Specialty Business Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
PRSU vs FUN vs PRKS vs EPR vs DIS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Leisure
Leisure
REIT - Specialty
Entertainment
PRSU vs FUN vs PRKS vs EPR vs DIS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Business Services | Leisure | Leisure | REIT - Specialty | Entertainment |
| Market Cap | $1.16B | $2.32B | $2.02B | $4.43B | $192.60B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $466M | $2.90B | $1.66B | $700M | $97.26B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $54M | $-1.62B | $168M | $272M | $11.22B |
| Gross Margin | 50.1% | 54.8% | 92.3% | 81.2% | 37.2% |
| Operating Margin | 15.6% | -44.9% | 22.0% | 58.3% | 15.5% |
| Forward P/E | 28.7x | — | 10.0x | 19.2x | 16.5x |
| Total Debt | $195M | $5.43B | $0.00 | $3.14B | $44.88B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $31M | $91M | $100M | $99M | $5.70B |
PRSU vs FUN vs PRKS vs EPR vs DIS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pursuit Attractions… (PRSU) | 100 | 97.2 | -2.8% |
| Six Flags Entertain… (FUN) | 100 | 47.2 | -52.8% |
| United Parks & Reso… (PRKS) | 100 | 66.0 | -34.0% |
| EPR Properties (EPR) | 100 | 130.6 | +30.6% |
| The Walt Disney Com… (DIS) | 100 | 97.6 | -2.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PRSU vs FUN vs PRKS vs EPR vs DIS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PRSU is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 23.4%, EPS growth -93.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 14.8%
- 23.4% revenue growth vs PRKS's -3.6%
- +42.6% vs FUN's -37.0%
FUN lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
PRKS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value and efficiency.
- Lower P/E (10.0x vs 16.5x)
- 6.4% ROA vs FUN's -18.5%, ROIC 25.5% vs -15.1%
EPR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.35, yield 6.6%
- 28.4% 10Y total return vs PRKS's 103.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.35, current ratio 1.53x
- Beta 0.35, yield 6.6%, current ratio 1.53x
Among these 5 stocks, DIS doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 23.4% revenue growth vs PRKS's -3.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.0x vs 16.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 38.8% margin vs FUN's -56.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.35 vs FUN's 1.83, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 6.6% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs DIS's 0.9%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +42.6% vs FUN's -37.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.4% ROA vs FUN's -18.5%, ROIC 25.5% vs -15.1% |
PRSU vs FUN vs PRKS vs EPR vs DIS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
PRSU vs FUN vs PRKS vs EPR vs DIS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
EPR leads in 4 of 6 categories
PRKS leads 2 • PRSU leads 0 • FUN leads 0 • DIS leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EPR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DIS is the larger business by revenue, generating $97.3B annually — 208.5x PRSU's $466M. EPR is the more profitable business, keeping 38.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FUN's -56.0%. On growth, PRSU holds the edge at +37.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $466M | $2.9B | $1.7B | $700M | $97.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $117M | -$810M | $540M | $582M | $20.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $54M | -$1.6B | $168M | $272M | $11.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$13M | $29M | $263M | $435M | $7.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +50.1% | +54.8% | +92.3% | +81.2% | +37.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +15.6% | -44.9% | +22.0% | +58.3% | +15.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.5% | -56.0% | +10.1% | +38.8% | +11.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.7% | +1.0% | +15.8% | +62.1% | +7.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +37.4% | -100.0% | -2.8% | +10.9% | +6.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +100.0% | -20.5% | -44.0% | -5.1% | -29.8% |
Valuation Metrics
PRKS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.1x trailing earnings, PRKS trades at a 74% valuation discount to PRSU's 47.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PRKS's 3.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than EPR's 13.7x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.2B | $2.3B | $2.0B | $4.4B | $192.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.3B | $7.7B | $1.9B | $7.5B | $231.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 46.97x | -1.43x | 12.11x | 17.64x | 15.87x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 28.70x | — | 9.99x | 19.22x | 16.53x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.73x | — | 3.56x | 13.67x | 12.10x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.56x | 0.75x | 1.22x | 6.16x | 2.04x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.78x | 2.94x | — | 1.90x | 1.72x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 7.68x | 10.51x | 19.11x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PRKS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EPR delivers a 11.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-50 for FUN. PRSU carries lower financial leverage with a 0.30x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FUN's 6.92x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DIS scores 8/9 vs FUN's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.3% | -50.4% | — | +11.7% | +9.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.6% | -18.5% | +6.4% | +4.8% | +5.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.6% | -15.1% | +25.5% | +5.3% | +6.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.0% | -17.7% | +15.8% | +7.2% | +8.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.30x | 6.92x | — | 1.35x | 0.39x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $164M | $5.3B | -$100M | $3.0B | $39.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $31M | $91M | $100M | $99M | $5.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $195M | $5.4B | $0 | $3.1B | $44.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 9.53x | -2.60x | 2.69x | 3.08x | 9.95x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
