Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
QTTB logo
QTTB
IMVT logo
IMVT
KO logo
KO
ARDX logo
ARDX
PRAX logo
PRAX
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

QTTB vs IMVT vs KO vs ARDX vs PRAX

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
QTTB
Q32 Bio Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$161M
5Y Perf.-93.4%
IMVT
Immunovant, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$6.90B
5Y Perf.-22.9%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company

Beverages - Non-Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$355.61B
5Y Perf.+71.9%
ARDX
Ardelyx, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.40B
5Y Perf.+344.5%
PRAX
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$7.70B
5Y Perf.-49.2%

QTTB vs IMVT vs KO vs ARDX vs PRAX — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
QTTB logoQTTB
IMVT logoIMVT
KO logoKO
ARDX logoARDX
PRAX logoPRAX
IndustryBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBeverages - Non-AlcoholicBiotechnologyBiotechnology
Market Cap$161M$6.90B$355.61B$1.40B$7.70B
Revenue (TTM)$54M$0.00$49.28B$428M$0.00
Net Income (TTM)$33M$-506M$13.70B$-58M$-327M
Gross Margin99.5%61.7%91.9%
Operating Margin39.8%29.3%-8.7%
Forward P/E5.2x25.3x
Total Debt$15M$72K$45.49B$212M$110K
Cash & Equiv.$48M$902M$10.27B$68M$357M

QTTB vs IMVT vs KO vs ARDX vs PRAXLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

QTTB
IMVT
KO
ARDX
PRAX
StockOct 20Jun 26Return
Q32 Bio Inc. (QTTB)1006.6-93.4%
Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT)10077.1-22.9%
The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO)100171.9+71.9%
Ardelyx, Inc. (ARDX)100444.5+344.5%
Praxis Precision Me… (PRAX)10050.8-49.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: QTTB vs IMVT vs KO vs ARDX vs PRAX

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: QTTB leads in 6 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. The Coca-Cola Company is the stronger pick specifically for dividend income and shareholder returns. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇QTTB emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
QTTB
Q32 Bio Inc.
The Income Pick

QTTB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • beta 0.50
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.50, Low D/E 36.5%, current ratio 4.85x
  • Beta 0.50, current ratio 4.85x
  • 156.7% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0%
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
IMVT
Immunovant, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

IMVT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.

  • 237.9% 10Y total return vs ARDX's 162.2%
Best for: long-term compounding
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
The Income Pick

KO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if dividends is your priority.

  • 2.5% yield; 56-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: dividends
ARDX
Ardelyx, Inc.
The Growth Play

ARDX is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 22.1%, EPS growth -52.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 98.4%
Best for: growth exposure
PRAX
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.
The Healthcare Pick

Among these 5 stocks, PRAX doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: healthcare exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthQTTB logoQTTB156.7% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0%
ValueQTTB logoQTTBBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsQTTB logoQTTB61.9% margin vs ARDX's -13.6%
Stability / SafetyQTTB logoQTTBBeta 0.50 vs IMVT's 1.66
DividendsKO logoKO2.5% yield; 56-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)QTTB logoQTTB+6.4% vs KO's +17.2%
Efficiency (ROA)QTTB logoQTTB53.3% ROA vs IMVT's -62.2%

QTTB vs IMVT vs KO vs ARDX vs PRAX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

QTTBQ32 Bio Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

IMVTImmunovant, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

KOThe Coca-Cola Company
FY 2025
Pacific
84.6%$31.6B
Bottling investments
15.4%$5.7B
ARDXArdelyx, Inc.
FY 2025
Product
57.5%$378M
Product, IBSRELA
41.7%$274M
License
0.8%$5M
PRAXPraxis Precision Medicines, Inc.
FY 2024
License
76.8%$9M
Upfront Payment
23.2%$3M

QTTB vs IMVT vs KO vs ARDX vs PRAX — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLQTTBLAGGINGPRAX

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

QTTB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

KO and PRAX operate at a comparable scale, with $49.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. QTTB is the more profitable business, keeping 61.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ARDX's -13.6%. On growth, ARDX holds the edge at +27.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricQTTB logoQTTBQ32 Bio Inc.IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…ARDX logoARDXArdelyx, Inc.PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$54M$0$49.3B$428M$0
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$22M-$532M$15.5B-$35M-$357M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$33M-$506M$13.7B-$58M-$327M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$27M-$407M$12.6B-$37M-$283M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+99.5%+61.7%+91.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+39.8%+29.3%-8.7%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+61.9%+27.8%-13.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-51.0%+25.5%-8.8%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+12.1%+27.5%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+40.0%-14.1%+18.2%+11.8%+2.7%
QTTB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

QTTB leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

At 5.2x trailing earnings, QTTB trades at a 81% valuation discount to KO's 27.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, QTTB's 7.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than KO's 26.4x.

