Shell Companies
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
QETA vs PSFE vs EVTC vs PRTH vs FIS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Information Technology Services
Software - Infrastructure
Software - Infrastructure
Information Technology Services
QETA vs PSFE vs EVTC vs PRTH vs FIS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Shell Companies | Information Technology Services | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Infrastructure | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $44M | $367M | $1.62B | $506M | $20.26B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $1.74B | $951M | $978M | $11.66B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-503K | $-199M | $133M | $57M | $2.67B |
| Gross Margin | — | 48.4% | 46.4% | 35.3% | 37.6% |
| Operating Margin | — | 5.5% | 19.1% | 14.5% | 17.9% |
| Forward P/E | 50.5x | 3.3x | 6.7x | 6.2x | 6.2x |
| Total Debt | $500K | $2.66B | $1.13B | $1.05B | $4.01B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $1.35B | $306M | $77M | $599M |
QETA vs PSFE vs EVTC vs PRTH vs FIS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 23 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quetta Acquisition … (QETA) | 100 | 115.2 | +15.2% |
| Paysafe Limited (PSFE) | 100 | 70.2 | -29.8% |
| EVERTEC, Inc. (EVTC) | 100 | 71.1 | -28.9% |
| Priority Technology… (PRTH) | 100 | 205.0 | +105.0% |
| Fidelity National I… (FIS) | 100 | 66.8 | -33.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: QETA vs PSFE vs EVTC vs PRTH vs FIS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
QETA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 15.2% 10Y total return vs EVTC's 81.2%
- +6.9% vs FIS's -49.4%
PSFE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Lower P/E (3.3x vs 6.2x)
EVTC is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 10.2%, EPS growth 27.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 14.6%
- 10.2% revenue growth vs QETA's -63.4%
Among these 5 stocks, PRTH doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
FIS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.61, yield 4.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.61, Low D/E 28.9%, current ratio 0.59x
- PEG 0.26 vs EVTC's 0.75
- Beta 0.61, yield 4.2%, current ratio 0.59x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.2% revenue growth vs QETA's -63.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (3.3x vs 6.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 22.9% margin vs PSFE's -11.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.61 vs PSFE's 2.44, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs EVTC's 0.8%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +6.9% vs FIS's -49.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.5% ROA vs PSFE's -4.2%, ROIC 6.0% vs 3.6% |
QETA vs PSFE vs EVTC vs PRTH vs FIS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
QETA vs PSFE vs EVTC vs PRTH vs FIS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
QETA leads in 2 of 6 categories
FIS leads 1 • PSFE leads 1 • PRTH leads 1 • EVTC leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FIS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FIS and QETA operate at a comparable scale, with $11.7B and $0 in trailing revenue. FIS is the more profitable business, keeping 22.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PSFE's -11.4%. On growth, FIS holds the edge at +30.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $1.7B | $951M | $978M | $11.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$2M | $373M | $316M | $209M | $4.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$502,732 | -$199M | $133M | $57M | $2.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$2M | $174M | $165M | $89M | $2.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +48.4% | +46.4% | +35.3% | +37.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +5.5% | +19.1% | +14.5% | +17.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -11.4% | +13.9% | +5.8% | +22.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +10.0% | +17.4% | +9.1% | +23.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +10.4% | +8.4% | +11.1% | +30.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -111.4% | -115.2% | -24.0% | +20.0% | +30.6% |
Valuation Metrics
PSFE leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.0x trailing earnings, PRTH trades at a 83% valuation discount to FIS's 52.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), EVTC offers better value at 1.33x vs FIS's 2.14x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $44M | $367M | $1.6B | $506M | $20.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $42M | $1.7B | $2.4B | $1.5B | $23.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 50.48x | -2.26x | 11.95x | 9.04x | 52.27x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 3.27x | 6.71x | 6.19x | 6.24x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.33x | — | 2.14x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.91x | 4.24x | 7.92x | 7.22x | 6.50x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 0.22x | 1.74x | 0.53x | 1.90x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.13x | 0.63x | 2.37x | — | 1.46x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 1.64x | 11.95x | 6.75x | 7.21x |
Profitability & Efficiency
QETA leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EVTC delivers a 18.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $-29 for PSFE. QETA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PSFE's 4.06x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EVTC scores 7/9 vs QETA's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -1.8% | -28.6% | +18.7% | — | +18.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.5% | -4.2% | +6.1% | +2.5% | +7.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.9% | +3.6% | +10.2% | +13.4% | +6.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +3.6% | +10.5% | +16.0% | +6.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 4.06x | 1.58x | — | 0.29x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1M | $1.3B | $824M | $969M | $3.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $1.3B | $306M | $77M | $599M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $500,000 | $2.7B | $1.1B | $1.0B | $4.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 0.75x | 3.10x | 2.86x | 21.16x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PRTH leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in QETA five years ago would be worth $11,518 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $508 for PSFE. Over the past 12 months, QETA leads with a +6.9% total return vs FIS's -49.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRTH at 15.9% vs PSFE's -12.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.3% | -11.0% | -8.0% | +15.6% | -38.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +6.9% | -45.0% | -28.7% | -25.5% | -49.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +15.2% | -33.0% | -24.7% | +55.7% | -18.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +15.2% | -94.9% | -38.1% | -23.1% | -67.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +15.2% | -94.1% | +81.2% | -37.2% | -25.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +4.8% | -12.5% | -9.0% | +15.9% | -6.8% |