EPR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in EPR five years ago would be worth $14,956 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,201 for FUN. Over the past 12 months, PRSU leads with a +42.6% total return vs FUN's -37.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors EPR at 17.2% vs FUN's -16.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +23.7% | +46.9% | +2.3% | +16.4% | -2.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +42.6% | -37.0% | -18.7% | +22.0% | +7.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -3.4% | -41.3% | -34.3% | +61.0% | +8.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -3.4% | -48.0% | -31.0% | +49.6% | -39.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +0.4% | -33.1% | +103.5% | +28.4% | +11.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -1.1% | -16.3% | -13.1% | +17.2% | +2.6% |
Risk & Volatility
EPR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EPR is the less volatile stock with a 0.35 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FUN's 1.83 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EPR currently trades 93.2% from its 52-week high vs FUN's 59.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.45x | 1.83x | 1.54x | 0.35x | 0.90x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $45.47 | $38.47 | $56.95 | $62.08 | $124.69 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $26.66 | $12.51 | $28.77 | $48.11 | $92.19 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +90.9% | +59.1% | +65.1% | +93.2% | +87.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.9 | 58.0 | 54.8 | 57.6 | 64.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 223K | 1.7M | 944K | 818K | 9.1M |
Analyst Outlook
EPR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PRSU as "Buy", FUN as "Buy", PRKS as "Buy", EPR as "Hold", DIS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 28.4% upside for PRKS (target: $48) vs 0.6% for FUN (target: $23). For income investors, EPR offers the higher dividend yield at 6.57% vs DIS's 0.92%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $46.00 | $22.88 | $47.60 | $59.13 | $139.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 29 | 23 | 21 | 63 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +6.6% | +0.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $3.80 | $1.00 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.9% | 0.0% | +0.8% | +0.2% | +1.8% |
EPR leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). PRKS leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency).
PRSU vs FUN vs PRKS vs EPR vs DIS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PRSU or FUN or PRKS or EPR or DIS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Pursuit Attractions and Hospitality, Inc.
(PRSU) is the stronger pick with 23. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 6% for United Parks & Resorts Inc. (PRKS). United Parks & Resorts Inc. (PRKS) offers the better valuation at 12. 1x trailing P/E (10. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Pursuit Attractions and Hospitality, Inc. (PRSU) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PRSU or FUN or PRKS or EPR or DIS?
On trailing P/E, United Parks & Resorts Inc.
(PRKS) is the cheapest at 12. 1x versus Pursuit Attractions and Hospitality, Inc. at 47. 0x. On forward P/E, United Parks & Resorts Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PRSU or FUN or PRKS or EPR or DIS?
Over the past 5 years, EPR Properties (EPR) delivered a total return of +49.
6%, compared to -48. 0% for Six Flags Entertainment Corporation (FUN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PRKS returned +103. 5% versus FUN's -33. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PRSU or FUN or PRKS or EPR or DIS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), EPR Properties (EPR) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
35β versus Six Flags Entertainment Corporation's 1. 83β — meaning FUN is approximately 426% more volatile than EPR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Pursuit Attractions and Hospitality, Inc. (PRSU) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 30% versus 7% for Six Flags Entertainment Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PRSU or FUN or PRKS or EPR or DIS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Pursuit Attractions and Hospitality, Inc.
(PRSU) is pulling ahead at 23. 4% versus -3. 6% for United Parks & Resorts Inc. (PRKS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Walt Disney Company grew EPS 151. 8% year-over-year, compared to -591. 3% for Six Flags Entertainment Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, FUN leads at 19. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PRSU or FUN or PRKS or EPR or DIS?
EPR Properties (EPR) is the more profitable company, earning 38.
3% net margin versus -50. 8% for Six Flags Entertainment Corporation — meaning it keeps 38. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EPR leads at 52. 5% versus -43. 7% for FUN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PRKS leads at 92. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PRSU or FUN or PRKS or EPR or DIS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, United Parks & Resorts Inc.
(PRKS) trades at 10. 0x forward P/E versus 28. 7x for Pursuit Attractions and Hospitality, Inc. — 18. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PRKS: 28. 4% to $47. 60.
08Which pays a better dividend — PRSU or FUN or PRKS or EPR or DIS?
In this comparison, EPR (6.
6% yield), DIS (0. 9% yield) pay a dividend. PRSU, FUN, PRKS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is PRSU or FUN or PRKS or EPR or DIS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, EPR Properties (EPR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
35), 6. 6% yield). Six Flags Entertainment Corporation (FUN) carries a higher beta of 1. 83 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (EPR: +28. 4%, FUN: -33. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PRSU and FUN and PRKS and EPR and DIS?
These companies operate in different sectors (PRSU (Industrials) and FUN (Consumer Cyclical) and PRKS (Consumer Cyclical) and EPR (Real Estate) and DIS (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: PRSU is a small-cap high-growth stock; FUN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRKS is a small-cap deep-value stock; EPR is a small-cap deep-value stock; DIS is a mid-cap deep-value stock. EPR, DIS pay a dividend while PRSU, FUN, PRKS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.