Semiconductors
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
PXLW vs SMTC vs SIMO vs SITM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
PXLW vs SMTC vs SIMO vs SITM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $36M | $11.21B | $2.04B | $21.05B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $693K | $1.03B | $886M | $380M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-8M | $29M | $123M | $-24M |
| Gross Margin | 85.0% | 52.0% | 48.3% | 55.7% |
| Operating Margin | -16.7% | 12.3% | 10.5% | -12.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | 71.7x | 29.9x | 155.1x |
| Total Debt | $298K | $552M | $0.00 | $5M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $11M | $152M | $202M | $17M |
PXLW vs SMTC vs SIMO vs SITM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pixelworks, Inc. (PXLW) | 100 | 13.0 | -87.0% |
| Semtech Corporation (SMTC) | 100 | 228.5 | +128.5% |
| Silicon Motion Tech… (SIMO) | 100 | 538.5 | +438.5% |
| SiTime Corporation (SITM) | 100 | 2674.6 | +2574.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PXLW vs SMTC vs SIMO vs SITM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PXLW is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 1.83
- Lower volatility, beta 1.83, Low D/E 4.0%, current ratio 2.51x
- Beta 1.83, current ratio 2.51x
- Beta 1.83 vs SMTC's 2.73, lower leverage
SMTC lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
SIMO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.
- Lower P/E (29.9x vs 155.1x)
- 13.8% margin vs PXLW's -11.9%
- 3.3% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
- 11.2% ROA vs PXLW's -15.6%, ROIC 12.4% vs -106.5%
SITM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 61.2%, EPS growth 57.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.8%
- 60.3% 10Y total return vs SIMO's 5.3%
- 61.2% revenue growth vs PXLW's -98.4%
- +379.7% vs PXLW's -8.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 61.2% revenue growth vs PXLW's -98.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (29.9x vs 155.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.8% margin vs PXLW's -11.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.83 vs SMTC's 2.73, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.3% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +379.7% vs PXLW's -8.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.2% ROA vs PXLW's -15.6%, ROIC 12.4% vs -106.5% |
PXLW vs SMTC vs SIMO vs SITM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
PXLW vs SMTC vs SIMO vs SITM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SIMO leads in 2 of 6 categories
SITM leads 1 • PXLW leads 0 • SMTC leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — PXLW and SITM each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SMTC is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.0B annually — 1481.4x PXLW's $693,000. SIMO is the more profitable business, keeping 13.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PXLW's -11.9%. On growth, SITM holds the edge at +88.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $693,000 | $1.0B | $886M | $380M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$10M | $173M | $123M | -$24M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$8M | $29M | $123M | -$24M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$21M | $143M | $6M | $54M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +85.0% | +52.0% | +48.3% | +55.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -16.7% | +12.3% | +10.5% | -12.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -11.9% | +2.8% | +13.8% | -6.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -30.4% | +13.9% | +0.7% | +14.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.6% | +12.7% | +45.7% | +88.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +24.4% | +67.4% | +7.4% | +80.2% |
Valuation Metrics
SIMO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, SIMO's 14.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SMTC's 104.6x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $36M | $11.2B | $2.0B | $21.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $25M | $11.6B | $1.8B | $21.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -3.74x | -53.76x | 16.62x | -463.55x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 71.68x | 29.86x | 155.06x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.37x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 104.59x | 14.90x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 51.30x | 12.33x | 2.30x | 64.43x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.12x | 16.04x | 2.45x | 17.22x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 256.13x | 324.67x | 599.17x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SIMO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SIMO delivers a 15.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $-34 for PXLW. SITM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SMTC's 1.02x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SITM scores 7/9 vs PXLW's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -33.9% | +5.1% | +15.2% | -2.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -15.6% | +2.0% | +11.2% | -1.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -106.5% | +4.9% | +12.4% | -4.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -26.6% | +5.4% | +10.8% | -6.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.04x | 1.02x | — | 0.00x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$11M | $400M | -$202M | -$12M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $11M | $152M | $202M | $17M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $298,000 | $552M | $0 | $5M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -886.45x | 2.45x | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SITM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SITM five years ago would be worth $87,974 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,396 for PXLW. Over the past 12 months, SITM leads with a +379.7% total return vs PXLW's -8.