Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
PYPD vs ACRS vs NKTR vs ABBV vs PFE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Biotechnology
Drug Manufacturers - General
Drug Manufacturers - General
PYPD vs ACRS vs NKTR vs ABBV vs PFE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - General | Drug Manufacturers - General |
| Market Cap | $80M | $595M | $1.66B | $356.49B | $146.02B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $8M | $56M | $61.16B | $63.31B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-34M | $-70M | $-158M | $4.23B | $7.49B |
| Gross Margin | — | 76.3% | 80.1% | 70.2% | 69.3% |
| Operating Margin | — | -9.6% | -226.3% | 26.7% | 23.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | 14.2x | 8.7x |
| Total Debt | $3M | $2M | $149M | $69.07B | $67.42B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6M | $20M | $15M | $5.23B | $1.14B |
PYPD vs ACRS vs NKTR vs ABBV vs PFE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| PolyPid Ltd. (PYPD) | 100 | 0.8 | -99.2% |
| Aclaris Therapeutic… (ACRS) | 100 | 304.3 | +204.3% |
| Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR) | 100 | 23.6 | -76.4% |
| AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) | 100 | 205.3 | +105.3% |
| Pfizer Inc. (PFE) | 100 | 82.8 | -17.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PYPD vs ACRS vs NKTR vs ABBV vs PFE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, PYPD doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
ACRS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.22, Low D/E 2.1%, current ratio 5.28x
- Beta 0.22, current ratio 5.28x
- Beta 0.22 vs NKTR's 1.80, lower leverage
NKTR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +7.8% vs ABBV's +12.2%
ABBV is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 8.6%, EPS growth -0.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 1.8%
- 293.8% 10Y total return vs PFE's 28.5%
- 8.6% revenue growth vs ACRS's -58.2%
PFE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.49, yield 6.7%
- Lower P/E (8.7x vs 14.2x)
- 11.8% margin vs ACRS's -8.3%
- 6.7% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs ABBV's 3.3%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.6% revenue growth vs ACRS's -58.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.7x vs 14.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 11.8% margin vs ACRS's -8.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.22 vs NKTR's 1.80, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 6.7% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs ABBV's 3.3%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +7.8% vs ABBV's +12.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.6% ROA vs PYPD's -153.2%, ROIC 7.5% vs -5.5% |
PYPD vs ACRS vs NKTR vs ABBV vs PFE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
PYPD vs ACRS vs NKTR vs ABBV vs PFE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PFE leads in 2 of 6 categories
ABBV leads 1 • NKTR leads 1 • ACRS leads 1 • PYPD leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ABBV leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PFE and PYPD operate at a comparable scale, with $63.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. PFE is the more profitable business, keeping 11.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ACRS's -8.3%. On growth, ACRS holds the edge at +37.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $8M | $56M | $61.2B | $63.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$15M | -$80M | -$125M | $24.5B | $21.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$34M | -$70M | -$158M | $4.2B | $7.5B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | -$52M | -$160M | $18.7B | $9.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +76.3% | +80.1% | +70.2% | +69.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -9.6% | -2.3% | +26.7% | +23.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -8.3% | -2.8% | +6.9% | +11.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -6.2% | -2.9% | +30.6% | +15.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +37.2% | +3.8% | +10.0% | +5.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -25.0% | +49.7% | +57.4% | -9.5% |
Valuation Metrics
PFE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 18.9x trailing earnings, PFE trades at a 78% valuation discount to ABBV's 85.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PFE's 10.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ABBV's 14.9x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $80M | $595M | $1.7B | $356.5B | $146.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $76M | $577M | $1.8B | $420.3B | $212.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.10x | -9.30x | -8.42x | 85.04x | 18.88x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 14.17x | 8.66x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 14.89x | 10.44x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 75.97x | 30.09x | 5.83x | 2.33x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.53x | 5.87x | 15.38x | — | 1.68x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 20.01x | 16.09x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — ACRS and ABBV and PFE each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ABBV delivers a 62.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $62 in annual profit, vs $-3 for PYPD. ACRS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NKTR's 1.66x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PFE scores 7/9 vs NKTR's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -3.1% | -55.9% | -87.0% | +62.1% | +8.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -153.2% | -38.5% | -40.7% | +3.1% | +3.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -5.5% | -53.0% | -57.2% | +23.9% | +7.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.4% | -47.7% | -55.7% | +21.5% | +9.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.25x | 0.02x | 1.66x | — | 0.78x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$4M | -$18M | $134M | $63.8B | $66.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6M | $20M | $15M | $5.2B | $1.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3M | $2M | $149M | $69.1B | $67.