Biotechnology
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
QTTB vs TERN vs KO vs AKRO vs ALNY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
QTTB vs TERN vs KO vs AKRO vs ALNY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $161M | $4.77B | $355.61B | $4.50B | $37.74B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $54M | $0.00 | $49.28B | $0.00 | $4.29B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $33M | $-96M | $13.70B | $-293M | $577M |
| Gross Margin | 99.5% | — | 61.7% | — | 80.9% |
| Operating Margin | 39.8% | — | 29.3% | — | 17.5% |
| Forward P/E | 5.2x | — | 25.3x | — | 37.7x |
| Total Debt | $15M | $919K | $45.49B | $36M | $1.28B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $48M | $525M | $10.27B | $340M | $1.66B |
QTTB vs TERN vs KO vs AKRO vs ALNY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 21 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q32 Bio Inc. (QTTB) | 100 | 6.5 | -93.5% |
| Terns Pharmaceutica… (TERN) | 100 | 233.7 | +133.7% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 168.6 | +68.6% |
| Akero Therapeutics,… (AKRO) | 100 | 178.8 | +78.8% |
| Alnylam Pharmaceuti… (ALNY) | 100 | 191.0 | +91.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: QTTB vs TERN vs KO vs AKRO vs ALNY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
QTTB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth and value.
- 156.7% revenue growth vs AKRO's -24.6%
- Lower P/E (5.2x vs 37.7x)
- 61.9% margin vs TERN's 1.4%
- 53.3% ROA vs AKRO's -29.1%
TERN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +12.5% vs ALNY's -7.2%
KO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for dividends.
- 2.5% yield; 56-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
AKRO is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 0.32
- Lower volatility, beta 0.32, Low D/E 4.9%, current ratio 19.38x
- Beta 0.32, current ratio 19.38x
- Beta 0.32 vs ALNY's 0.60, lower leverage
ALNY is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 65.2%, EPS growth 206.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 53.0%
- 366.4% 10Y total return vs AKRO's 198.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 156.7% revenue growth vs AKRO's -24.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.2x vs 37.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 61.9% margin vs TERN's 1.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.32 vs ALNY's 0.60, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.5% yield; 56-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +12.5% vs ALNY's -7.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 53.3% ROA vs AKRO's -29.1% |
QTTB vs TERN vs KO vs AKRO vs ALNY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
QTTB vs TERN vs KO vs AKRO vs ALNY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
QTTB leads in 3 of 6 categories
TERN leads 1 • KO leads 0 • AKRO leads 0 • ALNY leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
QTTB leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO and AKRO operate at a comparable scale, with $49.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. QTTB is the more profitable business, keeping 61.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ALNY's 13.5%. On growth, ALNY holds the edge at +96.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $54M | $0 | $49.3B | $0 | $4.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $22M | -$110M | $15.5B | -$318M | $677M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $33M | -$96M | $13.7B | -$293M | $577M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$27M | -$82M | $12.6B | -$250M | $641M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +99.5% | — | +61.7% | — | +80.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +39.8% | — | +29.3% | — | +17.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +61.9% | — | +27.8% | — | +13.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -51.0% | — | +25.5% | — | +15.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | +12.1% | — | +96.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +40.0% | 0.0% | +18.2% | +5.7% | +4.4% |
Valuation Metrics
QTTB leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.2x trailing earnings, QTTB trades at a 96% valuation discount to ALNY's 121.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, QTTB's 7.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ALNY's 67.0x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $161M | $4.8B | $355.6B | $4.5B | $37.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $129M | $4.2B | $390.8B | $4.2B | $37.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 5.22x | -51.41x | 27.18x | -14.57x | 121.39x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 25.27x | — | 37.74x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 2.43x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.43x | — | 26.39x | — | 67.05x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.01x | — | 7.42x | — | 10.16x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.70x | 4.90x | 10.40x | 4.89x | 48.27x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 67.15x | — | 81.09x |
Profitability & Efficiency
QTTB leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
QTTB delivers a 2.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $2 in annual profit, vs $-31 for AKRO. TERN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ALNY's 1.62x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs AKRO's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.3% | -20.0% | +41.1% | -30.6% | +98.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +53.3% | -19.4% | +13.1% | -29.1% | +11.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -24.7% | +15.8% | -55.3% | +33.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +26.8% | -16.2% | +17.3% | -42.4% | +15.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 7 | 2 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.37x | 0.00x | 1.33x | 0.05x | 1.62x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$33M | -$524M | $35.2B | -$304M | -$379M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $48M | $525M | $10.3B | $340M | $1.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $15M | $919,000 | $45.5B | $36M | $1.