Software - Application
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
PRO vs APPF vs PCTY vs SPSC vs QLYS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Software - Application
Software - Infrastructure
Software - Infrastructure
PRO vs APPF vs PCTY vs SPSC vs QLYS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Application | Software - Application | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Infrastructure |
| Market Cap | $1.12B | $6.12B | $5.93B | $2.14B | $3.34B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $352M | $995M | $1.73B | $762M | $685M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-12M | $152M | $258M | $91M | $201M |
| Gross Margin | 67.9% | 63.2% | 69.3% | 68.0% | 83.1% |
| Operating Margin | -4.5% | 17.1% | 21.3% | 15.3% | 33.7% |
| Forward P/E | 27.6x | 25.0x | 14.0x | 12.7x | 12.9x |
| Total Debt | $301M | $71M | $218M | $10M | $97M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $162M | $107M | $398M | $151M | $250M |
PRO vs APPF vs PCTY vs SPSC vs QLYS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | Dec 25 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| PROS Holdings, Inc. (PRO) | 100 | 59.7 | -40.3% |
| AppFolio, Inc. (APPF) | 100 | 144.0 | +44.0% |
| Paylocity Holding C… (PCTY) | 100 | 113.3 | +13.3% |
| SPS Commerce, Inc. (SPSC) | 100 | 122.2 | +22.2% |
| Qualys, Inc. (QLYS) | 100 | 122.1 | +22.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PRO vs APPF vs PCTY vs SPSC vs QLYS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PRO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +40.2% vs SPSC's -59.7%
APPF has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 19.7%, EPS growth -30.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 26.3%
- 12.8% 10Y total return vs QLYS's 267.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.71, Low D/E 13.2%, current ratio 3.20x
- Beta 0.71, current ratio 3.20x
PCTY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- beta 0.43
- PEG 0.50 vs SPSC's 0.89
- Lower P/E (14.0x vs 25.0x)
- Beta 0.43 vs PRO's 1.47
Among these 5 stocks, SPSC doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
QLYS is the clearest fit if your priority is quality.
- 29.4% margin vs PRO's -3.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.7% revenue growth vs PRO's 8.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.0x vs 25.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 29.4% margin vs PRO's -3.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.43 vs PRO's 1.47 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +40.2% vs SPSC's -59.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 24.2% ROA vs PRO's -2.6%, ROIC 22.4% vs -19.2% |
PRO vs APPF vs PCTY vs SPSC vs QLYS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
PRO vs APPF vs PCTY vs SPSC vs QLYS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
QLYS leads in 1 of 6 categories
SPSC leads 1 • APPF leads 1 • PRO leads 0 • PCTY leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
QLYS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PCTY is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.7B annually — 4.9x PRO's $352M. QLYS is the more profitable business, keeping 29.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PRO's -3.3%. On growth, APPF holds the edge at +20.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $352M | $995M | $1.7B | $762M | $685M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$8M | $192M | $394M | $162M | $241M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$12M | $152M | $258M | $91M | $201M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $39M | $234M | $470M | $167M | $290M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +67.9% | +63.2% | +69.3% | +68.0% | +83.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -4.5% | +17.1% | +21.3% | +15.3% | +33.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.3% | +15.3% | +14.9% | +11.9% | +29.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.0% | +23.5% | +27.2% | +21.9% | +42.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.9% | +20.4% | +10.5% | +5.8% | +9.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +37.2% | +26.7% | -8.6% | +10.1% |
Valuation Metrics
SPSC leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 17.5x trailing earnings, QLYS trades at a 60% valuation discount to APPF's 43.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), QLYS offers better value at 0.90x vs SPSC's 1.62x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.1B | $6.1B | $5.9B | $2.1B | $3.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.3B | $6.1B | $5.8B | $2.0B | $3.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -54.07x | 43.83x | 27.14x | 23.24x | 17.45x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 27.57x | 24.99x | 14.05x | 12.73x | 12.87x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.96x | 1.62x | 0.90x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 34.66x | 14.25x | 11.30x | 13.49x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.40x | 6.44x | 3.72x | 2.84x | 5.00x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 11.39x | 5.00x | 2.23x | 6.17x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 42.83x | 25.62x | 17.31x | 14.04x | 10.98x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — PCTY and QLYS each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
QLYS delivers a 37.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $37 in annual profit, vs $9 for SPSC. SPSC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PCTY's 0.18x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PCTY scores 8/9 vs APPF's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +30.9% | +22.4% | +9.5% | +37.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.6% | +24.2% | +4.9% | +7.9% | +19.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -19.2% | +22.4% | +26.2% | +12.2% | +47.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -8.3% | +25.9% | +23.3% | +12.5% | +37.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 | 8 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.13x | 0.18x | 0.01x | 0.17x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $139M | -$36M | -$180M | -$141M | -$153M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $162M | $107M | $398M | $151M | $250M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $301M | $71M | $218M | $10M | $97M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.79x | — | 23.29x | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
