Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

QTRX vs CDNA vs NTRA vs EXAS

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
QTRX
Quanterix Corporation

Medical - Devices

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$129M
5Y Perf.-90.0%
CDNA
CareDx, Inc

Medical - Diagnostics & Research

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.11B
5Y Perf.-33.3%
NTRA
Natera, Inc.

Medical - Diagnostics & Research

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$31.16B
5Y Perf.+401.3%
EXAS
Exact Sciences Corporation

Medical - Diagnostics & Research

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$20.02B
5Y Perf.+20.4%

QTRX vs CDNA vs NTRA vs EXAS — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
QTRX logoQTRX
CDNA logoCDNA
NTRA logoNTRA
EXAS logoEXAS
IndustryMedical - DevicesMedical - Diagnostics & ResearchMedical - Diagnostics & ResearchMedical - Diagnostics & Research
Market Cap$129M$1.11B$31.16B$20.02B
Revenue (TTM)$145M$413M$2.31B$3.25B
Net Income (TTM)$-104M$-8M$-208M$-208M
Gross Margin44.1%48.2%64.8%69.7%
Operating Margin-96.4%-3.3%-13.4%-6.4%
Forward P/E22.8x582.8x
Total Debt$37M$20M$214M$2.52B
Cash & Equiv.$30M$65M$1.08B$956M

QTRX vs CDNA vs NTRA vs EXASLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

QTRX
CDNA
NTRA
EXAS
StockMay 20May 26Return
Quanterix Corporati… (QTRX)10010.0-90.0%
CareDx, Inc (CDNA)10066.7-33.3%
Natera, Inc. (NTRA)100501.3+401.3%
Exact Sciences Corp… (EXAS)100120.4+20.4%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: QTRX vs CDNA vs NTRA vs EXAS

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: CDNA leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Exact Sciences Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and recent price momentum and sentiment. NTRA also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
QTRX
Quanterix Corporation
The Secondary Option

QTRX lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: healthcare exposure
CDNA
CareDx, Inc
The Value Play

CDNA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.

  • Lower P/E (22.8x vs 582.8x)
  • -2.0% margin vs QTRX's -71.9%
  • -1.9% ROA vs QTRX's -26.0%, ROIC -5.7% vs -21.4%
Best for: value and quality
NTRA
Natera, Inc.
The Growth Play

NTRA is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 35.9%, EPS growth 0.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 41.1%
  • 20.9% 10Y total return vs EXAS's 16.7%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.26, Low D/E 12.5%, current ratio 3.39x
  • Beta 1.26, current ratio 3.39x
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
EXAS
Exact Sciences Corporation
The Income Pick

EXAS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.

  • beta 0.12
  • Beta 0.12 vs QTRX's 1.98
  • +96.9% vs QTRX's -48.7%
Best for: income & stability
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthNTRA logoNTRA35.9% revenue growth vs QTRX's 2.6%
ValueCDNA logoCDNALower P/E (22.8x vs 582.8x)
Quality / MarginsCDNA logoCDNA-2.0% margin vs QTRX's -71.9%
Stability / SafetyEXAS logoEXASBeta 0.12 vs QTRX's 1.98
DividendsTieNone of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)EXAS logoEXAS+96.9% vs QTRX's -48.7%
Efficiency (ROA)CDNA logoCDNA-1.9% ROA vs QTRX's -26.0%, ROIC -5.7% vs -21.4%

QTRX vs CDNA vs NTRA vs EXAS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

QTRXQuanterix Corporation
FY 2025
Product
66.9%$93M
Service And Other Revenue
31.8%$44M
License and Service
1.1%$2M
Grant
0.2%$243,000
CDNACareDx, Inc
FY 2025
Service
85.0%$274M
Product
15.0%$48M
NTRANatera, Inc.
FY 2025
Product
99.6%$2.3B
Licensing and other
0.4%$10M
EXASExact Sciences Corporation
FY 2025
Screening
77.9%$2.5B
Precision Oncology
22.1%$717M

QTRX vs CDNA vs NTRA vs EXAS — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLCDNALAGGINGQTRX

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

CDNA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

EXAS is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.2B annually — 22.4x QTRX's $145M. CDNA is the more profitable business, keeping -2.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to QTRX's -71.9%. On growth, NTRA holds the edge at +39.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricQTRX logoQTRXQuanterix Corpora…CDNA logoCDNACareDx, IncNTRA logoNTRANatera, Inc.EXAS logoEXASExact Sciences Co…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$145M$413M$2.3B$3.2B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$125M$2M-$310M-$41M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$104M-$8M-$208M-$208M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$83M$65M$97M$357M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+44.1%+48.2%+64.8%+69.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-96.4%-3.3%-13.4%-6.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-71.9%-2.0%-9.0%-6.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-57.2%+15.8%+4.2%+11.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+20.3%+39.0%+39.8%+23.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+30.2%+126.3%+185.4%+90.4%
CDNA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — QTRX and CDNA each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
MetricQTRX logoQTRXQuanterix Corpora…CDNA logoCDNACareDx, IncNTRA logoNTRANatera, Inc.EXAS logoEXASExact Sciences Co…
Market CapShares × price$129M$1.1B$31.2B$20.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$136M$1.1B$30.3B$21.6B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-1.10x-53.60x-144.62x-95.37x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.22.85x582.83x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.93x2.92x13.51x6.16x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.40x3.77x17.55x8.24x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF30.66x285.53x56.10x
Evenly matched — QTRX and CDNA each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — CDNA and EXAS each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

