Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

PSIG vs CTRM vs TOPS vs GLBS vs ESEA

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
PSIG
PS International Group Ltd.

Integrated Freight & Logistics

IndustrialsNASDAQ • HK
Market Cap$26M
5Y Perf.-19.4%
CTRM
Castor Maritime Inc.

Marine Shipping

IndustrialsNASDAQ • CY
Market Cap$78M
5Y Perf.-62.6%
TOPS
Top Ships Inc.

Marine Shipping

IndustrialsNASDAQ • GR
Market Cap$10M
5Y Perf.-78.0%
GLBS
Globus Maritime Limited

Marine Shipping

IndustrialsNASDAQ • GR
Market Cap$45M
5Y Perf.+26.4%
ESEA
Euroseas Ltd.

Marine Shipping

IndustrialsNASDAQ • GR
Market Cap$506M
5Y Perf.+140.4%

PSIG vs CTRM vs TOPS vs GLBS vs ESEA — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
PSIG logoPSIG
CTRM logoCTRM
TOPS logoTOPS
GLBS logoGLBS
ESEA logoESEA
IndustryIntegrated Freight & LogisticsMarine ShippingMarine ShippingMarine ShippingMarine Shipping
Market Cap$26M$78M$10M$45M$506M
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$68M$123M$44M$228M
Net Income (TTM)$-1M$-44M$1M$-2M$137M
Gross Margin4.1%23.8%59.5%26.5%63.5%
Operating Margin-6.0%-62.2%36.5%5.4%61.6%
Forward P/E2.3x2.0x4.3x
Total Debt$131K$111M$251M$109M$217M
Cash & Equiv.$8M$88M$8M$27M$177M

PSIG vs CTRM vs TOPS vs GLBS vs ESEALong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

PSIG
CTRM
TOPS
GLBS
ESEA
StockJul 24May 26Return
PS International Gr… (PSIG)10080.6-19.4%
Castor Maritime Inc. (CTRM)10037.4-62.6%
Top Ships Inc. (TOPS)10022.0-78.0%
Globus Maritime Lim… (GLBS)100126.4+26.4%
Euroseas Ltd. (ESEA)100240.4+140.4%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: PSIG vs CTRM vs TOPS vs GLBS vs ESEA

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: ESEA leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. Globus Maritime Limited is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. PSIG and TOPS also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
PSIG
PS International Group Ltd.
The Momentum Pick

PSIG ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.

  • +126.6% vs TOPS's -61.1%
Best for: momentum
CTRM
Castor Maritime Inc.
The Income Angle

Among these 5 stocks, CTRM doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: industrials exposure
TOPS
Top Ships Inc.
The Growth Play

TOPS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 3.8%, EPS growth 108.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 15.2%
  • Lower P/E (2.0x vs 4.3x)
Best for: growth exposure
GLBS
Globus Maritime Limited
The Defensive Pick

GLBS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.50, Low D/E 62.1%, current ratio 2.74x
  • 26.8% revenue growth vs PSIG's -37.7%
  • Beta 0.50 vs ESEA's 1.28
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
ESEA
Euroseas Ltd.
The Income Pick

ESEA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 1.28, yield 3.8%
  • 389.1% 10Y total return vs PSIG's -92.2%
  • Beta 1.28, yield 3.8%, current ratio 4.89x
  • 60.1% margin vs CTRM's -65.4%
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthGLBS logoGLBS26.8% revenue growth vs PSIG's -37.7%
ValueTOPS logoTOPSLower P/E (2.0x vs 4.3x)
Quality / MarginsESEA logoESEA60.1% margin vs CTRM's -65.4%
Stability / SafetyGLBS logoGLBSBeta 0.50 vs ESEA's 1.28
DividendsESEA logoESEA3.8% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs CTRM's 3.2%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)PSIG logoPSIG+126.6% vs TOPS's -61.1%
Efficiency (ROA)ESEA logoESEA19.6% ROA vs PSIG's -9.7%, ROIC 19.5% vs -159.2%

PSIG vs CTRM vs TOPS vs GLBS vs ESEA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

PSIGPS International Group Ltd.

Segment breakdown not available.