Risk & Volatility
QETA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
QETA is the less volatile stock with a -0.25 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PSFE's 2.44 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. QETA currently trades 88.8% from its 52-week high vs PSFE's 47.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.25x | 2.44x | 0.74x | 1.99x | 0.61x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $13.07 | $15.02 | $37.78 | $8.89 | $82.74 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.80 | $5.95 | $21.82 | $4.44 | $37.91 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +88.8% | +47.3% | +69.6% | +69.2% | +47.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.1 | 39.7 | 54.6 | 56.0 | 30.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 158 | 324K | 518K | 237K | 5.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — PRTH and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PSFE as "Buy", EVTC as "Buy", PRTH as "Buy", FIS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 95.1% upside for PRTH (target: $12) vs 12.3% for EVTC (target: $30). For income investors, FIS offers the higher dividend yield at 4.16% vs EVTC's 0.75%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $10.13 | $29.50 | $12.00 | $62.88 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 11 | 18 | 5 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.8% | — | +4.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 0 | 3 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.20 | — | $1.63 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +27.6% | +4.3% | +2.0% | +7.0% |
QETA leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Risk & Volatility). FIS leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
QETA vs PSFE vs EVTC vs PRTH vs FIS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is QETA or PSFE or EVTC or PRTH or FIS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, EVERTEC, Inc.
(EVTC) is the stronger pick with 10. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 2% for Paysafe Limited (PSFE). Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. (PRTH) offers the better valuation at 9. 0x trailing P/E (6. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Paysafe Limited (PSFE) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — QETA or PSFE or EVTC or PRTH or FIS?
On trailing P/E, Priority Technology Holdings, Inc.
(PRTH) is the cheapest at 9. 0x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 52. 3x. On forward P/E, Paysafe Limited is actually cheaper at 3. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. wins at 0. 26x versus EVERTEC, Inc. 's 0. 75x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — QETA or PSFE or EVTC or PRTH or FIS?
Over the past 5 years, Quetta Acquisition Corporation (QETA) delivered a total return of +15.
2%, compared to -94. 9% for Paysafe Limited (PSFE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EVTC returned +81. 2% versus PSFE's -94. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — QETA or PSFE or EVTC or PRTH or FIS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Quetta Acquisition Corporation (QETA) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
25β versus Paysafe Limited's 2. 44β — meaning PSFE is approximately -1075% more volatile than QETA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Quetta Acquisition Corporation (QETA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 4% for Paysafe Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — QETA or PSFE or EVTC or PRTH or FIS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), EVERTEC, Inc.
(EVTC) is pulling ahead at 10. 2% versus -0. 2% for Paysafe Limited (PSFE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 319. 4% year-over-year, compared to -972. 2% for Paysafe Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, EVTC leads at 14. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — QETA or PSFE or EVTC or PRTH or FIS?
EVERTEC, Inc.
(EVTC) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 2% net margin versus -10. 7% for Paysafe Limited — meaning it keeps 15. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EVTC leads at 20. 0% versus 0. 0% for QETA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EVTC leads at 49. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is QETA or PSFE or EVTC or PRTH or FIS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 26x versus EVERTEC, Inc. 's 0. 75x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Paysafe Limited (PSFE) trades at 3. 3x forward P/E versus 6. 7x for EVERTEC, Inc. — 3. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PRTH: 95. 1% to $12. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — QETA or PSFE or EVTC or PRTH or FIS?
In this comparison, FIS (4.
2% yield), EVTC (0. 8% yield) pay a dividend. QETA, PSFE, PRTH do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is QETA or PSFE or EVTC or PRTH or FIS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Quetta Acquisition Corporation (QETA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
25)). Paysafe Limited (PSFE) carries a higher beta of 2. 44 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (QETA: +15. 2%, PSFE: -94. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between QETA and PSFE and EVTC and PRTH and FIS?
These companies operate in different sectors (QETA (Financial Services) and PSFE (Technology) and EVTC (Technology) and PRTH (Technology) and FIS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: QETA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PSFE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; EVTC is a small-cap deep-value stock; PRTH is a small-cap deep-value stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. EVTC, FIS pay a dividend while QETA, PSFE, PRTH do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.