Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

PYPD vs ACRS vs NKTR vs ABBV vs PFE

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
PYPD
PolyPid Ltd.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • IL
Market Cap$80M
5Y Perf.-99.2%
ACRS
Aclaris Therapeutics, Inc.

Medical - Diagnostics & Research

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$595M
5Y Perf.+204.3%
NKTR
Nektar Therapeutics

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.66B
5Y Perf.-76.4%
ABBV
AbbVie Inc.

Drug Manufacturers - General

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$356.49B
5Y Perf.+105.3%
PFE
Pfizer Inc.

Drug Manufacturers - General

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$146.02B
5Y Perf.-17.2%

PYPD vs ACRS vs NKTR vs ABBV vs PFE — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
PYPD logoPYPD
ACRS logoACRS
NKTR logoNKTR
ABBV logoABBV
PFE logoPFE
IndustryBiotechnologyMedical - Diagnostics & ResearchBiotechnologyDrug Manufacturers - GeneralDrug Manufacturers - General
Market Cap$80M$595M$1.66B$356.49B$146.02B
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$8M$56M$61.16B$63.31B
Net Income (TTM)$-34M$-70M$-158M$4.23B$7.49B
Gross Margin76.3%80.1%70.2%69.3%
Operating Margin-9.6%-226.3%26.7%23.4%
Forward P/E14.2x8.7x
Total Debt$3M$2M$149M$69.07B$67.42B
Cash & Equiv.$6M$20M$15M$5.23B$1.14B

PYPD vs ACRS vs NKTR vs ABBV vs PFELong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

PYPD
ACRS
NKTR
ABBV
PFE
StockJun 20May 26Return
PolyPid Ltd. (PYPD)1000.8-99.2%
Aclaris Therapeutic… (ACRS)100304.3+204.3%
Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR)10023.6-76.4%
AbbVie Inc. (ABBV)100205.3+105.3%
Pfizer Inc. (PFE)10082.8-17.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: PYPD vs ACRS vs NKTR vs ABBV vs PFE

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: PFE leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Aclaris Therapeutics, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility. NKTR and ABBV also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
PYPD
PolyPid Ltd.
The Healthcare Pick

Among these 5 stocks, PYPD doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: healthcare exposure
ACRS
Aclaris Therapeutics, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

ACRS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.22, Low D/E 2.1%, current ratio 5.28x
  • Beta 0.22, current ratio 5.28x
  • Beta 0.22 vs NKTR's 1.80, lower leverage
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
NKTR
Nektar Therapeutics
The Momentum Pick

NKTR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.

  • +7.8% vs ABBV's +12.2%
Best for: momentum
ABBV
AbbVie Inc.
The Growth Play

ABBV is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 8.6%, EPS growth -0.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 1.8%
  • 293.8% 10Y total return vs PFE's 28.5%
  • 8.6% revenue growth vs ACRS's -58.2%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
PFE
Pfizer Inc.
The Income Pick

PFE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.49, yield 6.7%
  • Lower P/E (8.7x vs 14.2x)
  • 11.8% margin vs ACRS's -8.3%
  • 6.7% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs ABBV's 3.3%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Best for: income & stability
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthABBV logoABBV8.6% revenue growth vs ACRS's -58.2%
ValuePFE logoPFELower P/E (8.7x vs 14.2x)
Quality / MarginsPFE logoPFE11.8% margin vs ACRS's -8.3%
Stability / SafetyACRS logoACRSBeta 0.22 vs NKTR's 1.80, lower leverage
DividendsPFE logoPFE6.7% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs ABBV's 3.3%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)NKTR logoNKTR+7.8% vs ABBV's +12.2%
Efficiency (ROA)PFE logoPFE3.6% ROA vs PYPD's -153.2%, ROIC 7.5% vs -5.5%

PYPD vs ACRS vs NKTR vs ABBV vs PFE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

PYPDPolyPid Ltd.

Segment breakdown not available.

