Insurance - Property & Casualty
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
PRHI vs HIFS vs NBTB vs INDB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
PRHI vs HIFS vs NBTB vs INDB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $8M | $626M | $2.35B | $3.89B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $43M | $217M | $867M | $974M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-27M | $45M | $169M | $180M |
| Gross Margin | -48.4% | 30.1% | 72.1% | 66.4% |
| Operating Margin | -62.3% | 16.8% | 25.3% | 25.4% |
| Forward P/E | 0.3x | 20.4x | 10.8x | 10.7x |
| Total Debt | $12M | $1.50B | $327M | $701M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $28M | $352M | $185M | $220M |
PRHI vs HIFS vs NBTB vs INDB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Presurance Holdings… (PRHI) | 100 | 26.4 | -73.6% |
| Hingham Institution… (HIFS) | 100 | 174.8 | +74.8% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 143.9 | +43.9% |
| Independent Bank Co… (INDB) | 100 | 112.6 | +12.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PRHI vs HIFS vs NBTB vs INDB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PRHI has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in value and dividends.
- Lower P/E (0.3x vs 10.7x)
- 5.4% yield, vs NBTB's 3.2%
HIFS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 14.1%, EPS growth 6.8%
- 142.5% 10Y total return vs INDB's 109.5%
- 14.1% NII/revenue growth vs PRHI's -26.3%
NBTB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 3.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.89, Low D/E 17.3%, current ratio 1.60x
- Beta 0.89, yield 3.2%, current ratio 1.60x
- NIM 3.1% vs HIFS's 1.0%
INDB is the clearest fit if your priority is quality and momentum.
- 19.7% margin vs PRHI's -62.7%
- +32.7% vs PRHI's -3.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 14.1% NII/revenue growth vs PRHI's -26.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.3x vs 10.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 19.7% margin vs PRHI's -62.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.89 vs HIFS's 1.25, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 5.4% yield, vs NBTB's 3.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +32.7% vs PRHI's -3.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.1% ROA vs PRHI's -9.4%, ROIC 7.9% vs -239.2% |
PRHI vs HIFS vs NBTB vs INDB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
PRHI vs HIFS vs NBTB vs INDB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NBTB leads in 2 of 6 categories
PRHI leads 1 • INDB leads 1 • HIFS leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — NBTB and INDB each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
INDB is the larger business by revenue, generating $974M annually — 22.8x PRHI's $43M. INDB is the more profitable business, keeping 19.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PRHI's -62.7%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $43M | $217M | $867M | $974M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$26M | $62M | $241M | $272M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$27M | $45M | $169M | $180M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$39M | $30M | $225M | $209M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -48.4% | +30.1% | +72.1% | +66.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -62.3% | +16.8% | +25.3% | +25.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -62.7% | +13.0% | +19.5% | +19.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -90.6% | +5.4% | +25.2% | +21.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -58.3% | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -107.4% | +195.1% | +39.5% | -31.7% |
Valuation Metrics
PRHI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 0.3x trailing earnings, PRHI trades at a 98% valuation discount to HIFS's 22.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NBTB's 10.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HIFS's 47.5x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $8M | $626M | $2.4B | $3.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$8M | $1.8B | $2.5B | $4.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 0.34x | 22.33x | 13.53x | 17.31x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 20.43x | 10.80x | 10.74x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.92x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 47.53x | 10.35x | 15.19x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.12x | 2.88x | 2.71x | 4.00x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.38x | 1.46x | 1.21x | 1.11x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 53.27x | 10.75x | 18.59x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NBTB leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HIFS delivers a 9.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $-106 for PRHI. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HIFS's 3.47x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NBTB scores 7/9 vs PRHI's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -105.8% | +9.8% | +9.5% | +5.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -9.4% | +1.0% | +1.1% | +0.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.4% | +1.4% | +7.9% | +4.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -12.2% | +2.2% | +2.4% | +5.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.55x | 3.47x | 0.17x | 0.23x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$16M | $1.1B | $142M | $481M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $28M | $352M | $185M | $220M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $12M | $1.5B | $327M | $701M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -6.48x | 0.44x | 1.05x | 0.77x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