APPF leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in APPF five years ago would be worth $13,059 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,811 for SPSC. Over the past 12 months, PRO leads with a +40.2% total return vs SPSC's -59.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors APPF at 7.3% vs SPSC's -28.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | — | -26.2% | -25.1% | -35.0% | -27.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +40.2% | -20.7% | -40.6% | -59.7% | -25.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -11.4% | +23.4% | -37.1% | -62.6% | -17.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -41.0% | +30.6% | -35.2% | -41.9% | -3.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +98.0% | +1277.1% | +218.2% | +119.8% | +267.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -4.0% | +7.3% | -14.3% | -28.0% | -6.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PRO and PCTY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PCTY is the less volatile stock with a 0.43 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PRO's 1.47 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PRO currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs SPSC's 37.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.47x | 0.71x | 0.43x | 1.03x | 0.53x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $23.26 | $326.04 | $201.97 | $153.16 | $155.47 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $13.61 | $142.72 | $92.99 | $50.56 | $74.51 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +100.0% | +52.2% | +54.0% | +37.3% | +61.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 74.2 | 53.2 | 45.7 | 46.9 | 54.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5.2M | 349K | 733K | 605K | 773K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PRO as "Buy", APPF as "Buy", PCTY as "Buy", SPSC as "Hold", QLYS as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 54.0% upside for PCTY (target: $168) vs 20.2% for SPSC (target: $69).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $29.05 | $236.67 | $168.08 | $68.71 | $134.30 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 20 | 13 | 41 | 23 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.1% | +2.5% | +5.3% | +5.5% |
QLYS leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). SPSC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
PRO vs APPF vs PCTY vs SPSC vs QLYS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PRO or APPF or PCTY or SPSC or QLYS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, AppFolio, Inc.
(APPF) is the stronger pick with 19. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 8. 8% for PROS Holdings, Inc. (PRO). Qualys, Inc. (QLYS) offers the better valuation at 17. 5x trailing P/E (12. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate PROS Holdings, Inc. (PRO) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PRO or APPF or PCTY or SPSC or QLYS?
On trailing P/E, Qualys, Inc.
(QLYS) is the cheapest at 17. 5x versus AppFolio, Inc. at 43. 8x. On forward P/E, SPS Commerce, Inc. is actually cheaper at 12. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Paylocity Holding Corporation wins at 0. 50x versus SPS Commerce, Inc. 's 0. 89x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PRO or APPF or PCTY or SPSC or QLYS?
Over the past 5 years, AppFolio, Inc.
(APPF) delivered a total return of +30. 6%, compared to -41. 9% for SPS Commerce, Inc. (SPSC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: APPF returned +1277% versus PRO's +98. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PRO or APPF or PCTY or SPSC or QLYS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Paylocity Holding Corporation (PCTY) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
43β versus PROS Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 47β — meaning PRO is approximately 243% more volatile than PCTY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, SPS Commerce, Inc. (SPSC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 18% for Paylocity Holding Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PRO or APPF or PCTY or SPSC or QLYS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), AppFolio, Inc.
(APPF) is pulling ahead at 19. 7% versus 8. 8% for PROS Holdings, Inc. (PRO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: PROS Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 64. 8% year-over-year, compared to -30. 1% for AppFolio, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, APPF leads at 26. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PRO or APPF or PCTY or SPSC or QLYS?
Qualys, Inc.
(QLYS) is the more profitable company, earning 29. 6% net margin versus -6. 2% for PROS Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 29. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: QLYS leads at 33. 2% versus -5. 8% for PRO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — QLYS leads at 82. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PRO or APPF or PCTY or SPSC or QLYS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Paylocity Holding Corporation (PCTY) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 50x versus SPS Commerce, Inc. 's 0. 89x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, SPS Commerce, Inc. (SPSC) trades at 12. 7x forward P/E versus 27. 6x for PROS Holdings, Inc. — 14. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PCTY: 54. 0% to $168. 08.
08Which pays a better dividend — PRO or APPF or PCTY or SPSC or QLYS?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is PRO or APPF or PCTY or SPSC or QLYS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, AppFolio, Inc.
(APPF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 71), +1277% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (APPF: +1277%, PRO: +98. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PRO and APPF and PCTY and SPSC and QLYS?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PRO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; APPF is a small-cap high-growth stock; PCTY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SPSC is a small-cap high-growth stock; QLYS is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.