CDNA delivers a -2.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-3 in annual profit, vs $-35 for QTRX. CDNA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to EXAS's 1.05x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EXAS scores 7/9 vs QTRX's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricQTRX logoQTRXQuanterix Corpora…CDNA logoCDNACareDx, IncNTRA logoNTRANatera, Inc.EXAS logoEXASExact Sciences Co…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-35.2%-2.6%-15.3%-8.7%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-26.0%-1.9%-10.6%-3.5%
ROICReturn on invested capital-21.4%-5.7%-36.1%-3.6%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-24.7%-5.8%-18.3%-4.0%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–92557
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.13x0.06x0.13x1.05x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$7M-$46M-$862M$1.6B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$30M$65M$1.1B$956M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$37M$20M$214M$2.5B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-25.21x-5.47x
Evenly matched — CDNA and EXAS each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

NTRA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in NTRA five years ago would be worth $21,587 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $490 for QTRX. Over the past 12 months, EXAS leads with a +96.9% total return vs QTRX's -48.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NTRA at 60.6% vs QTRX's -45.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricQTRX logoQTRXQuanterix Corpora…CDNA logoCDNACareDx, IncNTRA logoNTRANatera, Inc.EXAS logoEXASExact Sciences Co…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-57.2%+12.0%-3.9%+3.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-48.7%+45.2%+37.3%+96.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-84.1%+161.1%+314.0%+53.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-95.1%-72.4%+115.9%+0.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-84.3%+385.1%+2089.4%+1669.1%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-45.8%+37.7%+60.6%+15.2%
NTRA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

EXAS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

EXAS is the less volatile stock with a 0.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than QTRX's 1.98 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EXAS currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs QTRX's 31.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricQTRX logoQTRXQuanterix Corpora…CDNA logoCDNACareDx, IncNTRA logoNTRANatera, Inc.EXAS logoEXASExact Sciences Co…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.98x1.39x1.26x0.12x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$8.77$23.24$256.36$104.98
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$2.56$10.96$131.81$38.81
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+31.4%+92.3%+85.7%+99.9%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10042.356.457.176.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded937K667K1.3M4.2M
EXAS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: QTRX as "Buy", CDNA as "Buy", NTRA as "Buy", EXAS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 45.5% upside for QTRX (target: $4) vs -1.6% for EXAS (target: $103).

MetricQTRX logoQTRXQuanterix Corpora…CDNA logoCDNACareDx, IncNTRA logoNTRANatera, Inc.EXAS logoEXASExact Sciences Co…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$4.00$24.00$262.50$103.18
# AnalystsCovering analysts10132741
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+7.9%0.0%+0.1%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

CDNA leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). NTRA leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.

Best OverallCareDx, Inc (CDNA)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

QTRX vs CDNA vs NTRA vs EXAS: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is QTRX or CDNA or NTRA or EXAS a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Natera, Inc.

(NTRA) is the stronger pick with 35. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 6% for Quanterix Corporation (QTRX). Analysts rate Quanterix Corporation (QTRX) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — QTRX or CDNA or NTRA or EXAS?

Over the past 5 years, Natera, Inc.

(NTRA) delivered a total return of +115. 9%, compared to -95. 1% for Quanterix Corporation (QTRX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NTRA returned +20. 9% versus QTRX's -84. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — QTRX or CDNA or NTRA or EXAS?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Exact Sciences Corporation (EXAS) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

12β versus Quanterix Corporation's 1. 98β — meaning QTRX is approximately 1542% more volatile than EXAS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, CareDx, Inc (CDNA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 105% for Exact Sciences Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — QTRX or CDNA or NTRA or EXAS?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Natera, Inc.

(NTRA) is pulling ahead at 35. 9% versus 2. 6% for Quanterix Corporation (QTRX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Exact Sciences Corporation grew EPS 80. 3% year-over-year, compared to -151. 0% for Quanterix Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, NTRA leads at 41. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — QTRX or CDNA or NTRA or EXAS?

CareDx, Inc (CDNA) is the more profitable company, earning -5.

6% net margin versus -77. 1% for Quanterix Corporation — meaning it keeps -5. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CDNA leads at -5. 5% versus -62. 9% for QTRX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EXAS leads at 69. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is QTRX or CDNA or NTRA or EXAS more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, CareDx, Inc (CDNA) trades at 22.

8x forward P/E versus 582. 8x for Exact Sciences Corporation — 560. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for QTRX: 45. 5% to $4. 00.

07

Which pays a better dividend — QTRX or CDNA or NTRA or EXAS?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

08

Is QTRX or CDNA or NTRA or EXAS better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Exact Sciences Corporation (EXAS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

12), +1669% 10Y return). Quanterix Corporation (QTRX) carries a higher beta of 1. 98 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (EXAS: +1669%, QTRX: -84. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between QTRX and CDNA and NTRA and EXAS?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: QTRX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CDNA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NTRA is a mid-cap high-growth stock; EXAS is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

QTRX

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 10%
  • Gross Margin > 26%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CDNA

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 19%
  • Gross Margin > 28%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NTRA

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 19%
  • Gross Margin > 38%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

EXAS

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 11%
  • Gross Margin > 41%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform QTRX and CDNA and NTRA and EXAS on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(QTRX: 20.3% · CDNA: 39.0%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.