PTRN vs CNXN vs KO vs PEP vs CDW

For growth investors, Pattern Group Inc.

Series A Common Stock (PTRN) is the stronger pick with 39. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). CDW Corporation (CDW) offers the better valuation at 16. 1x trailing P/E (12. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Pattern Group Inc. Series A Common Stock (PTRN) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, CDW Corporation (CDW) is the cheapest at 16.

1x versus The Coca-Cola Company at 26. 4x. On forward P/E, CDW Corporation is actually cheaper at 12. 2x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: CDW Corporation wins at 1. 48x versus PepsiCo, Inc. 's 5. 18x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.

Over the past 5 years, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) delivered a total return of +64.

2%, compared to -17. 5% for CDW Corporation (CDW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CDW returned +260. 8% versus PTRN's +22. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

20β versus Pattern Group Inc. Series A Common Stock's 1. 65β — meaning PTRN is approximately -923% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, PC Connection, Inc. (CNXN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 2% for CDW Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Pattern Group Inc.

Series A Common Stock (PTRN) is pulling ahead at 39. 3% versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Pattern Group Inc. Series A Common Stock grew EPS 27. 6% year-over-year, compared to -13. 7% for PepsiCo, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, KO leads at 3. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.

3% net margin versus 0. 6% for Pattern Group Inc. Series A Common Stock — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus 1. 0% for PTRN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KO leads at 61. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, CDW Corporation (CDW) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 48x versus PepsiCo, Inc. 's 5. 18x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, CDW Corporation (CDW) trades at 12. 2x forward P/E versus 34. 7x for Pattern Group Inc. Series A Common Stock — 22. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PTRN: 17. 4% to $22. 50.

In this comparison, PEP (3.

8% yield), KO (2. 5% yield), CDW (1. 9% yield), CNXN (0. 9% yield) pay a dividend. PTRN does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

20), 2. 5% yield, +115. 4% 10Y return). Pattern Group Inc. Series A Common Stock (PTRN) carries a higher beta of 1. 65 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +115. 4%, PTRN: +22. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (PTRN (Technology) and CNXN (Technology) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and PEP (Consumer Defensive) and CDW (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: PTRN is a small-cap high-growth stock; CNXN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; PEP is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; CDW is a mid-cap deep-value stock. CNXN, KO, PEP, CDW pay a dividend while PTRN does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.