Specialty Business Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
PRSU vs FUN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Leisure
PRSU vs FUN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Business Services | Leisure |
| Market Cap | $1.17B | $1.99B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $466M | $3.14B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $54M | $-1.75B |
| Gross Margin | 50.1% | 73.8% |
| Operating Margin | 15.6% | -41.4% |
| Forward P/E | 29.1x | — |
| Total Debt | $195M | $5.16B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $31M | $83M |
PRSU vs FUN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pursuit Attractions… (PRSU) | 100 | 98.6 | -1.4% |
| Six Flags Entertain… (FUN) | 100 | 40.9 | -59.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PRSU vs FUN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PRSU carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.45
- 1.7% 10Y total return vs FUN's -37.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.45, Low D/E 29.6%, current ratio 0.81x
FUN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 50.6%, EPS growth -195.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 26.5%
- 50.6% revenue growth vs PRSU's 23.4%
- 1.6% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 50.6% revenue growth vs PRSU's 23.4% | |
| Quality / Margins | 11.5% margin vs FUN's -55.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.45 vs FUN's 1.83, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.6% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +41.0% vs FUN's -44.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.6% ROA vs FUN's -22.1%, ROIC 6.6% vs 5.1% |
PRSU vs FUN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
PRSU vs FUN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PRSU leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FUN is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.1B annually — 6.7x PRSU's $466M. PRSU is the more profitable business, keeping 11.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FUN's -55.7%. On growth, PRSU holds the edge at +37.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $466M | $3.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $117M | -$828M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $54M | -$1.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$13M | -$169M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +50.1% | +73.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +15.6% | -41.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.5% | -55.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.7% | -5.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +37.4% | -2.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +100.0% | -11.7% |
Valuation Metrics
FUN leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, FUN's 11.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PRSU's 11.9x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.2B | $2.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.3B | $7.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 47.61x | -8.56x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 29.10x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.88x | 11.25x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.60x | 0.74x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.80x | 0.87x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 37.91x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PRSU leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PRSU delivers a 8.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $-2 for FUN. PRSU carries lower financial leverage with a 0.30x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FUN's 2.26x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PRSU scores 5/9 vs FUN's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.3% | -2.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.6% | -22.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.6% | +5.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.0% | +6.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.30x | 2.26x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $164M | $5.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $31M | $83M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $195M | $5.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 9.53x | -3.53x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PRSU leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PRSU five years ago would be worth $9,797 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,558 for FUN. Over the past 12 months, PRSU leads with a +41.0% total return vs FUN's -44.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRSU at -0.7% vs FUN's -19.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +25.4% | +27.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +41.0% | -44.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -2.0% | -48.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -2.0% | -54.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1.7% | -37.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -0.7% | -19.9% |
Risk & Volatility
PRSU leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PRSU is the less volatile stock with a 1.45 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FUN's 1.83 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PRSU currently trades 98.0% from its 52-week high vs FUN's 51.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.45x | 1.83x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $42.76 | $38.47 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $26.66 | $12.51 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.0% | +51.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.7 | 48.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 221K | 1.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates PRSU as "Buy" and FUN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 16.2% upside for FUN (target: $23) vs 9.8% for PRSU (target: $46). FUN is the only dividend payer here at 1.56% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $46.00 | $22.88 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 29 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.31 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.9% | 0.0% |
PRSU leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FUN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
PRSU vs FUN: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PRSU or FUN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Six Flags Entertainment Corporation (FUN) is the stronger pick with 50.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 23. 4% for Pursuit Attractions and Hospitality, Inc. (PRSU). Pursuit Attractions and Hospitality, Inc. (PRSU) offers the better valuation at 47. 6x trailing P/E (29. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Pursuit Attractions and Hospitality, Inc. (PRSU) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — PRSU or FUN?
Over the past 5 years, Pursuit Attractions and Hospitality, Inc.
(PRSU) delivered a total return of -2. 0%, compared to -54. 4% for Six Flags Entertainment Corporation (FUN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PRSU returned +1. 7% versus FUN's -37. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — PRSU or FUN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Pursuit Attractions and Hospitality, Inc.
(PRSU) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 45β versus Six Flags Entertainment Corporation's 1. 83β — meaning FUN is approximately 26% more volatile than PRSU relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Pursuit Attractions and Hospitality, Inc. (PRSU) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 30% versus 2% for Six Flags Entertainment Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — PRSU or FUN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Six Flags Entertainment Corporation (FUN) is pulling ahead at 50.
6% versus 23. 4% for Pursuit Attractions and Hospitality, Inc. (PRSU). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Pursuit Attractions and Hospitality, Inc. grew EPS -93. 1% year-over-year, compared to -195. 0% for Six Flags Entertainment Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, FUN leads at 26. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — PRSU or FUN?
Pursuit Attractions and Hospitality, Inc.
(PRSU) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 0% net margin versus -8. 5% for Six Flags Entertainment Corporation — meaning it keeps 5. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PRSU leads at 14. 7% versus 11. 5% for FUN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FUN leads at 91. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is PRSU or FUN more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FUN: 16.
2% to $22. 88.
07Which pays a better dividend — PRSU or FUN?
In this comparison, FUN (1.
6% yield) pays a dividend. PRSU does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is PRSU or FUN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Six Flags Entertainment Corporation (FUN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1.
6% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FUN: -37. 5%, PRSU: +1. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between PRSU and FUN?
These companies operate in different sectors (PRSU (Industrials) and FUN (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
FUN pays a dividend while PRSU does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.