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -27.47x | — | -6.23x | 3.28x | 4.02x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NKTR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ABBV five years ago would be worth $19,956 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $161 for PYPD. Over the past 12 months, NKTR leads with a +782.4% total return vs ABBV's +12.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NKTR at 92.1% vs PYPD's -29.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +0.7% | +71.2% | +88.6% | -10.6% | +5.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +61.0% | +276.3% | +782.4% | +12.2% | +21.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -64.7% | -41.3% | +609.0% | +49.7% | -19.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.4% | -78.9% | -72.3% | +99.6% | -14.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.2% | -76.0% | -59.8% | +293.8% | +28.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -29.3% | -16.3% | +92.1% | +14.4% | -6.9% |
Risk & Volatility
ACRS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ACRS is the less volatile stock with a 0.22 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NKTR's 1.80 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ACRS currently trades 99.8% from its 52-week high vs NKTR's 75.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.10x | 0.22x | 1.80x | 0.28x | 0.49x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.12 | $4.94 | $109.00 | $244.81 | $28.75 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.44 | $1.16 | $7.99 | $176.57 | $21.97 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +85.5% | +99.8% | +75.1% | +82.3% | +89.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.1 | 67.4 | 50.5 | 43.9 | 43.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 50K | 1.9M | 977K | 5.8M | 33.3M |
Analyst Outlook
PFE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ACRS as "Buy", NKTR as "Buy", ABBV as "Buy", PFE as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 115.0% upside for ACRS (target: $11) vs 6.7% for PFE (target: $27). For income investors, PFE offers the higher dividend yield at 6.69% vs ABBV's 3.26%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $10.60 | $147.33 | $256.69 | $27.40 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 16 | 33 | 41 | 39 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +3.3% | +6.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 13 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $6.57 | $1.72 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.3% | 0.0% |
PFE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). ABBV leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
PYPD vs ACRS vs NKTR vs ABBV vs PFE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PYPD or ACRS or NKTR or ABBV or PFE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) is the stronger pick with 8. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -58. 2% for Aclaris Therapeutics, Inc. (ACRS). Pfizer Inc. (PFE) offers the better valuation at 18. 9x trailing P/E (8. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Aclaris Therapeutics, Inc. (ACRS) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PYPD or ACRS or NKTR or ABBV or PFE?
On trailing P/E, Pfizer Inc.
(PFE) is the cheapest at 18. 9x versus AbbVie Inc. at 85. 0x. On forward P/E, Pfizer Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PYPD or ACRS or NKTR or ABBV or PFE?
Over the past 5 years, AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) delivered a total return of +99. 6%, compared to -98. 4% for PolyPid Ltd. (PYPD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ABBV returned +293. 8% versus PYPD's -99. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PYPD or ACRS or NKTR or ABBV or PFE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Aclaris Therapeutics, Inc.
(ACRS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 22β versus Nektar Therapeutics's 1. 80β — meaning NKTR is approximately 720% more volatile than ACRS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Aclaris Therapeutics, Inc. (ACRS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 166% for Nektar Therapeutics — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PYPD or ACRS or NKTR or ABBV or PFE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) is pulling ahead at 8. 6% versus -58. 2% for Aclaris Therapeutics, Inc. (ACRS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Aclaris Therapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 69. 0% year-over-year, compared to -12. 1% for Nektar Therapeutics. Over a 3-year CAGR, ABBV leads at 1. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PYPD or ACRS or NKTR or ABBV or PFE?
Pfizer Inc.
(PFE) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 4% net margin versus -829. 6% for Aclaris Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ABBV leads at 32. 8% versus -975. 9% for ACRS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NKTR leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PYPD or ACRS or NKTR or ABBV or PFE more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Pfizer Inc.
(PFE) trades at 8. 7x forward P/E versus 14. 2x for AbbVie Inc. — 5. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ACRS: 115. 0% to $10. 60.
08Which pays a better dividend — PYPD or ACRS or NKTR or ABBV or PFE?
In this comparison, PFE (6.
7% yield), ABBV (3. 3% yield) pay a dividend. PYPD, ACRS, NKTR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is PYPD or ACRS or NKTR or ABBV or PFE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 28), 3. 3% yield, +293. 8% 10Y return). Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR) carries a higher beta of 1. 80 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ABBV: +293. 8%, NKTR: -59. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PYPD and ACRS and NKTR and ABBV and PFE?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PYPD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ACRS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NKTR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ABBV is a large-cap income-oriented stock; PFE is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. ABBV, PFE pay a dividend while PYPD, ACRS, NKTR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.