Software - Application
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
QTWO vs JKHY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Information Technology Services
QTWO vs JKHY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $3.17B | $10.57B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $822M | $2.52B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $74M | $519M |
| Gross Margin | 55.6% | 44.1% |
| Operating Margin | 8.2% | 26.0% |
| Forward P/E | 18.0x | 21.8x |
| Total Debt | $346M | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $368M | $102M |
QTWO vs JKHY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 Holdings, Inc. (QTWO) | 100 | 61.4 | -38.6% |
| Jack Henry & Associ… (JKHY) | 100 | 80.7 | -19.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: QTWO vs JKHY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
QTWO is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 14.1%, EPS growth 225.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.0%
- 103.5% 10Y total return vs JKHY's 94.9%
- 14.1% revenue growth vs JKHY's 7.2%
JKHY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 32 yrs, beta 0.28, yield 1.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.28, current ratio 1.27x
- Beta 0.28, yield 1.5%, current ratio 1.27x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 14.1% revenue growth vs JKHY's 7.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (18.0x vs 21.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.6% margin vs QTWO's 9.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.28 vs QTWO's 1.06 | |
| Dividends | 1.5% yield; 32-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -13.6% vs QTWO's -36.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 17.0% ROA vs QTWO's 5.5%, ROIC 21.0% vs 5.1% |
QTWO vs JKHY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
QTWO vs JKHY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — QTWO and JKHY each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JKHY is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.5B annually — 3.1x QTWO's $822M. JKHY is the more profitable business, keeping 20.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to QTWO's 9.0%. On growth, QTWO holds the edge at +14.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $822M | $2.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $115M | $810M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $74M | $519M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $196M | $728M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +55.6% | +44.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.2% | +26.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +9.0% | +20.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +23.8% | +28.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +14.1% | +8.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.7% | +12.5% |
Valuation Metrics
QTWO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 23.4x trailing earnings, JKHY trades at a 63% valuation discount to QTWO's 63.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, JKHY's 13.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than QTWO's 27.4x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.2B | $10.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.2B | $10.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 63.36x | 23.40x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 18.05x | 21.79x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.32x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 27.39x | 13.53x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.99x | 4.45x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.99x | 5.01x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 16.30x | 17.97x |
Profitability & Efficiency
JKHY leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JKHY delivers a 24.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $12 for QTWO. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), QTWO scores 7/9 vs JKHY's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.9% | +24.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.5% | +17.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.1% | +21.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.6% | +22.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.52x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$22M | -$102M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $368M | $102M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $346M | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 15.31x | 122.37x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — QTWO and JKHY each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JKHY five years ago would be worth $10,029 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,202 for QTWO. Over the past 12 months, JKHY leads with a -13.6% total return vs QTWO's -36.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors QTWO at 30.9% vs JKHY's -0.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -27.0% | -17.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -36.9% | -13.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +124.4% | -1.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -48.0% | +0.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +103.5% | +94.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +30.9% | -0.3% |
Risk & Volatility
JKHY leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
JKHY is the less volatile stock with a 0.28 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than QTWO's 1.06 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JKHY currently trades 75.5% from its 52-week high vs QTWO's 52.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.06x | 0.28x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $96.68 | $193.39 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $44.65 | $141.81 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +52.4% | +75.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.5 | 28.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 929K | 902K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates QTWO as "Buy" and JKHY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 49.9% upside for QTWO (target: $76) vs 39.5% for JKHY (target: $204). JKHY is the only dividend payer here at 1.54% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $76.00 | $203.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 32 | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 32 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.25 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | +0.3% |
JKHY leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Risk & Volatility). QTWO leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
QTWO vs JKHY: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is QTWO or JKHY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Q2 Holdings, Inc.
(QTWO) is the stronger pick with 14. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 7. 2% for Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. (JKHY). Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. (JKHY) offers the better valuation at 23. 4x trailing P/E (21. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Q2 Holdings, Inc. (QTWO) a "Buy" — based on 32 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — QTWO or JKHY?
On trailing P/E, Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.
(JKHY) is the cheapest at 23. 4x versus Q2 Holdings, Inc. at 63. 4x. On forward P/E, Q2 Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 18. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — QTWO or JKHY?
Over the past 5 years, Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.
(JKHY) delivered a total return of +0. 3%, compared to -48. 0% for Q2 Holdings, Inc. (QTWO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: QTWO returned +103. 5% versus JKHY's +94. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — QTWO or JKHY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.
(JKHY) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 28β versus Q2 Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 06β — meaning QTWO is approximately 275% more volatile than JKHY relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — QTWO or JKHY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Q2 Holdings, Inc.
(QTWO) is pulling ahead at 14. 1% versus 7. 2% for Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. (JKHY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Q2 Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 225. 0% year-over-year, compared to 19. 3% for Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, QTWO leads at 12. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — QTWO or JKHY?
Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.
(JKHY) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 2% net margin versus 6. 5% for Q2 Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JKHY leads at 23. 9% versus 5. 7% for QTWO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — QTWO leads at 54. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is QTWO or JKHY more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Q2 Holdings, Inc.
(QTWO) trades at 18. 0x forward P/E versus 21. 8x for Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. — 3. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for QTWO: 49. 9% to $76. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — QTWO or JKHY?
In this comparison, JKHY (1.
5% yield) pays a dividend. QTWO does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is QTWO or JKHY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.
(JKHY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 28), 1. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (JKHY: +94. 9%, QTWO: +103. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between QTWO and JKHY?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
JKHY pays a dividend while QTWO does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.