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SITM at 110.7% vs PXLW's -30.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -18.0% | +61.4% | +159.9% | +115.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -8.3% | +253.5% | +359.6% | +379.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -66.6% | +547.3% | +311.9% | +836.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -86.0% | +89.8% | +267.4% | +779.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -73.6% | +460.9% | +533.8% | +6033.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -30.6% | +86.4% | +60.3% | +110.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PXLW and SIMO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PXLW is the less volatile stock with a 1.83 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SMTC's 2.73 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SIMO currently trades 96.4% from its 52-week high vs PXLW's 36.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.83x | 2.73x | 1.90x | 2.56x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $15.42 | $127.19 | $251.71 | $845.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.67 | $33.06 | $52.01 | $158.63 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +36.4% | +95.5% | +96.4% | +94.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.9 | 69.3 | 85.8 | 76.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 43K | 2.4M | 743K | 427K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PXLW as "Buy", SMTC as "Buy", SIMO as "Buy", SITM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 167.4% upside for PXLW (target: $15) vs -45.3% for SITM (target: $436). SIMO is the only dividend payer here at 3.30% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $15.00 | $87.44 | $251.25 | $436.43 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 32 | 31 | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +3.3% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 2 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $8.00 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.2% | 0.0% |
SIMO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). SITM leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
PXLW vs SMTC vs SIMO vs SITM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PXLW or SMTC or SIMO or SITM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, SiTime Corporation (SITM) is the stronger pick with 61.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -98. 4% for Pixelworks, Inc. (PXLW). Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (SIMO) offers the better valuation at 16. 6x trailing P/E (29. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Pixelworks, Inc. (PXLW) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PXLW or SMTC or SIMO or SITM?
On forward P/E, Silicon Motion Technology Corporation is actually cheaper at 29.
9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PXLW or SMTC or SIMO or SITM?
Over the past 5 years, SiTime Corporation (SITM) delivered a total return of +779.
7%, compared to -86. 0% for Pixelworks, Inc. (PXLW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SITM returned +60. 3% versus PXLW's -73. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PXLW or SMTC or SIMO or SITM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Pixelworks, Inc.
(PXLW) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 83β versus Semtech Corporation's 2. 73β — meaning SMTC is approximately 49% more volatile than PXLW relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, SiTime Corporation (SITM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 102% for Semtech Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PXLW or SMTC or SIMO or SITM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), SiTime Corporation (SITM) is pulling ahead at 61.
2% versus -98. 4% for Pixelworks, Inc. (PXLW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Semtech Corporation grew EPS 86. 7% year-over-year, compared to 38. 3% for Silicon Motion Technology Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, SMTC leads at 7. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PXLW or SMTC or SIMO or SITM?
Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (SIMO) is the more profitable company, earning 13.
9% net margin versus -1190. 3% for Pixelworks, Inc. — meaning it keeps 13. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SIMO leads at 10. 5% versus -1667. 5% for PXLW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PXLW leads at 85. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PXLW or SMTC or SIMO or SITM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (SIMO) trades at 29.
9x forward P/E versus 155. 1x for SiTime Corporation — 125. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PXLW: 167. 4% to $15. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — PXLW or SMTC or SIMO or SITM?
In this comparison, SIMO (3.
3% yield) pays a dividend. PXLW, SMTC, SITM do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is PXLW or SMTC or SIMO or SITM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (SIMO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (3.
3% yield, +533. 8% 10Y return). SiTime Corporation (SITM) carries a higher beta of 2. 56 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SIMO: +533. 8%, SITM: +60. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PXLW and SMTC and SIMO and SITM?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PXLW is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SMTC is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SIMO is a small-cap deep-value stock; SITM is a mid-cap high-growth stock. SIMO pays a dividend while PXLW, SMTC, SITM do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.