CTRMCastor Maritime Inc.
FY 2024
Asset Management Segment
100.0%$1M
TOPSTop Ships Inc.
FY 2021
Time Charter Contracts
100.0%$56M
Time Charter - Related Parties
0.0%$0
Voyage Charter
0.0%$0
GLBSGlobus Maritime Limited

Segment breakdown not available.

ESEAEuroseas Ltd.

Segment breakdown not available.

PSIG vs CTRM vs TOPS vs GLBS vs ESEA — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLESEALAGGINGGLBS

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

ESEA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

ESEA and PSIG operate at a comparable scale, with $228M and $0 in trailing revenue. ESEA is the more profitable business, keeping 60.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CTRM's -65.4%. On growth, TOPS holds the edge at +100.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricPSIG logoPSIGPS International …CTRM logoCTRMCastor Maritime I…TOPS logoTOPSTop Ships Inc.GLBS logoGLBSGlobus Maritime L…ESEA logoESEAEuroseas Ltd.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$68M$123M$44M$228M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$1M-$27M$66M$16M$169M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$1M-$44M$1M-$2M$137M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$784,909-$58M-$63M$2M$64M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+4.1%+23.8%+59.5%+26.5%+63.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-6.0%-62.2%+36.5%+5.4%+61.6%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-5.5%-65.4%+1.2%-4.0%+60.1%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-2.1%-86.1%-50.9%+5.2%+28.1%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+10.2%+100.0%+54.8%+7.7%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-94.1%-3.2%+141.9%+65.9%
ESEA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

TOPS leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

At 2.0x trailing earnings, TOPS trades at a 45% valuation discount to ESEA's 3.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ESEA's 3.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GLBS's 7.6x.

MetricPSIG logoPSIGPS International …CTRM logoCTRMCastor Maritime I…TOPS logoTOPSTop Ships Inc.GLBS logoGLBSGlobus Maritime L…ESEA logoESEAEuroseas Ltd.
Market CapShares × price$26M$78M$10M$45M$506M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$18M$102M$254M$128M$546M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-5.38x2.32x2.02x-26.04x3.67x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.4.32x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple5.86x4.97x7.55x3.44x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.30x1.18x0.12x1.02x2.22x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.40x0.13x0.07x0.26x1.08x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF0.59x7.90x
TOPS leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

ESEA leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

ESEA delivers a 29.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $30 in annual profit, vs $-19 for PSIG. PSIG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TOPS's 1.74x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ESEA scores 7/9 vs PSIG's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricPSIG logoPSIGPS International …CTRM logoCTRMCastor Maritime I…TOPS logoTOPSTop Ships Inc.GLBS logoGLBSGlobus Maritime L…ESEA logoESEAEuroseas Ltd.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-19.4%-8.0%+0.8%-1.0%+29.6%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-9.7%-6.3%+0.3%-0.6%+19.6%
ROICReturn on invested capital-159.2%+0.2%+5.3%+0.7%+19.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-44.4%+0.2%+6.9%+0.9%+21.7%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–934467
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.01x0.18x1.74x0.62x0.47x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$8M$23M$244M$83M$40M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$8M$88M$8M$27M$177M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$131,325$111M$251M$109M$217M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-4.80x1.91x0.76x9.47x
ESEA leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

ESEA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in ESEA five years ago would be worth $54,420 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $56 for TOPS. Over the past 12 months, PSIG leads with a +126.6% total return vs TOPS's -61.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ESEA at 73.8% vs PSIG's -57.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricPSIG logoPSIGPS International …CTRM logoCTRMCastor Maritime I…TOPS logoTOPSTop Ships Inc.GLBS logoGLBSGlobus Maritime L…ESEA logoESEAEuroseas Ltd.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+54.3%-4.7%-53.6%+32.5%+34.7%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+126.6%-4.7%-61.1%+101.8%+115.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-92.2%-69.4%-75.2%+126.8%+425.3%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-92.2%-88.4%-99.4%-50.5%+444.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-92.2%-99.0%-100.0%-99.9%+389.1%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-57.3%-32.6%-37.2%+31.4%+73.8%
ESEA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — PSIG and GLBS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