ACRSAclaris Therapeutics, Inc.
FY 2025
License and Service
76.1%$6M
Contract research
23.9%$2M
NKTRNektar Therapeutics
FY 2025
Non Cash Royalty Revenue Related To Sale Of Future Royalties
99.5%$55M
License Collaboration And Other Revenue
0.5%$300,000
ABBVAbbVie Inc.
FY 2025
SKYRIZI
30.2%$17.6B
RINVOQ
14.3%$8.3B
H U M I R A
7.8%$4.5B
Botox Therapeutic
6.5%$3.8B
Vraylar
6.2%$3.6B
Imbruvica
4.9%$2.9B
VENCLEXTA
4.8%$2.8B
Other (14)
25.3%$14.7B
PFEPfizer Inc.
FY 2025
Biopharma Segment
97.8%$61.2B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
2.2%$1.4B

PYPD vs ACRS vs NKTR vs ABBV vs PFE — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLPFELAGGINGPYPD

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

ABBV leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

PFE and PYPD operate at a comparable scale, with $63.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. PFE is the more profitable business, keeping 11.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ACRS's -8.3%. On growth, ACRS holds the edge at +37.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricPYPD logoPYPDPolyPid Ltd.ACRS logoACRSAclaris Therapeut…NKTR logoNKTRNektar Therapeuti…ABBV logoABBVAbbVie Inc.PFE logoPFEPfizer Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$8M$56M$61.2B$63.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$15M-$80M-$125M$24.5B$21.0B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$34M-$70M-$158M$4.2B$7.5B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$0-$52M-$160M$18.7B$9.5B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+76.3%+80.1%+70.2%+69.3%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-9.6%-2.3%+26.7%+23.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-8.3%-2.8%+6.9%+11.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-6.2%-2.9%+30.6%+15.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+37.2%+3.8%+10.0%+5.4%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-25.0%+49.7%+57.4%-9.5%
ABBV leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

PFE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 18.9x trailing earnings, PFE trades at a 78% valuation discount to ABBV's 85.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PFE's 10.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ABBV's 14.9x.

MetricPYPD logoPYPDPolyPid Ltd.ACRS logoACRSAclaris Therapeut…NKTR logoNKTRNektar Therapeuti…ABBV logoABBVAbbVie Inc.PFE logoPFEPfizer Inc.
Market CapShares × price$80M$595M$1.7B$356.5B$146.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$76M$577M$1.8B$420.3B$212.3B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-2.10x-9.30x-8.42x85.04x18.88x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.14.17x8.66x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple14.89x10.44x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue75.97x30.09x5.83x2.33x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share6.53x5.87x15.38x1.68x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF20.01x16.09x
PFE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — ACRS and ABBV and PFE each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

ABBV delivers a 62.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $62 in annual profit, vs $-3 for PYPD. ACRS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NKTR's 1.66x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PFE scores 7/9 vs NKTR's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricPYPD logoPYPDPolyPid Ltd.ACRS logoACRSAclaris Therapeut…NKTR logoNKTRNektar Therapeuti…ABBV logoABBVAbbVie Inc.PFE logoPFEPfizer Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-3.1%-55.9%-87.0%+62.1%+8.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-153.2%-38.5%-40.7%+3.1%+3.6%
ROICReturn on invested capital-5.5%-53.0%-57.2%+23.9%+7.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-2.4%-47.7%-55.7%+21.5%+9.0%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–934267
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.25x0.02x1.66x0.78x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$4M-$18M$134M$63.8B$66.3B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$6M$20M$15M$5.2B$1.1B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$3M$2M$149M$69.1B$67.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-27.47x-6.23x3.28x4.02x
Evenly matched — ACRS and ABBV and PFE each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

NKTR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in ABBV five years ago would be worth $19,956 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $161 for PYPD. Over the past 12 months, NKTR leads with a +782.4% total return vs ABBV's +12.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NKTR at 92.1% vs PYPD's -29.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricPYPD logoPYPDPolyPid Ltd.ACRS logoACRSAclaris Therapeut…NKTR logoNKTRNektar Therapeuti…ABBV logoABBVAbbVie Inc.PFE logoPFEPfizer Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+0.7%+71.2%+88.6%-10.6%+5.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+61.0%+276.3%+782.4%+12.2%+21.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-64.7%-41.3%+609.0%+49.7%-19.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-98.4%-78.9%-72.3%+99.6%-14.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.2%-76.0%-59.8%+293.8%+28.5%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-29.3%-16.3%+92.1%+14.4%-6.9%
NKTR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

