Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
RANI vs CDTX vs PRAX vs ARQT vs NKTR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
RANI vs CDTX vs PRAX vs ARQT vs NKTR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $23M | $6.96B | $9.53B | $2.65B | $1.66B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1M | $0.00 | $0.00 | $416M | $56M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-28M | $-185M | $-327M | $-2M | $-158M |
| Gross Margin | 100.0% | 100.0% | — | 90.9% | 80.1% |
| Operating Margin | -37.3% | -138.1% | — | 0.8% | -226.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | 106.5x | — |
| Total Debt | $30M | $4M | $110K | $6M | $149M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $190M | $357M | $43M | $15M |
RANI vs CDTX vs PRAX vs ARQT vs NKTR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rani Therapeutics H… (RANI) | 100 | 8.8 | -91.2% |
| Cidara Therapeutics… (CDTX) | 100 | 726.6 | +626.6% |
| Praxis Precision Me… (PRAX) | 100 | 141.0 | +41.0% |
| Arcutis Biotherapeu… (ARQT) | 100 | 90.7 | -9.3% |
| Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR) | 100 | 34.6 | -65.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RANI vs CDTX vs PRAX vs ARQT vs NKTR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RANI lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
CDTX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 0.82
- -16.0% 10Y total return vs ARQT's -2.9%
- Beta 0.82 vs RANI's 2.38, lower leverage
- +10.6% vs RANI's +24.4%
PRAX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.40, Low D/E 0.0%, current ratio 10.22x
- Beta 1.40, current ratio 10.22x
- 2.4% margin vs CDTX's -133.2%
ARQT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 91.3%, EPS growth 88.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 367.3%
- 91.3% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0%
- -0.6% ROA vs RANI's -279.3%, ROIC -5.2% vs -101.1%
Among these 5 stocks, NKTR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 91.3% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | 2.4% margin vs CDTX's -133.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.82 vs RANI's 2.38, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +10.6% vs RANI's +24.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -0.6% ROA vs RANI's -279.3%, ROIC -5.2% vs -101.1% |
RANI vs CDTX vs PRAX vs ARQT vs NKTR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
RANI vs CDTX vs PRAX vs ARQT vs NKTR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ARQT leads in 3 of 6 categories
CDTX leads 1 • RANI leads 0 • PRAX leads 0 • NKTR leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ARQT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ARQT and PRAX operate at a comparable scale, with $416M and $0 in trailing revenue. ARQT is the more profitable business, keeping -0.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CDTX's -133.2%. On growth, ARQT holds the edge at +60.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1M | $0 | $0 | $416M | $56M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$44M | -$195M | -$357M | $6M | -$125M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$28M | -$185M | -$327M | -$2M | -$158M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$28M | -$133M | -$283M | $27M | -$160M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +100.0% | +100.0% | — | +90.9% | +80.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -37.3% | -138.1% | — | +0.8% | -2.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -23.6% | -133.2% | — | -0.6% | -2.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -23.2% | -138.6% | — | +6.5% | -2.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | +60.1% | +3.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +50.0% | -30.3% | +2.7% | +55.0% | +49.7% |
Valuation Metrics
ARQT leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $23M | $7.0B | $9.5B | $2.6B | $1.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $49M | $6.8B | $9.2B | $2.6B | $1.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.92x | -8.28x | -24.48x | -162.85x | -8.42x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 106.49x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 22.51x | 5460.07x | — | 7.04x | 30.09x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 7.87x | 8.61x | 8.46x | 14.22x | 15.38x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ARQT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ARQT delivers a -1.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-1 in annual profit, vs $-2 for RANI. PRAX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RANI's 8.51x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ARQT scores 4/9 vs NKTR's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.1% | -43.7% | -43.0% | -1.4% | -87.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.8% | -35.6% | -40.2% | -0.6% | -40.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -101.1% | — | -65.0% | -5.2% | -57.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -159.9% | -2.1% | -49.3% | -4.3% | -55.