GLBS is the less volatile stock with a 0.50 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ESEA's 1.28 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PSIG currently trades 98.2% from its 52-week high vs TOPS's 19.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricPSIG logoPSIGPS International …CTRM logoCTRMCastor Maritime I…TOPS logoTOPSTop Ships Inc.GLBS logoGLBSGlobus Maritime L…ESEA logoESEAEuroseas Ltd.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.75x1.22x0.54x0.50x1.28x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$7.29$2.65$11.47$2.44$74.70
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$2.14$1.66$2.11$0.99$33.76
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+98.2%+76.1%+19.2%+90.2%+96.8%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10055.255.524.753.262.5
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded287K52K210K87K86K
Evenly matched — PSIG and GLBS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

ESEA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

For income investors, ESEA offers the higher dividend yield at 3.78% vs CTRM's 3.19%.

MetricPSIG logoPSIGPS International …CTRM logoCTRMCastor Maritime I…TOPS logoTOPSTop Ships Inc.GLBS logoGLBSGlobus Maritime L…ESEA logoESEAEuroseas Ltd.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target
# AnalystsCovering analysts5
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+3.2%+3.8%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises11005
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.06$2.73
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+100.0%0.0%+0.4%
ESEA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

ESEA leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TOPS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallEuroseas Ltd. (ESEA)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

PSIG vs CTRM vs TOPS vs GLBS vs ESEA: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is PSIG or CTRM or TOPS or GLBS or ESEA a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Globus Maritime Limited (GLBS) is the stronger pick with 26.

8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -37. 7% for PS International Group Ltd. (PSIG). Top Ships Inc. (TOPS) offers the better valuation at 2. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Euroseas Ltd. (ESEA) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — PSIG or CTRM or TOPS or GLBS or ESEA?

On trailing P/E, Top Ships Inc.

(TOPS) is the cheapest at 2. 0x versus Euroseas Ltd. at 3. 7x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — PSIG or CTRM or TOPS or GLBS or ESEA?

Over the past 5 years, Euroseas Ltd.

(ESEA) delivered a total return of +444. 2%, compared to -99. 4% for Top Ships Inc. (TOPS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ESEA returned +389. 1% versus TOPS's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — PSIG or CTRM or TOPS or GLBS or ESEA?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Globus Maritime Limited (GLBS) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

50β versus Euroseas Ltd. 's 1. 28β — meaning ESEA is approximately 154% more volatile than GLBS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, PS International Group Ltd. (PSIG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 174% for Top Ships Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — PSIG or CTRM or TOPS or GLBS or ESEA?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Globus Maritime Limited (GLBS) is pulling ahead at 26.

8% versus -37. 7% for PS International Group Ltd. (PSIG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Top Ships Inc. grew EPS 108. 8% year-over-year, compared to -638. 9% for PS International Group Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TOPS leads at 15. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — PSIG or CTRM or TOPS or GLBS or ESEA?

Euroseas Ltd.

(ESEA) is the more profitable company, earning 60. 1% net margin versus -5. 5% for PS International Group Ltd. — meaning it keeps 60. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ESEA leads at 57. 0% versus -6. 0% for PSIG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ESEA leads at 63. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Which pays a better dividend — PSIG or CTRM or TOPS or GLBS or ESEA?

In this comparison, ESEA (3.

8% yield), CTRM (3. 2% yield) pay a dividend. PSIG, TOPS, GLBS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

08

Is PSIG or CTRM or TOPS or GLBS or ESEA better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Euroseas Ltd.

(ESEA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 28), 3. 8% yield, +389. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ESEA: +389. 1%, PSIG: -92. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between PSIG and CTRM and TOPS and GLBS and ESEA?

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: PSIG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CTRM is a small-cap deep-value stock; TOPS is a small-cap deep-value stock; GLBS is a small-cap high-growth stock; ESEA is a small-cap deep-value stock. CTRM, ESEA pay a dividend while PSIG, TOPS, GLBS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

PSIG

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CTRM

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 14%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TOPS

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 49%
  • Gross Margin > 35%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

GLBS

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 27%
  • Gross Margin > 15%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ESEA

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 36%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform PSIG and CTRM and TOPS and GLBS and ESEA on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(PSIG: -37.7% · CTRM: 10.2%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.