ACRS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

ACRS is the less volatile stock with a 0.22 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NKTR's 1.80 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ACRS currently trades 99.8% from its 52-week high vs NKTR's 75.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricPYPD logoPYPDPolyPid Ltd.ACRS logoACRSAclaris Therapeut…NKTR logoNKTRNektar Therapeuti…ABBV logoABBVAbbVie Inc.PFE logoPFEPfizer Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.10x0.22x1.80x0.28x0.49x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$5.12$4.94$109.00$244.81$28.75
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$2.44$1.16$7.99$176.57$21.97
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+85.5%+99.8%+75.1%+82.3%+89.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10048.167.450.543.943.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded50K1.9M977K5.8M33.3M
ACRS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

PFE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: ACRS as "Buy", NKTR as "Buy", ABBV as "Buy", PFE as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 115.0% upside for ACRS (target: $11) vs 6.7% for PFE (target: $27). For income investors, PFE offers the higher dividend yield at 6.69% vs ABBV's 3.26%.

MetricPYPD logoPYPDPolyPid Ltd.ACRS logoACRSAclaris Therapeut…NKTR logoNKTRNektar Therapeuti…ABBV logoABBVAbbVie Inc.PFE logoPFEPfizer Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$10.60$147.33$256.69$27.40
# AnalystsCovering analysts16334139
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+3.3%+6.7%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1315
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$6.57$1.72
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%+0.3%0.0%
PFE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

PFE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). ABBV leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.

Best OverallPfizer Inc. (PFE)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

PYPD vs ACRS vs NKTR vs ABBV vs PFE: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is PYPD or ACRS or NKTR or ABBV or PFE a better buy right now?

For growth investors, AbbVie Inc.

(ABBV) is the stronger pick with 8. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -58. 2% for Aclaris Therapeutics, Inc. (ACRS). Pfizer Inc. (PFE) offers the better valuation at 18. 9x trailing P/E (8. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Aclaris Therapeutics, Inc. (ACRS) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — PYPD or ACRS or NKTR or ABBV or PFE?

On trailing P/E, Pfizer Inc.

(PFE) is the cheapest at 18. 9x versus AbbVie Inc. at 85. 0x. On forward P/E, Pfizer Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 7x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — PYPD or ACRS or NKTR or ABBV or PFE?

Over the past 5 years, AbbVie Inc.

(ABBV) delivered a total return of +99. 6%, compared to -98. 4% for PolyPid Ltd. (PYPD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ABBV returned +293. 8% versus PYPD's -99. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — PYPD or ACRS or NKTR or ABBV or PFE?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Aclaris Therapeutics, Inc.

(ACRS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 22β versus Nektar Therapeutics's 1. 80β — meaning NKTR is approximately 720% more volatile than ACRS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Aclaris Therapeutics, Inc. (ACRS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 166% for Nektar Therapeutics — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — PYPD or ACRS or NKTR or ABBV or PFE?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), AbbVie Inc.

(ABBV) is pulling ahead at 8. 6% versus -58. 2% for Aclaris Therapeutics, Inc. (ACRS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Aclaris Therapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 69. 0% year-over-year, compared to -12. 1% for Nektar Therapeutics. Over a 3-year CAGR, ABBV leads at 1. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — PYPD or ACRS or NKTR or ABBV or PFE?

Pfizer Inc.

(PFE) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 4% net margin versus -829. 6% for Aclaris Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ABBV leads at 32. 8% versus -975. 9% for ACRS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NKTR leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is PYPD or ACRS or NKTR or ABBV or PFE more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Pfizer Inc.

(PFE) trades at 8. 7x forward P/E versus 14. 2x for AbbVie Inc. — 5. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ACRS: 115. 0% to $10. 60.

08

Which pays a better dividend — PYPD or ACRS or NKTR or ABBV or PFE?

In this comparison, PFE (6.

7% yield), ABBV (3. 3% yield) pay a dividend. PYPD, ACRS, NKTR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is PYPD or ACRS or NKTR or ABBV or PFE better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, AbbVie Inc.

(ABBV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 28), 3. 3% yield, +293. 8% 10Y return). Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR) carries a higher beta of 1. 80 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ABBV: +293. 8%, NKTR: -59. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between PYPD and ACRS and NKTR and ABBV and PFE?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: PYPD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ACRS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NKTR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ABBV is a large-cap income-oriented stock; PFE is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. ABBV, PFE pay a dividend while PYPD, ACRS, NKTR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

PYPD

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ACRS

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 18%
  • Gross Margin > 45%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NKTR

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 48%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ABBV

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PFE

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 7%
Run This Screen

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.