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 21.88x | — | 10.70x | -62.41x | 2.02x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TERN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TERN five years ago would be worth $34,721 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $950 for QTTB. Over the past 12 months, TERN leads with a +1247.3% total return vs ALNY's -7.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TERN at 63.8% vs QTTB's -14.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +267.4% | +32.0% | +20.3% | — | -29.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +643.5% | +1247.3% | +17.2% | +2.0% | -7.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -37.3% | +339.4% | +47.0% | -1.2% | +46.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -90.5% | +247.2% | +65.6% | +83.9% | +69.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.2% | +187.9% | +121.1% | +198.3% | +366.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -14.4% | +63.8% | +13.7% | -0.4% | +13.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TERN and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ALNY's 0.60 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TERN currently trades 99.6% from its 52-week high vs ALNY's 57.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.50x | 0.34x | -0.20x | 0.32x | 0.60x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.85 | $53.18 | $84.04 | $57.35 | $495.55 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.35 | $3.55 | $65.35 | $41.77 | $281.76 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +85.1% | +99.6% | +98.3% | +95.3% | +57.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 64.2 | 73.7 | 60.6 | 70.4 | 44.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 827K | 5.5M | 12.7M | 0 | 1.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: QTTB as "Hold", TERN as "Buy", KO as "Buy", AKRO as "Buy", ALNY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 57.6% upside for ALNY (target: $446) vs -11.4% for AKRO (target: $48). KO is the only dividend payer here at 2.46% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $13.50 | $55.50 | $86.13 | $48.40 | $445.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 16 | 48 | 14 | 52 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +2.5% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 56 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $2.04 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
QTTB leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). TERN leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
QTTB vs TERN vs KO vs AKRO vs ALNY: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is QTTB or TERN or KO or AKRO or ALNY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ALNY) is the stronger pick with 65. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). Q32 Bio Inc. (QTTB) offers the better valuation at 5. 2x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Terns Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (TERN) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — QTTB or TERN or KO or AKRO or ALNY?
On trailing P/E, Q32 Bio Inc.
(QTTB) is the cheapest at 5. 2x versus Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. at 121. 4x. On forward P/E, The Coca-Cola Company is actually cheaper at 25. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — QTTB or TERN or KO or AKRO or ALNY?
Over the past 5 years, Terns Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(TERN) delivered a total return of +247. 2%, compared to -90. 5% for Q32 Bio Inc. (QTTB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ALNY returned +366. 4% versus QTTB's -96. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — QTTB or TERN or KO or AKRO or ALNY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
20β versus Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 's 0. 60β — meaning ALNY is approximately -402% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Terns Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (TERN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 162% for Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — QTTB or TERN or KO or AKRO or ALNY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ALNY) is pulling ahead at 65. 2% versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. grew EPS 206. 9% year-over-year, compared to -29. 8% for Akero Therapeutics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, QTTB leads at 100. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — QTTB or TERN or KO or AKRO or ALNY?
Q32 Bio Inc.
(QTTB) is the more profitable company, earning 55. 5% net margin versus 0. 0% for Akero Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 55. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: QTTB leads at 31. 5% versus 0. 0% for AKRO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — QTTB leads at 99. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is QTTB or TERN or KO or AKRO or ALNY more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) trades at 25.
3x forward P/E versus 37. 7x for Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — 12. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ALNY: 57. 6% to $445. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — QTTB or TERN or KO or AKRO or ALNY?
In this comparison, KO (2.
5% yield) pays a dividend. QTTB, TERN, AKRO, ALNY do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is QTTB or TERN or KO or AKRO or ALNY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, QTTB: -96. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between QTTB and TERN and KO and AKRO and ALNY?
These companies operate in different sectors (QTTB (Healthcare) and TERN (Healthcare) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and AKRO (Healthcare) and ALNY (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: QTTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; TERN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; AKRO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ALNY is a mid-cap high-growth stock. KO pays a dividend while QTTB, TERN, AKRO, ALNY do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.