PTLO
Portillo's Inc.
Restaurants
Market Cap$315M
5Y Perf.-70.8%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
PTLO vs BIRK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
BIRK
Birkenstock Holding plc
Apparel - Footwear & Accessories
Market Cap$7.18B
5Y Perf.-0.0%
PTLO vs BIRK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | PTLO | BIRK |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Restaurants | Apparel - Footwear & Accessories |
| Market Cap | $315M | $7.18B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $738M | $2.14B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $16M | $379M |
| Gross Margin | 29.0% | 58.3% |
| Operating Margin | 6.1% | 26.4% |
| Forward P/E | 20.3x | 18.8x |
| Total Debt | $999M | $1.31B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $20M | $329M |
PTLO vs BIRK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
PTLO
BIRK
| Stock | Oct 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Portillo's Inc. (PTLO) | 100 | 29.2 | -70.8% |
| Birkenstock Holding… (BIRK) | 100 | 100.0 | -0.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PTLO vs BIRK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: BIRK leads in 6 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
PTLO
Portillo's Inc.
The Specific-Use Pick
In this particular matchup, PTLO is outpaced on most metrics by others in the set.
Best for: consumer cyclical exposure
BIRK
Birkenstock Holding plc
The Income Pick
BIRK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.20
- Rev growth 16.2%, EPS growth 83.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 19.1%
- -2.8% 10Y total return vs PTLO's -85.0%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | BIRK | 16.2% revenue growth vs PTLO's 3.0% |
| Value | BIRK | Lower P/E (18.8x vs 20.3x) |
| Quality / Margins | BIRK | 17.7% margin vs PTLO's 2.1% |
| Stability / Safety | BIRK | Beta 1.20 vs PTLO's 1.35, lower leverage |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | BIRK | -24.7% vs PTLO's -61.4% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | BIRK | 7.7% ROA vs PTLO's 1.0%, ROIC 11.3% vs 3.0% |
PTLO vs BIRK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
Segment breakdown not available.
PTLO vs BIRK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLBIRKLAGGINGPTLO
PTLOPortillo's Inc.
1leads
BIRKBirkenstock Holding p…
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs PTLOMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
BIRK6/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
PTLO3/5
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
BIRK7/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
BIRK5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
BIRK2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BIRK leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BIRK is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.1B annually — 2.9x PTLO's $738M. BIRK is the more profitable business, keeping 17.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PTLO's 2.1%. On growth, BIRK holds the edge at +11.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | PTLOPortillo's Inc. | BIRKBirkenstock Holdi… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $738M | $2.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $75M | $687M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $16M | $379M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$9M | $282M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +29.0% | +58.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.1% | +26.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.1% | +17.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -1.2% | +13.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.5% | +11.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -111.2% | +145.5% |
BIRK leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
PTLO leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.1x trailing earnings, PTLO trades at a 9% valuation discount to BIRK's 17.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BIRK's 10.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PTLO's 16.1x.
| Metric | PTLOPortillo's Inc. | BIRKBirkenstock Holdi… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $315M | $7.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.3B | $8.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 16.15x | 17.77x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 20.34x | 18.78x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 16.11x | 10.80x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.43x | 2.91x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.62x | 2.28x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 21.20x |
PTLO leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BIRK leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BIRK delivers a 13.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $3 for PTLO. BIRK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.48x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PTLO's 2.01x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BIRK scores 9/9 vs PTLO's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | PTLOPortillo's Inc. | BIRKBirkenstock Holdi… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.2% | +13.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.0% | +7.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.0% | +11.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.7% | +12.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 9 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.01x | 0.48x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $980M | $1.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $20M | $329M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $999M | $1.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.78x | 10.04x |
BIRK leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BIRK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BIRK five years ago would be worth $9,715 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,498 for PTLO. Over the past 12 months, BIRK leads with a -24.7% total return vs PTLO's -61.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BIRK at -1.0% vs PTLO's -40.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | PTLOPortillo's Inc. | BIRKBirkenstock Holdi… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -5.0% | -6.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -61.4% | -24.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -78.4% | -2.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -85.0% | -2.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -85.0% | -2.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -40.0% | -1.0% |
BIRK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BIRK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BIRK is the less volatile stock with a 1.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PTLO's 1.35 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BIRK currently trades 65.6% from its 52-week high vs PTLO's 32.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | PTLOPortillo's Inc. | BIRKBirkenstock Holdi… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.35x | 1.20x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $13.55 | $59.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.27 | $33.06 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +32.2% | +65.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 31.9 | 54.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.5M | 2.1M |
BIRK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates PTLO as "Hold" and BIRK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 58.7% upside for PTLO (target: $7) vs 42.2% for BIRK (target: $56).
| Metric | PTLOPortillo's Inc. | BIRKBirkenstock Holdi… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $6.92 | $55.54 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.2% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
BIRK leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PTLO leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
Best OverallBirkenstock Holding plc (BIRK)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
PTLO vs BIRK: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PTLO or BIRK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Birkenstock Holding plc (BIRK) is the stronger pick with 16.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 0% for Portillo's Inc. (PTLO). Portillo's Inc. (PTLO) offers the better valuation at 16. 1x trailing P/E (20. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Birkenstock Holding plc (BIRK) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PTLO or BIRK?
On trailing P/E, Portillo's Inc.
(PTLO) is the cheapest at 16. 1x versus Birkenstock Holding plc at 17. 8x. On forward P/E, Birkenstock Holding plc is actually cheaper at 18. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PTLO or BIRK?
Over the past 5 years, Birkenstock Holding plc (BIRK) delivered a total return of -2.
8%, compared to -85. 0% for Portillo's Inc. (PTLO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BIRK returned -2. 8% versus PTLO's -85. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PTLO or BIRK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Birkenstock Holding plc (BIRK) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
20β versus Portillo's Inc. 's 1. 35β — meaning PTLO is approximately 12% more volatile than BIRK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Birkenstock Holding plc (BIRK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 48% versus 2% for Portillo's Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PTLO or BIRK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Birkenstock Holding plc (BIRK) is pulling ahead at 16.
2% versus 3. 0% for Portillo's Inc. (PTLO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Birkenstock Holding plc grew EPS 83. 3% year-over-year, compared to -41. 3% for Portillo's Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BIRK leads at 19. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PTLO or BIRK?
Birkenstock Holding plc (BIRK) is the more profitable company, earning 16.
6% net margin versus 2. 6% for Portillo's Inc. — meaning it keeps 16. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BIRK leads at 26. 2% versus 7. 0% for PTLO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BIRK leads at 59. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PTLO or BIRK more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Birkenstock Holding plc (BIRK) trades at 18.
8x forward P/E versus 20. 3x for Portillo's Inc. — 1. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PTLO: 58. 7% to $6. 92.
08Which pays a better dividend — PTLO or BIRK?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is PTLO or BIRK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Birkenstock Holding plc (BIRK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
20)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BIRK: -2. 8%, PTLO: -85. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PTLO and BIRK?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PTLO is a small-cap deep-value stock; BIRK is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(PTLO: 3.5% · BIRK: 11.1%)Net Margin>
%
(PTLO: 2.1% · BIRK: 17.7%)P/E Ratio<
x
(PTLO: 16.1x · BIRK: 17.8x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.