INDB leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NBTB five years ago would be worth $12,989 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,188 for PRHI. Over the past 12 months, INDB leads with a +32.7% total return vs PRHI's -3.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors INDB at 21.1% vs PRHI's -24.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -5.3% | +6.3% | +9.3% | +7.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -3.6% | +14.4% | +9.0% | +32.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -57.1% | +61.9% | +54.1% | +77.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -78.1% | -1.9% | +29.9% | +11.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -90.0% | +142.5% | +102.2% | +109.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -24.6% | +17.4% | +15.5% | +21.1% |
Risk & Volatility
NBTB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NBTB is the less volatile stock with a 0.89 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HIFS's 1.25 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NBTB currently trades 96.1% from its 52-week high vs PRHI's 23.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.00x | 1.25x | 0.89x | 1.11x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.83 | $338.00 | $46.92 | $87.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.48 | $220.76 | $39.20 | $57.01 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +23.5% | +84.9% | +96.1% | +89.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.1 | 51.0 | 57.3 | 53.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 94K | 51K | 236K | 324K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — PRHI and NBTB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NBTB as "Hold", INDB as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 12.9% upside for INDB (target: $88) vs 2.1% for NBTB (target: $46). For income investors, PRHI offers the higher dividend yield at 5.40% vs HIFS's 0.87%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $46.00 | $88.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 10 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +5.4% | +0.9% | +3.2% | +2.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 12 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.04 | $2.50 | $1.43 | $2.26 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.4% | +0.8% |
NBTB leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Risk & Volatility). PRHI leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
PRHI vs HIFS vs NBTB vs INDB: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PRHI or HIFS or NBTB or INDB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Hingham Institution for Savings (HIFS) is the stronger pick with 14.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -26. 3% for Presurance Holdings, Inc. (PRHI). Presurance Holdings, Inc. (PRHI) offers the better valuation at 0. 3x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) a "Hold" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PRHI or HIFS or NBTB or INDB?
On trailing P/E, Presurance Holdings, Inc.
(PRHI) is the cheapest at 0. 3x versus Hingham Institution for Savings at 22. 3x. On forward P/E, Independent Bank Corp. is actually cheaper at 10. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PRHI or HIFS or NBTB or INDB?
Over the past 5 years, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) delivered a total return of +29. 9%, compared to -78. 1% for Presurance Holdings, Inc. (PRHI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HIFS returned +142. 5% versus PRHI's -90. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PRHI or HIFS or NBTB or INDB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 89β versus Hingham Institution for Savings's 1. 25β — meaning HIFS is approximately 41% more volatile than NBTB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 3% for Hingham Institution for Savings — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PRHI or HIFS or NBTB or INDB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hingham Institution for Savings (HIFS) is pulling ahead at 14.
1% versus -26. 3% for Presurance Holdings, Inc. (PRHI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Presurance Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 191. 0% year-over-year, compared to -16. 6% for Independent Bank Corp.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PRHI or HIFS or NBTB or INDB?
Presurance Holdings, Inc.
(PRHI) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 7% net margin versus 13. 0% for Hingham Institution for Savings — meaning it keeps 36. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: INDB leads at 25. 4% versus -54. 4% for PRHI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PRHI or HIFS or NBTB or INDB more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Independent Bank Corp.
(INDB) trades at 10. 7x forward P/E versus 20. 4x for Hingham Institution for Savings — 9. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for INDB: 12. 9% to $88. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — PRHI or HIFS or NBTB or INDB?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Presurance Holdings, Inc. (PRHI) offers the highest yield at 5. 4%, versus 0. 9% for Hingham Institution for Savings (HIFS).
09Is PRHI or HIFS or NBTB or INDB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 89), 3. 2% yield, +102. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NBTB: +102. 2%, HIFS: +142. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PRHI and HIFS and NBTB and INDB?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PRHI is a small-cap deep-value stock; HIFS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; INDB is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.