Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
PTGX vs KYMR vs IMVT vs BMY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Drug Manufacturers - General
PTGX vs KYMR vs IMVT vs BMY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - General |
| Market Cap | $6.36B | $6.91B | $5.53B | $114.85B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $18M | $51M | $0.00 | $48.48B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-115M | $-315M | $-464M | $7.28B |
| Gross Margin | 100.0% | 33.2% | — | 68.7% |
| Operating Margin | -8.1% | -7.0% | — | 25.7% |
| Forward P/E | 30.6x | — | — | 8.9x |
| Total Debt | $10M | $82M | $98K | $47.14B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $128M | $357M | $714M | $10.21B |
PTGX vs KYMR vs IMVT vs BMY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protagonist Therape… (PTGX) | 100 | 443.6 | +343.6% |
| Kymera Therapeutics… (KYMR) | 100 | 269.8 | +169.8% |
| Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) | 100 | 79.9 | -20.1% |
| Bristol-Myers Squib… (BMY) | 100 | 97.4 | -2.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PTGX vs KYMR vs IMVT vs BMY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PTGX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- beta 0.25
- 7.4% 10Y total return vs IMVT's 173.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.25, Low D/E 1.7%, current ratio 12.71x
- Beta 0.25, current ratio 12.71x
KYMR is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +190.7% vs BMY's +23.4%
IMVT lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
BMY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth -0.2%, EPS growth 178.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 1.4%
- -0.2% revenue growth vs PTGX's -89.4%
- Better valuation composite
- 15.0% margin vs PTGX's -6.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -0.2% revenue growth vs PTGX's -89.4% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.0% margin vs PTGX's -6.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.25 vs IMVT's 1.37 | |
| Dividends | 4.4% yield; 6-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +190.7% vs BMY's +23.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.9% ROA vs IMVT's -44.1% |
PTGX vs KYMR vs IMVT vs BMY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
PTGX vs KYMR vs IMVT vs BMY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BMY leads in 3 of 6 categories
PTGX leads 2 • KYMR leads 0 • IMVT leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BMY leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BMY and IMVT operate at a comparable scale, with $48.5B and $0 in trailing revenue. BMY is the more profitable business, keeping 15.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PTGX's -6.5%. On growth, KYMR holds the edge at +55.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $18M | $51M | $0 | $48.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$141M | -$352M | -$487M | $15.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$115M | -$315M | -$464M | $7.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$116M | -$244M | -$423M | $11.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +100.0% | +33.2% | — | +68.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -8.1% | -7.0% | — | +25.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -6.5% | -6.1% | — | +15.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -6.6% | -4.7% | — | +24.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | +55.5% | — | +2.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +126.3% | +13.4% | +19.7% | +9.2% |
Valuation Metrics
BMY leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $6.4B | $6.9B | $5.5B | $114.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.2B | $6.6B | $4.8B | $151.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -48.22x | -22.93x | -9.97x | 16.30x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 30.60x | — | — | 8.93x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 9.17x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 138.15x | 176.26x | — | 2.38x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 10.22x | 4.52x | 5.83x | 6.20x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 113.36x | — | — | 8.94x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BMY leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BMY delivers a 39.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $39 in annual profit, vs $-47 for IMVT. IMVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BMY's 2.55x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BMY scores 8/9 vs IMVT's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -17.8% | -25.0% | -47.1% | +39.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -16.5% | -22.3% | -44.1% | +7.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -21.8% | -24.9% | — | +16.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -23.9% | -27.2% | -66.1% | +18.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.02x | 0.05x | 0.00x | 2.55x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$118M | -$275M | -$714M | $36.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $128M | $357M | $714M | $10.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $10M | $82M | $98,000 | $47.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -2119.53x | — | 10.33x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PTGX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PTGX five years ago would be worth $33,876 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,523 for BMY. Over the past 12 months, KYMR leads with a +190.7% total return vs BMY's +23.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PTGX at 58.3% vs BMY's -2.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +13.4% | +16.3% | +5.1% | +7.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +129.4% | +190.7% | +96.1% | +23.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +296.5% | +205.1% | +40.9% | -7.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +238.8% | +92.1% | +62.4% | +5.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +744.9% | +154.4% | +173.6% | +6.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +58.3% | +45.0% | +12.1% | -2.4% |
Risk & Volatility
PTGX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PTGX is the less volatile stock with a 0.25 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IMVT's 1.37 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PTGX currently trades 91.7% from its 52-week high vs KYMR's 82.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.23x | 1.15x | 1.37x | 0.50x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $107.84 | $103.00 | $30.09 | $62.89 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $41.29 | $28.06 | $13.36 | $42.52 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.7% | +82.2% | +90.5% | +89.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.4 | 54.1 | 60.2 | 41.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 752K | 602K | 1.4M | 10.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PTGX as "Buy", KYMR as "Buy", IMVT as "Buy", BMY as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 67.2% upside for IMVT (target: $46) vs 10.2% for BMY (target: $62). BMY is the only dividend payer here at 4.39% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $116.75 | $117.06 | $45.50 | $62.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 26 | 26 | 23 | 41 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +4.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 6 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $2.47 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
BMY leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). PTGX leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility).
PTGX vs KYMR vs IMVT vs BMY: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PTGX or KYMR or IMVT or BMY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY) is the stronger pick with -0.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -89. 4% for Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc. (PTGX). Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY) offers the better valuation at 16. 3x trailing P/E (8. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc. (PTGX) a "Buy" — based on 26 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PTGX or KYMR or IMVT or BMY?
On forward P/E, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company is actually cheaper at 8.
9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PTGX or KYMR or IMVT or BMY?
Over the past 5 years, Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTGX) delivered a total return of +238. 8%, compared to +5. 2% for Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PTGX returned +749. 2% versus BMY's +6. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PTGX or KYMR or IMVT or BMY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTGX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 23β versus Immunovant, Inc. 's 1. 37β — meaning IMVT is approximately 491% more volatile than PTGX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 3% for Bristol-Myers Squibb Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PTGX or KYMR or IMVT or BMY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY) is pulling ahead at -0.
2% versus -89. 4% for Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc. (PTGX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company grew EPS 178. 2% year-over-year, compared to -148. 5% for Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PTGX leads at 20. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PTGX or KYMR or IMVT or BMY?
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY) is the more profitable company, earning 14.
6% net margin versus -794. 4% for Kymera Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 14. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BMY leads at 26. 3% versus -891. 3% for KYMR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KYMR leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PTGX or KYMR or IMVT or BMY more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY) trades at 8.
9x forward P/E versus 30. 6x for Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc. — 21. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IMVT: 67. 2% to $45. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — PTGX or KYMR or IMVT or BMY?
In this comparison, BMY (4.
4% yield) pays a dividend. PTGX, KYMR, IMVT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is PTGX or KYMR or IMVT or BMY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTGX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 23), +749. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PTGX: +749. 2%, IMVT: +173. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PTGX and KYMR and IMVT and BMY?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PTGX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KYMR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IMVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BMY is a mid-cap deep-value stock. BMY pays a dividend while PTGX, KYMR, IMVT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.