MetricQTTB logoQTTBQ32 Bio Inc.IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…ARDX logoARDXArdelyx, Inc.PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …
Market CapShares × price$161M$6.9B$355.6B$1.4B$7.7B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$129M$6.0B$390.8B$1.5B$7.3B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS5.22x-12.14x27.18x-21.88x-19.77x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.25.27x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.43x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple7.43x26.39x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue3.01x7.42x3.43x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share3.70x7.19x10.40x8.21x6.83x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF67.15x
QTTB leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

QTTB leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

QTTB delivers a 2.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $2 in annual profit, vs $-68 for IMVT. IMVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KO's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs IMVT's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricQTTB logoQTTBQ32 Bio Inc.IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…ARDX logoARDXArdelyx, Inc.PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+2.3%-68.2%+41.1%-38.1%-43.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+53.3%-62.2%+13.1%-11.8%-40.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital+15.8%-10.7%-65.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+26.8%-68.3%+17.3%-10.6%-49.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–942733
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.37x0.00x1.33x1.27x0.00x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$33M-$902M$35.2B$144M-$357M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$48M$902M$10.3B$68M$357M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$15M$72,000$45.5B$212M$110,000
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense21.88x10.70x-0.28x
QTTB leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — QTTB and IMVT and PRAX each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in IMVT five years ago would be worth $31,304 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $950 for QTTB. Over the past 12 months, QTTB leads with a +643.5% total return vs KO's +17.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRAX at 164.8% vs QTTB's -14.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricQTTB logoQTTBQ32 Bio Inc.IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…ARDX logoARDXArdelyx, Inc.PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+267.4%+29.8%+20.3%-7.5%-6.9%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+643.5%+110.9%+17.2%+53.0%+491.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-37.3%+55.0%+47.0%+42.6%+1757.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-90.5%+213.0%+65.6%+207.6%-14.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-96.2%+237.9%+121.1%+162.2%-36.1%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-14.4%+15.7%+13.7%+12.6%+164.8%
Evenly matched — QTTB and IMVT and PRAX each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IMVT's 1.66 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 98.3% from its 52-week high vs ARDX's 67.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricQTTB logoQTTBQ32 Bio Inc.IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…ARDX logoARDXArdelyx, Inc.PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.50x1.66x-0.20x1.01x1.55x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$14.85$36.27$84.04$8.40$366.52
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.35$14.32$65.35$3.49$37.19
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+85.1%+92.7%+98.3%+67.7%+72.7%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10064.257.960.645.031.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded827K1.9M12.7M3.4M396K
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: QTTB as "Hold", IMVT as "Buy", KO as "Buy", ARDX as "Buy", PRAX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 198.8% upside for ARDX (target: $17) vs 4.2% for KO (target: $86). KO is the only dividend payer here at 2.46% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricQTTB logoQTTBQ32 Bio Inc.IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…ARDX logoARDXArdelyx, Inc.PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$13.50$43.67$86.13$17.00$607.15
# AnalystsCovering analysts823481616
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises56
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$2.04
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+0.2%0.0%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

QTTB leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). KO leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.

Best OverallQ32 Bio Inc. (QTTB)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

QTTB vs IMVT vs KO vs ARDX vs PRAX: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is QTTB or IMVT or KO or ARDX or PRAX a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Ardelyx, Inc.

(ARDX) is the stronger pick with 22. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). Q32 Bio Inc. (QTTB) offers the better valuation at 5. 2x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — QTTB or IMVT or KO or ARDX or PRAX?

On trailing P/E, Q32 Bio Inc.

(QTTB) is the cheapest at 5. 2x versus The Coca-Cola Company at 27. 2x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — QTTB or IMVT or KO or ARDX or PRAX?

Over the past 5 years, Immunovant, Inc.

(IMVT) delivered a total return of +213. 0%, compared to -90. 5% for Q32 Bio Inc. (QTTB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IMVT returned +237. 9% versus QTTB's -96. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — QTTB or IMVT or KO or ARDX or PRAX?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

20β versus Immunovant, Inc. 's 1. 66β — meaning IMVT is approximately -928% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 133% for The Coca-Cola Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — QTTB or IMVT or KO or ARDX or PRAX?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ardelyx, Inc.

(ARDX) is pulling ahead at 22. 1% versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Q32 Bio Inc. grew EPS 136. 8% year-over-year, compared to -52. 9% for Ardelyx, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, QTTB leads at 100. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — QTTB or IMVT or KO or ARDX or PRAX?

Q32 Bio Inc.

(QTTB) is the more profitable company, earning 55. 5% net margin versus -15. 1% for Ardelyx, Inc. — meaning it keeps 55. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: QTTB leads at 31. 5% versus -10. 1% for ARDX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — QTTB leads at 99. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is QTTB or IMVT or KO or ARDX or PRAX more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ARDX: 198.

8% to $17. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — QTTB or IMVT or KO or ARDX or PRAX?

In this comparison, KO (2.

5% yield) pays a dividend. QTTB, IMVT, ARDX, PRAX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is QTTB or IMVT or KO or ARDX or PRAX better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a higher beta of 1. 55 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, PRAX: -36. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between QTTB and IMVT and KO and ARDX and PRAX?

These companies operate in different sectors (QTTB (Healthcare) and IMVT (Healthcare) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and ARDX (Healthcare) and PRAX (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: QTTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; IMVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; ARDX is a small-cap high-growth stock; PRAX is a small-cap quality compounder stock. KO pays a dividend while QTTB, IMVT, ARDX, PRAX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.