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 8.51x | 0.02x | 0.00x | 0.03x | 1.66x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $26M | -$186M | -$357M | -$37M | $134M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $190M | $357M | $43M | $15M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $30M | $4M | $110,000 | $6M | $149M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -11.97x | — | — | 2.08x | -6.23x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — CDTX and PRAX each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CDTX five years ago would be worth $59,193 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $878 for RANI. Over the past 12 months, CDTX leads with a +1056.0% total return vs RANI's +24.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRAX at 174.0% vs RANI's -39.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -29.0% | +0.2% | +15.2% | -27.0% | +88.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +24.4% | +1056.0% | +767.1% | +56.6% | +782.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -77.4% | +944.2% | +1956.2% | +48.5% | +609.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -91.2% | +491.9% | -14.9% | -35.0% | -72.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -91.2% | -16.0% | -20.9% | -2.9% | -59.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -39.1% | +118.6% | +174.0% | +14.1% | +92.1% |
Risk & Volatility
CDTX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CDTX is the less volatile stock with a 0.82 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RANI's 2.38 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CDTX currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs RANI's 24.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.38x | 0.82x | 1.40x | 1.50x | 1.80x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.87 | $221.42 | $356.00 | $31.77 | $109.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.39 | $18.51 | $35.21 | $12.72 | $7.99 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +24.9% | +100.0% | +92.7% | +66.6% | +75.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.2 | 84.8 | 53.3 | 34.8 | 50.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.0M | 0 | 376K | 1.3M | 977K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: RANI as "Buy", CDTX as "Buy", PRAX as "Buy", ARQT as "Buy", NKTR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 1523.0% upside for RANI (target: $16) vs 0.1% for CDTX (target: $222).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $15.67 | $221.50 | $548.80 | $35.50 | $147.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 11 | 16 | 12 | 33 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
ARQT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). CDTX leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
RANI vs CDTX vs PRAX vs ARQT vs NKTR: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RANI or CDTX or PRAX or ARQT or NKTR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.
(ARQT) is the stronger pick with 91. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). Analysts rate Rani Therapeutics Holdings, Inc. (RANI) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — RANI or CDTX or PRAX or ARQT or NKTR?
Over the past 5 years, Cidara Therapeutics, Inc.
(CDTX) delivered a total return of +491. 9%, compared to -91. 2% for Rani Therapeutics Holdings, Inc. (RANI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ARQT returned -2. 9% versus RANI's -91. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — RANI or CDTX or PRAX or ARQT or NKTR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Cidara Therapeutics, Inc.
(CDTX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 82β versus Rani Therapeutics Holdings, Inc. 's 2. 38β — meaning RANI is approximately 190% more volatile than CDTX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 9% for Rani Therapeutics Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — RANI or CDTX or PRAX or ARQT or NKTR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.
(ARQT) is pulling ahead at 91. 3% versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 88. 8% year-over-year, compared to -409. 5% for Cidara Therapeutics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ARQT leads at 367. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — RANI or CDTX or PRAX or ARQT or NKTR?
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.
(PRAX) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -133. 2% for Cidara Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PRAX leads at 0. 0% versus -138. 1% for CDTX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RANI leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is RANI or CDTX or PRAX or ARQT or NKTR more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RANI: 1523.
0% to $15. 67.
07Which pays a better dividend — RANI or CDTX or PRAX or ARQT or NKTR?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is RANI or CDTX or PRAX or ARQT or NKTR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Cidara Therapeutics, Inc.
(CDTX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 82)). Rani Therapeutics Holdings, Inc. (RANI) carries a higher beta of 2. 38 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CDTX: -16. 0%, RANI: -91. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between RANI and CDTX and PRAX and ARQT and NKTR?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: RANI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CDTX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRAX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ARQT is a small-cap high-growth stock; NKTR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.