Renewable Utilities
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
RAIN vs CLIR vs PESI vs NRGV vs CECO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls
Waste Management
Renewable Utilities
Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls
RAIN vs CLIR vs PESI vs NRGV vs CECO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Renewable Utilities | Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls | Waste Management | Renewable Utilities | Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls |
| Market Cap | $3M | $254M | $207M | $716M | $2.92B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $2M | $59M | $217M | $812M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-6M | $-6M | $-18M | $-115M | $17M |
| Gross Margin | — | 32.8% | 4.1% | 22.1% | 34.3% |
| Operating Margin | — | -348.9% | -26.3% | -35.8% | 7.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | — | 48.8x |
| Total Debt | $4M | $188K | $4M | $95M | $25M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $33K | $14M | $12M | $58M | $33M |
RAIN vs CLIR vs PESI vs NRGV vs CECO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rain Enhancement Te… (RAIN) | 100 | 39.0 | -61.0% |
| ClearSign Technolog… (CLIR) | 100 | 39.6 | -60.4% |
| Perma-Fix Environme… (PESI) | 100 | 109.2 | +9.2% |
| Energy Vault Holdin… (NRGV) | 100 | 237.9 | +137.9% |
| CECO Environmental … (CECO) | 100 | 287.4 | +187.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RAIN vs CLIR vs PESI vs NRGV vs CECO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RAIN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for stability.
- Beta 1.20 vs NRGV's 3.08
CLIR is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.43, Low D/E 1.4%, current ratio 7.28x
- Beta 1.43, current ratio 7.28x
PESI is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.85
NRGV carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 340.9%, EPS growth 28.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.8%
- 340.9% revenue growth vs RAIN's -121.2%
- +447.1% vs RAIN's -75.1%
CECO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 12.8% 10Y total return vs PESI's 178.6%
- 2.1% margin vs CLIR's -294.9%
- 1.9% ROA vs RAIN's -298.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 340.9% revenue growth vs RAIN's -121.2% | |
| Quality / Margins | 2.1% margin vs CLIR's -294.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.20 vs NRGV's 3.08 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +447.1% vs RAIN's -75.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.9% ROA vs RAIN's -298.9% |
RAIN vs CLIR vs PESI vs NRGV vs CECO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
RAIN vs CLIR vs PESI vs NRGV vs CECO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CECO leads in 3 of 6 categories
PESI leads 2 • RAIN leads 0 • CLIR leads 0 • NRGV leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CECO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CECO and RAIN operate at a comparable scale, with $812M and $0 in trailing revenue. CECO is the more profitable business, keeping 2.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CLIR's -2.9%. On growth, NRGV holds the edge at +156.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $2M | $59M | $217M | $812M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$5M | -$7M | -$14M | -$72M | $86M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$6M | -$6M | -$18M | -$115M | $17M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$4M | -$4M | -$14M | -$98M | $4M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +32.8% | +4.1% | +22.1% | +34.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -3.5% | -26.3% | -35.8% | +7.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -2.9% | -30.1% | -53.0% | +2.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -182.3% | -23.4% | -45.2% | +0.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -44.6% | -20.1% | +156.4% | +21.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -42.2% | -110.5% | -42.9% | -91.8% |
Valuation Metrics
PESI leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3M | $254M | $207M | $716M | $2.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6M | $240M | $200M | $752M | $2.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.64x | -43.91x | -14.89x | -6.37x | 59.40x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | 48.83x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 1.39x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — | 38.01x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 70.54x | 3.36x | 3.52x | 3.77x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 17.17x | 4.11x | 7.50x | 9.22x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
CECO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CECO delivers a 5.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $-147 for NRGV. CLIR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NRGV's 1.07x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PESI scores 5/9 vs RAIN's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -69.9% | -34.5% | -146.8% | +5.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.0% | -49.8% | -20.2% | -40.3% | +1.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | — | -21.7% | -49.5% | +10.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | -67.4% | -16.7% | -53.7% | +9.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.01x | 0.09x | 1.07x | 0.08x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3M | -$14M | -$7M | $36M | -$8M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $32,604 | $14M | $12M | $58M | $33M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4M | $188,000 | $4M | $95M | $25M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -148.90x | — | -42.14x | -10.33x | 2.