gross Margin > 38%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ISRG

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 11%
  • Net Margin > 16%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

EXAS

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 11%
  • Gross Margin > 41%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform PRCT and NTRA and ISRG and EXAS on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(PRCT: 20.2% · NTRA: 39.8%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.