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CECO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CECO five years ago would be worth $110,271 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,093 for CLIR. Over the past 12 months, NRGV leads with a +447.1% total return vs RAIN's -75.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CECO at 88.7% vs RAIN's -41.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -70.8% | -15.3% | -8.8% | -15.3% | +36.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -75.1% | -10.6% | +26.2% | +447.1% | +220.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -80.0% | -52.6% | +21.7% | +140.7% | +572.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -80.0% | -89.1% | +45.6% | -57.7% | +1002.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -80.0% | -88.7% | +178.6% | -57.1% | +1281.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -41.5% | -22.1% | +6.8% | +34.0% | +88.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — RAIN and CECO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RAIN is the less volatile stock with a 1.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NRGV's 3.08 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CECO currently trades 90.2% from its 52-week high vs RAIN's 15.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.20x | 1.43x | 1.85x | 3.08x | 1.36x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.58 | $11.20 | $16.50 | $6.35 | $90.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.43 | $0.70 | $8.02 | $0.65 | $24.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +15.2% | +43.1% | +67.7% | +65.2% | +90.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 33.7 | 45.8 | 41.5 | 53.3 | 75.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 19K | 37K | 164K | 3.7M | 673K |
Analyst Outlook
PESI leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CLIR as "Buy", PESI as "Hold", NRGV as "Buy", CECO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 61.1% upside for PESI (target: $18) vs -33.6% for NRGV (target: $3).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $18.00 | $2.75 | $86.20 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 1 | 1 | 7 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 1 | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
CECO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PESI leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
RAIN vs CLIR vs PESI vs NRGV vs CECO: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RAIN or CLIR or PESI or NRGV or CECO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Energy Vault Holdings, Inc.
(NRGV) is the stronger pick with 340. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 3% for Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. (PESI). CECO Environmental Corp. (CECO) offers the better valuation at 59. 4x trailing P/E (48. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ClearSign Technologies Corporation (CLIR) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — RAIN or CLIR or PESI or NRGV or CECO?
Over the past 5 years, CECO Environmental Corp.
(CECO) delivered a total return of +1003%, compared to -89. 1% for ClearSign Technologies Corporation (CLIR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CECO returned +1282% versus CLIR's -88. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — RAIN or CLIR or PESI or NRGV or CECO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Rain Enhancement Technologies Holdco Inc (RAIN) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
20β versus Energy Vault Holdings, Inc. 's 3. 08β — meaning NRGV is approximately 157% more volatile than RAIN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ClearSign Technologies Corporation (CLIR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 107% for Energy Vault Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — RAIN or CLIR or PESI or NRGV or CECO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Energy Vault Holdings, Inc.
(NRGV) is pulling ahead at 340. 9% versus 4. 3% for Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. (PESI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: CECO Environmental Corp. grew EPS 280. 6% year-over-year, compared to -34. 9% for Rain Enhancement Technologies Holdco Inc. Over a 3-year CAGR, CLIR leads at 80. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — RAIN or CLIR or PESI or NRGV or CECO?
CECO Environmental Corp.
(CECO) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 5% net margin versus -147. 4% for ClearSign Technologies Corporation — meaning it keeps 6. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CECO leads at 6. 7% versus -180. 4% for CLIR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CECO leads at 32. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is RAIN or CLIR or PESI or NRGV or CECO more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PESI: 61.
1% to $18. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — RAIN or CLIR or PESI or NRGV or CECO?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is RAIN or CLIR or PESI or NRGV or CECO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, CECO Environmental Corp.
(CECO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1282% 10Y return). Energy Vault Holdings, Inc. (NRGV) carries a higher beta of 3. 08 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CECO: +1282%, NRGV: -57. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between RAIN and CLIR and PESI and NRGV and CECO?
These companies operate in different sectors (RAIN (Utilities) and CLIR (Industrials) and PESI (Industrials) and NRGV (Utilities) and CECO (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: RAIN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CLIR is a small-cap high-growth stock; PESI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NRGV is a small-cap high-growth stock; CECO is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.